Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPhase 4LAL-AR/2003NCT00853008
Treatment of High Risk Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
A Phase 4 study testing Vincristine, Daunorubicin and Prednisone in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by PETHEMA Foundation at 38 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Current therapeutic protocols for adult ALL consider MRD together with the baseline risk factors (age, WBC count, immunophenotype, cytogenetics) and speed in response to therapy for treatment decisions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Vincristine, Daunorubicin and Prednisone
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Jan 2003to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- High risk ALL adult patients (age> 15 years)no treated previously
- High-risk ALL:
- One or more of the following:
- Age 30-60 yr.
- WBC count >25x109/L
- 11q23 or ALL1/AF4
Show all 10Show fewer
- Very high-risk ALL:
- HR ALL and one or the following:
- Slow cytologic response (>10% blasts in BM on d14 of induction therapy).
- MRD>0.05% (by flow cytometry) at the end of consolidation
Who cannot join
- L3 ALL or B mature(sIg +) or t(8;14), t(2;8), t(8;22).
- ALL Ph (BCR/ABL) positive.
- Bifenotipics ALL as EGIL criteria.
- Indifferentiated ALL.
- Patients with cardiac pathology
- Patients with chronic liver disease in activity fase
Show all 10Show fewer
- Pulmonary disease
- Renal insufficiency not due to ALL
- Neurological disorders not due to ALL
- PS (grades 3 and 4) not due to ALL.
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 1 country.
38 sites in 1 country
Spain38 sites
Hospital Juan Canalejo
A Coruña
Hospital General
Alicante
Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona
Clínica Teknon
Barcelona
Hospital Clínic i Provincial
Barcelona
Hospital de Sant Pau
Barcelona
Hospital Duran y Reynals
Barcelona
Hospital Vall d'Hebrón
Barcelona
Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara
Cáceres
Hospital Puerta del Mar
Cadiz
Hospital General
Castellon
Hospital Josep Trueta
Girona
Hospital Universitario
Guadalajara
Hospital Xeral
Lugo
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Hospital Clínico Universitario
Madrid
Hospital de Fuenlabrada
Madrid
Hospital Ramón y Cajal
Madrid
Hospital Carlos Haya
Málaga
Hospital Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga
Hospital Morales Messeguer
Murcia
Hospital Central de Asturias
Oviedo
Hospital Son Llàtzer
Palma de Mallorca
Clínica Universitaria de Navarra
Pamplona
Hospital Parc Taulí
Sabadell
Hospital Clínico Universitario
Salamanca
Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander
Hospital Xeral
Santiago
Hospital Virgen del Rocio
Seville
Hospital Joan XXIII
Tarragona
Hospital Mútua de Terrassa
Terrassa
Hospital Clínico Universitario
Valencia
Hospital Dr Pesset
Valencia
Hospital General
Valencia
Hospital La Fe
Valencia
Hospital Clínico
Valladolid
Hospital Virgen de la Concha
Zamora
Hospital Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza
About this study
Current therapeutic protocols for adult ALL consider MRD together with the baseline risk factors (age, WBC count, immunophenotype, cytogenetics) and speed in response to therapy for treatment decisions. On the other hand, the systematic use of allogeneic SCT for all adult patients (pts) with Ph- HR-ALL is still a matter of debate. The aim of the prospective study ALL-AR-03 from the Spanish PETHEMA Group was to evaluate the response to a differentiated therapy (chemotherapy or allogeneic SCT) according to early bone marrow blast clearance and MRD levels (assessed by cytofluorometry at the end of induction and consolidation therapy) in HR Ph- adult ALL patients.
Read the detailed description
HR ALL included one or more of the following baseline parameters: age 30-60 yr, WBC count >25x109/L and 11q23 or MLL rearrangements. Induction therapy included vincristine, prednisone and daunorubicin for 4 weeks. In pts with slow cytologic response to therapy (≥10% blasts in bone marrow assessed on d14) intensified induction with high dose ARA-C and mitoxantrone was administered. Early consolidation therapy included 3 cycles with rotating cytotoxic drugs including high-dose methotrexate, high-dose ARA-C and high-dose asparaginase. Pts. with slow cytologic response on d14 or MRD level >0.05% after consolidation were assigned to allogeneic SCT (related or unrelated) and those with standard cytologic response on d14 and MRD level <0.05% after consolidation received 3 additional cycles of delayed consolidation (identical to those of early consolidation) followed by maintenance therapy up to 2yr in CR.
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Being tested
- Vincristine, Daunorubicin, Prednisone, Mitoxantrone, Cytosine Arabinoside
- Keywords
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, High-Risk (HR), Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative
- Medical subject headings
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VincristineDrug
Vincristine (VCR): 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) IV d 1, 8, 15, 22 in induction VCR 2 mg, IV, d 1,8 in consolidation (cycle 1, 2)
DaunorubicinDrug
Daunorubicin (DNR): 60 mg/m2 IV d 1, 8, 15, 22
PrednisoneDrug
Prednisone (PDN): 60 mg/m2/d IV or PO, d 1-28
MitoxantroneDrug
Mitoxantrone:12 mg/m2, IV d 15-17 in induction 12 mg/m2, IV,d 5 in cycle 2 consolidation
Cytosine ArabinosideDrug
ARA-C 2,000 mg/m2/12h IV, d18,19 (4 doses) in induction
DexamethasoneDrug
Dexamethasone 20 mg/m2,IV, d 1-5,10 mg/m2,IV, d 6 and 5 mg/m2,IV, d 7 in Consolidation (3 cycles)
Methotrexate (MTX)Drug
Methotrexate (MTX)3 g/m2,IV, d1 (24h)in consolidation, cycles 1 and 2 MTX (15 mg/m2/wk, IM)in maintenance MTX 15 mg, IT
CytarabineDrug
Cytarabine 2g/m2/12h, IV d5 in cycle 1 consolidation Cytarabine 2g/m2/12h, IV d 1,2 in cycle 3 consolidation Cytarabine 30 mg, intrathecal
ASPDrug
ASP 25,000 IU/m2, IV, d5 in consolidation (cycle 1, 2, 3)
MercaptopurineDrug
Mercaptopurine 100 mg/m2, PO, d 1-5 in consolidation
TeniposideDrug
Teniposide 150 mg/m2, IV d 3,4 in consolidation cycle 3
HydrocortisoneDrug
Hydrocortisone 20 mg, IT d 1, 28, 49, 77, 105, 175, 203, 231, 259,287, 311 intrathecal
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the response to a differentiated therapy (chemotherapy or allogeneic SCT) according to early bone marrow blast clearance and MRD levels in HR Ph- adult ALL patients.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2003
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- PETHEMA Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ribera Josep Mª, Dr, Study chair, PETHEMA Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00853008
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LAL-AR/2003
- Acronym
- LAL-AR/2003
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2009
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ribera JM, Oriol A, Morgades M, Montesinos P, Sarra J, Gonzalez-Campos J, Brunet S, Tormo M, Fernandez-Abellan P, Guardia R, Bernal MT, Esteve J, Barba P, Moreno MJ, Bermudez A, Cladera A, Escoda L, Garcia-Boyero R, Del Potro E, Bergua J, Amigo ML, Grande C, Rabunal MJ, Hernandez-Rivas JM, Feliu E. Treatment of high-risk Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and adults according to early cytologic response and minimal residual disease after consolidation assessed by flow cytometry: final results of the PETHEMA ALL-AR-03 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20;32(15):1595-604. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2425. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
PubMed 24752047
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of High Risk Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00853008
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LAL-AR/2003 / LAL-AR/2003
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Keywords
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, High-Risk (HR), Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- PETHEMA FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2003
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Current therapeutic protocols for adult ALL consider MRD together with the baseline risk factors (age, WBC count, immunophenotype, cytogenetics) and speed in response to therapy for treatment decisions. On the other hand, the systematic use of allogeneic SCT for all adult patients (pts) with Ph- HR-ALL is still a matter of debate. The aim of the prospective study ALL-AR-03 from the Spanish PETHEMA Group was to evaluate the response to a differentiated therapy (chemotherapy or allogeneic SCT) according to early bone marrow blast clearance and MRD levels (assessed by cytofluorometry at the end of induction and consolidation therapy) in HR Ph- adult ALL patients.
Detailed description
HR ALL included one or more of the following baseline parameters: age 30-60 yr, WBC count >25x109/L and 11q23 or MLL rearrangements. Induction therapy included vincristine, prednisone and daunorubicin for 4 weeks. In pts with slow cytologic response to therapy (≥10% blasts in bone marrow assessed on d14) intensified induction with high dose ARA-C and mitoxantrone was administered. Early consolidation therapy included 3 cycles with rotating cytotoxic drugs including high-dose methotrexate, high-dose ARA-C and high-dose asparaginase. Pts. with slow cytologic response on d14 or MRD level >0.05% after consolidation were assigned to allogeneic SCT (related or unrelated) and those with standard cytologic response on d14 and MRD level <0.05% after consolidation received 3 additional cycles of delayed consolidation (identical to those of early consolidation) followed by maintenance therapy up to 2yr in CR.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- High risk ALL adult patients (age> 15 years)no treated previously
- High-risk ALL:
- One or more of the following:
- Very high-risk ALL:
- HR ALL and one or the following:
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- L3 ALL or B mature(sIg +) or t(8;14), t(2;8), t(8;22).
- ALL Ph (BCR/ABL) positive.
- Bifenotipics ALL as EGIL criteria.
- Indifferentiated ALL.
- Patients with cardiac pathology
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VincristineVincristine (VCR): 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) IV d 1, 8, 15, 22 in induction VCR 2 mg, IV, d 1,8 in consolidation (cycle 1, 2) | Drug | – |
| DaunorubicinDaunorubicin (DNR): 60 mg/m2 IV d 1, 8, 15, 22 | Drug | – |
| PrednisonePrednisone (PDN): 60 mg/m2/d IV or PO, d 1-28 | Drug | – |
| MitoxantroneMitoxantrone:12 mg/m2, IV d 15-17 in induction 12 mg/m2, IV,d 5 in cycle 2 consolidation | Drug | – |
| Cytosine ArabinosideARA-C 2,000 mg/m2/12h IV, d18,19 (4 doses) in induction | Drug | – |
| DexamethasoneDexamethasone 20 mg/m2,IV, d 1-5,10 mg/m2,IV, d 6 and 5 mg/m2,IV, d 7 in Consolidation (3 cycles) | Drug | – |
| Methotrexate (MTX)Methotrexate (MTX)3 g/m2,IV, d1 (24h)in consolidation, cycles 1 and 2 MTX (15 mg/m2/wk, IM)in maintenance MTX 15 mg, IT | Drug | – |
| CytarabineCytarabine 2g/m2/12h, IV d5 in cycle 1 consolidation Cytarabine 2g/m2/12h, IV d 1,2 in cycle 3 consolidation Cytarabine 30 mg, intrathecal | Drug | – |
| ASPASP 25,000 IU/m2, IV, d5 in consolidation (cycle 1, 2, 3) | Drug | – |
| MercaptopurineMercaptopurine 100 mg/m2, PO, d 1-5 in consolidation | Drug | – |
| TeniposideTeniposide 150 mg/m2, IV d 3,4 in consolidation cycle 3 | Drug | – |
| HydrocortisoneHydrocortisone 20 mg, IT d 1, 28, 49, 77, 105, 175, 203, 231, 259,287, 311 intrathecal | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the response to a differentiated therapy (chemotherapy or allogeneic SCT) according to early bone marrow blast clearance and MRD levels in HR Ph- adult ALL patients.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24752047Ribera JM, Oriol A, Morgades M, Montesinos P, Sarra J, Gonzalez-Campos J, Brunet S, Tormo M, Fernandez-Abellan P, Guardia R, Bernal MT, Esteve J, Barba P, Moreno MJ, Bermudez A, Cladera A, Escoda L, Garcia-Boyero R, Del Potro E, Bergua J, Amigo ML, Grande C, Rabunal MJ, Hernandez-Rivas JM, Feliu E. Treatment of high-risk Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and adults according to early cytologic response and minimal residual disease after consolidation assessed by flow cytometry: final results of the PETHEMA ALL-AR-03 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20;32(15):1595-604. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2425. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
- Spanish Association of HematologyLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Obesity Treatment With Phentermine-Topiramate ER in AYA Surviving Leukemia and Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Hodgkin Lymphoma in Remission
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ribera Josep Mª, Dr study chair
PETHEMA Foundation
38 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Vincristine, Daunorubicin and Prednisone in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by PETHEMA Foundation at 38 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the response to a differentiated therapy (chemotherapy or allogeneic SCT) according to early bone marrow blast clearance and MRD levels in HR Ph- adult ALL patients. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00853008, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2020.