Ovarian CancerPhase 2NCT00520013
Avastin +/- Erlotinib Consolidation Chemotherapy After Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Avastin (CTA) Induction Therapy for Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Primary Peritoneal Cancer & Papillary Serous or Clear Cell Mullerian Tumors
A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab, erlotinib and paclitaxel in people with Ovarian Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer, run by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate how patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal cancer and papillary serous or clear cell mullerian tumors respond to consolidation therapy with Avastin and erlotinib or Avastin alone over 1 year. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- bevacizumab, erlotinib and paclitaxel
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2007to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age and older
- Histological diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or papillary serous mullerian carcinoma
- Previous attempted surgical debulking
- Stage III or IV
- Willing and able to undergo second look laparoscopy
- Performance status 0-1 by ECOG scale
- Peripheral neuropathy < grade 2
- Life expectancy of 6 months or greater
Who cannot join
- Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease as outlined in the protocol
- Neutrophil count < 1,500/mm3; platelet count <100,000/m3
- Alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, SGOT > 5 x ULN
- Calculated creatinine clearance < 50ml/min
- Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for other malignancy except for the treatment for localized breast cancer greater than five years prior to diagnosis
- No more than one cycle of first line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel
Show all 28Show fewer
- Inadequate surgical cytoreduction such that interval cytoreductive surgery could materially improve prognosis
- Concurrent invasive malignancy
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- Evidence of tumor involving major blood vessels on any prior CT scans
- Surgical wound that has failed to close
- Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to Day 0, or anticipation of need for major surgical procedure during the course of this study
- Core biopsy or other minor surgical procedure, excluding placement of a vascular access device, within 7 days prior to study enrollment
- History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within 6 months prior to day 0
- Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
- Prior treatment with an anti-angiogenic agent
- Any active bleeding
- Active psychiatric disease or neurologic symptoms requiring treatment
- Presence of central nervous system brain metastases
- Proteinuria at screening as demonstrated by criteria in protocol
- Dementia or significantly altered mental status that would prohibit the understanding and/or giving of informed consent
- Known hypersensitivity to Cremophor EL or any component of Avastin
- Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infections
- Receiving any other investigational agent
- History of gastrointestinal perforation
- Prior therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor
- Symptoms of bowel obstruction
- Dependence on TPN or IV hydration
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Avastin (A) or Avastin and Erlotinib (AE) as First Line Consolidation Chemotherapy After Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Avastin (CTA) Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Primary Peritoneal Cancer & Papillary Serous or Clear Cell Mullerian Tumors
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate how patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal cancer and papillary serous or clear cell mullerian tumors respond to consolidation therapy with Avastin and erlotinib or Avastin alone over 1 year. These drugs have been used in the treatment of other types of cancers and information from those studies suggests that these agents may help to treat the cancers studied here.
Read the detailed description
Objectives:
Primary To examine the progression free survival (PFS) of Avastin and Erlotinib (AE) or Avastin (A) as consolidation therapy.
Secondary To examine the toxicity between the two consolidative regimens AE vs. A. To assess the response rate of CTA.
STATISTICAL DESIGN This study uses a randomized selection design. Both consolidation treatment arms are deemed experimental and are compared against a historical control [McGuire WP et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. NEJM 1996: 334:1-6. PMID:7494563]. With 30 patients in a given arm and 6 months of follow-up, there was 80% power to detect a 61.5% increase in median PFS from 13 months to 21 months assuming 1-sided 10% significance.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer, Papillary Serous Mullerian Tumor, Clear Cell Mullerian Tumor
- Being tested
- bevacizumab, erlotinib, paclitaxel, carboplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bevacizumabDrug
Also called Avastin, rhuMAB VEGF
erlotinibDrug
Also called Tarceeva
paclitaxelDrug
Also called Taxol
carboplatinDrug
Also called Paraplatin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab | Experimental | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2.
Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase.
Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. Receives: Drug: bevacizumab; Drug: paclitaxel; Drug: carboplatin |
| carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab/erlotinib | Experimental | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2.
Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase.
Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. Receives: Drug: bevacizumab; Drug: erlotinib; Drug: paclitaxel; Drug: carboplatin |
| carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab | Experimental | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2.
Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase.
Consolidation: None Receives: Drug: bevacizumab; Drug: paclitaxel; Drug: carboplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Consolidation Progression-Free Survival
Consolidation PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method was defined as the time from the first day of consolidation therapy to documented disease progression (PD) or disease-specific death. Based on RECIST 1.1, radiographic PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since beginning consolidation, the appearence of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Based on Rustin criteria, serlogic PD was a rise in CA125 since beginning of consolidation or previously normal CA125 that rises to >/= 2xULN with either event documented on 2 occasions. Patients who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.
Measured: Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year and upon treatment discontinuation were followed for another year.
Consolidation Treatment-related Toxicity Rate
Consolidation treatment-related toxicity rates based on CTCAEv3 were defined as rates of maximum grade 3 or higher toxicity events with attribution possible, probable or definite occurring during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment.
Measured: Assessed every cycle during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment. Per protocol, consolidation treatment was a fixed duration of 1 year.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Consolidation Objective Response Rate
Consolidation objective response (OR) was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria with OR defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. For CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. If CA125 disease then OR based on Rustin criteria is a 50% decrease in serum CA125 level from two initially elevated samples confirmed by a 4th sample.
Measured: Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2007
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Ovarian CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc., Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Susana M. Campos, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Investigators
- Susana Campos, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00520013
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07-039
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 22 Aug 2007
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase II Trial of Avastin (A) or Avastin and Erlotinib (AE) as First Line Consolidation Chemotherapy After Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Avastin (CTA) Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Primary Peritoneal Cancer & Papillary Serous or Clear Cell Mullerian Tumors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00520013
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 07-039
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer, Papillary Serous Mullerian Tumor, Clear Cell Mullerian Tumor
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc., Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Study start
- Aug 2007
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Jul 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate how patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal cancer and papillary serous or clear cell mullerian tumors respond to consolidation therapy with Avastin and erlotinib or Avastin alone over 1 year. These drugs have been used in the treatment of other types of cancers and information from those studies suggests that these agents may help to treat the cancers studied here.
Detailed description
Objectives:
Primary To examine the progression free survival (PFS) of Avastin and Erlotinib (AE) or Avastin (A) as consolidation therapy.
Secondary To examine the toxicity between the two consolidative regimens AE vs. A. To assess the response rate of CTA.
STATISTICAL DESIGN This study uses a randomized selection design. Both consolidation treatment arms are deemed experimental and are compared against a historical control [McGuire WP et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. NEJM 1996: 334:1-6. PMID:7494563]. With 30 patients in a given arm and 6 months of follow-up, there was 80% power to detect a 61.5% increase in median PFS from 13 months to 21 months assuming 1-sided 10% significance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab | Experimental | Drug: bevacizumab, Drug: paclitaxel, Drug: carboplatinInduction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. |
| carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab/erlotinib | Experimental | Drug: bevacizumab, Drug: erlotinib, Drug: paclitaxel, Drug: carboplatinInduction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. |
| carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab | Experimental | Drug: bevacizumab, Drug: paclitaxel, Drug: carboplatinInduction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation: None |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- 18 years of age and older
- Histological diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or papillary serous mullerian carcinoma
- Previous attempted surgical debulking
- Stage III or IV
- Willing and able to undergo second look laparoscopy
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease as outlined in the protocol
- Neutrophil count < 1,500/mm3; platelet count <100,000/m3
- Alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, SGOT > 5 x ULN
- Calculated creatinine clearance < 50ml/min
- Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for other malignancy except for the treatment for localized breast cancer greater than five years prior to diagnosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bevacizumabAlso: Avastin, rhuMAB VEGF | Drug | carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab, carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab, carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab/erlotinib |
| erlotinibAlso: Tarceeva | Drug | carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab/erlotinib |
| paclitaxelAlso: Taxol | Drug | carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab, carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab, carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab/erlotinib |
| carboplatinAlso: Paraplatin | Drug | carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab, carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab, carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab/erlotinib |
Primary outcome
Consolidation Progression-Free Survival
Time frame: Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year and upon treatment discontinuation were followed for another year.
Consolidation PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method was defined as the time from the first day of consolidation therapy to documented disease progression (PD) or disease-specific death. Based on RECIST 1.1, radiographic PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since beginning consolidation, the appearence of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Based on Rustin criteria, serlogic PD was a rise in CA125 since beginning of consolidation or previously normal CA125 that rises to >/= 2xULN with either event documented on 2 occasions. Patients who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.
Consolidation Treatment-related Toxicity Rate
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment. Per protocol, consolidation treatment was a fixed duration of 1 year.
Consolidation treatment-related toxicity rates based on CTCAEv3 were defined as rates of maximum grade 3 or higher toxicity events with attribution possible, probable or definite occurring during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment.
1 secondary outcome
Consolidation Objective Response Rate
Time frame: Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Durvalumab Antibody (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Can...
Colorectal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susana Campos, MD, MPH principal investigator
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab, erlotinib and paclitaxel in people with Ovarian Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer, run by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Consolidation Progression-Free Survival (time frame: Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year and upon treatment discontinuation were followed for another year.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2018.