Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 1/2NCT00390195
Randomized Phase I/II of RAD001 in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
A Phase 1/2 study testing RAD001 (everolimus) in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan at 2 sites in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The mTOR has been examined in hepatocellular carcinomas as well. This pathway is up-regulated in a proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and that rapamycin inhibits cell proliferation and blocks S6K phosphorylation. Inhibition of mTOR had been shown to suppress substantially the liver tumor growth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- RAD001 (everolimus)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 134 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesTaiwan
- Study dates
- Oct 2006to Jun 2011
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with measurable, metastatic or locally advanced HCC that are not feasible to have or have failed to prior local therapy (including surgical resection, transarterial chemoembolization and/or alcohol injection) are eligible.
- The diagnosis of HCC should be established either by cyto/histology; or, by characteristic imaging studies (have to including angiography) plus serum level of AFP equal to or more than 400 ng/mL in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and/or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection.
- Patients must be equal to or more than 20 years of age and equal or less than 75 years of age.
- Patients must have a performance status of ECOG score equal to or less than 2.
- Patients must fulfill all of the following criteria: Child-Pugh's Score equal to or less than 9; serum total bilirubin level is equal to or less than 2.0 mg/dL; serum ALT level (GPT) equal to or less than 3.0 x upper normal limit; platelet are equal to or more than 50,000 / uL; WBC are equal to or more than 3,000 / uL.
- Serum creatinine equal to or less than 2.0 x upper normal limit.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Life expectancy equal to or more than 12 weeks.
- Signed informed consent.
- Sexually active patients, in conjunction with their partner, must practice birth control during, and for 2 months after therapy.
- Female patients at child-bearing age must have negative pregnancy test.
- No known HIV infection.
Who cannot join
- Patients with diseases which require concurrent usage of glucocorticosteroid or immunosuppressant agent(s) are not eligible.
- Patients with concomitant active secondary malignancies, except for surgically cured carcinoma in situ of the cervix and basal or adequately treated squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or disease-free of malignancies < 3 years before the study, are not eligible.
- Patients with active infection are not eligible.
- Patients who received other rapamycin analogs before are not eligible.
- Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases (including history of stable, effort-induced or unstable angina pectoris or myocardiac infarction) and other systemic diseases under poor control are not eligible.
- Patients with history of psychiatric disorder are not eligible.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with brain metastases are not eligible.
- Patients who received surgery, radiotherapy except to bone, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or other investigational drug within 4 weeks before initiating study are not eligible.
- Patients who are pregnant, breast-feeding or not using appropriate birth control during the course of the study are not eligible.
- Patients with significant concomitant disease that will be aggravated by the investigational drug are not eligible.
- Patients on active treatment with inhibitors or inducers of P-glycoprotein, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 are not eligible; a minimal of 2 weeks wash-out period will be required after stop such medications.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Taiwan2 sites, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan, 704
Her-Shyong Shiah, M.D., +886-6-208-3422 ext. 65113, hsshiah@nhri.org.tw
Li-Tzong Chen, M.D., Ph.D.
- Active, not recruiting
Tri-Service General Hospital
Taipei, 11490
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase I/II of Rapamycin Analog, RAD001, in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma - With a Pharmacokinetic Study of RAD001
The mTOR has been examined in hepatocellular carcinomas as well. This pathway is up-regulated in a proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and that rapamycin inhibits cell proliferation and blocks S6K phosphorylation. Inhibition of mTOR had been shown to suppress substantially the liver tumor growth. Nevertheless, inhibition of mTOR was demonstrated to have a clinical response in some cancer types. These reports imply that inhibition of mTOR could be a promising therapeutic strategy in the treatment of HCC. Therefore, we hypothesize that RAD001, a rapamycin analog, can inhibit the mTOR, and subsequently suppress the liver tumor in the treatment of HCC patients.
This study is aimed to investigate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics and feasibility of RAD001 in advanced HCC patients. This study will be a randomized phase I study with dose escalation and subsequently a phase II study of intent to treat, as well as pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and surrogate marker study of RAD001.
Read the detailed description
Objectives:
- Primary Objectives
- Phase I: To assess the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of once daily and weekly oral RAD001 in patients with advanced HCC of Child-Pugh's class A or B
- Phase II: To assess the disease control rate of advanced Child-Pugh's class A or B HCC patients receiving the determined MTD of once daily and weekly oral RAD001 in phase I
- Secondary Objectives
- Phase I: To investigate the following items in the advanced HCC patients receiving RAD001
- Dose-limiting toxicity
- Pharmacokinetics study
- Pharmacogenetic study
- Surrogate marker study on the PTEN, total and Phosphorylated forms of Akt of tumor tissues
- Disease control rate
- Phase II: To investigate the following items in the advanced HCC patients receiving RAD001
- Overall survival
- Toxicity profile
- Pharmacogenetic study
- Surrogate marker study on the PTEN, total and Phosphorylated forms of Akt of tumor tissues
Study Design: This study will be a randomized phase I study with dose escalation and subsequently a phase II study of intent to treat, as well as pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and surrogate marker study of RAD001.
Sample Size: Upto 134 patients (Phase I: in cohort of 3-6 to test each dose level and a upto 48 patients to reach the expected MTD, 24 patients in each schedule of treatment arm; Phase II: 18 patients of each schedule at the first stage and 25 patients of each schedule at the second stage).
Study Medication: The RAD001 dose level of daily schedule will be escalated from 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 to 10 mg/day without splitting, with or without food. The RAD001 dose level of weekly schedule will be escalated from 20, 30, 50 to 70 mg/week without splitting. The dose and schedule of RAD001 in the phase II study will be dependent on the result of phase I study. RAD001 will be supplied by Novartis Co.,
Study Conduct: Patients will be enrolled onto a sequence of receiving an oral dose of RAD001. The schedule of RAD001 will be either once daily or once weekly. Throughout the whole phase I and II study, an eligible patient will be randomized into either arm of daily or weekly schedule. In the phase I part, each cohort of dose level will have 3 patients. The dose of oral RAD001 will be initially fixed at 2.5 gm/day in daily schedule arm and at 20 mg/week in weekly schedule arm. One treatment course is defined as 4 weeks of RAD001 therapy. When no patient experiences dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at certain level, subsequent patients would be randomized to the next dose level. When 1 out of 3 patients developed DLT, 3 additional patients would be treated with the same dose level. Three patients will be further recruited to the next dose level when none of that 3 additional patients experience DLT. No intra-individual dose-escalation will be performed. In the phase II part, Simon's optimal two-stage approach will be used in both daily and weekly schedules. If one responder is observed at the first stage of eighteen patients in either treatment schedule, further twenty-five patients will be accrued.
Therapeutic Assessment:
- Efficacy assessment:
- Radiological response: To evaluate the disease control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) by computed tomography after every 8 weeks of therapy and according to RECIST guideline.
- Biological response
- To evaluate the change of serum a-fetoprotein level.
- To evaluate the change of plasma angiogenic factors levels.
- Safety Assessment: Toxicity assessment:
- Evaluation of toxicity will be performed on patient-base.
- Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptomatology will be graded according to NCI common toxicity criteria (CTC) version 3.0.
- Abnormal liver functional tests are common in patients with HCC, only abnormal elevation of ALT will be considered as indicator of hepatotoxicity.
- Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacogenetic \& Surrogate Marker Assessments
- Pharmacokinetic assessments:
- Cmax: peak concentration
- tmax: time to achieve peak concentration
- Cmin: trough concentration
- Cave: average concentration
- AUCt: area under curve within a given time
- t1/2: elimination half life
- Pharmacogenetic assessments:
- Polymorphic CYP3A4
- Polymorphic CYP3A5
- Polymorphic P-glycoprotein
- Surrogate marker assessments:
- PTEN
- Total and Phosphorylated forms of Akt
Procedures:
- Screening will be done within 2 weeks before starting treatment, and will include all parameters listed below, (except for pharmacokinetics, AEs/concomitant medications, and toxicity assessments) as well as informed consent, patient eligibility, medical history, a pregnancy test (if indicated), EKG, and urinalysis.
- During treatment:
- Physical examination (including vital sign measurements), height, weight, AEs, and toxicity evaluation at the first day of each week during the initial 4 weeks, biweekly at the subsequently 8 weeks and 4-weekly thereafter.
- Performance status will be assessed on the first day of each treatment course.
- Investigators/research nurses should monitor patients in each treatment course and should instruct patients regarding the signs and symptoms of RAD001 toxicity as described in the "Information for Patients" section of the RAD001 product labeling.
- The laboratory tests, hemogram, clinical chemistry will be conducted weekly at the first 4 weeks, biweekly at the subsequent 8 weeks and 4- weekly thereafter.
- Imaging studies for tumor response will be performed every 2 courses.
- Patient clinical and biological responses will be noted at the end of the study.
Statistical Analysis: No formal inferential statistical analyses will be performed. Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics (number of patients, mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum) for continuous variables and using frequency and percentage for discrete variables. For the safety analyses, data will be presented for all patients. An accounting of the study patients by disposition will be tabulated. Demographic data (e.g., age, gender), medical history, cancer history, and other baseline characteristics will be summarized.
- Safety Evaluation: The general safety and tolerability of RAD001 will be assessed using the following safety endpoints: AEs, routine clinical laboratory evaluations (hemogram, serum chemistry, and urinalysis), physical examination, concomitant medications, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. The grade of AEs at the time of rescue as determined from the NCI-CTC version 3.0.
- Pharmacokinetic Analysis: Pharmacokinetic parameters will be determined from plasma drug and metabolite concentration curves using non- compartmental approaches. Mean (SD) plasma drug concentration values will be summarized and plotted for each dose group. All parameters described will be summarized with means and standard deviations. The concentration in plasma determined at each sampling time point will be furnished on the original scale for each subject participating in the study. The pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Cmin, Cave, and AUC will be analyzed on the logarithmic scale of measurement. The parameters of elimination half- life and tmax will be analyzed on the original scale.
- Efficacy Analysis: The efficacious parameters will be determined by mean of disease control rate and median of time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier method. The efficacious parameters will be added with 95% confidence interval. All calculations will be based on the intent-to-treat principle.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- RAD001 (everolimus)
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, RAD001, Rapamycin, Randomize, Phase I, Phase II, Pharmacokinetics
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RAD001 (everolimus)Drug
Also called Certican
Arm 1: 2.5, 5, 7.5 or 10 mg of RAD001 daily
RAD001 (everolimus)Drug
Also called Certican
Arm 2: 20, 30, 50 or 70 mg of RAD001 daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Daily | Experimental | Taking orally the investigational drug daily Receives: Drug: RAD001 (everolimus) |
| 2. Weekly | Experimental | Taking orally the investigational drug weekly Receives: Drug: RAD001 (everolimus) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum tolerated dose in Phase I
Measured: June-2008
Disease control rate in Phase II
Measured: Dec-2009
Secondary outcomes (7)
Angiogenic factors
Measured: Dec-2009
Pharmacokinetics
Measured: Jun-2008
Pharmacogenetics
Measured: Dec-2009
Pharmacodynamics
Measured: Dec-2009
Overall survival
Measured: Jun-2010
Time to tumor progression
Measured: Jun-2010
Tumor marker
Measured: Dec-2009
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2006
- Primary completionJun 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Novartis
- Investigators
- Li-Tzong Chen, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00390195
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRAD001C2453
- Status last verified
- Jun 2009
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2009
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Chan S. Targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR): a new approach to treating cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004 Oct 18;91(8):1420-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602162.
PubMed 15365568Meric-Bernstam F, Mills GB. Mammalian target of rapamycin. Semin Oncol. 2004 Dec;31(6 Suppl 16):10-7; discussion 33. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.10.013.
PubMed 15799239Bjornsti MA, Houghton PJ. The TOR pathway: a target for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 May;4(5):335-48. doi: 10.1038/nrc1362. No abstract available.
PubMed 15122205Yee KW, Zeng Z, Konopleva M, Verstovsek S, Ravandi F, Ferrajoli A, Thomas D, Wierda W, Apostolidou E, Albitar M, O'Brien S, Andreeff M, Giles FJ. Phase I/II study of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 1;12(17):5165-73. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0764.
PubMed 16951235Sahin F, Kannangai R, Adegbola O, Wang J, Su G, Torbenson M. mTOR and P70 S6 kinase expression in primary liver neoplasms. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Dec 15;10(24):8421-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0941.
PubMed 15623621Rizell M, Lindner P. Inhibition of mTOR suppresses experimental liver tumours. Anticancer Res. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2A):789-93.
PubMed 15868910Shiah HS, Chen CY, Dai CY, Hsiao CF, Lin YJ, Su WC, Chang JY, Whang-Peng J, Lin PW, Huang JD, Chen LT. Randomised clinical trial: comparison of two everolimus dosing schedules in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(1):62-73. doi: 10.1111/apt.12132. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PubMed 23134470Treiber G. mTOR inhibitors for hepatocellular cancer: a forward-moving target. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Feb;9(2):247-61. doi: 10.1586/14737140.9.2.247.
PubMed 19192962
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase I/II of Rapamycin Analog, RAD001, in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma - With a Pharmacokinetic Study of RAD001
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00390195
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRAD001C2453
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, RAD001, Rapamycin, Randomize, Phase I, Phase II, Pharmacokinetics
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Health Research Institutes, TaiwanUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Novartis
- Study start
- Oct 2006
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The mTOR has been examined in hepatocellular carcinomas as well. This pathway is up-regulated in a proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and that rapamycin inhibits cell proliferation and blocks S6K phosphorylation. Inhibition of mTOR had been shown to suppress substantially the liver tumor growth. Nevertheless, inhibition of mTOR was demonstrated to have a clinical response in some cancer types. These reports imply that inhibition of mTOR could be a promising therapeutic strategy in the treatment of HCC. Therefore, we hypothesize that RAD001, a rapamycin analog, can inhibit the mTOR, and subsequently suppress the liver tumor in the treatment of HCC patients.
This study is aimed to investigate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics and feasibility of RAD001 in advanced HCC patients. This study will be a randomized phase I study with dose escalation and subsequently a phase II study of intent to treat, as well as pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and surrogate marker study of RAD001.
Detailed description
Objectives:
- Primary Objectives
- Phase I: To assess the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of once daily and weekly oral RAD001 in patients with advanced HCC of Child-Pugh's class A or B
- Phase II: To assess the disease control rate of advanced Child-Pugh's class A or B HCC patients receiving the determined MTD of once daily and weekly oral RAD001 in phase I
- Secondary Objectives
- Phase I: To investigate the following items in the advanced HCC patients receiving RAD001
- Dose-limiting toxicity
- Pharmacokinetics study
- Pharmacogenetic study
- Surrogate marker study on the PTEN, total and Phosphorylated forms of Akt of tumor tissues
- Disease control rate
- Phase II: To investigate the following items in the advanced HCC patients receiving RAD001
- Overall survival
- Toxicity profile
- Pharmacogenetic study
- Surrogate marker study on the PTEN, total and Phosphorylated forms of Akt of tumor tissues
Study Design: This study will be a randomized phase I study with dose escalation and subsequently a phase II study of intent to treat, as well as pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and surrogate marker study of RAD001.
Sample Size: Upto 134 patients (Phase I: in cohort of 3-6 to test each dose level and a upto 48 patients to reach the expected MTD, 24 patients in each schedule of treatment arm; Phase II: 18 patients of each schedule at the first stage and 25 patients of each schedule at the second stage).
Study Medication: The RAD001 dose level of daily schedule will be escalated from 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 to 10 mg/day without splitting, with or without food. The RAD001 dose level of weekly schedule will be escalated from 20, 30, 50 to 70 mg/week without splitting. The dose and schedule of RAD001 in the phase II study will be dependent on the result of phase I study. RAD001 will be supplied by Novartis Co.,
Study Conduct: Patients will be enrolled onto a sequence of receiving an oral dose of RAD001. The schedule of RAD001 will be either once daily or once weekly. Throughout the whole phase I and II study, an eligible patient will be randomized into either arm of daily or weekly schedule. In the phase I part, each cohort of dose level will have 3 patients. The dose of oral RAD001 will be initially fixed at 2.5 gm/day in daily schedule arm and at 20 mg/week in weekly schedule arm. One treatment course is defined as 4 weeks of RAD001 therapy. When no patient experiences dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at certain level, subsequent patients would be randomized to the next dose level. When 1 out of 3 patients developed DLT, 3 additional patients would be treated with the same dose level. Three patients will be further recruited to the next dose level when none of that 3 additional patients experience DLT. No intra-individual dose-escalation will be performed. In the phase II part, Simon's optimal two-stage approach will be used in both daily and weekly schedules. If one responder is observed at the first stage of eighteen patients in either treatment schedule, further twenty-five patients will be accrued.
Therapeutic Assessment:
- Efficacy assessment:
- Radiological response: To evaluate the disease control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) by computed tomography after every 8 weeks of therapy and according to RECIST guideline.
- Biological response
- To evaluate the change of serum a-fetoprotein level.
- To evaluate the change of plasma angiogenic factors levels.
- Safety Assessment: Toxicity assessment:
- Evaluation of toxicity will be performed on patient-base.
- Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptomatology will be graded according to NCI common toxicity criteria (CTC) version 3.0.
- Abnormal liver functional tests are common in patients with HCC, only abnormal elevation of ALT will be considered as indicator of hepatotoxicity.
- Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacogenetic \& Surrogate Marker Assessments
- Pharmacokinetic assessments:
- Cmax: peak concentration
- tmax: time to achieve peak concentration
- Cmin: trough concentration
- Cave: average concentration
- AUCt: area under curve within a given time
- t1/2: elimination half life
- Pharmacogenetic assessments:
- Polymorphic CYP3A4
- Polymorphic CYP3A5
- Polymorphic P-glycoprotein
- Surrogate marker assessments:
- PTEN
- Total and Phosphorylated forms of Akt
Procedures:
- Screening will be done within 2 weeks before starting treatment, and will include all parameters listed below, (except for pharmacokinetics, AEs/concomitant medications, and toxicity assessments) as well as informed consent, patient eligibility, medical history, a pregnancy test (if indicated), EKG, and urinalysis.
- During treatment:
- Physical examination (including vital sign measurements), height, weight, AEs, and toxicity evaluation at the first day of each week during the initial 4 weeks, biweekly at the subsequently 8 weeks and 4-weekly thereafter.
- Performance status will be assessed on the first day of each treatment course.
- Investigators/research nurses should monitor patients in each treatment course and should instruct patients regarding the signs and symptoms of RAD001 toxicity as described in the "Information for Patients" section of the RAD001 product labeling.
- The laboratory tests, hemogram, clinical chemistry will be conducted weekly at the first 4 weeks, biweekly at the subsequent 8 weeks and 4- weekly thereafter.
- Imaging studies for tumor response will be performed every 2 courses.
- Patient clinical and biological responses will be noted at the end of the study.
Statistical Analysis: No formal inferential statistical analyses will be performed. Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics (number of patients, mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum) for continuous variables and using frequency and percentage for discrete variables. For the safety analyses, data will be presented for all patients. An accounting of the study patients by disposition will be tabulated. Demographic data (e.g., age, gender), medical history, cancer history, and other baseline characteristics will be summarized.
- Safety Evaluation: The general safety and tolerability of RAD001 will be assessed using the following safety endpoints: AEs, routine clinical laboratory evaluations (hemogram, serum chemistry, and urinalysis), physical examination, concomitant medications, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. The grade of AEs at the time of rescue as determined from the NCI-CTC version 3.0.
- Pharmacokinetic Analysis: Pharmacokinetic parameters will be determined from plasma drug and metabolite concentration curves using non- compartmental approaches. Mean (SD) plasma drug concentration values will be summarized and plotted for each dose group. All parameters described will be summarized with means and standard deviations. The concentration in plasma determined at each sampling time point will be furnished on the original scale for each subject participating in the study. The pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Cmin, Cave, and AUC will be analyzed on the logarithmic scale of measurement. The parameters of elimination half- life and tmax will be analyzed on the original scale.
- Efficacy Analysis: The efficacious parameters will be determined by mean of disease control rate and median of time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier method. The efficacious parameters will be added with 95% confidence interval. All calculations will be based on the intent-to-treat principle.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Daily | Experimental | Drug: RAD001 (everolimus)Taking orally the investigational drug daily |
| 2. Weekly | Experimental | Drug: RAD001 (everolimus)Taking orally the investigational drug weekly |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with measurable, metastatic or locally advanced HCC that are not feasible to have or have failed to prior local therapy (including surgical resection, transarterial chemoembolization and/or alcohol injection) are eligible.
- The diagnosis of HCC should be established either by cyto/histology; or, by characteristic imaging studies (have to including angiography) plus serum level of AFP equal to or more than 400 ng/mL in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and/or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection.
- Patients must be equal to or more than 20 years of age and equal or less than 75 years of age.
- Patients must have a performance status of ECOG score equal to or less than 2.
- Patients must fulfill all of the following criteria: Child-Pugh's Score equal to or less than 9; serum total bilirubin level is equal to or less than 2.0 mg/dL; serum ALT level (GPT) equal to or less than 3.0 x upper normal limit; platelet are equal to or more than 50,000 / uL; WBC are equal to or more than 3,000 / uL.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with diseases which require concurrent usage of glucocorticosteroid or immunosuppressant agent(s) are not eligible.
- Patients with concomitant active secondary malignancies, except for surgically cured carcinoma in situ of the cervix and basal or adequately treated squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or disease-free of malignancies < 3 years before the study, are not eligible.
- Patients with active infection are not eligible.
- Patients who received other rapamycin analogs before are not eligible.
- Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases (including history of stable, effort-induced or unstable angina pectoris or myocardiac infarction) and other systemic diseases under poor control are not eligible.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RAD001 (everolimus)Also: CerticanArm 1: 2.5, 5, 7.5 or 10 mg of RAD001 daily | Drug | 1. Daily |
| RAD001 (everolimus)Also: CerticanArm 2: 20, 30, 50 or 70 mg of RAD001 daily | Drug | 2. Weekly |
Primary outcome
Maximum tolerated dose in Phase I
Time frame: June-2008
Disease control rate in Phase II
Time frame: Dec-2009
7 secondary outcomes
Angiogenic factors
Time frame: Dec-2009
Pharmacokinetics
Time frame: Jun-2008
Pharmacogenetics
Time frame: Dec-2009
Pharmacodynamics
Time frame: Dec-2009
Overall survival
Time frame: Jun-2010
Time to tumor progression
Time frame: Jun-2010
Tumor marker
Time frame: Dec-2009
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2009.
- Background: PubMed 15365568Chan S. Targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR): a new approach to treating cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004 Oct 18;91(8):1420-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602162.
- Background: PubMed 15799239Meric-Bernstam F, Mills GB. Mammalian target of rapamycin. Semin Oncol. 2004 Dec;31(6 Suppl 16):10-7; discussion 33. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.10.013.
- Background: PubMed 15122205Bjornsti MA, Houghton PJ. The TOR pathway: a target for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 May;4(5):335-48. doi: 10.1038/nrc1362. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 16951235Yee KW, Zeng Z, Konopleva M, Verstovsek S, Ravandi F, Ferrajoli A, Thomas D, Wierda W, Apostolidou E, Albitar M, O'Brien S, Andreeff M, Giles FJ. Phase I/II study of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 1;12(17):5165-73. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0764.
- Results publication: PubMed 15623621Sahin F, Kannangai R, Adegbola O, Wang J, Su G, Torbenson M. mTOR and P70 S6 kinase expression in primary liver neoplasms. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Dec 15;10(24):8421-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0941.
- Results publication: PubMed 15868910Rizell M, Lindner P. Inhibition of mTOR suppresses experimental liver tumours. Anticancer Res. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2A):789-93.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23134470Shiah HS, Chen CY, Dai CY, Hsiao CF, Lin YJ, Su WC, Chang JY, Whang-Peng J, Lin PW, Huang JD, Chen LT. Randomised clinical trial: comparison of two everolimus dosing schedules in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(1):62-73. doi: 10.1111/apt.12132. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19192962Treiber G. mTOR inhibitors for hepatocellular cancer: a forward-moving target. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Feb;9(2):247-61. doi: 10.1586/14737140.9.2.247.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Li-Tzong Chen, M.D., Ph.D. principal investigator
National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing RAD001 (everolimus) in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan at 2 sites in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Her-Shyong Shiah, M.D. (886-6-208-3422 ext. 65113, hsshiah@nhri.org.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum tolerated dose in Phase I (time frame: June-2008). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00390195, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2009.