AzTrials
AzTrials

Depression - Major Depressive DisorderNDP_CCGNCT07889908

Testing a Non-Deceptive Placebo Intervention for Subclinical Depressive Symptoms

A study of Depression - Major Depressive Disorder and Psychological Distress, run by Miami University at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Subclinical depression - depressive symptoms that fall below the threshold for major depressive disorder - is common in young adults and predicts later depressive episodes, yet it often goes untreated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
330 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
25 Oct 2026to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 to 30 years
  • Native English speaker
  • Currently resides in the state of Ohio
  • PHQ-8 score of 5 to 9 at screening
  • Reliable daily access to the internet
  • Willing to provide a mailing address to receive study materials
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Willing to participate in Webex sessions with a working microphone and webcam
  • Willing to complete surveys over a 16- to 18-day period
  • Willing to receive weekly email or text reminders

Who cannot join

  • PHQ-8 score greater than 9 or less than 5 at screening
  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Current clinical diagnosis of anxiety, depression, ADHD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, substance use disorder, or another psychiatric disorder made by a licensed healthcare professional
  • Use of psychotropic medication (e.g., antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications, stimulants) within the past 8 weeks
  • Psychiatric hospitalization within the past 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Darwin A Guevarra, PHD contact

513-529-2415

guevarda@miamioh.edu

United States1 site
  • Miami University, Department of Psychology

    Oxford, Ohio, 45056

    Darwin A Guevarra, PhD, 513-529-2415, guevarda@miamioh.edu

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Examining Non-Deceptive Placebo Effects on Subclinical Depression Symptoms: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Blinded and Unblinded Control Conditions

Subclinical depression - depressive symptoms that fall below the threshold for major depressive disorder - is common in young adults and predicts later depressive episodes, yet it often goes untreated. This study tests whether a brief, remotely delivered non-deceptive (open-label) placebo intervention reduces subclinical depressive symptoms over approximately two weeks.

Participants aged 18-30 living in Ohio, with PHQ-8 scores in the 5-9 range, are randomly assigned to one of three groups: a non-deceptive placebo group, a blinded control group, or an unblinded control group. All participants complete three remote sessions over 16-18 days and complete the same assessments on the same schedule. Participants in the non-deceptive placebo group additionally receive psychoeducation about placebo effects and placebo pills that are explicitly described as containing no active ingredients, which they take twice daily for two weeks. Participants in the unblinded control group are told they have been assigned to a control condition. Participants in the blinded control group are not told their group assignment until debriefing at the end of the study.

The study has two aims. The first is to estimate the effect of the non-deceptive placebo intervention on depressive symptoms and related outcomes. The second is methodological: to determine whether telling control participants that they are in a control group changes their outcomes, and therefore whether the choice of control condition systematically biases estimates of non-deceptive placebo effects.

Read the detailed description

Non-deceptive (open-label) placebos have been shown to reduce negative emotion, stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms across a range of nonclinical samples. Because the intervention requires explicitly telling participants that the pills contain no active ingredients, participants cannot be blinded to the intervention. This creates an unresolved methodological problem: there is no consensus on the appropriate comparison condition. Some trials use unblinded assessment-only controls, which prioritize transparency but may introduce negative expectancy or demoralization and inflate apparent intervention effects. Others use blinded controls, which may better isolate expectancy mechanisms but raise concerns about incomplete disclosure. Few studies have compared the two within a single randomized design.

This trial is a remote, parallel-group randomized controlled trial in young adults with subclinical depressive symptoms. Eligible participants are randomized in blocks of 30 to one of three arms, with allocation distributed evenly across conditions. Randomization occurs after eligibility confirmation and before the first live session, because arm assignment determines which enrollment consent form is presented and because the placebo arm requires materials to be mailed in advance.

The study is conducted entirely remotely using Qualtrics for survey administration and Webex for live sessions, across four phases spanning approximately 16-18 days:

Day 0 (Screening): Online screening consent followed by an eligibility survey covering demographics, PHQ-8, and feasibility items.

Day 1 (Enrollment, ~60 min, Webex Session 1): Eligibility is confirmed, participants complete arm-specific enrollment consent, and a battery of individual difference measures assessing worry, trait anxiety, dispositional optimism, personality, emotion regulation, and implicit theories of anxiety, depression, and trauma.

Days 3-5 (Baseline/Time 1, ~60 min, Webex Session 2): All participants complete baseline outcome measures, then receive a standardized presentation on the prevalence of stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Participants in the non-deceptive placebo arm then receive the intervention: two brief psychoeducational videos on placebos and non-deceptive placebo effects with comprehension and expectancy items, followed by instructions for twice-daily pill intake over the following two weeks and for completing a brief daily pill-tracking survey. Participants in the unblinded control arm are informed of their control status. Participants in the two control arms receive no placebo psychoeducation and no pills.

Days 16-18 (Endpoint/Time 2, ~60 min, Webex Session 3): All participants complete endpoint outcome measures and open-ended feedback items and receive a full debriefing describing the study conditions and their own assignment. Participants in the blinded control arm are explicitly informed that the study involved incomplete disclosure and given the rationale, and may request withdrawal of their data.

The primary analysis will use a mixed model for repeated measures with planned orthogonal contrasts: the non-deceptive placebo arm versus the average of the two control arms (Aim 1), and the blinded versus unblinded control arms (Aim 2).

Being tested
Non-deceptive placebo (NDP)
Keywords
open-label placebo, non-deceptive placebo, placebo effect, expectancy, subclinical depression, control group design, blinding, remote intervention
Medical subject headings
Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non-deceptive placebo (NDP)Other

    Also called open-label placebo

    Participants are explicitly informed that they are in a study of placebo effects and that the pills they receive contain no active ingredients. They receive psychoeducation about placebo effects and open-label placebo tablets (Zeebo Effect LLC; microcrystalline cellulose with a small amount of vegetable-grade stearate), mailed in advance, to be taken twice daily for approximately two weeks, along with a brief daily pill-tracking survey.

Study groups in NCT07889908
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Blinded Control (BCG)No interventionParticipants complete the same assessments and receive the same placebo psychoeducation content as the intervention arm, but receive no pills. They are not informed of their group assignment or of the existence of other study arms until debriefing at endpoint.
Unblinded Control (UCG)No interventionParticipants complete the same assessments on the same schedule as the intervention arm but receive no intervention. They are explicitly informed at the baseline session that they have been assigned to a control condition and will not receive the intervention.
Non-Deceptive Placebo (NDP)OtherPsychoeducation about placebo effects, consisting of two brief videos ("Placebos \& the Placebo Effect" and "Placebos Can Work Without Deception") with a minimum viewing time and written comprehension summaries, plus an experimenter-delivered summary of evidence that non-deceptive placebos can reduce emotional distress. Participants also receive inert tablets containing no active pharmaceutical ingredient (microcrystalline cellulose and vegetable-grade stearate; Zeebo Effect LLC), explicitly described as containing no active medicine, mailed in advance and taken twice daily for approximately two weeks, with adherence recorded via a brief daily yes/no tracking survey.
Receives: Other: Non-deceptive placebo (NDP)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in depressive symptoms (PHQ-8)

    Patient Health Questionnaire, 8-item depression scale (Kroenke et al., 2009). Total score range 0-24, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Measured: Baseline to endpoint at 2 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2026
  2. Study start25 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Three-arm parallel-group design with block randomization in fixed blocks of 30, allocated evenly across arms. Randomization occurs after eligibility confirmation and prior to arm-specific enrollment consent.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
330 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07889908
Sponsor's protocol ID
ASP-CCG-RCT-001
Acronym
NDP_CCG
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
6 Oct 2026
Last updated
22 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data underlying published results may be shared for replication, secondary analysis, and publication purposes, consistent with Miami University data management policies. Data will be stripped of any information that could reasonably identify a participant. Data will be retained for up to five years after study completion.

Publications

  • Shedden-Mora MC, Alberts J, Petrie KJ, Laferton JAC, von Blanckenburg P, Kohlmann S, Nestoriuc Y, Lowe B. The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients' treatment expectations. PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280472. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 36689398
  • von Wernsdorff M, Loef M, Tuschen-Caffier B, Schmidt S. Effects of open-label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83148-6.

    PubMed 33594150
  • Colloca L, Howick J. Placebos Without Deception: Outcomes, Mechanisms, and Ethics. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:219-240. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

    PubMed 29681327
  • Guevarra DA, Moser JS, Wager TD, Kross E. Placebos without deception reduce self-report and neural measures of emotional distress. Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 29;11(1):3785. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17654-y.

    PubMed 32728026
  • Guevarra DA, Webster CT, Moros JN, Kross E, Moser JS. Remotely administered non-deceptive placebos reduce COVID-related stress, anxiety, and depression. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 Nov;16(4):2204-2224. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12583. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

    PubMed 39143695

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in