Schizophrenia ProdromePhase 2/3NCT00291226
Glycine vs Placebo for the Schizophrenia Prodrome
A Phase 2/3 study testing Glycine in people with Schizophrenia Prodrome, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Glycine is a natural amino acid neurotransmitter that acts as a co-agonist at NMDA receptors in brain. We hypothesize that symptoms of the schizophrenia prodrome will improve with glycine to a greater degree than with placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 35 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia Prodrome
- What is being tested?
- Glycine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2006to Jul 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 35 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- meet SIPS criteria for schizophrenia prodrome
Who cannot join
- history of psychosis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Glycine is a natural amino acid neurotransmitter that acts as a co-agonist at NMDA receptors in brain. We hypothesize that symptoms of the schizophrenia prodrome will improve with glycine to a greater degree than with placebo.
Read the detailed description
A pilot clinical trial comparing glycine to placebo in patients with the schizophrenia prodrome.
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia Prodrome
- Being tested
- Glycine, Placebo
- Keywords
- schizophrenia prodrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GlycineDrug
Glycine 0.4 g/kg bid
PlaceboDrug
Placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Glycine | Experimental | Glycine dosing was fixed at an initial dose of 0.2 g/kg q.h.s for 3 days, then 0.2 g/kg b.i.d. for 4 days, then 0.2 g/kg in the a.m. and 0.4 g/kg in the p.m. for 4 days, and finally 0.4 g/kg b.i.d. Subjects weighing > 100 kg were limited to a total daily dose of 80 g daily. Glycine was dispensed under IND 33,515 (DCJ). Receives: Drug: Glycine |
| Placebo Group | Placebo comparator | Placebo was dispensed as a proprietary formulations developed by Glytech, Inc, consisting of microencapsulated sucrose. Recommended administration of the sprinkles was to spoon them onto pudding or applesauce and swallow them with minimal chewing. Since earlier product testing by Glytech revealed that a few individuals did not like the somewhat granular texture of the sprinkles, subjects could switch to a second Glytech placebo formulation, consisting of proprietary pre-flavored sugar powders to be dissolved in 8 ounces of water. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Scale of Prodromal Symptoms Total Score
Scale Of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS) is a 19-item instrument. The SOPS is comprised of symptoms that are classified as falling into four pathology domains: positive, negative, disorganized and general. The scales identify and measure five attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, six negative symptoms, four disorganization symptoms and four general symptoms. These seven-point scales cover severity variance in the subpsychotic or attenuated range. Each item is scaled 0-6, with 0-2 being the normal range, 3-5 being the risk syndrome range, and 6 being severe and psychotic for the positive symptoms and very severe for the other symptoms. The higher the score, the more symptoms an individual has and is therefore negative in its interpretation. The severity of the prodromal state is judged according to the sum of the ratings from each of the SOPS items and can range from 0 to 114. Actual SOPS total scores in this study ranged from 23 to 59 across subjects at baseline.
Measured: Baseline
Change in Scale of Prodromal Symptoms Total Score
Scale Of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS) is a 19-item instrument. The SOPS is comprised of symptoms that are classified as falling into four pathology domains: positive, negative, disorganized and general. The scales identify and measure five attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, six negative symptoms, four disorganization symptoms and four general symptoms. These seven-point scales cover severity variance in the subpsychotic or attenuated range. Each item is scaled 0-6, with 0-2 being the normal range, 3-5 being the risk syndrome range, and 6 being severe and psychotic for the positive symptoms and very severe for the other symptoms. The higher the score, the more symptoms an individual has and is therefore negative in its interpretation. The severity of the prodromal state is judged according to the sum of the ratings from each of the SOPS items and can range from 0 to 114. Actual SOPS total scores in this study ranged from 23 to 59 across subjects at baseline.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2006
- Primary completionJul 2009
- Study completionJul 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Schizophrenia ProdromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Glytech, Inc, National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Scott W Woods, MD, Principal investigator, Yale University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00291226
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0502027440
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Woods SW, Walsh BC, Hawkins KA, Miller TJ, Saksa JR, D'Souza DC, Pearlson GD, Javitt DC, McGlashan TH, Krystal JH. Glycine treatment of the risk syndrome for psychosis: report of two pilot studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Aug;23(8):931-40. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
PubMed 23089076
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Glycine vs Placebo for the Schizophrenia Prodrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00291226
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0502027440
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia Prodrome
- Keywords
- schizophrenia prodrome
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Glytech, Inc, National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Study start
- Mar 2006
- Primary completion
- Jul 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Dec 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Glycine is a natural amino acid neurotransmitter that acts as a co-agonist at NMDA receptors in brain. We hypothesize that symptoms of the schizophrenia prodrome will improve with glycine to a greater degree than with placebo.
Detailed description
A pilot clinical trial comparing glycine to placebo in patients with the schizophrenia prodrome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Glycine | Experimental | Drug: GlycineGlycine dosing was fixed at an initial dose of 0.2 g/kg q.h.s for 3 days, then 0.2 g/kg b.i.d. for 4 days, then 0.2 g/kg in the a.m. and 0.4 g/kg in the p.m. for 4 days, and finally 0.4 g/kg b.i.d. Subjects weighing > 100 kg were limited to a total daily dose of 80 g daily. Glycine was dispensed under IND 33,515 (DCJ). |
| Placebo Group | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo was dispensed as a proprietary formulations developed by Glytech, Inc, consisting of microencapsulated sucrose. Recommended administration of the sprinkles was to spoon them onto pudding or applesauce and swallow them with minimal chewing. Since earlier product testing by Glytech revealed that a few individuals did not like the somewhat granular texture of the sprinkles, subjects could switch to a second Glytech placebo formulation, consisting of proprietary pre-flavored sugar powders to be dissolved in 8 ounces of water. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- meet SIPS criteria for schizophrenia prodrome
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- history of psychosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GlycineGlycine 0.4 g/kg bid | Drug | Glycine |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Drug | Placebo Group |
Primary outcome
Scale of Prodromal Symptoms Total Score
Time frame: Baseline
Scale Of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS) is a 19-item instrument. The SOPS is comprised of symptoms that are classified as falling into four pathology domains: positive, negative, disorganized and general. The scales identify and measure five attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, six negative symptoms, four disorganization symptoms and four general symptoms. These seven-point scales cover severity variance in the subpsychotic or attenuated range. Each item is scaled 0-6, with 0-2 being the normal range, 3-5 being the risk syndrome range, and 6 being severe and psychotic for the positive symptoms and very severe for the other symptoms. The higher the score, the more symptoms an individual has and is therefore negative in its interpretation. The severity of the prodromal state is judged according to the sum of the ratings from each of the SOPS items and can range from 0 to 114. Actual SOPS total scores in this study ranged from 23 to 59 across subjects at baseline.
Change in Scale of Prodromal Symptoms Total Score
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 Weeks
Scale Of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS) is a 19-item instrument. The SOPS is comprised of symptoms that are classified as falling into four pathology domains: positive, negative, disorganized and general. The scales identify and measure five attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, six negative symptoms, four disorganization symptoms and four general symptoms. These seven-point scales cover severity variance in the subpsychotic or attenuated range. Each item is scaled 0-6, with 0-2 being the normal range, 3-5 being the risk syndrome range, and 6 being severe and psychotic for the positive symptoms and very severe for the other symptoms. The higher the score, the more symptoms an individual has and is therefore negative in its interpretation. The severity of the prodromal state is judged according to the sum of the ratings from each of the SOPS items and can range from 0 to 114. Actual SOPS total scores in this study ranged from 23 to 59 across subjects at baseline.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23089076Woods SW, Walsh BC, Hawkins KA, Miller TJ, Saksa JR, D'Souza DC, Pearlson GD, Javitt DC, McGlashan TH, Krystal JH. Glycine treatment of the risk syndrome for psychosis: report of two pilot studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Aug;23(8):931-40. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Schizophrenia Prodrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Recruiting
Effects of NAC on Symptoms of CHR Patients
Prodromal Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 2
Early Intervention of Prodromal Schizophrenia Using an NMDA Enhancer
Prodromal Schizophrenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Scott W Woods, MD principal investigator
Yale University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Glycine in people with Schizophrenia Prodrome, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Dec 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Scale of Prodromal Symptoms Total Score (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00291226, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2020.