Esophageal CancerPhase 2/3NCT00509561
Cisplatin, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Esophageal Cancer
A Phase 2/3 study testing cetuximab, capecitabine and cisplatin in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Wales Cancer Trials Unit at 55 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and capecitabine, work in different ways to kill tumor cells or stop them from growing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cetuximab, capecitabine and cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 259 participants
- Where
- 55 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Feb 2008to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed carcinoma of the esophagus
- Adenocarcinoma
- Squamous cell
- Undifferentiated carcinoma
- Siewert type I tumor of the gastroesophageal junction
- Localized, nonmetastatic disease (T1-4, N0-1) confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and spiral CT scan
- Total disease length (primary and lymph nodes) < 10 cm by EUS
- Not suitable for surgery (either for medical reasons or patient's choice)
- No metastatic disease (i.e., M1a or M1b according to UICC TNM version 6)
- No significant (> 2 cm) extension of tumor into the stomach
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- WHO performance status 0-1
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm³
- White blood cell count ≥ 2,000/mm³
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
- Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL (should be corrected to > 10 g/dL before treatment)
- Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- ALT/AST ≤ 2.5 times ULN
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3 times ULN
- Glomerular filtration rate > 40 mL/min OR > 60 mL/min estimated by Cockcroft-Gault formula
- Adequate cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 40% by MUGA or ECHO
- FEV_1 ≥ 1 L by spirometry
- Not pregnant
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No malignancy within the past 5 years
- No unstable angina, uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac failure, or other clinically significant cardiac disease
- No major trauma within the past 4 weeks
- No known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
- No hearing impairment or sensory-motor neuropathy > grade 2
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- At least 4 weeks since prior sorivudine and analogues
- At least 4 weeks since prior major surgery
- At least 4 weeks since prior monoclonal antibody
- At least 3 months since prior radiotherapy
- No prior treatment for invasive esophageal carcinoma or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (not including photodynamic therapy or laser therapy for high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ)
- No other prior treatment for this malignancy that would compromise the ability to deliver definitive mediastinal chemoradiotherapy or compromise survival
Trial locations and contacts
55 sites in 1 country.
55 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom55 sites
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZN
Belfast City Hospital Trust Incorporating Belvoir Park Hospital
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT8 8JR
Queen Elizabeth Hospital at University Hospital of Birmingham NHS Trust
Birmingham, England, B12 2TH
Good Hope Hospital
Birmingham, England, B75 7RR
Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton, England, BN2 5BE
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, England, BS2 8ED
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, England, CB2 2QQ
Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 2TL
Cumberland Infirmary
Carlisle, England, CA2 7HY
Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, GL53 7AN
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
Cheltenham, England, GL53 7AN
Walsgrave Hospital
Coventry, England, CV2 2DX
Doncaster Royal Infirmary
Doncaster, England, DN2 5LT
Ninewells Hospital
Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY
Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 2XU
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Essex, England, CM20 1QX
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Exeter, England, EX2 5DW
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, Scotland, G12 0YN
Diana Princess of Wales Hospital
Grimsby, England, DN33 2BA
St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, England, GU2 7XX
Princess Royal Hospital at Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
Hull, England, HU8 9HE
Raigmore Hospital
Inverness, Scotland, 1V2 3UJ
Cookridge Hospital
Leeds, England, LS16 6QB
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, England, LE1 5WW
Lincoln County Hospital
Lincoln, England, LN2 5QY
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool, England, L7 8XP
Aintree University Hospital
Liverpool, England, L9 7AL
Saint Bartholomew's Hospital
London, England, EC1M 6BQ
Helen Rollason Cancer Care Centre at North Middlesex Hospital
London, England, N18 1QX
University College of London Hospitals
London, England, WIT 3AA
Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, England, ME16 9QQ
Christie Hospital
Manchester, England, M20 4BX
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
Merseyside, England, CH63 4JY
James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough, England, TS4 3BW
Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment at Newcastle General Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE4 6BE
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
Northwood, England, HA6 2RN
Nottingham City Hospital
Nottingham, England, NG5 1PB
Peterborough Hospitals Trust
Peterborough, England, PE3 6DA
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, England, PL6 8DH
Dorset Cancer Centre
Poole Dorset, England, BH15 2JB
Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital
Portsmouth Hants, England, PO3 6AD
Alexandra Healthcare NHS
Redditch, England, B98 7UB
Glan Clwyd Hospital
Rhyl, Denbighshire, Wales, LL 18 5UJ
Scarborough General Hospital
Scarborough, England, YO12 6QL
Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, England, S1O 2SJ
Wexham Park Hospital
Slough, Berkshire, England, SL2 4HL
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, England, SO16 6YD
Southport and Formby District General Hospital
Southport, England, PR8 6PN
Royal Marsden - Surrey
Sutton, England, SM2 5PT
Singleton Hospital
Swansea, Wales, SA2 8QA
Musgrove Park Hospital
Taunton, England, TA1 5DA
Torbay Hospital
Torquay, England, TQ2 7AA
Royal Cornwall Hospital
Truro, Cornwall, England, TR1 3LJ
Worcester Royal Hospital
Worcester, England, WR5 1DD
Wrexham Maelor Hospital
Wrexham, Wales, LL13 7TD
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Phase II/III Multi-Centre Clinical Trial of Definitive Chemotherapy, With or Without Cetuximab, in Carcinoma of the Oesophagus
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and capecitabine, work in different ways to kill tumor cells or stop them from growing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Cetuximab may also stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether giving cisplatin together with capecitabine and radiation therapy is more effective with or without cetuximab in treating esophageal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying the side effects and how well giving cisplatin together with capecitabine, radiation therapy, and cetuximab works compared with giving cisplatin, capecitabine, and radiation therapy without cetuximab in treating patients with esophageal cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To determine whether the addition of cetuximab to definitive chemoradiotherapy comprising cisplatin, capecitabine, and radiotherapy shows evidence of enhanced overall survival in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus.
- To determine the safety of this regimen in these patients.
- To determine the feasibility of this regimen in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV over 2 hours on days 1, 22, 43, and 64 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-84. Beginning in week 7 patients also undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks (weeks 7-11). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive cisplatin and capecitabine and undergo radiotherapy as in arm I. Patients also receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on day 1 in weeks 1-12. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life and health economics are assessed at baseline, during treatment, and at pre-specified time points during follow-up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1 year, and then annually for a minimum of 5 years.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- cetuximab, capecitabine, cisplatin, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, stage IA esophageal cancer, stage IB esophageal cancer, stage IIA esophageal cancer, stage IIB esophageal cancer, stage IIIA esophageal cancer, stage IIIB esophageal cancer, stage IIIC esophageal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cetuximabBiological
capecitabineDrug
cisplatinDrug
radiation therapyRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chemo-radiotherapy | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: capecitabine; Drug: cisplatin; Radiation: radiation therapy |
| Chemo-radiotherapy plus cetuximab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: cetuximab; Drug: capecitabine; Drug: cisplatin; Radiation: radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment-failure rate at 24 weeks
Overall survival
Secondary outcomes (5)
Feasibility
Toxicity
Quality of life
Quality of assurance
Health economics
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2008
- Primary completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 259 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wales Cancer Trials Unit
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cancer Research UK
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tom Crosby, MD, Study chair, Velindre NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00509561
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000558804
- Other IDs
- WCTU-SCOPE-1, EU-20739, EUDRACT-2006-002241-37, ISRCTN47718479, CTA-17853/0202/001-0001
- Status last verified
- Dec 2012
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2007
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Phase II/III Multi-Centre Clinical Trial of Definitive Chemotherapy, With or Without Cetuximab, in Carcinoma of the Oesophagus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00509561
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000558804
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, stage IA esophageal cancer, stage IB esophageal cancer, stage IIA esophageal cancer, stage IIB esophageal cancer, stage IIIA esophageal cancer, stage IIIB esophageal cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 259 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wales Cancer Trials UnitUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cancer Research UK
- Study start
- Feb 2008
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and capecitabine, work in different ways to kill tumor cells or stop them from growing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Cetuximab may also stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether giving cisplatin together with capecitabine and radiation therapy is more effective with or without cetuximab in treating esophageal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying the side effects and how well giving cisplatin together with capecitabine, radiation therapy, and cetuximab works compared with giving cisplatin, capecitabine, and radiation therapy without cetuximab in treating patients with esophageal cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To determine whether the addition of cetuximab to definitive chemoradiotherapy comprising cisplatin, capecitabine, and radiotherapy shows evidence of enhanced overall survival in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus.
- To determine the safety of this regimen in these patients.
- To determine the feasibility of this regimen in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV over 2 hours on days 1, 22, 43, and 64 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-84. Beginning in week 7 patients also undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks (weeks 7-11). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive cisplatin and capecitabine and undergo radiotherapy as in arm I. Patients also receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on day 1 in weeks 1-12. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life and health economics are assessed at baseline, during treatment, and at pre-specified time points during follow-up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1 year, and then annually for a minimum of 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chemo-radiotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: capecitabine, Drug: cisplatin, Radiation: radiation therapy |
| Chemo-radiotherapy plus cetuximab | Experimental | Biological: cetuximab, Drug: capecitabine, Drug: cisplatin, Radiation: radiation therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cetuximab | Biological | Chemo-radiotherapy plus cetuximab |
| capecitabine | Drug | Chemo-radiotherapy, Chemo-radiotherapy plus cetuximab |
| cisplatin | Drug | Chemo-radiotherapy, Chemo-radiotherapy plus cetuximab |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | Chemo-radiotherapy, Chemo-radiotherapy plus cetuximab |
Primary outcome
Treatment-failure rate at 24 weeks
Overall survival
5 secondary outcomes
Feasibility
Toxicity
Quality of life
Quality of assurance
Health economics
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2012.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tom Crosby, MD study chair
Velindre NHS Trust
55 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing cetuximab, capecitabine and cisplatin in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Wales Cancer Trials Unit at 55 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 55 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment-failure rate at 24 weeks. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2012.