AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT00863304

Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee (2)

A Phase 3 study testing tanezumab 10 mg, tanezumab 5 mg and naproxen in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 95 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Test the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of tanezumab compared with naproxen and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
tanezumab 10 mg, tanezumab 5 mg and naproxen
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
849 participants
Where
95 sitesUnited States
Study dates
9 Jun 2009to 16 Aug 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Osteoarthritis of the hip or knee according to Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of 2

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy or intent to become pregnant
  • BMI greater than 39
  • other severe pain, significant cardiac, neurological or psychiatric disease

Trial locations and contacts

95 sites in 1 country.

95 sites in 1 country

United States95 sites
  • Commonwealth Orthopedics & Rehabilitation , P.C.

    Arlington, Virginia, 22205

  • IntegraTrials, LLC

    Arlington, Virginia, 22205

  • Virginia Hospital Center

    Arlington, Virginia, 22205

  • Masters of Clinical Research, Inc.

    Augusta, Georgia, 30909

  • South Austin Orthopedics

    Austin, Texas, 78745

  • Tekton Research Inc. - Research Office

    Austin, Texas, 78746

  • Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808

  • Gulf Coast Research, LLC

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808

  • Great Lakes Research Group, Incorporated

    Bay City, Michigan, 48706

  • Greystone Medical Research, LLC

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35242

  • Millennium Pain Center

    Bloomington, Illinois, 61701

  • River Birch Research Alliance, LLC

    Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513

  • HeartCare

    Bradenton, Florida, 34202

  • Beacon Clinical Research, LLC

    Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301

  • Miray Medical Center

    Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301

  • Peak Anesthesia and Pain Management

    Centennial, Colorado, 80112

  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • eStudySite

    Chula Vista, California, 91911

  • The Family Healthcare Center, PA

    Clinton, South Carolina, 29325

  • Southern Orthopaedic Sports Medicine

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29204

  • Columbus Clinical Research, Inc.

    Columbus, Ohio, 43213

  • Providence Health Partners - Center for Clinical Research

    Dayton, Ohio, 45439

  • Denver Internal Medicine Group

    Denver, Colorado, 80209

  • Mountain View Clinical Research, Inc.

    Denver, Colorado, 80209

  • In Vivo Clinical Research, Inc

    Doral, Florida, 33166

  • Orthopedic Physicians of Colorado, PC

    Englewood, California, 80113

  • University Parks Hematology/Oncology

    Englewood, California, 80113

  • Colorado Hematology

    Englewood, Colorado, 80110

  • Colorado Orthopedic Consultants, PC

    Englewood, Colorado, 80110

  • American Clinical Research, LLC

    Englewood, Colorado, 80113

  • MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC

    Evansville, Indiana, 47714

  • S & W Clinical Research

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33306

  • Centre for Rheumatology, Immunology and Arthritis

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334

  • Edinger Medical Group and Research Center

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Valley Research

    Fresno, California, 93720

  • Texas Orthopedic Specialists

    Grapevine, Texas, 76051

  • Diagnositc Center of Medicine

    Henderson, Nevada, 89052

  • Mid-Atlantic Medical Research Centers

    Hollywood, Maryland, 20636

  • Foundation for Southwest Orthopedic Research

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Southwest Orthopedic Group

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • The Neurology Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Saadat Ansari, MD

    Huntsville, Alabama, 35801

  • Lakewood Orthopedic Medical & Surgical Group

    Lakewood, California, 90712

  • High Desert Medical Group Research for Life

    Lancaster, California, 93534

  • Independent Clinical Researchers

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103

  • Wolfson Medical Center

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103

  • Clinical Research Consortium

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119

  • Rheumatology Consultants of Delaware

    Lewes, Delaware, 19958

  • Pasadena Pharmacy

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40503

  • The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40503

  • Premiere Clinical Research, LLC

    Long Beach, California, 90807

  • Miracle Mile Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90036

  • Samaritan Center for Medical Research

    Los Gatos, California, 95032

  • L-Marc Research Center

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40213

  • Gill Orthopedic Center

    Lubbock, Texas, 79410

  • Robert R. King, M.D., PA

    Lubbock, Texas, 79410

  • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc. / Central Arizona Medical Associates, PC

    Mesa, Arizona, 85206

  • Novara Clinical Research

    Mesa, Arizona, 85206

  • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.

    Mesa, Arizona, 85213

  • Kendall South Medical Center, Inc

    Miami, Florida, 33175

  • Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Consultants

    Middletown, Ohio, 45042

  • Signal Point Clinical Research Center, LLC

    Middletown, Ohio, 45042

  • Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.

    Mobile, Alabama, 36608

  • Coastal Carolina Research Center

    Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464

  • Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.

    New York, New York, 10004

  • Low Country Rheumatology, PA

    North Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • Norwalk Medical Group

    Norwalk, Connecticut, 06851

  • Cor Clinical Research, LLC

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Sunshine Research Center

    Opa-locka, Florida, 33054

  • Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, PA

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Central Phoenix Medical - Clinical Research Advantage

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85020

  • Planters Clinic

    Port Gibson, Mississippi, 39150

  • Del Carmen Medical Center

    Reseda, California, 91335

  • HypotheTest, LLC

    Roanoke, Virginia, 24018

  • The Carolina Center for Rheumatology and Arthritis Care, PA

    Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732

  • J. Lewis Research, Inc. / Foothill Family Clinic

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84109

  • J. Lewis Research, Incorporated/Foothill Family Clinic South

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121

  • Probe Clinical Research, Corp.

    Santa Ana, California, 92701

  • HeartCare Research

    Sarasota, Florida, 34232

  • Empirical Clinical Trials, LLC

    Selah, Washington, 98942

  • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC

    Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681

  • Arthritis Northwest, PLLC

    Spokane, Washington, 99204-2336

  • St. John's Medical Research Institute, Inc.

    Springfield, Missouri, 65807

  • Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.

    St Louis, Missouri, 63117

  • AZ Clinical Research

    Sugar Land, Texas, 77478

  • Spring Clinical Research

    Sugar Land, Texas, 77478

  • Sugar Land Med-Ped, P.A.

    Sugar Land, Texas, 77479

  • Tampa Medical Group PA

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • SPRI Bronx LLC

    The Bronx, New York, 10454

  • Lawrence P.McAdam, MD, A Medical Corporation

    Thousand Oaks, California, 91360

  • Paradigm Clinical, Inc

    Tucson, Arizona, 85705

  • Westlake Medical Center

    Westlake Village, California, 91361

  • Grayline Clinical Drug Trials

    Wichita Falls, Texas, 76309

  • Physicians' Research, Inc

    Zanesville, Ohio, 43701

  • PrimeCare of Southeastern Ohio, Inc

    Zanesville, Ohio, 43701

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO AND NAPROXEN CONTROLLED MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP OR KNEE

Test the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of tanezumab compared with naproxen and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis

Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Being tested
tanezumab 10 mg, tanezumab 5 mg, naproxen, placebo
Keywords
monoclonal antibody RN624 PF-04383119 nerve growth factor anti-nerve growth factor OA pain arthritis
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tanezumab 10 mgBiological

    tanezumab 10 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8

  • tanezumab 5 mgBiological

    tanezumab 5 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8

  • naproxenDrug

    naproxen 1000 mg daily for 16 weeks

  • placeboOther

    placebo to match tanezumab and naproxen dosing

Study groups in NCT00863304
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: tanezumab 10 mg
2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: tanezumab 5 mg
3Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: naproxen
4Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  2. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  5. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  6. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  7. Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  8. Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  9. Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  10. Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  11. Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  12. Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  13. Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0 percent [%]; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  14. Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0%; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  15. Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    Participants assessed their average daily pain score in the index hip/knee using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. A weekly mean was calculated using the daily index hip/knee pain scores within each specified study week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  16. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score was 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  17. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 [no stiffness] to 10 [worst stiffness], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse response.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  18. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  19. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  20. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher score indicated a better health related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16

  21. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). These 8 domains are also summarized as 2 summary scores: mental component aggregate (MCA) and physical component aggregate (PCA). Total score range for each of the 2 summary scores =0 (minimum level of functioning) to 100 (maximum level of functioning). Higher (8 domains and 2 summary) scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16

  22. Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

    Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  23. Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication

    In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Percentage of participants with any use of rescue medication during the specified study week were summarized.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  24. Duration of Rescue Medication Use

    In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Number of days participants used any of the rescue medication, during the specified week were summarized.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  25. Amount of Rescue Medication Taken

    In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. The total dosage of acetaminophen in mg used during the specified week were summarized.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

  26. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 24 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24

  27. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities

    Laboratory values: hematology (hemoglobin; hematocrit; red blood cell count [less than {<}0.8* lower limit of normal [LLN], platelets <0.5* LLN,>1.75* upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell count<0.6* LLN, >1.5* ULN, liver function (total bilirubin>1.5* ULN, aspartate aminotransferase; alanine aminotransferase; gamma-glutamyltransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase>3.0* ULN, total protein; albumin<0.8* LLN; >1.2* ULN), renal function (blood urea nitrogen; creatinine>1.3* ULN, uric acid>1.2* ULN), lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN), electrolytes (sodium<0.95* LLN, >1.05* ULN; potassium; chloride; calcium; magnesium; phosphate; bicarbonate<0.9* LLN, >1.1* ULN), chemistry (glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN), urinalysis (specific gravity <1.003, >1.030; pH<4.5, >8, glucose; protein; blood; ketones; urobilinogen; bilirubin; nitrite, esterase>=1).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24

  28. Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula [QTcF], QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula [QTcB], RR intervals and heart rate) were analyzed. Participants with abnormal ECG findings reported as treatment related adverse events were presented. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by investigator.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24

  29. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24

    NIS is a standardized instrument used to evaluate participant for signs of peripheral neuropathy. NIS is the sum of scores of 37 items, where 24 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 4 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality and 13 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 2 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality. NIS possible overall score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 122 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

  30. Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level

    Participants who developed anti-tanezumab antibodies after treatment were evaluated for the presence of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies in their serum. Number of participants with positive ADA were summarized for reporting groups: Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo and Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo. Results with titer value >= 4.32 nanogram per milliliter of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies were counted as positive.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, and 24

  31. Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings

    Physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, heart, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, breasts, abdomen, musculoskeletal, neck, extremities, thyroid and others. Criteria for abnormal physical findings were based on investigator's discretion.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1)

  32. Number of Participants With Adverse Events Associated With Vital Sign Measurements

    Vital signs included the assessment of the following: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant vital signs (based on the investigator's judgment) considered as adverse events were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 Jun 2009
  3. Primary completion27 Apr 2010
  4. Study completion16 Aug 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
849 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00863304
Sponsor's protocol ID
A4091018
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
13 Mar 2009
Last updated
17 May 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Brown MT, Cornblath DR, Koltzenburg M, Gorson KC, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Gaitonde P, Viktrup L, West CR. Peripheral Nerve Safety of Nerve Growth Factor Inhibition by Tanezumab: Pooled Analyses of Phase III Clinical Studies in Over 5000 Patients with Osteoarthritis. Clin Drug Investig. 2023 Jul;43(7):551-563. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01286-3. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

    PubMed 37460782
  • Tive L, Bello AE, Radin D, Schnitzer TJ, Nguyen H, Brown MT, West CR. Pooled analysis of tanezumab efficacy and safety with subgroup analyses of phase III clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 19;12:975-995. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S191297. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30936738
  • Ekman EF, Gimbel JS, Bello AE, Smith MD, Keller DS, Annis KM, Brown MT, West CR, Verburg KM. Efficacy and safety of intravenous tanezumab for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis: 2 randomized controlled trials versus naproxen. J Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;41(11):2249-59. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131294. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

    PubMed 25274899

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing tanezumab 10 mg, tanezumab 5 mg and naproxen in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 95 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 95 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF) (time frame: Baseline, Week 16). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00863304, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in