Cardiac Pacing, ArtificialPhase 4COGNITIONNCT00323661
Closed Loop Stimulation, Cognitive Performance, and Quality of Life in Pacemaker Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometer and Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop Stimulation in people with Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 55 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the influence of accelerometer-based rate adaptation and Closed Loop Stimulation on cognitive performance and quality of life in pacemaker patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
- What is being tested?
- Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometer and Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop Stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 405 participants
- Where
- 55 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- May 2006to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a CYLOS pacemaker (implantation within the last 3 to 6 weeks)
- Closed Loop Stimulation mode activated since pre-hospital discharge
- Patients with chronotropic incompetence according to physician's judgment
- Maximum sinus rate < 100 beats per minute (bpm) OR percentage of atrial pacing ≥ 25%
- Patients suitable for rate-adaptive pacing for at least 2 years
- Patient informed consent
Who cannot join
- Age under 55
- Pregnant and breast-feeding women
- Patients who are already enrolled in another study
Trial locations and contacts
55 sites in 10 countries.
55 sites in 10 countries
Germany35 sites
Universitätsklinik der RWTH Aachen
Aachen, 52074
Städtische Kliniken Bielefeld, Klinikum Mitte
Bielefeld, 33604
St. Agnes Hospital GmbH, 1. Medizinische Klinik-Kardiologie
Bocholt, 46397
Klinikum Coburg
Coburg, 96450
Klinikum Lippe-Detmold
Detmold, 32756
Med. Klinik/Kardiologie, Herzzentrum, Universitätsklinik an der Technischen Universität Dresden
Dresden, 01307
Kreisklinik Ebersberg GmbH
Ebersberg, 85560
Marien-Hospital Erftstadt-Frauenthal
Erftstadt-Frauenthal, 50374
Klinken Erlabrunn GmbH
Erlabrunn, 08349
Westdeutsches Herzzentrum Essen; Klinik für Kardiologie und Thorax-Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie des Universitätsklinikums Essen
Essen, 45122
Kardiologisches Zentrum am Zoo
Frankfurt, 60316
St. Elisabeth-Hospital
Gütersloh, 33276
Klinikum der Medizinischen Fakultät Halle-Wittenberg
Halle, 06120
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Zentrum für Kardiologische und Angiologische Medizin Hamburg
Hamburg, 22041
AK Altona
Hamburg, 22763
St. Vinzenz-Krankenhaus Hanau gGmbH
Hanau, 63450
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Klinikum Herford
Herford, 32049
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Holzminden
Holzminden, 37603
Klinikum der Universität Jena Klinik für Innere Medizin I
Jena, 07743
Kardiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Kiel, 24116
Städtisches Klinikum St. Georg
Leipzig, 04129
Universitätsklinikum Lübeck
Lübeck, 23538
Krankenhaus St. Franziskus, Medizinische Klinik II
Mönchengladbach, 41063
St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH
Paderborn, 33098
Kardiologische Praxis
Papenburg, 26871
Christl. Krankenhaus Quakenbrück
Quakenbrück, 49610
Elisabeth Krankenhaus GmbH
Recklinghausen, 45661
St. Adolf-Stift
Reinbek, 21465
Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Stenzel/Dr. Ebert
Riesa, 01587
Evangelisches Elisabeth Krankenhaus
Trier, 54292
Gemeinschaftspraxis Drs. Schley, Burkhard-Meier, Schemeitat
Viersen, 41747
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Canada5 sites
Practice Dr. Bloomberg
Burnaby, B.C., V5H 2E3
Kelowna Cardiology Research
Kelowna BC, V1Y 1E4
Hopital Sacre-Coeur
Montreal, H4J 1C5
Dr. Dante Manyauri
Surrey BC, V3V 1N1
Scarborough Cardiology Research
Toronto, Ontario, M1P 2T7
Austria4 sites
A.ö. Krankenhaus der Stadt Linz
Linz, 4020
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Ried
Ried, 4910
A. ö. Landeskrankenhaus Steyr
Steyr, 4400
Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien
Vienna, 1160
Brazil3 sites
Hospital Anchieta, Instituto do Coracao de Taguatinga
Brasilia - DF, 71525-255
Hospital Sao Francisco
Porto Alegre, 90510-000
Hospital Real e Benemerita Sociedade Portuguesa de Beneficencia
São Paulo, 01323-001
Hong Kong2 sites
Princess Margaret Hospital
Hong Kong
Yan Chai Hospital
Hong Kong
Slovakia2 sites
Nemocnica Ministerstva Obrany
Bratislava, 83331
VUSCH East Slovak Cardiology Institute, Arytmology
Košice, 04011
About this study
Official title: COGNITION - Cognitive Performance & Closed Loop Stimulation
The purpose of this study is to compare the influence of accelerometer-based rate adaptation and Closed Loop Stimulation on cognitive performance and quality of life in pacemaker patients.
Read the detailed description
Within the scope of a usual follow-up schedule the influence of the mode of rate-adaptation on cognitive performance of pacemaker patients will be analysed. Accelerometer sensor will be compared with Closed Loop Stimulation over 2 years. The cognitive performance will be measured by means of a standardized psychometric test. The occurrence of atrial fibrillation and serious adverse events, patient self-assessment and quality of life will be evaluated. An analysis of the telemonitored (Home Monitoring) data will be performed in order to identify predictors of changes or differences in cognitive performance.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
- Being tested
- Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometer, Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop Stimulation
- Keywords
- Pacing, Rate-adaptive, Quality of life, Cognitive performance, Atrial fibrillation, Pacemaker sensor
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometerDevice
Accelerometer based pacing rate adaptation
Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop StimulationDevice
Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) is a unique concept in rate-adaptive pacing that uses the natural cardiovascular control loop to determine the appropriate pacing rate. Closed Loop Stimulation is the only rate-adaptive system responding to mental stress and thereby assuring optimal cerebral perfusion in everyday activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Rate-adaptation by Closed Loop Stimulation Receives: Device: Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop Stimulation |
| 2 | Active comparator | Accelerometer based pacing rate adaptation Receives: Device: Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cognitive performance assessed by the Number Connection Test
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Quality of life assessed by the SF-08
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
occurrence of atrial fibrillation
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
occurrence of serious adverse events
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
self-assessment of general well-being, mental and physical performance assessed by Visual Analogue Scales
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Home Monitoring data
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2006
- Primary completionNov 2010
- Study completionMar 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac Pacing, ArtificialStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 405 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Uwe Wiegand, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Sana-Klinikum Remscheid, 42859 Remscheid, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00323661
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BA079
- Acronym
- COGNITION
- Status last verified
- Feb 2012
- First submitted
- 8 May 2006
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2012
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Wiegand U, Nuernberg M, Maier SK, Weiss C, Sancho-Tello MJ, Hartmann A, Schuchert A, Maier P, Chan NY. The COGNITION study rationale and design: influence of closed loop stimulation on cognitive performance in pacemaker patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Jun;31(6):709-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01075.x.
PubMed 18507543
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- COGNITION - Cognitive Performance & Closed Loop Stimulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00323661
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COGNITION / BA079
- Conditions
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
- Keywords
- Pacing, Rate-adaptive, Quality of life, Cognitive performance, Atrial fibrillation, Pacemaker sensor
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 405 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2006
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 May 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the influence of accelerometer-based rate adaptation and Closed Loop Stimulation on cognitive performance and quality of life in pacemaker patients.
Detailed description
Within the scope of a usual follow-up schedule the influence of the mode of rate-adaptation on cognitive performance of pacemaker patients will be analysed. Accelerometer sensor will be compared with Closed Loop Stimulation over 2 years. The cognitive performance will be measured by means of a standardized psychometric test. The occurrence of atrial fibrillation and serious adverse events, patient self-assessment and quality of life will be evaluated. An analysis of the telemonitored (Home Monitoring) data will be performed in order to identify predictors of changes or differences in cognitive performance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Device: Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop StimulationRate-adaptation by Closed Loop Stimulation |
| 2 | Active comparator | Device: Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometerAccelerometer based pacing rate adaptation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with a CYLOS pacemaker (implantation within the last 3 to 6 weeks)
- Closed Loop Stimulation mode activated since pre-hospital discharge
- Patients with chronotropic incompetence according to physician's judgment
- Maximum sinus rate < 100 beats per minute (bpm) OR percentage of atrial pacing ≥ 25%
- Patients suitable for rate-adaptive pacing for at least 2 years
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age under 55
- Pregnant and breast-feeding women
- Patients who are already enrolled in another study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometerAccelerometer based pacing rate adaptation | Device | 2 |
| Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop StimulationClosed Loop Stimulation (CLS) is a unique concept in rate-adaptive pacing that uses the natural cardiovascular control loop to determine the appropriate pacing rate. Closed Loop Stimulation is the only rate-adaptive system responding to mental stress and thereby assuring optimal cerebral perfusion in everyday activity. | Device | 1 |
Primary outcome
Cognitive performance assessed by the Number Connection Test
Time frame: 24 months
5 secondary outcomes
Quality of life assessed by the SF-08
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
occurrence of atrial fibrillation
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
occurrence of serious adverse events
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
self-assessment of general well-being, mental and physical performance assessed by Visual Analogue Scales
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Home Monitoring data
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2012.
- Background: PubMed 18507543Wiegand U, Nuernberg M, Maier SK, Weiss C, Sancho-Tello MJ, Hartmann A, Schuchert A, Maier P, Chan NY. The COGNITION study rationale and design: influence of closed loop stimulation on cognitive performance in pacemaker patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Jun;31(6):709-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01075.x.
Related trials for Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
RecruitingObservational study
Leadless Pacemaker Registry: Outcomes and Follow-up From the University Hospital of St. Pölten
Pacemaker, Leadless Pacemaker
Active, not recruiting
BIO|MASTER.CSP Study
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Cardiac Pacemaker, Artificial
Not yet recruiting
Procedural Endpoint in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: Conduction System Capture Versus LV Septal Capture
Bradycardia, Atrioventricular Block
Recruiting
AI-Guided Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Heart Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device- Induced Remodelling of Tricuspid Valve and Right Chambers
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation, Non-rheumatic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Uwe Wiegand, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Sana-Klinikum Remscheid, 42859 Remscheid, Germany
55 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometer and Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop Stimulation in people with Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 55 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 55 sites in Germany, Canada, Austria, Brazil, Hong Kong and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cognitive performance assessed by the Number Connection Test (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00323661, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2012.