AzTrials
AzTrials

Stroke, AcutePhase 3NCT00276380

A Study on the Use of Tanakan® for Recovery of Neurological Impairment Following Ischaemic Stroke

A Phase 3 study testing EGb761 and Acetylsalicylic acid in people with Stroke, Acute and Neurological Impairment, run by Ipsen at 10 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Tanakan® 240mg in association with Acetylsalicylic acid (325mg/day) in the recovery of neurological impairment following ischemic stroke. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Acute, Neurological Impairment
What is being tested?
EGb761 and Acetylsalicylic acid
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
204 participants
Where
10 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Feb 2003to Mar 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient having had a single infarct in the carotid artery territory 3 to 8 days before inclusion
  • Patient with a moderately severe or severe disability (Modified Rankin Score 4 or 5)
  • Patient having a Quick's Test (for INR) and APPT (activated partial prothrombin time) test in the normal values of the laboratory

Who cannot join

  • Patients having had an ischemic stroke (CT confirmed) less than 3 days and more than 8 days prior
  • Patient with known pre-existent cerebral infarction
  • Infarct damaged area bigger than 1/3 hemisphere
  • Patient having a score below the cut-off point at Frenchay Aphasia Short Test

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 4 countries.

10 sites in 4 countries

Poland3 sites
  • Department and Clinic of Neurology of the Old Age

    Katowice, 40 752

  • CMUJ Krakov

    Krakow, 31503

  • Postgraduate Medical Teaching Center

    Warsaw, 00 416

Other trials in Poland

Russia3 sites
  • Russian State Medical University - Neurology and Neurosurgery Clinic

    Moscow, 117415

  • Russian State Medical University - Dept Fundamental Neurology & Neurosurgery

    Moscow, 129327

  • Ural State Medical Academy

    Yekaterinburg, 620102

Other trials in Russia

Czechia2 sites
  • Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove

    Hradec Králové, 500 02

  • General Faculty Hospital

    Prague, 120 00

Other trials in Czechia

Romania2 sites
  • Institul de Boli Cerebro Vascular

    Bucharest, 75622

  • Spitalul Universitar de Urgenta

    Bucharest, Sector 5

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blinded, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study for Evaluating the Efficacy of EGb 761® (Tanakan®) (240mg) in the Recovery of Neurological Impairment Following Ischemic Stroke

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Tanakan® 240mg in association with Acetylsalicylic acid (325mg/day) in the recovery of neurological impairment following ischemic stroke.

Being tested
EGb761, Placebo, Acetylsalicylic acid
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Neurologic Manifestations

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EGb761Drug

    Also called Tanakan

    EGb761 (Tanakan) 40 mg tablets (2 tablets t.i.d. (3 times a day)) 240 mg/day for 6 months.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo 40 mg tablets (2 tablets t.i.d.) 240 mg/day for 6 months.

  • Acetylsalicylic acidDrug

    Acetylsalicylic acid 325 mg/day (1 tablet once daily), for 6 months.

Study groups in NCT00276380
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EGb761®ExperimentalEGb761® 240 milligrams (mg)/day for 6 months administered orally, in association with acetylsalicylic acid (325 mg/day). The test treatment consists of 6 tablets/day. 2 tablets (each containing 40 mg EGb761®) taken orally with half a glass of water during 3 main meals. 1 tablet/day of acetylsalicylic acid during lunch.
Receives: Drug: EGb761; Drug: Acetylsalicylic acid
PlaceboPlacebo comparator6 months, administered orally, in association with acetylsalicylic acid (325 mg/day). The placebo consists of 6 tablets/day. 2 tablets taken orally with half a glass of water during 3 main meals. 1 tablet/day of acetylsalicylic acid during lunch.
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Acetylsalicylic acid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Subjects With Modified Rankin Score of Less Than 3 at the End of Study Period.

    The degree of disability and dependence in daily activities was assessed using the modified Rankin scale. The modified Rankin scale is a 6-point numerical scale (0=no symptoms at all, 1=no significant disability, 2=slight disability, 3=moderate disability, 4=moderately severe disability, 5=severe disability) which measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. The percentage of subjects having a modified Rankin Score<3 at the end of the study (Day 168) are reported.

    Measured: Day 168

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of Subjects With Modified Rankin Score of Less Than 3 at Day 28 and Day 84.

    The degree of disability and dependence in daily activities was assessed using the modified Rankin scale. The modified Rankin scale is a 6-point numerical scale (0=no symptoms at all, 1=no significant disability, 2=slight disability, 3=moderate disability, 4=moderately severe disability, 5=severe disability) which measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. The percentage of subjects having a modified Rankin Score<3 at each follow-up visit (not including end of study) are reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 84

  2. Percentage of Subjects at Each Point on the Modified Rankin Scale at Baseline, Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.

    The degree of disability and dependence in daily activities was assessed using the modified Rankin scale.The modified Rankin scale is a 6-point numerical scale (0=no symptoms at all, 1=no significant disability, 2=slight disability,3=moderate disability, 4=moderately severe disability, 5=severe disability) which measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. The distribution of subjects according to disability severity scores was assessed and the percentage of subjects at each point on the modified Rankin scale are reported for each time point.

    Measured: Up to Day 168

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Sandoz Clinical Assessment-Geriatric (SCAG) Scores at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.

    The SCAG scale was to be used to evaluate the psychopathological state of the subject. It is composed of 18 symptom areas and an overall global assessment, all rated on a 7-point format from 1=not present to 7=severe. The total score range is from 19 to 133 (best to worst), with a negative mean change from baseline indicating an improvement in symptoms. Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168 and the mean change from baseline at each time point is reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 168

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Barthel Index Scores at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.

    The performance in activities of daily living was assessed by using the Barthel scale. The Barthel scale is an ordinal scale which measures 10 performance items describing activities of daily living. Each item is rated with a given number of points from 0 indicating total dependence up to a maximum of 10 or 15 (depending on performance item) indicating complete independence. The total score range is from 0 to 100 (worst to best), with a positive mean change indicating an improvement in independence.

    Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168 and the mean change from baseline at each time point is reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 168

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in the Mini Mental State (MMS) Test Scores at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.

    The MMS test was used to evaluate the cognitive function of the subject. It includes tests of orientation, attention, memory, language and visual spatial skills, which are rated with a given number of points assigned to each level or ranking. The lower the score, the more important the mental deficit. The total score range is from 0 to 30 (worst to best), with a positive mean change indicating an improvement (i.e. less mental deficit). Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168 and the mean change from baseline at each time point is reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 168

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Subscore for Questions 1a,1b and 1c at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168.

    The NIHSS was to be used to objectively quantify the impairment caused by the stroke.The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which score a specific ability between 0 (normal function) and 4 (high level of impairment).The minimum total score is 0 and maximum is 42. Only 8 of the NIHSS subscores were calculated for this study.

    Assessments were made at baseline (Day 0) and at each follow-up visit on Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. Mean NIHSS subscores for questions 1a (level of consciousness),1b (asking patient the month and their age), and 1c (asking to open and close eyes) were analysed using descriptive quantitative statistics at each visit and the mean change from baseline at each time point is reported. The range for the subscore for items 1a is 0 - 3, for 1b is 0 - 2 and for 1c is 0 - 2 (best to worst), with a negative mean change from baseline indicating an improvement.

    Measured: Up to Day 168

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2003
  3. Primary completionMar 2009
  4. Study completionMar 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
204 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00276380
Sponsor's protocol ID
A-38-00240-704
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
12 Jan 2006
Last updated
8 Jan 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing EGb761 and Acetylsalicylic acid in people with Stroke, Acute and Neurological Impairment, run by Ipsen at 10 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Poland, Russia, Czechia, Romania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Subjects With Modified Rankin Score of Less Than 3 at the End of Study Period. (time frame: Day 168). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in