EndometriosisPhase 2NCT00797225
Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix Versus Placebo or Leuprorelin Acetate in Endometriosis
A Phase 2 study testing Leuprorelin Acetate Depot and Elagolix in people with Endometriosis, run by AbbVie.
Trial summary
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and beneficial effects of elagolix (NBI-56418) compared to placebo and leuprorelin (an approved endometriosis therapy) over a three month period followed by an additional three months of treatment on elagolix. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometriosis
- What is being tested?
- Leuprorelin Acetate Depot and Elagolix
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 174 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 26 Nov 2008to 24 Feb 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Female, aged 18 to 45 years, inclusive
- Have moderate to severe pelvic pain due to endometriosis
- Have been surgically (laparoscopy) diagnosed with endometriosis within the last 5 years and have recurrent or persistent endometriosis symptoms
- Have regular menstrual cycle (23-33 day)
- Agree to use two forms of non-hormonal contraception during the study
Who cannot join
- Received a Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, GnRH antagonist, danazol, or have received any of these agents within 6 months of the start of screening.
- Received subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) or intramuscular (i.m.) medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), or have received either of these agents within 3 months of the start of screening.
- Are currently using hormonal contraception or other forms of hormonal therapy or received such treatment within the last month
- Have had surgery for endometriosis within the last month
- Are using systemic steroids on a chronic or regular basis within 3 months
- Have uterine fibroids or other pelvic lesions ≥ 3 cm in diameter
Show all 10Show fewer
- Have had a hysterectomy or oophorectomy
- Have pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis
- Have unstable medical condition or chronic disease
- Have been pregnant within the last 6 months and is currently breast feeding
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NBI-56418 in Subjects With Endometriosis
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and beneficial effects of elagolix (NBI-56418) compared to placebo and leuprorelin (an approved endometriosis therapy) over a three month period followed by an additional three months of treatment on elagolix.
Read the detailed description
The study followed a parallel-group design in which participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to one of the following treatment groups for the first 12 weeks of dosing: 150 mg elagolix once daily (q.d.); 250 mg elagolix q.d.; placebo; or leuprorelin acetate depot injection 3.75 mg (monthly). Blinding was achieved using a double-dummy design. Following 12 weeks of dosing, participants continued in the study for an additional 12 weeks; participants randomized to elagolix continued to receive their assigned dose and participants randomized to placebo or leuprorelin acetate were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg q.d. or 250 mg q.d.) for 12 weeks in a double-blind fashion. Six weeks after the last dose of the study drug at the end of Week 24, a follow-up visit was performed (end of Week 30).
There was no pre-specified primary efficacy end point as there was no single key efficacy outcome measure in this exploratory Phase 2 study. For purposes of results reported here, Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain is designated as the primary outcome measure.
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Being tested
- Leuprorelin Acetate Depot, Elagolix, Placebo to Elagolix, Placebo to Leuprorelin Acetate
- Keywords
- bone mineral density,endometriosis,pelvic pain
- Medical subject headings
- Endometriosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Leuprorelin Acetate DepotDrug
Also called Prostap SR
Leuprorelin acetate depot injection 3.75 mg administered as an intramuscular injection
ElagolixDrug
Also called NBI-56418, Orilissa™
Elagolix tablets administered orally
Placebo to ElagolixDrug
Placebo tablet administered orally
Placebo to Leuprorelin AcetateDrug
Saline solution administered as an intramuscular injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received placebo tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg or 250 mg) for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo to Elagolix; Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin Acetate |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Experimental | Participants received elagolix 150 mg tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 150 mg for an additional 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Elagolix; Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin Acetate |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Experimental | Participants received elagolix 250 mg tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 250 mg for an additional 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Elagolix; Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin Acetate |
| Leuprorelin | Other | Participants received placebo tablets once a day and leuprorelin acetate 1-month depot 3.75 mg intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg or 250 mg) for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Leuprorelin Acetate Depot; Drug: Placebo to Elagolix |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day.
The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Secondary outcomes (23)
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day.
The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score
Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:
- 0 = No pelvic pain
- 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does
- 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does
- 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does.
The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options:
- Subject is not having her period
- 0 = No pain related to period
- 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does
- 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does
- 3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does.
The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Sum of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The dysmenorrhea scale included an option for participants who were not having their period.
The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use
The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.
The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of "none").
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use
The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.
The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of "none").
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use
The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.
The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of "none").
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.
To assess dyspareunia (painful intercourse) participants were asked to select the best description of pain during sexual intercourse over the past 28 days using the following response categories:
- 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse.
- 1 = Mild; I can tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse.
- 2 = Moderate; Intercourse is sometime interrupted due to pain.
- 3 = Severe; I prefer to avoid intercourse because of pain.
- Not applicable. I am not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis symptoms.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.
To assess dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation), participants were asked to select the best description of painful menstruation over the past 28 days using the following response categories:
- 0 = Absent; Amenorrhea (no bleeding) or no discomfort.
- 1 = Mild; Some loss of work efficiency; occasional use of analgesics.
- 2 = Moderate; In bed part of one day, occasional loss of work; regular use of analgesics.
- 3 = Severe; In bed ≥ 1 day, incapacitation; requirement for strong analgesics.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain CPSSS Component
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.
To assess non-menstrual pelvic pain, participants were asked to select the best description of pelvic pain over the past 28 days using the following response categories:
- 0 = Absent; No discomfort.
- 1 = Mild; Occasional pelvic discomfort that can be treated with NSAIDs.
- 2 = Moderate; Noticeable discomfort or pain for most of cycle requiring regular use of NSAID or weak opiate.
- 3 = Severe; Pain persisting during the cycle or pain requiring strong analgesics.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:
- Very Much Improved
- Much Improved
- Minimally Improved
- Not Changed
- Minimally Worse
- Much Worse
- Very Much Worse
Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved
The PGIC is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:
- Very Much Improved
- Much Improved
- Minimally Improved
- Not Changed
- Minimally Worse
- Much Worse
- Very Much Worse
Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved
The PGIC is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:
- Very Much Improved
- Much Improved
- Minimally Improved
- Not Changed
- Minimally Worse
- Much Worse
- Very Much Worse
Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
- A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always)
- A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored.
The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Concentration of Serum Estradiol
The concentration of serum estradiol (E2) was quantified using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrophotometry (LC/MS/MS). Serum estradiol concentrations below the limit of quantification (BLQ) were set equal to the lower limit of quantification (2.5 pg/mL).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Serum N-telopeptide Concentration at Week 12
Blood samples to determine N-telopeptide concentrations were analyzed by a central laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Average Number of Hot Flashes Per Day
Hot flashes, if any, were reported daily by participants during the study using the e-Diary.
The average number of hot flashes per day was calculated for each participant as the total number of hot flashes divided by total days in the phase.
Measured: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1), Treatment phase (weeks 1 to 12 for participants in the placebo and leuprorelin treatment groups and weeks 1 to 24 for participants in the elagolix treatment groups)
Percentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding
Uterine bleeding was reported daily by participants during the study using the e-Diary.
The percentage of days a participant reported any bleeding was calculated as the total number of days the participant reported any bleeding ( light, moderate, or heavy) divided by the total number of days the participant had a non-missing eDiary report of vaginal bleeding in the phase.
Measured: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1), Treatment phase (weeks 1 to 12 for participants in the placebo and leuprorelin treatment groups and weeks 1 to 24 for participants in the elagolix treatment groups)
Number of Days to First Posttreatment Menses
Defined as the number of days from the last dose of study drug until the start date of the first post-treatment menses.
Measured: From last day of study drug up to 6 weeks after the last dose.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Study start26 Nov 2008
- Primary completion24 Feb 2010
- Study completion24 Feb 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for EndometriosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 174 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AbbVie Inc., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00797225
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NBI-56418-0703
- Other IDs
- 2007-006474-28
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2008
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NBI-56418 in Subjects With Endometriosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00797225
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NBI-56418-0703
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Keywords
- bone mineral density,endometriosis,pelvic pain
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 174 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Nov 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Feb 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Feb 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Sep 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and beneficial effects of elagolix (NBI-56418) compared to placebo and leuprorelin (an approved endometriosis therapy) over a three month period followed by an additional three months of treatment on elagolix.
Detailed description
The study followed a parallel-group design in which participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to one of the following treatment groups for the first 12 weeks of dosing: 150 mg elagolix once daily (q.d.); 250 mg elagolix q.d.; placebo; or leuprorelin acetate depot injection 3.75 mg (monthly). Blinding was achieved using a double-dummy design. Following 12 weeks of dosing, participants continued in the study for an additional 12 weeks; participants randomized to elagolix continued to receive their assigned dose and participants randomized to placebo or leuprorelin acetate were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg q.d. or 250 mg q.d.) for 12 weeks in a double-blind fashion. Six weeks after the last dose of the study drug at the end of Week 24, a follow-up visit was performed (end of Week 30).
There was no pre-specified primary efficacy end point as there was no single key efficacy outcome measure in this exploratory Phase 2 study. For purposes of results reported here, Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain is designated as the primary outcome measure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo to Elagolix, Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin AcetateParticipants received placebo tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg or 250 mg) for 12 weeks. |
| Elagolix 150 mg | Experimental | Drug: Elagolix, Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin AcetateParticipants received elagolix 150 mg tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 150 mg for an additional 12 weeks. |
| Elagolix 250 mg | Experimental | Drug: Elagolix, Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin AcetateParticipants received elagolix 250 mg tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 250 mg for an additional 12 weeks. |
| Leuprorelin | Other | Drug: Leuprorelin Acetate Depot, Drug: Placebo to ElagolixParticipants received placebo tablets once a day and leuprorelin acetate 1-month depot 3.75 mg intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg or 250 mg) for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Female, aged 18 to 45 years, inclusive
- Have moderate to severe pelvic pain due to endometriosis
- Have been surgically (laparoscopy) diagnosed with endometriosis within the last 5 years and have recurrent or persistent endometriosis symptoms
- Have regular menstrual cycle (23-33 day)
- Agree to use two forms of non-hormonal contraception during the study
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Received a Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, GnRH antagonist, danazol, or have received any of these agents within 6 months of the start of screening.
- Received subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) or intramuscular (i.m.) medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), or have received either of these agents within 3 months of the start of screening.
- Are currently using hormonal contraception or other forms of hormonal therapy or received such treatment within the last month
- Have had surgery for endometriosis within the last month
- Are using systemic steroids on a chronic or regular basis within 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Leuprorelin Acetate DepotAlso: Prostap SRLeuprorelin acetate depot injection 3.75 mg administered as an intramuscular injection | Drug | Leuprorelin |
| ElagolixAlso: NBI-56418, Orilissa™Elagolix tablets administered orally | Drug | Elagolix 150 mg, Elagolix 250 mg |
| Placebo to ElagolixPlacebo tablet administered orally | Drug | Leuprorelin, Placebo |
| Placebo to Leuprorelin AcetateSaline solution administered as an intramuscular injection | Drug | Elagolix 150 mg, Elagolix 250 mg, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
23 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Sum of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain CPSSS Component
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Concentration of Serum Estradiol
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Serum N-telopeptide Concentration at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Average Number of Hot Flashes Per Day
Time frame: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1), Treatment phase (weeks 1 to 12 for participants in the placebo and leuprorelin treatment groups and weeks 1 to 24 for participants in the elagolix treatment groups)
Percentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding
Time frame: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1), Treatment phase (weeks 1 to 12 for participants in the placebo and leuprorelin treatment groups and weeks 1 to 24 for participants in the elagolix treatment groups)
Number of Days to First Posttreatment Menses
Time frame: From last day of study drug up to 6 weeks after the last dose.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Endometriosis
Not yet recruiting
Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Women With Endometriosis
SIBO, Endometriosis
Recruiting
Endometriosis Transcriptomic Cell Atlas
Endometriosis, Infertility
Not yet recruiting
Psychotherapy in Patients With Endometriosis: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Endometriosis, Adenomyosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of a Diagnosis or Lack of a Diagnosis of Endometriosis Via a Saliva Test on Pain Catastrophizing, Quality of Life, Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression, and Treatment Adherence
Endometriosis
RecruitingPhase 4
Estetrol/Drospirenone to Reduce the Average Size of Endometriomas
Ovarian Endometrioma, Endometrioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AbbVie Inc. study director
AbbVie
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Leuprorelin Acetate Depot and Elagolix in people with Endometriosis, run by AbbVie.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain (time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.