EndometriosisPhase 2NCT00784693
A Clinical Study To Investigate The Effectiveness And Safety Of Tanezumab In Treating Pain Associated With Endometriosis
A Phase 2 study testing Tanezumab in people with Endometriosis, run by Pfizer at 30 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether tanezumab is effective and safe in the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 49 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometriosis
- What is being tested?
- Tanezumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Dec 2008to 5 Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pre-menstrual women with moderate to severe endometriosis. The diagnosis of endometriosis must have been confirmed surgically within the last 8 years.
- Subjects should have regular menstrual cycle (21 - 35 days) and must be willing to use adequate contraception (2 forms of birth control, one of which must be a barrier method). Contraception is required throughout the study (screening to 16 weeks post treatment), even if subjects discontinue prematurely.
Who cannot join
- Previous hysterectomy
- Surgical treatment for endometriosis within last 6 months.
- Medical treatment for endometriosis other than combined oral contraceptive pill within the last 3 months
- Current use of the coil or progesterone only contraceptive (the combined oral contraceptive pill is allowed).
- Any history of malignant disease (cancer)
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 1 country.
30 sites in 1 country
United States30 sites
Allegheny Pain Management
Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16602
Mount Vernon Clinical Research
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Visions Clinical Research
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
ClinSearch, LLC
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421
Columbus Center for Women's Health Research
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Nature Coast Clinical Research, LLC
Crystal River, Florida, 34429
Whitaker's Women Care
East Ridge, Tennessee, 37412
N.E.C.C.R, Fall River LLC
Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720
Greenville Hospital System University Medical Group, Department of OB/GYN
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Advances In Health, Inc.
Houston, Texas, 77030
Allon Health Care
Houston, Texas, 77079
Jacksonville Center for Clnical Research
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Lyndhurst Clinical Research
Kernersville, North Carolina, 27284
Women's Clinic of Lincoln, PC
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Bay Area Physicians for Women
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Springhill Medical Center
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Wilmax Clinical Research
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Radiant Research
Overland Park, Kansas, 66202
Women's Healthcare Group
Overland Park, Kansas, 66215
Beyer Research - Women's Health Care Specialists, PC
Paw Paw, Michigan, 49079
Old Farm Obstetrics and Gynecology
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
Salt Lake Research
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
Genesis Center for Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92103
Medical Center for Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92108
Women's Clinical Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98105
Visions Clinical Research - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74105
Advanced Women's Healthcare
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
Comprehensive Clinical Trials, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
Lyndhurst Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 2, 16 WEEK, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
The purpose of this study is to determine whether tanezumab is effective and safe in the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis.
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Being tested
- Tanezumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Endometriosis, pain, tanezumab, nerve growth factor, questionnaires
- Medical subject headings
- Endometriosis, Pain, Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TanezumabBiological
15 mg IV single dose
PlaceboDrug
Placebo IV single dose
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Tanezumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Week 8
Participants assessed daily endometriosis pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8
Secondary outcomes (19)
Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Weeks 4, 12, and 16
Participants assessed daily endometriosis pain on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12, and 16
Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score During Menstruation at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Endometriosis pain during menstruation was derived from the average endometriosis pain severity as recorded on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine) over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period in baseline observation period and preceding each post-baseline visit. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Average Daily Non-Menstrual Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Non-menstrual endometriosis pain was derived from the average endometriosis pain severity as recorded on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine) on the non-menstrual days for the 28-day period in baseline observation period and preceding each post-baseline visit. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Worst Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Participants assessed worst endometriosis pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Worst Daily Endometriosis Pain Score During Menstruation at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Participants assessed worst endometriosis pain during menstruation in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Worst Daily Non-Menstrual Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Participants assessed worst endometriosis non-menstrual pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores on non-menstrual days for the 28-day period in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores on non-menstrual days for the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Average Pain Score With Intercourse at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Pain related to sexual intercourse was defined as the discomfort or pain that may occur during or after sexual intercourse with vaginal penetration. Participants assessed pain during or after sexual intercourse on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Endometriosis Symptom Severity Score (ESSS) Total Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Investigator assessed the severity of the dysmenorrhea (menstrual pain), pelvic pain and dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse) experienced by participants occurring during the most recent menstrual cycle on a 4-point scale, where 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. Total score was calculated as a sum of the individual pain scores for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and pelvic pain. The total score range: 0 (no pain) to 9 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) Score at Baseline and Week 8
EHP-30 is a validated quality of life (QoL) scale assessing emotional, physical and sexual function. EHP-30 consists of 30 items that assess the frequency of physical and mental manifestations of endometriosis during the previous 4 weeks on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = always).. Scores for 6 domains (pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, self image, and sexual intercourse) were obtained as a sum of all relevant item scores and transformed to a 0 to 100 score range. Each domain score ranges from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Global Response Assessment (GRA) at Week 8
GRA questionnaire is a 7-point symmetric scale which measures participant-reported overall response to treatment compared to baseline as 1 of the following possible responses: markedly worse, moderately worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, moderately improved, and markedly improved. Number of participants with each response is reported.
Measured: Week 8
Participant Global Satisfaction at Week 8
Participant global satisfaction is assessed using Patient Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant's response is rated on a 5-point scale where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied. Number of participants with each response is reported.
Measured: Week 8
Participant Global Preference at Week 8
Participant global preference is assessed using PRTI, which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant reported previous treatment under following categories: hormonal contraceptive, painkiller, and hormone treatment by injection, hormone treatment by tablet, surgery, and no treatment. Participant preference was assessed using following categories: definitely prefer study medication, slightly prefer study medication, no preference, slightly prefer previous treatment, and definitely prefer previous treatment. Number of participants under each of the categories is reported. For previous treatment, a single participant may be represented in more than 1 category.
Measured: Week 8
Participant Willingness to Re-use Study Medication
Participant willingness to re-use study medication is assessed using PRTI, which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant willingness to re-use study medication was assessed using following categories: definitely want to re-use, might want to re-use, not sure, might not want to re-use, definitely would not want to re-use.
Measured: Week 8
Plasma Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Measured: Day 1, Week 8, and Week 16 (End of Treatment)
Amount of Rescue Medication Used
Mean amount of daily rescue medication (acetaminophen 500 mg tablet/capsule) taken for endometriosis associated pain (in mg) was assessed.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 113 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Measured: Baseline up to 113 days after last dose of study medication
Number of Participants With New or Worsened Neurological Examinations
A neurological evaluation was performed by a consulting neurologist if adverse events suggested new or worsening peripheral neuropathy with respect to baseline or any adverse event of abnormal peripheral sensation was recorded. A neurological evaluation was done as soon as the above signs and symptoms were known, preferably within 7 days of becoming aware of such problems if possible. Neurological evaluation was done using Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) by investigator. Neurologic examination assessment included strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes. Abnormality was judged by the investigator.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)
Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies using validated semi-quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Measured: Day 1 (pre-dose), Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 16
Number of Participants With Positive Urine or Serum Pregnancy Test
Measured: Screening, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and Early termination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Study start18 Dec 2008
- Primary completion27 Jan 2010
- Study completion5 Apr 2010
Why it stopped: Further recruitment into the study was ceased on 10th December 2009, not attributed to safety. All patients recruited in the study completed all study visits.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for EndometriosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00784693
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A4091023
- Other IDs
- ENDOMETRIOSIS POC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 2008
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 2, 16 WEEK, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00784693
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A4091023
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Keywords
- Endometriosis, pain, tanezumab, nerve growth factor, questionnaires
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Further recruitment into the study was ceased on 10th December 2009, not attributed to safety. All patients recruited in the study completed all study visits.
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 18 Dec 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Apr 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether tanezumab is effective and safe in the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab | Experimental | Biological: Tanezumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 49 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pre-menstrual women with moderate to severe endometriosis. The diagnosis of endometriosis must have been confirmed surgically within the last 8 years.
- Subjects should have regular menstrual cycle (21 - 35 days) and must be willing to use adequate contraception (2 forms of birth control, one of which must be a barrier method). Contraception is required throughout the study (screening to 16 weeks post treatment), even if subjects discontinue prematurely.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Previous hysterectomy
- Surgical treatment for endometriosis within last 6 months.
- Medical treatment for endometriosis other than combined oral contraceptive pill within the last 3 months
- Current use of the coil or progesterone only contraceptive (the combined oral contraceptive pill is allowed).
- Any history of malignant disease (cancer)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab15 mg IV single dose | Biological | Tanezumab |
| PlaceboPlacebo IV single dose | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Participants assessed daily endometriosis pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
19 secondary outcomes
Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Weeks 4, 12, and 16
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, and 16
Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score During Menstruation at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Average Daily Non-Menstrual Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Worst Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Worst Daily Endometriosis Pain Score During Menstruation at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Worst Daily Non-Menstrual Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Average Pain Score With Intercourse at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Endometriosis Symptom Severity Score (ESSS) Total Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) Score at Baseline and Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Global Response Assessment (GRA) at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Participant Global Satisfaction at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Participant Global Preference at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Participant Willingness to Re-use Study Medication
Time frame: Week 8
Plasma Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Time frame: Day 1, Week 8, and Week 16 (End of Treatment)
Amount of Rescue Medication Used
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 113 days after last dose of study medication
Number of Participants With New or Worsened Neurological Examinations
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)
Time frame: Day 1 (pre-dose), Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 16
Number of Participants With Positive Urine or Serum Pregnancy Test
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and Early termination
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Endometriosis
Not yet recruiting
Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Women With Endometriosis
SIBO, Endometriosis
Recruiting
Endometriosis Transcriptomic Cell Atlas
Endometriosis, Infertility
Not yet recruiting
Psychotherapy in Patients With Endometriosis: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Endometriosis, Adenomyosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of a Diagnosis or Lack of a Diagnosis of Endometriosis Via a Saliva Test on Pain Catastrophizing, Quality of Life, Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression, and Treatment Adherence
Endometriosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
PRECISION-E2: Teverelix in Women With Endometriosis - Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Precision Medicine Correlates
Endometriosis Pelvic, Endometriosis Ovaries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
30 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tanezumab in people with Endometriosis, run by Pfizer at 30 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Week 8 (time frame: Baseline, Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2021.