Colorectal SurgeryPhase 3NCT00090272
A Single Dose of a Marketed Drug Being Studied for a New Indication to Treat Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Surgery as Compared to a Marketed Drug Approved for This Indication (0826-039)
A Phase 3 study testing MK0826, ertapenem sodium and Comparator: cefotetan in people with Colorectal Surgery, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a one time dose of an intravenous marketed drug being evaluated for a new indication as compared to a marketed drug already approved for the prevention of surgical site infection following colorectal surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Surgery
- What is being tested?
- MK0826, ertapenem sodium and Comparator: cefotetan
- How many people
- 952 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2002to Mar 2005
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients 18 years of age scheduled to undergo elective colon or colorectal surgery by laparotomy must meet the following criteria:
- Surgery must be scheduled in advance.
- There must be adequate time to complete preoperative bowel preparation
Who cannot join
None listed.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of a Single Dose of Ertapenem Sodium (MK0826) Versus Cefotetan for the Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Colorectal Surgery
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a one time dose of an intravenous marketed drug being evaluated for a new indication as compared to a marketed drug already approved for the prevention of surgical site infection following colorectal surgery.
Read the detailed description
The duration of treatment is 1 day.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Surgery
- Being tested
- MK0826, ertapenem sodium, Comparator: cefotetan
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MK0826, ertapenem sodiumDrug
Comparator: cefotetanDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Surgical site infection following elective colorectal surgery based on surgical site assessment.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Microbiology of surgical site infection in pts who fail prevention or have distant site infection; Safety profile based on AE monitoring and lab results.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2004 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2002
- Primary completionMar 2005
- Study completionMar 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 952 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Monitor, Study director, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00090272
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0826-039
- Other IDs
- 2004_010
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 25 Aug 2004
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA. Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2640-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054408.
PubMed 17182989Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Merriam CV, Abramson MA. Infection after elective colorectal surgery: bacteriological analysis of failures in a randomized trial of cefotetan vs. ertapenem prophylaxis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009 Apr;10(2):111-8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.096.
PubMed 19226203Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2007 Feb;193(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.024.
PubMed 17236845Itani KM, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Tomassini JE, Abramson MA. Effect of body mass index and ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis on surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;9(2):131-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.034.
PubMed 18426345
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of a Single Dose of Ertapenem Sodium (MK0826) Versus Cefotetan for the Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Colorectal Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00090272
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0826-039
- Conditions
- Colorectal Surgery
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 952 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2002
- Primary completion
- Mar 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a one time dose of an intravenous marketed drug being evaluated for a new indication as compared to a marketed drug already approved for the prevention of surgical site infection following colorectal surgery.
Detailed description
The duration of treatment is 1 day.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or female patients 18 years of age scheduled to undergo elective colon or colorectal surgery by laparotomy must meet the following criteria:
- Surgery must be scheduled in advance.
- There must be adequate time to complete preoperative bowel preparation
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MK0826, ertapenem sodium | Drug | – |
| Comparator: cefotetan | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Surgical site infection following elective colorectal surgery based on surgical site assessment.
1 secondary outcome
Microbiology of surgical site infection in pts who fail prevention or have distant site infection; Safety profile based on AE monitoring and lab results.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2017.
- Background: PubMed 17182989Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA. Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2640-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054408.
- Background: PubMed 19226203Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Merriam CV, Abramson MA. Infection after elective colorectal surgery: bacteriological analysis of failures in a randomized trial of cefotetan vs. ertapenem prophylaxis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009 Apr;10(2):111-8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.096.
- Background: PubMed 17236845Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2007 Feb;193(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.024.
- Background: PubMed 18426345Itani KM, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Tomassini JE, Abramson MA. Effect of body mass index and ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis on surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;9(2):131-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.034.
Related trials for Colorectal Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Tailored Nutrition vs. Exercise Prehabilitation Before Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
Nurse-Led Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of Total Ablative Therapy to Usual Systemic Therapy Treatment for Limited Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, ERASur Trial
Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma, Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Monitor study director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing MK0826, ertapenem sodium and Comparator: cefotetan in people with Colorectal Surgery, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Surgical site infection following elective colorectal surgery based on surgical site assessment.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00090272, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2017.