Breast CancerPhase 315-95NCT00002784
High-Dose Combination Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women With High-Risk Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, CMF regimen and cyclophosphamide in people with Breast Cancer, run by ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation at 11 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- filgrastim, CMF regimen and cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 344 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 1996to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven breast carcinoma in one of the following categories: 10 or more involved axillary nodes 5 or more involved axillary nodes and either: Primary tumor estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (less than 10 femtomoles per milligram of cytosol protein) T3 tumor (regardless of ER status) Total mastectomy or breast-conserving procedure (lumpectomy or quadrantectomy) required within 6 weeks prior to randomization Tumor confined to breast and axillary nodes (T1a-c, T2, or T3, N1-2, M0 by the UICC staging system) The following conditions exclude entry: Satellite skin nodules distant from the primary tumor Supraclavicular node involvement Inoperable, matted axillary nodes Fixation of primary tumor to chest wall (excluding pectoralis major) Bilateral breast cancer (any mass in opposite breast unless biopsy-proven benign) Hot spots on bone scintigram (unless confirmed to be benign) Skeletal pain of unknown cause Hormone receptor status: ER status determination preferred, but not required
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 16-65 Sex: Women only Menopausal status: Any status Performance status: ECOG 0-2 Hematopoietic: WBC at least 4,000 Platelets at least 100,000 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.1 mg/dL (20 micromoles/L) AST no greater than twice normal Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.3 mg/dL (120 micromoles/L) Cardiovascular: Left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 50% by MUGA Other: No second malignancy except: Basal cell carcinoma Adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix No significant nonmalignant disease that would preclude participation No psychiatric or addictive disorder that would compromise informed consent or participation No pregnant or nursing women Adequate contraception strongly advised for fertile women
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior therapy for breast cancer other than surgery (see Disease Characteristics)
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 2 countries.
11 sites in 2 countries
Switzerland6 sites
Swiss Institute for Applied Cancer Research
Bern, CH-3008
Inselspital, Bern
Bern, CH-3010
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, CH-1011
Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana
Lugano, CH-6900
Kantonsspital - Saint Gallen
Sankt Gallen, CH-9007
Universitaetsspital
Zurich, CH-8091
Australia5 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5011
Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hospital
Newcastle, New South Wales, NSW 2310
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney
Sydney, New South Wales, 2050
About this study
Official title: Randomized Trial of High-dose Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide x 3 Supported by Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells Versus Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide x 4 Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil x 3 as Adjuvant Treatment for High Risk Operable Stage ii and Stage Iii Breast Cancer in Premenopausal and Young Postmenopausal (Less Than or Equal to 65 Yrs) Patients.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known if high-dose combination chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard combination chemotherapy for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare high-dose combination chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation with standard combination chemotherapy in treating women with stage II or stage III breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the survival, disease-free survival, and systemic disease-free survival of women with high-risk, operable stage II/III breast cancer treated with three courses of dose-intensive epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells vs. standard EC followed by cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil. II. Compare the toxicity, duration of quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity, and quality of life associated with these two treatments. III. Evaluate the cost effectiveness of these two treatments.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by estrogen receptor status and menopausal status. Within 6 weeks of surgery, patients in the first group receive epirubicin (preferred) or doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks for 4 courses followed by conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) every 4 weeks for 3 courses. Patients in the second group undergo stem cell mobilization and harvest with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) followed within 10 weeks of surgery by high-dose chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by peripheral blood stem cell rescue and G-CSF. All patients receive adjuvant tamoxifen, and patients who underwent lumpectomy prior to entry are required to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (radiotherapy is optional for patients who underwent mastectomy prior to entry). Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then q 6 months for 3 years, then yearly.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 210 patients will be accrued over 4 years to provide 195 evaluable patients.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- filgrastim, CMF regimen, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, epirubicin hydrochloride
- Keywords
- stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filgrastimBiological
Filgrastim 10 mg/kg/d sc for 6 days after randomization.
CMF regimenDrug
Cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 - 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 8, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 8. Repeat every 28 days.
cyclophosphamideDrug
For high-dose EC arm: cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m2 iv as 4 divided doses. For standard chemotherapy arm: cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 iv day 1 of 21-day EC cycles, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14 of 28-day CMF cycles.
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 iv on day 1 of 21-day cycles of AC.
epirubicin hydrochlorideDrug
Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 iv on day 1 of 21-day cycles of EC.
fluorouracilDrug
5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 8 of 28-day cycles of CMF.
mesnaDrug
MESNA (7.2 gm/m2) on days 2 and 3 of 21-day cycles of dose-intensive EC.
methotrexateDrug
Methotrexate 40 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 8 of 28-day cycles of CMF.
tamoxifen citrateDrug
Tamoxifen 20mg daily for 5 years or until relapse.
peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) infusion on day 5 of each 21-day cycle of dose-intensive EC.
low-LET electron therapyRadiation
Radiation therapy to the conserved breast is mandatory, to be carried out according to the prospectively defined guidelines of each participating institution; either after all chemotherapy or integrated into CMF as agreed per institution. Radiotherapy to the chest wall following mastectomy is optional according to the prospectively defined guidelines of each participating institution.
low-LET photon therapyRadiation
radiation therapy to the conserved breast is mandatory, to be carried out according to the prospectively defined guidelines of each participating institution; either after all chemotherapy or integrated into CMF as agreed per institution. Radiotherapy to the chest wall following mastectomy is optional according to the prospectively defined guidelines of each participating institution.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard chemotherapy | Active comparator | EC/AC x 4 followed by CMF x 3 and tamoxifen to 5 years after randomization. Receives: Drug: CMF regimen; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride; Drug: fluorouracil; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: tamoxifen citrate; Radiation: low-LET electron therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy |
| Dose-intensive EC | Experimental | High-dose EC x 3 supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells and tamoxifen to 5 years after randomization. Receives: Biological: filgrastim; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: mesna; Drug: tamoxifen citrate; Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; Radiation: low-LET electron therapy; Radiation: low-LET photon therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease-free survival.
Time from randomization to recurrence (including recurrence isolated to the breast), metastasis, appearance of a second primary tumor, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: 16 years after randomization.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall survival.
Time from randomization to death from any cause.
Measured: 16 years after randomization.
Toxicity.
Morbidity information was recorded using standard toxicity criteria.
Measured: 5 years after randomization.
Quality of life.
Quality of life was assessed using standard International Breast Cancer Study Group instruments.
Measured: 16 years after randomization.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2004 (estimated)
- Study startJun 1996
- Primary completionAug 2011
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 344 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Russell Basser, MD, Study chair, Melbourne Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002784
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000064834
- Other IDs
- IBCSG-15-95, EU-96021
- Acronym
- 15-95
- Status last verified
- Jul 2012
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 4 Apr 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Pestalozzi BC, Zahrieh D, Mallon E, Gusterson BA, Price KN, Gelber RD, Holmberg SB, Lindtner J, Snyder R, Thurlimann B, Murray E, Viale G, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A; International Breast Cancer Study Group. Distinct clinical and prognostic features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: combined results of 15 International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):3006-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9336. Epub 2008 May 5.
PubMed 18458044Keshaviah A, Dellapasqua S, Rotmensz N, Lindtner J, Crivellari D, Collins J, Colleoni M, Thurlimann B, Mendiola C, Aebi S, Price KN, Pagani O, Simoncini E, Castiglione Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A. CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase as predictors for breast cancer recurrence: a combined analysis of seven International Breast Cancer Study Group trials. Ann Oncol. 2007 Apr;18(4):701-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl492. Epub 2007 Jan 20.
PubMed 17237474Colleoni M, Sun Z, Martinelli G, Basser RL, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Green MD, Peccatori F, Cinieri S, Aebi S, Viale G, Price KN, Goldhirsch A; International Breast Cancer Study Group. The effect of endocrine responsiveness on high-risk breast cancer treated with dose-intensive chemotherapy: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95 after prolonged follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2009 Aug;20(8):1344-51. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp024. Epub 2009 May 25.
PubMed 19468030International Breast Cancer Study Group; Basser RL, O'Neill A, Martinelli G, Green MD, Peccatori F, Cinieri S, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Aebi S, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Viale G, Price KN, Goldhirsch A. Multicycle dose-intensive chemotherapy for women with high-risk primary breast cancer: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):370-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.5196.
PubMed 16421418Basser RL, Abraham R, To LB, Fox RM, Green MD. Cardiac effects of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with poor prognosis breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 1999 Jan;10(1):53-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1008390203340.
PubMed 10076722Basser RL, To LB, Collins JP, Begley CG, Keefe D, Cebon J, Bashford J, Durrant S, Szer J, Kotasek D, Juttner CA, Russell I, Maher DW, Olver I, Sheridan WP, Fox RM, Green MD. Multicycle high-dose chemotherapy and filgrastim-mobilized peripheral-blood progenitor cells in women with high-risk stage II or III breast cancer: five-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):82-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.82.
PubMed 10458221Basser RL, To LB, Begley CG, Juttner CA, Maher DW, Szer J, Cebon J, Collins JP, Russell I, Olver I, et al. Adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer using multicycle high-dose chemotherapy and filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1995 Jul;1(7):715-21.
PubMed 9816037
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Apr 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Trial of High-dose Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide x 3 Supported by Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells Versus Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide x 4 Followed by Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil x 3 as Adjuvant Treatment for High Risk Operable Stage ii and Stage Iii Breast Cancer in Premenopausal and Young Postmenopausal (Less Than or Equal to 65 Yrs) Patients.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002784
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15-95 / CDR0000064834
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 344 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ETOP IBCSG Partners FoundationResearch network
- Study start
- Jun 1996
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known if high-dose combination chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard combination chemotherapy for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare high-dose combination chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation with standard combination chemotherapy in treating women with stage II or stage III breast cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the survival, disease-free survival, and systemic disease-free survival of women with high-risk, operable stage II/III breast cancer treated with three courses of dose-intensive epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells vs. standard EC followed by cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil. II. Compare the toxicity, duration of quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity, and quality of life associated with these two treatments. III. Evaluate the cost effectiveness of these two treatments.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by estrogen receptor status and menopausal status. Within 6 weeks of surgery, patients in the first group receive epirubicin (preferred) or doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks for 4 courses followed by conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) every 4 weeks for 3 courses. Patients in the second group undergo stem cell mobilization and harvest with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) followed within 10 weeks of surgery by high-dose chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by peripheral blood stem cell rescue and G-CSF. All patients receive adjuvant tamoxifen, and patients who underwent lumpectomy prior to entry are required to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (radiotherapy is optional for patients who underwent mastectomy prior to entry). Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then q 6 months for 3 years, then yearly.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 210 patients will be accrued over 4 years to provide 195 evaluable patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard chemotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: CMF regimen, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride, Drug: fluorouracil, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: tamoxifen citrate, Radiation: low-LET electron therapy, Radiation: low-LET photon therapyEC/AC x 4 followed by CMF x 3 and tamoxifen to 5 years after randomization. |
| Dose-intensive EC | Experimental | Biological: filgrastim, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: mesna, Drug: tamoxifen citrate, Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, Radiation: low-LET electron therapy, Radiation: low-LET photon therapyHigh-dose EC x 3 supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells and tamoxifen to 5 years after randomization. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filgrastimFilgrastim 10 mg/kg/d sc for 6 days after randomization. | Biological | Dose-intensive EC |
| CMF regimenCyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 - 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 8, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 8. Repeat every 28 days. | Drug | Standard chemotherapy |
| cyclophosphamideFor high-dose EC arm: cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m2 iv as 4 divided doses. For standard chemotherapy arm: cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 iv day 1 of 21-day EC cycles, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14 of 28-day CMF cycles. | Drug | Dose-intensive EC, Standard chemotherapy |
| doxorubicin hydrochlorideDoxorubicin 60 mg/m2 iv on day 1 of 21-day cycles of AC. | Drug | Standard chemotherapy |
| epirubicin hydrochlorideEpirubicin 90 mg/m2 iv on day 1 of 21-day cycles of EC. | Drug | Standard chemotherapy |
| fluorouracil5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 8 of 28-day cycles of CMF. | Drug | Standard chemotherapy |
| mesnaMESNA (7.2 gm/m2) on days 2 and 3 of 21-day cycles of dose-intensive EC. | Drug | Dose-intensive EC |
| methotrexateMethotrexate 40 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 8 of 28-day cycles of CMF. | Drug | Standard chemotherapy |
| tamoxifen citrateTamoxifen 20mg daily for 5 years or until relapse. | Drug | Dose-intensive EC, Standard chemotherapy |
| peripheral blood stem cell transplantationPeripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) infusion on day 5 of each 21-day cycle of dose-intensive EC. | Procedure or surgery | Dose-intensive EC |
| low-LET electron therapyRadiation therapy to the conserved breast is mandatory, to be carried out according to the prospectively defined guidelines of each participating institution; either after all chemotherapy or integrated into CMF as agreed per institution. Radiotherapy to the chest wall following mastectomy is optional according to the prospectively defined guidelines of each participating institution. | Radiation | Dose-intensive EC, Standard chemotherapy |
| low-LET photon therapyradiation therapy to the conserved breast is mandatory, to be carried out according to the prospectively defined guidelines of each participating institution; either after all chemotherapy or integrated into CMF as agreed per institution. Radiotherapy to the chest wall following mastectomy is optional according to the prospectively defined guidelines of each participating institution. | Radiation | Dose-intensive EC, Standard chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Disease-free survival.
Time frame: 16 years after randomization.
Time from randomization to recurrence (including recurrence isolated to the breast), metastasis, appearance of a second primary tumor, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
3 secondary outcomes
Overall survival.
Time frame: 16 years after randomization.
Toxicity.
Time frame: 5 years after randomization.
Quality of life.
Time frame: 16 years after randomization.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Apr 2013.
- Background: PubMed 18458044Pestalozzi BC, Zahrieh D, Mallon E, Gusterson BA, Price KN, Gelber RD, Holmberg SB, Lindtner J, Snyder R, Thurlimann B, Murray E, Viale G, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A; International Breast Cancer Study Group. Distinct clinical and prognostic features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: combined results of 15 International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):3006-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9336. Epub 2008 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 17237474Keshaviah A, Dellapasqua S, Rotmensz N, Lindtner J, Crivellari D, Collins J, Colleoni M, Thurlimann B, Mendiola C, Aebi S, Price KN, Pagani O, Simoncini E, Castiglione Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A. CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase as predictors for breast cancer recurrence: a combined analysis of seven International Breast Cancer Study Group trials. Ann Oncol. 2007 Apr;18(4):701-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl492. Epub 2007 Jan 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 19468030Colleoni M, Sun Z, Martinelli G, Basser RL, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Green MD, Peccatori F, Cinieri S, Aebi S, Viale G, Price KN, Goldhirsch A; International Breast Cancer Study Group. The effect of endocrine responsiveness on high-risk breast cancer treated with dose-intensive chemotherapy: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95 after prolonged follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2009 Aug;20(8):1344-51. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp024. Epub 2009 May 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 16421418International Breast Cancer Study Group; Basser RL, O'Neill A, Martinelli G, Green MD, Peccatori F, Cinieri S, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Aebi S, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Viale G, Price KN, Goldhirsch A. Multicycle dose-intensive chemotherapy for women with high-risk primary breast cancer: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):370-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.5196.
- Results publication: PubMed 10076722Basser RL, Abraham R, To LB, Fox RM, Green MD. Cardiac effects of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with poor prognosis breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 1999 Jan;10(1):53-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1008390203340.
- Results publication: PubMed 10458221Basser RL, To LB, Collins JP, Begley CG, Keefe D, Cebon J, Bashford J, Durrant S, Szer J, Kotasek D, Juttner CA, Russell I, Maher DW, Olver I, Sheridan WP, Fox RM, Green MD. Multicycle high-dose chemotherapy and filgrastim-mobilized peripheral-blood progenitor cells in women with high-risk stage II or III breast cancer: five-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):82-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.82.
- Results publication: PubMed 9816037Basser RL, To LB, Begley CG, Juttner CA, Maher DW, Szer J, Cebon J, Collins JP, Russell I, Olver I, et al. Adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer using multicycle high-dose chemotherapy and filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1995 Jul;1(7):715-21.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tamoxifen Citrate or Z-Endoxifen Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Recurrent Breast Carcinoma, Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Effect of GDC-4198 Alone and in Combination With Giredestrant Versus Abemaciclib and Giredestrant in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Negative (HER2-) Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Podcast-Based Psychosocial Support for Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
Recruiting
A Study of Skipping Radiation Therapy in People With Breast Cancer
HER2-positive Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Dance Study for Post-surgical Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer, Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Russell Basser, MD study chair
Melbourne Health
11 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, CMF regimen and cyclophosphamide in people with Breast Cancer, run by ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation at 11 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Switzerland, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease-free survival. (time frame: 16 years after randomization.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002784, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2013.