PainPhase 1NCT00410878
A Repeated Dose Study of the Metabolism and Action Evaluation of OROS Hydromorphone HCI (Slow Release) Tablets in Patients With Chronic Pain
A Phase 1 study testing OROS Hydromorphone HCI (slow release) in people with Pain and Analgesics, Opioid, run by Alza Corporation, DE, USA.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetic (metabolism and action) profile of OROS hydromorphone HCI (slow release) in patients who required opioid therapy on a daily basis for chronic pain conditions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Analgesics, Opioid
- What is being tested?
- OROS Hydromorphone HCI (slow release)
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Start not givento Aug 1999
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who had chronic nonmalignant or chronic cancer pain and were currently receiving strong oral or transdermal opioid analgesics (drug that relieves pain) on a daily basis or patients suitable for advancement of therapy to step 3 on the WHO (World Health Organization) analgesic (drug that relieves pain) ladder
- Patients who required the opioid equivalent of at least 32 mg but no more than 300 mg of oral morphine sulfate or opioid equivalent (exclusive of breakthrough pain medication) every 24 hours for the management of chronic nonmalignant or cancer pain
- Patients who were expected to have reasonably stable opioid requirements for the duration of the study
Who cannot join
- Patients intolerant of or hypersensitive to hydromorphone (or other opioid drugs)
- Patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding.Patients with any dysphagia or unable to swallow tablets, acute abdominal conditions that may be obscured by opioids or gastrointestinal disorders, including pre-existing severe GI narrowing, that may affect the absorption or transit of orally administered drugs
- Patients with any significant CNS disorder, including but not limited to head injury, intracranial lesion, increased intracranial pressure, seizure disorder, stroke within the past 6 months, and disorders of cognition, and clinically significant impaired hematological function
- Patients that may be at risk for serious decreases in blood pressure following administration of an opioid analgesic (pain relief)
About this study
Official title: A Repeated-Dose Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Dilaudid SR Tablets (Hydromorphone HCI) in Patients With Chronic Pain
The purpose of this study was to characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetic (metabolism and action) profile of OROS hydromorphone HCI (slow release) in patients who required opioid therapy on a daily basis for chronic pain conditions. Patients stabilized on prior opioids were converted to OROS hydromorphone slow release and titrated (slowly increased or decreased) to adequate analgesia (pain relief). They were maintained at that dose for 4-10 days and had blood samples drawn over 24 hours on the last day of study.
Read the detailed description
This was an open-label, repeated-dose study involving patients who required opioid therapy on a daily basis for chronic pain conditions. In this study, baseline evaluations were performed at Visit 1. Patients were given a diary in which to record daily opioid medication use and daily pain-relief ratings throughout the study. During the time between Visit 1 and Visit 2 patients continued taking their prior oral or transdermal opioid medication for pain. Patients were considered stabilized when during usual activity, the total daily dose of baseline medication remained unchanged, with no more than three opioid breakthrough pain medication doses/day administered, for two consecutive days. Patients returned within 1 week of Visit 1 for Visit 2. During this visit, patient's 24-hour baseline oral opioid dose was converted to hydromorphone at a conversion ratio of approximately 5:1 (oral morphine sulfate to oral hydromorphone HCI mg equivalents). Patients were dispensed OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release tablets and were then increased to acceptable analgesia (pain relief). Eligible stabilized patients requiring a total daily dose of at least 8 mg but no more than 64 mg of OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release (exclusive of breakthrough medication) began the 5-10 day maintenance therapy phase at Visit 3. Morphine sulfate (immediate-release tablets) were provided as breakthrough pain medication. Patients returned to the clinic in the morning following a minimum of 4 days of continuous OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release therapy at a constant daily dose for Visit 4. Upon arrival at the clinic, an initial (trough) blood sample was taken prior to witnessed administration of the usual dosage of OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release. The exact time of the drug administration was documented. Patients were instructed to return the following morning and not to consume food or beverage within 3 hours of their scheduled visit. Patients were instructed not to self administer their OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release the following morning; they were dosed in the clinic. Patients could take immediate release morphine sulfate as needed. Patients returned to the clinic the next morning (visit 5) and remained for a 24-hour period for witnessed dosing and plasma (blood) sampling for pharmacokinetic (metabolism/action) analysis. Dosing and plasma (blood) sampling began 24 hours following the time of dosing at the clinic the previous day. Water (240 mL) was taken with the medication. Immediately prior to each blood draw, patients rated their pain intensity using an 11-point scale and rated their pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Blood samples for analysis were drawn at: 0 (prior to dosing), 1,2,4,6,8,10,12,15,18,21 and 24 hours after dosing. Urine output was collected over the 24-hour period from selected patients. Vital signs were taken. At the conclusion of Visit 5 or in the event of early study termination, a Global Evaluation and physical examination were performed. The patient's diary was reviewed with the patient and all unused study medication was collected. Safety assessments included vital signs and physical examination at the start and end of study. OROS Hydromorphone HCL (slow release) 8,16,32,and 64 mg tablets orally. Patients were stabilized on prior opioids then converted to OROS Hydromorphone HCL (slow release) and slowly increased or decreased to adequate analgesia. Then the patients were maintained at that dose for 4 - 10 days. Duration of treatment was up to 31 days.
- Conditions
- Pain, Analgesics, Opioid
- Being tested
- OROS Hydromorphone HCI (slow release)
- Keywords
- Opioids, Chronic cancer pain, Analgesic
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OROS Hydromorphone HCI (slow release)Drug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The pharmacokinetic (absorption, distribution, excretion) profile of OROS hydromorphone. The time required for absorption and distribution in the body.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Relationships between pharmacokinetic (absorption, distribution, excretion) and pharmacodynamic (drug action on body systems) responses. Patients rated their pain intensity prior to each time blood was draw.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 1999
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alza Corporation, DE, USA
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Alza Corporation Clinical Trial, Study director, ALZA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00410878
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR011620
- Status last verified
- Apr 2010
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Repeated-Dose Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Dilaudid SR Tablets (Hydromorphone HCI) in Patients With Chronic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00410878
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR011620
- Conditions
- Pain, Analgesics, Opioid
- Keywords
- Opioids, Chronic cancer pain, Analgesic
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alza Corporation, DE, USAIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study completion
- Aug 1999 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetic (metabolism and action) profile of OROS hydromorphone HCI (slow release) in patients who required opioid therapy on a daily basis for chronic pain conditions. Patients stabilized on prior opioids were converted to OROS hydromorphone slow release and titrated (slowly increased or decreased) to adequate analgesia (pain relief). They were maintained at that dose for 4-10 days and had blood samples drawn over 24 hours on the last day of study.
Detailed description
This was an open-label, repeated-dose study involving patients who required opioid therapy on a daily basis for chronic pain conditions. In this study, baseline evaluations were performed at Visit 1. Patients were given a diary in which to record daily opioid medication use and daily pain-relief ratings throughout the study. During the time between Visit 1 and Visit 2 patients continued taking their prior oral or transdermal opioid medication for pain. Patients were considered stabilized when during usual activity, the total daily dose of baseline medication remained unchanged, with no more than three opioid breakthrough pain medication doses/day administered, for two consecutive days. Patients returned within 1 week of Visit 1 for Visit 2. During this visit, patient's 24-hour baseline oral opioid dose was converted to hydromorphone at a conversion ratio of approximately 5:1 (oral morphine sulfate to oral hydromorphone HCI mg equivalents). Patients were dispensed OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release tablets and were then increased to acceptable analgesia (pain relief). Eligible stabilized patients requiring a total daily dose of at least 8 mg but no more than 64 mg of OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release (exclusive of breakthrough medication) began the 5-10 day maintenance therapy phase at Visit 3. Morphine sulfate (immediate-release tablets) were provided as breakthrough pain medication. Patients returned to the clinic in the morning following a minimum of 4 days of continuous OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release therapy at a constant daily dose for Visit 4. Upon arrival at the clinic, an initial (trough) blood sample was taken prior to witnessed administration of the usual dosage of OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release. The exact time of the drug administration was documented. Patients were instructed to return the following morning and not to consume food or beverage within 3 hours of their scheduled visit. Patients were instructed not to self administer their OROS hydromorphone HCI slow release the following morning; they were dosed in the clinic. Patients could take immediate release morphine sulfate as needed. Patients returned to the clinic the next morning (visit 5) and remained for a 24-hour period for witnessed dosing and plasma (blood) sampling for pharmacokinetic (metabolism/action) analysis. Dosing and plasma (blood) sampling began 24 hours following the time of dosing at the clinic the previous day. Water (240 mL) was taken with the medication. Immediately prior to each blood draw, patients rated their pain intensity using an 11-point scale and rated their pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Blood samples for analysis were drawn at: 0 (prior to dosing), 1,2,4,6,8,10,12,15,18,21 and 24 hours after dosing. Urine output was collected over the 24-hour period from selected patients. Vital signs were taken. At the conclusion of Visit 5 or in the event of early study termination, a Global Evaluation and physical examination were performed. The patient's diary was reviewed with the patient and all unused study medication was collected. Safety assessments included vital signs and physical examination at the start and end of study. OROS Hydromorphone HCL (slow release) 8,16,32,and 64 mg tablets orally. Patients were stabilized on prior opioids then converted to OROS Hydromorphone HCL (slow release) and slowly increased or decreased to adequate analgesia. Then the patients were maintained at that dose for 4 - 10 days. Duration of treatment was up to 31 days.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who had chronic nonmalignant or chronic cancer pain and were currently receiving strong oral or transdermal opioid analgesics (drug that relieves pain) on a daily basis or patients suitable for advancement of therapy to step 3 on the WHO (World Health Organization) analgesic (drug that relieves pain) ladder
- Patients who required the opioid equivalent of at least 32 mg but no more than 300 mg of oral morphine sulfate or opioid equivalent (exclusive of breakthrough pain medication) every 24 hours for the management of chronic nonmalignant or cancer pain
- Patients who were expected to have reasonably stable opioid requirements for the duration of the study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients intolerant of or hypersensitive to hydromorphone (or other opioid drugs)
- Patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding.Patients with any dysphagia or unable to swallow tablets, acute abdominal conditions that may be obscured by opioids or gastrointestinal disorders, including pre-existing severe GI narrowing, that may affect the absorption or transit of orally administered drugs
- Patients with any significant CNS disorder, including but not limited to head injury, intracranial lesion, increased intracranial pressure, seizure disorder, stroke within the past 6 months, and disorders of cognition, and clinically significant impaired hematological function
- Patients that may be at risk for serious decreases in blood pressure following administration of an opioid analgesic (pain relief)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OROS Hydromorphone HCI (slow release) | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
The pharmacokinetic (absorption, distribution, excretion) profile of OROS hydromorphone. The time required for absorption and distribution in the body.
1 secondary outcome
Relationships between pharmacokinetic (absorption, distribution, excretion) and pharmacodynamic (drug action on body systems) responses. Patients rated their pain intensity prior to each time blood was draw.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2017.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alza Corporation Clinical Trial study director
ALZA
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing OROS Hydromorphone HCI (slow release) in people with Pain and Analgesics, Opioid, run by Alza Corporation, DE, USA.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The pharmacokinetic (absorption, distribution, excretion) profile of OROS hydromorphone. The time required for absorption and distribution in the body.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2017.