AzTrials
AzTrials

Focal DystoniaPhase 4NCT00208091

Quantifying Musical Performance After Treatment With Myobloc in Musician's Dystonia

A Phase 4 study testing Botulinum toxin, type B in people with Focal Dystonia, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study uses a computerized method of musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) quantification of performance before and after treatment with botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc ®, Solstice Neurosciences). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 69 years
Conditions the study is for
Focal Dystonia
What is being tested?
Botulinum toxin, type B
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2003to May 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Focal, task-specific dystonia clinically determined to be the result of a high level of musical skill and intensive performance history

Who cannot join

  • Neurological disorders other than dystonia
  • Patients who are clinically depressed, demented or otherwise unable to perform appropriately or sit through 1 hour of testing
  • Patients who have undergone pallidotomy, thalamotomy or deep brain stimulator implantations
  • Patients who have who recently have taken medications with extrapyramidal or tremorogenic side effects

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Neurological Institute, 710 W. 168th Street, NI-1112

    New York, New York, 10032

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Open Label Evaluation of MIDI to Quantify Performance Change in Subjects With Musician's Dystonia After Treatment With Botulinum Toxin Type B (Myobloc ®).

This study uses a computerized method of musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) quantification of performance before and after treatment with botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc ®, Solstice Neurosciences). Myobloc is a purified and diluted form of botulinum toxin used medically to relax unwanted muscle spasms and movements. The aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of quantifying change in performance following treatment.

Read the detailed description

Dystonia represents a group of clinical disorders characterized by various combinations of sustained involuntary muscle contractions, abnormal postures and movements, tremors and pain. Dystonia can occur at rest but is more likely to appear during voluntary activity.

Focal dystonia affects one body area and includes blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, spasmodic dysphonia, torticollis, and limb dystonia. Focal dystonia typically presents as task-specific muscle spasms or "occupational cramps" in which learned or repetitive motor tasks (such as writing or playing a musical instrument) trigger muscle spasms and interfere with performance while other actions remain normal. Writer's cramp is the most common form of idiopathic limb dystonia [1-3] where involuntary muscle activity and abnormal postures affect the arms and hands, but virtually any part of the body may be affected, even the lips when playing a woodwind or brass instrument [4]. Patients may develop two focal dystonias but rarely does focal dystonia progress to more generalized forms.

As originally defined by Oppenheim [5], dystonia refers to the slow, sustained, writhing, contorting movements of dystonia musculorum deformans. Dystonic movements, however, are often rapid [6] and this can be a cause for misdiagnosis. Electromyography (EMG) may be helpful in corroborating dystonia, but is not essential for diagnostic purposes. Nerve conduction studies, short and long loop reflexes and analysis of motor units are normal [7, 8]. Ballistic movements, which are normally tri-phasic in pattern with alternating agonist-antagonist bursts, may show disrupted patterns with co-contraction of agonist and antagonist muscles and excessively long EMG bursts in dystonia [3].

Dystonic spasms are intriguing in that they may be suppressed (or triggered) by sensory input such as postural change, tactile stimuli, alternative movements or even thought processes [9]. Studies are revealing that the involuntary muscle spasms may be due, at least in part, to abnormal sensory processing of spindle afferent information [10-12]. This may help explain the nature of these sensory "tricks" as well as why the effect of treatment using botulinum toxin usually outlasts the weakness it creates.

Though the pathophysiology of musicians' dystonia has yet to be determined fully, the motor learning associated with playing a musical instrument probably results in both functional and structural changes in the brain [13]. This plastic reorganization, including the rapid unmasking of existing neural circuitry and the establishment of new connections, is probably fundamental to the accomplishment of skillful playing, but also may result in focal, task-specific dystonia. When musicians get dystonia, their playing abilities can become severely compromised, to the point where they may not be able to perform professionally, and possibly not even teach. While botulinum toxin injections can be highly successful in allowing musicians to perform again, there are no objective methods to evaluate improvement.

Subtle dystonic abnormalities in motor control, therefore, particularly when they involve the arms, are difficult to ascertain with a high level of certainty. There are no truly objective measures of arm dystonia, and this is problematic because arm involvement can present so mildly as to go unnoticed by the examiner [14]. Furthermore, patients may not complain of mild finger or thumb cramping, arm twisting or shoulder elevation that could signify the presence of dystonia.

Clinical rating scales, even those that have been validated, do not detect subtle motor dysfunction or small changes after treatment [15] and certainly cannot determine improvement in musical performance. Metabolic imaging studies using positron emission tomography (PET) studies are emerging as helpful ancillary tests, but these are invasive and expensive. Furthermore, while PET studies have implicated that primary dystonia may be associated with relative hypermetabolism in the putamen [16], there have been conflicting reports [17]. Another major difficulty in the study of musician's dystonias has been lack of objective, quantifiable methods to assess degrees of dystonia severity or measure of treatment effects. Subjective and objective clinical rating scales with varying degrees of sophistication. Some subjective methods that have been used include subjective quantification usually using percentage improvement, also different various subjective rating scales using surveys.

This study tests a novel method devised for quantifying change in musical performance based on musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) data that will be able to directly rate or score changes in musical output. MIDI data include information on the note played, the time of onset, note duration, and note loudness. Note duration and loudness will be used in this study. It will be a quantitative, objective computerized evaluation that compares the patients' fine motor skills before and after treatment with Myobloc ®. It will be one of the first quantitative analyses of musical ability of its kind and could significantly impact the way musicians determine the efficacy of botulinum toxin treatment.

REFERENCES

  1. Nutt JG, Muenter MD, Melton LJ, Aronson A, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of dystonia in Rochester, Minnesota. Adv Neurol 1988; 50: 361-5.
  2. Sheehy MP, Marsden CD. Writers' cramp - a focal dystonia. Brain 1982; 105: 461-480.
  3. Cohen LG, Hallett M. Hand cramps: clinical features and electromyographic patterns in a focal dystonia. Neurology 1988; 38: 1005-1012.
  4. Frucht S, Fahn S, Ford B. French horn embouchure dystonia. Mov Disord 1999; 14: 171-3.
  5. Oppenheim H. Uber eine eigenartige Krampfkrankheit des kindlichen und jungendichen Alters (dysbasia lordotica progressiva, dystonia musculorum deformans). Neurologie Centralblatt 1911; 30: 1090-1107.
  6. Fahn S. Concept and classification of dystonia. In Fahn, S, Marsden, CD, Caln, DB, ed. Advances in Neurology: Dystonia 2. New York: Raven Press, 1988: 1-8.
  7. Rothwell JC, Obeso JA, Day BL, Marsden CD. Pathophysiology of dystonias. In Desmedt, JE, ed. Advances in Neurology: Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease. New York: Raven Press, 1983: 851-863.
  8. Marsden CD, Rothwell JC. The physiology of idiopathic dystonia. Can J Neurol Sci 1987; 14: 521-527.
  9. Greene PE, Bressman S. Exteroceptive and interoceptive stimuli in dystonia. Mov Disord 1998; 13: 549-51.
  10. Tempel L, Perlmutter J. Abnormal vibration-induced cerebral blood flow responses in idiopathic dystonia. Brain 1990; 113: 691-707.
  11. Kaji R, Rothwell JC, Katayama M, Tomoko I, Kubori T, Kohara N, Mezaki T, Shibasaki H, Kimura J. Tonic vibration reflex and muscle afferent block in writer's cramp. Ann Neurol 1995; 38: 155-162.
  12. Koelman JHTM, Willemse RB, Bour LJ, Hilgevoord AAJ, Speelman JD, Ongerboer de Visser BW. Soleus H-reflex tests in dystonia. Mov Disord 1995; 10: 44-50.
  13. Pascual-Leone A. The brain that plays music and is changed by it. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001; 930: 315-29.
  14. Bressman SB, de Leon D, Kramer PL, Ozelius LJ, Brin MF, Greene PE, Fahn S, Breakefield XO, Risch NJ. Dystonia in Ashkenazi Jews: Clinical characterization of a founder mutation. Ann Neurol 1994; 36: 771-777.
  15. Burke RE, Fahn S, Marsden CD, Bressman SB, Moskowitz C, Friedman J. Validity and reliability of a rating scale for the primary torsion dystonias. Neurology 1985; 35: 73-77.
  16. Eidelberg D, Moeller JR, Ishikawa T, Dhawan V, Spetsieris P, Przedborski S, Fahn S. The metabolic topography of idiopathic torsion dystonia. Brain 1995; 118: 1473-1484.
  17. Karbe H, Holthoff VA, Rudolf J, Herholz K, Heiss WD. Positron emission tomography demonstrates frontal cortex and basal ganglia hypometabolism in dystonia. Neurology 1992; 42: 1540-1544.
  18. Pullman SL. Limb dystonia: Use of botulinum toxin. In Jankovic, J, Hallett, M, ed. Therapeutic Use of Botulinum Toxin. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994: 307-321.
  19. Medical Research Council Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System; Crown: London, 1976.
  20. Pullman SL, Greene P, Fahn S, Pedersen SF. Approach to the treatment of limb disorders with botulinum toxin A. Experience with 187 patients. Arch Neurol 1996; 53: 617-24.
  21. Cohen LG, Hallett M, Geller BD, Hochberg F. Treatment of focal dystonias of the hand with botulinum toxin injections. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52: 355-363.
  22. Trosch RM, Pullman SL. Botulinum toxin A injections for the treatment of hand tremors. Mov Disord 1994; 9: 601-9.
Conditions
Focal Dystonia
Being tested
Botulinum toxin, type B
Keywords
Myloboc, Botulinum Toxin Type B, Focal Dystonia, Musicians, Muscle Relaxants, Motor Impairments, Motor Performance, Tremor, Abnormal Postures
Medical subject headings
Dystonic Disorders, Muscle Hypotonia, Tremor

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Botulinum toxin, type BDrug

    Also called Myobloc

    Diluted botulinum toxin (500 Units/0.1 ml) is injected to the affected muscle(s) through a hollow core needle using electromyographic guidance. Dosage according to muscle(s) and symptom severity. Injection occurs at first visit only, after neurological evaluation.

Study groups in NCT00208091
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Botulinum toxin, type BExperimentalDiluted botulinum toxin (500 Units/0.1 ml) is injected to the affected muscle(s) through a hollow core needle using electromyographic guidance. Dosage according to muscle(s) and symptom severity. Injection occurs at first visit only, after neurological evaluation.
Receives: Drug: Botulinum toxin, type B

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Note Errors (Related to Errors in Duration)

    Note errors (related to errors in duration in msec) were obtained as measures of difference between the affected and unaffected hands--taking the musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) note output from four musical sequences of 8 to 16 notes played. It was calculated by averaging the sequences for each hand, and deriving the square root of the mean of the square of the differences (root mean square error, in msec) in MIDI.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks post-injection

  2. Note Errors (Related to Errors in Loudness)

    Note errors (related to errors in loudness) were obtained as a measure of difference between the affected and unaffected hands--taking the musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) note loudness data (decibels) from four musical sequences of 8 to 16 notes. It was calculated by averaging sequences for each hand and taking the square root of the mean of the square of the differences (root mean square error, in decibels) in MIDI notes.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks post-injection

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Subjective Assessment Ratings of Change

    Each subject assessed his or her music playing performance change subjectively from -100 percent (fully worse) to 100 percent (fully better).

    Measured: Baseline to 6 weeks after injection

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2003
  3. Primary completionMay 2008
  4. Study completionMay 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00208091
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAB2808
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
13 Sep 2005
Last updated
9 May 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Botulinum toxin, type B in people with Focal Dystonia, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Note Errors (Related to Errors in Duration) (time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-injection). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in