AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT00175032

A Comparison of Safety and Treatment in Subjects With Osteoarthritis Taking Low Dose Aspirin

A Phase 3 study testing Lansoprazole and naproxen and aspirin and Celecoxib and aspirin in people with Osteoarthritis and Peptic Ulcer, run by Takeda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the gastroduodenal ulceration rate, gastrointestinal complication rate and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated dyspepsia between lansoprazole, naproxen and celecoxib, taken once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), in participants with osteoarthritis taking low dose… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis, Peptic Ulcer
What is being tested?
Lansoprazole and naproxen and aspirin and Celecoxib and aspirin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,045 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2003to Jul 2004
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must require the chronic use of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for the treatment of osteoarthritis.
  • Must be taking daily aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis.
  • Clinical Laboratory values within normal limits for this population

Who cannot join

  • History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer.
  • Evidence of uncontrolled, clinically significant disease.
  • History of cancer within the past 5 years.
  • Presence of gastroduodenal ulcers, esophageal ulcer or >= 10 gastroduodenal erosions during the screening endoscopy. Known history of gastroduodenal ulcer or bleeding within the past year. Esophageal stricture requiring dilatation.
  • Presence of Barrett's esophagus with dysplastic changes.
  • Systemic disease affecting the esophagus or a history of caustic or physiochemical trauma or irradiation to the esophagus.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Sero-tests positive for H. pylori.
  • Evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, esophageal varices, cholecystitis, or pancreaticobiliary tract disease.
  • Requires treatment with an excluded medication such as proton pump inhibitors, histamine H2 receptor antagonists, antacids, corticosteroids, lithium, fluconazole, misoprostol, probenecid, methotrexate, anticoagulants, St. John's wart, dong quai, feverfew, garlic, ginger, horse chestnut, red clover or white willow supplements or bisphosphonates.

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lansoprazole 30 mg QD and Naproxen 500 mg BID Versus Celecoxib 200 mg QD in Risk Reduction of Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory-Associated Ulcers in Osteoarthritis Subjects Taking Low Dose Aspirin

The purpose of this study is to compare the gastroduodenal ulceration rate, gastrointestinal complication rate and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated dyspepsia between lansoprazole, naproxen and celecoxib, taken once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), in participants with osteoarthritis taking low dose aspirin.

Read the detailed description

This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of reducing the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers between lansoprazole 30mg QD + naproxen 500mg BID vs celecoxib 200mg QD in subjects with osteoarthritis taking low dose aspirin. Approximately 100 sites across the U.S. will enroll subjects with normal endoscopic findings and negative H.pylori. The duration of the study will be a maximum of 14 weeks including a screening period of up to 2 weeks and a 12 week treatment period. Gelusil will be provided for dyspepsia symptom rescue.

Being tested
Lansoprazole and naproxen and aspirin, Celecoxib and aspirin
Keywords
Low dose aspirin, Peptic Ulcer, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, NSAIDs
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Peptic Ulcer, Stomach Ulcer, Duodenal Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lansoprazole and naproxen and aspirinDrug

    Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally once daily; Naproxen 500 mg, capsules, orally, twice daily; and aspirin 81 mg or 325 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks.

  • Celecoxib and aspirinDrug

    Celecoxib 200 mg, capsules, orally once daily and aspirin 81 mg or 325 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks.

Study groups in NCT00175032
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lansoprazole 30 mg QD + Naproxen 500 mg BIDExperimental(and added aspirin)
Receives: Drug: Lansoprazole and naproxen and aspirin
Celecoxib 200 mg QDActive comparator(and added aspirin)
Receives: Drug: Celecoxib and aspirin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Gastroduodenal ulcers at final visit

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Proportion of subjects with GI complications (GI bleeding, perforation and gastric outlet obstruction)

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Severity of each dyspepsia symptom (abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, heartburn, fullness, and belching) and combined dyspepsia scores.

    Measured: Weeks 4,8, and 12

  3. Proportion of subjects with dyspepsia at weeks 4, 8, and 12 that did not have dyspepsia at baseline.

    Measured: Weeks 4,8, and 12

  4. Proportion of subjects without dyspepsia at weeks 4, 8, and 12 who had dyspepsia at baseline.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  5. Scores of each SODA scale (pain intensity, non-pain symptoms, and satisfaction) for subjects with dyspepsia.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  6. The change from baseline SODA scale for subjects with dyspepsia at baseline.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2003
  3. Primary completionJul 2004
  4. Study completionJul 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,045 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00175032
Sponsor's protocol ID
LAN-0003-0041
Other IDs
U1111-1114-2275
Status last verified
Jul 2010
First submitted
12 Sep 2005
Last updated
22 Jul 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Goldstein JL, Cryer B, Amer F, Hunt B. Celecoxib plus aspirin versus naproxen and lansoprazole plus aspirin: a randomized, double-blind, endoscopic trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;5(10):1167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.06.009.

    PubMed 17916545

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Lansoprazole and naproxen and aspirin and Celecoxib and aspirin in people with Osteoarthritis and Peptic Ulcer, run by Takeda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Gastroduodenal ulcers at final visit (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00175032, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in