Spinal FusionNCT00152165
Use of Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) Following Spinal Fusion Versus the DYNESYS Stabilization System
An observational study of Spinal Fusion and Orthopedic Procedures, run by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Twelve subjects will be sought for this study. Six subjects will receive the DYNESYS system and six subjects will receive a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with the Silhouette device. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Fusion, Orthopedic Procedures
- What is being tested?
- Radiostereometric Analysis beads inserted during surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2003to not given
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing spinal fusion
- Patients undergoing spinal surgery with DYNESYS Stabilization System
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Institute for Human Performance
Syracuse, New York, 13202
About this study
Official title: A Biomechanical Assessment of the DYNESYS Stabilization System Using Radiostereometric Analysis
Twelve subjects will be sought for this study. Six subjects will receive the DYNESYS system and six subjects will receive a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with the Silhouette device. All subjects will already be participating in the DYNESYS multi-center study (under IRB #4884) and will have been randomized to either group. Five tantalum beads will be inserted into each vertebra associated with the DYNESYS or fusion surgery. Subjects will be followed in conjunction with the multi-center follow-up schedule and will have RSA exams at the following time points after surgery: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Standing neutral, flexion, extension, and lateral bending films will be collected at each time point and the amount of motion in each direction of the "marked" vertebrae will be measured. The time points have been selected based on their clinical relevance for comparison against the standard of care, which is the fusion procedure. Depending on the initial tension of the annular fibers, it is possible the DYNESYS will exhibit more motion with time. The time points are important to track the potential changes.
Read the detailed description
The amount of motion of the vertebrae following spinal surgery is important in determining the success of a procedure. Assessment of spinal motion has been, and continues to be, a difficult clinical problem. Errors of up to 10 degrees for simple measurements of flexion, extension, and side bending have been recorded using conventional radiographs. It has therefore been difficult to accurately measure changes in spinal motion using conventional radiographs.
Radiostereometric Analysis, or RSA, is an accurate in vivo measurement technique using two simultaneous radiographs for examining spinal motion. The measurement accuracy offered by this technique far exceeds the manual techniques currently used. In addition to improved accuracy, it provides more information on spinal motion in comparison to conventional radiographs. Utilization of the RSA technology at the IHP and the United States is in its infancy. The investigators have placed much effort over the past 1-2 years to put the necessary dedicated resources and personnel in place. This has been a collaborative effort between the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and the Imaging Core at IHP. Preliminary work on the accuracy, reliability, and surgical planning for use of RSA has been completed and presented at national conferences.
The purpose of this study is to assess the amount of motion in the lumbar spine in patients with a dynamic stabilization system, DYNESYS. Currently the DYNESYS is under investigation as part of a multi-center clinical trial (IRB # 4884). The DYNESYS system is designed to allow for some motion in the spine while providing the necessary stability to the spinal segment. The amount and degree of this motion is currently unknown. By using tantalum bead markers placed in the spine at the time of the surgery, RSA analysis can determine the amount of motion the DYNESYS system provides. Normal spinal motion of the lower spine is approximately 18 and 12 degrees for flexion/extension and lateral bending, respectively. Lumbar interbody fusion, which is the current standard surgical procedure, results in 5 degrees or less of spinal motion. Since the DYNESYS provides dynamic stabilization, it is estimated that there will be a 20% loss of motion with the DYNESYS in comparison to normal motion. Two questions will be examined in this study: 1) what is the amount of flexion/extension and lateral bending motion that occurs in the spine with a dynamic stabilization system in relation to a lumbar interbody fusion procedure? and 2) will the amount of motion change during the time frame of the study?
This study will involve 12 patients (6 with DYNESYS and 6 with posterior lumbar interbody fusion, PLIF) here at SUNY Upstate Medical University. Any subject who is part of the DYNESYS multi-center clinical trial (IRB # 4884) will be approached to participate in this RSA study. The subjects will already have been randomly assigned to the fusion group or the DYNESYS group. The RSA study is a single center, non-randomized design. All 12 subjects will have 10-15 tantalum markers placed in their spine at the time of their DYNESYS or fusion surgery. After surgery, subjects will have the special x-rays taken and the RSA analysis will be completed. Subjects will be seen at the following time points after surgery: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
- Conditions
- Spinal Fusion, Orthopedic Procedures
- Being tested
- Radiostereometric Analysis beads inserted during surgery
- Keywords
- spinal motion, tantalum beads, DYNESYS Stabilization system, spinal fusion, Radiostereometric Analysis following spinal fusion, Radiostereometric Analysis following surgery with DYNESYS Stabilization System
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radiostereometric Analysis beads inserted during surgeryProcedure or surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal FusionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 12 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Zimmer Biomet
- Investigators
- Nathaniel Ordway, MS, PE, Principal investigator, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00152165
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SUNY UMU IRB# 4895
- Status last verified
- Dec 2008
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2008
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Biomechanical Assessment of the DYNESYS Stabilization System Using Radiostereometric Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00152165
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUNY UMU IRB# 4895
- Conditions
- Spinal Fusion, Orthopedic Procedures
- Keywords
- spinal motion, tantalum beads, DYNESYS Stabilization system, spinal fusion, Radiostereometric Analysis following spinal fusion, Radiostereometric Analysis following surgery with DYNESYS Stabilization System
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants
- Lead sponsor
- State University of New York - Upstate Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Zimmer Biomet
- Study start
- Nov 2003
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Twelve subjects will be sought for this study. Six subjects will receive the DYNESYS system and six subjects will receive a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with the Silhouette device. All subjects will already be participating in the DYNESYS multi-center study (under IRB #4884) and will have been randomized to either group. Five tantalum beads will be inserted into each vertebra associated with the DYNESYS or fusion surgery. Subjects will be followed in conjunction with the multi-center follow-up schedule and will have RSA exams at the following time points after surgery: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Standing neutral, flexion, extension, and lateral bending films will be collected at each time point and the amount of motion in each direction of the "marked" vertebrae will be measured. The time points have been selected based on their clinical relevance for comparison against the standard of care, which is the fusion procedure. Depending on the initial tension of the annular fibers, it is possible the DYNESYS will exhibit more motion with time. The time points are important to track the potential changes.
Detailed description
The amount of motion of the vertebrae following spinal surgery is important in determining the success of a procedure. Assessment of spinal motion has been, and continues to be, a difficult clinical problem. Errors of up to 10 degrees for simple measurements of flexion, extension, and side bending have been recorded using conventional radiographs. It has therefore been difficult to accurately measure changes in spinal motion using conventional radiographs.
Radiostereometric Analysis, or RSA, is an accurate in vivo measurement technique using two simultaneous radiographs for examining spinal motion. The measurement accuracy offered by this technique far exceeds the manual techniques currently used. In addition to improved accuracy, it provides more information on spinal motion in comparison to conventional radiographs. Utilization of the RSA technology at the IHP and the United States is in its infancy. The investigators have placed much effort over the past 1-2 years to put the necessary dedicated resources and personnel in place. This has been a collaborative effort between the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and the Imaging Core at IHP. Preliminary work on the accuracy, reliability, and surgical planning for use of RSA has been completed and presented at national conferences.
The purpose of this study is to assess the amount of motion in the lumbar spine in patients with a dynamic stabilization system, DYNESYS. Currently the DYNESYS is under investigation as part of a multi-center clinical trial (IRB # 4884). The DYNESYS system is designed to allow for some motion in the spine while providing the necessary stability to the spinal segment. The amount and degree of this motion is currently unknown. By using tantalum bead markers placed in the spine at the time of the surgery, RSA analysis can determine the amount of motion the DYNESYS system provides. Normal spinal motion of the lower spine is approximately 18 and 12 degrees for flexion/extension and lateral bending, respectively. Lumbar interbody fusion, which is the current standard surgical procedure, results in 5 degrees or less of spinal motion. Since the DYNESYS provides dynamic stabilization, it is estimated that there will be a 20% loss of motion with the DYNESYS in comparison to normal motion. Two questions will be examined in this study: 1) what is the amount of flexion/extension and lateral bending motion that occurs in the spine with a dynamic stabilization system in relation to a lumbar interbody fusion procedure? and 2) will the amount of motion change during the time frame of the study?
This study will involve 12 patients (6 with DYNESYS and 6 with posterior lumbar interbody fusion, PLIF) here at SUNY Upstate Medical University. Any subject who is part of the DYNESYS multi-center clinical trial (IRB # 4884) will be approached to participate in this RSA study. The subjects will already have been randomly assigned to the fusion group or the DYNESYS group. The RSA study is a single center, non-randomized design. All 12 subjects will have 10-15 tantalum markers placed in their spine at the time of their DYNESYS or fusion surgery. After surgery, subjects will have the special x-rays taken and the RSA analysis will be completed. Subjects will be seen at the following time points after surgery: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients undergoing spinal fusion
- Patients undergoing spinal surgery with DYNESYS Stabilization System
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnant women
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiostereometric Analysis beads inserted during surgery | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2008.
Related trials for Spinal Fusion
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Post-Market Clinical Study of Functional Motion Outcomes in Subjects Treated With the Minuteman Device
Degenerative Conditions of the Lumbar Spine, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
Lumbar & Sacroiliac Fusion Study Involving Previously Implanted Devices
Fusion of Spine, Sacroiliac; Fusion
Active, not recruiting
Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers Mixed With Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
Degenerative Disc Disease, Spine Fusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nathaniel Ordway, MS, PE principal investigator
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Spinal Fusion and Orthopedic Procedures, run by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2008.