AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Arterial DiseasePhase 2NCT00719355

Polestriding Versus Walking for Subjects With Poor Leg Circulation

A Phase 2 study testing Walking with poles and Walking exercise in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by University of Illinois Chicago at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of polestriding (walking with poles) and traditional walking on physical endurance in subjects with poor circulation in their legs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Arterial Disease
What is being tested?
Walking with poles and Walking exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
146 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2005to May 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Peripheral Vascular Disease
  • Cramping/Claudication Pain in legs while walking
  • Ankle Brachial Index (measure of circulation by doppler) .90 or less

Who cannot join

  • Ulcers or sores on feet or legs
  • Unable to walk or confined to a wheelchair
  • Amputations or severe arthritis pain in shoulders, knees, or hips
  • Medical conditions which would exclude subject from participating in an exercise program
  • Vascular Surgery within the last six months, or planning vascular surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital

    Hines, Illinois, 60141

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Polestriding Versus Walking for PAD Rehabilitation

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of polestriding (walking with poles) and traditional walking on physical endurance in subjects with poor circulation in their legs. Another goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of a walking program in increasing the amount of oxygen in the calf muscles and therefore improving overall physical activity and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD/PVD) is caused by decreased blood flow to the legs. The most common symptom is intermittent claudication pain during walking that is relieved by rest. Walking is the primary treatment prescribed for PAD rehabilitation. Polestriding uses muscles of the upper and lower body in a continuous movement. Walking with poles increases stride length, cadence and walking speed and decreases ground reaction forces on the joints. Subjects in this study will participate in a walking program with or without poles.

Dr. Collins' research focuses on physical activity interventions to improve the functional status of persons with chronic illness. Several rehabilitation studies have tested the efficacy of walking exercise for patients with PAD. Studies on polestriding indicate that it may be superior to traditional walking, but these two methods have never been compared. Approximately 30% of patients with coronary artery disease have PAD as their only symptom. As the population ages and more people are affected by this debilitating condition, nurse-initiated rehabilitative therapies, such as polestriding, need to be explored. The consent form explains the purpose of the study in addition to the procedures, risks, benefits, options, confidentiality, costs, and compensation. Participants are also asked to sign a HIPPA authorization.

Being tested
Walking with poles, Walking exercise
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Walking with polesBehavioural

    Also called Exercise

    Patients walked with poles, 20-45 minutes, 3 times/week for 24 weeks.

  • Walking exerciseBehavioural

    Also called Exercise

    Patients walked for 20-45 minutes, 3 times/week for 24 weeks.

Study groups in NCT00719355
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Walking with PolesExperimentalPatients were assigned to a 24 week walking with poles program of rehabilitation. The intervention was the additional of poles to the walking program.
Receives: Behavioral: Walking with poles
Traditional walking programActive comparatorPatients were assigned to a 24 week traditional walking program.
Receives: Behavioral: Walking exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Length of Exercise Duration on the Treadmill Constant Work Rate Exercise Test

    Patients walked on the CWR test at 85% of his/her peak VO2 on the baseline progressive treadmill test. Since the polewalking group was older than the walking group, subject age was entered into the analysis as a co-variate. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses were used. The last measurement taken for all subjects with at least one follow-up test was carried forward (n=97).

    Measured: Baseline and 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Onset of Claudication Pain During Constant Work Rate Treadmill Test

    Perceived pain onset was recorded during the constant workrate test using the Borg ratio scale. Patient rated their pain from 0-10. Time elapased on the treadmill (minutes) at the onset of pain was recorded.

    Measured: At 24 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2005
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
146 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00719355
Sponsor's protocol ID
2004-0477
Other IDs
R01NR008877
Status last verified
Feb 2013
First submitted
17 Jul 2008
Last updated
12 Feb 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Collins EG, Langbein WE, Orebaugh C, Bammert C, Hanson K, Reda D, Edwards LC, Littooy FN. Cardiovascular training effect associated with polestriding exercise in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):177-85. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200505000-00009.

    PubMed 15870588
  • Collins EG, Edwin Langbein W, Orebaugh C, Bammert C, Hanson K, Reda D, Edwards LC, Littooy FN. PoleStriding exercise and vitamin E for management of peripheral vascular disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Mar;35(3):384-93. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000053658.82687.FF.

    PubMed 12618567
  • Langbein WE, Collins EG, Orebaugh C, Maloney C, Williams KJ, Littooy FN, Edwards LC. Increasing exercise tolerance of persons limited by claudication pain using polestriding. J Vasc Surg. 2002 May;35(5):887-93. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.123756.

    PubMed 12021703
  • Fritschi C, Collins EG, O'Connell S, McBurney C, Butler J, Edwards L. The effects of smoking status on walking ability and health-related quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):380-6. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31824af587.

    PubMed 22495802
  • Collins EG, McBurney C, Butler J, Jelinek C, O'Connell S, Fritschi C, Reda D. The Effects of Walking or Walking-with-Poles Training on Tissue Oxygenation in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease. Int J Vasc Med. 2012;2012:985025. doi: 10.1155/2012/985025. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

    PubMed 23050152
  • Collins EG, O'connell S, McBurney C, Jelinek C, Butler J, Reda D, Gerber BS, Hurt C, Grabiner M. Comparison of walking with poles and traditional walking for peripheral arterial disease rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):210-8. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e31825828f4.

    PubMed 22595894

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Walking with poles and Walking exercise in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by University of Illinois Chicago at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Sep 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Length of Exercise Duration on the Treadmill Constant Work Rate Exercise Test (time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00719355, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in