Clinical trials: Composite Resins
Caries, Defective Tooth Restorations
Prospective, Split-mouth, Comparative Study to Compare Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Posterior Composite
The objective of this 2-year split mouth comparative study, a randomized controlled study, is to determine whether the simplified placement procedure of the ultra-rapid polymerizing Tetric PowerFlow/ Tetric PowerFill with a…
- Trial name
- NCT04708223
- Testing
- Direct restorative treatment with fast-curing composites (Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow), Direct restorative treatment with conventionally applied composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill)
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 51 people
- Sponsor
- Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Dental Caries
Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment
The intent of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of an experimental dental bonding agent for use with dental restorative composites with and without pretreatment of the tooth dentin and enamel using phosphoric…
- Trial name
- NCT02071953
- Testing
- Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest., Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.
- Volunteers
- 37 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Dentsply International
Dental Caries
Clinical Performance of Incremental and Bulk Fill Composites in Class II Restorations
This study will examine the clinical performance of Class II restorations over a three year period with 3 composite resins - a conventional composite resin, a flowable composite resin and a bulk placed and cured composite resin.
- Trial name
- NCT02889835
- Testing
- Supreme Universal Restorative, Supreme Flowable Restorative, Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 53 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Solventum US LLC
Tooth Restoration
Evaluation of Self-adhesive Hybrid Resin Composite Compared to a Traditional Composite Resin in Restorations of NCCLs
This is a split-mouth randomized clinical investigation conducted to evaluate clinical performances of a self-adhesive hybrid resin composite (investigational medical device Surefil) compared to a traditional composite resin…
- Trial name
- NCT05751382
- Testing
- Surefil one, Venus Pearl
- Where
- Italy
- Volunteers
- 16 people
- Sponsor
- Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
Caries, Unsatisfactory or Defective Restoration of Tooth
Comparison of 2 Different Resin Based Filling Materials in Posterior Teeth - a Multicenter Study
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of a new resin based filling material to an established resin-based filling material in posterior teeth at 2 different study centers.
- Trial name
- NCT01925040
- Testing
- Placement of restoration
- Where
- 2 sites in United States, Germany
- Volunteers
- 130 people
- Sponsor
- Heraeus Kulzer GmbH
Dental Caries, Unsatisfactory or Defective Restoration of Tooth
Clinical Evaluation of a Bulk Fill Resin Composite
The purpose of this clinical trial is to measure the clinical outcomes of Tetric PowerFill Class I and II restorations cured in 3 seconds with the Bluephase PowerCure curing unit.
- Trial name
- NCT04686422
- Testing
- Tetric PowerFill
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 39 people
- Sponsor
- Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Dental Caries
Clinical Study on a New Flowable Composite as a Restorative in Adult Teeth
Study hypothesis: a new, low polymerization stress flowable composite performs no differently to a conventional, highly filled composite filling material when used as a restorative in small cavities in back teeth.
- Trial name
- NCT01369108
- Testing
- Flowable composite, Conventional composite restorative
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 60 people
- Sponsor
- Solventum US LLC
Class V Non-carious Cervical Dental Lesions
Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal With Filtek Universal Restorative to Restore Class V NCCLs
This is a prospective, controlled, within-subject, randomized, single-center study comparing Scotchbond Universal Plus (SBU+) and Scotchbond Universal (SBU) adhesives when used with Filtek restorative.
- Trial name
- SBU+ClassV (NCT05361746)
- Testing
- Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 38 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Solventum US LLC