AzTrials
AzTrials

SleepLS4NCT07889466

Circadian-informed Optimal Bedtime

A study testing Optimal Bedtime in people with Sleep and Alertness, Fatigue, Mood, and Performance, run by Massachusetts Institute of Technology at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this interventional study is to test whether circadian-informed bedtime recommendations can improve sleep, next-day psychomotor vigilance, and subjective well-being among healthy adults. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Optimal Bedtime
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
203 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
11 Jun 2025to 30 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18 to 60
  • English-speaking
  • Residence of the U.S.
  • Owner of a Samsung Galaxy Watch paired with an Android phone

Who cannot join

  • Shift work schedule
  • Current smoker or currently using recreational drug
  • Diagnosis of any sleep or circadian rhythm disorder
  • Currently taking medications that may inhibit melatonin production
  • History of traumatic brain injury, stroke, or seizure
  • Plan of traveling across time zones during the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: New Personalized Smart Bedtime Intervention Based on the Data Collected From Samsung Galaxy Watch.

The goal of this interventional study is to test whether circadian-informed bedtime recommendations can improve sleep, next-day psychomotor vigilance, and subjective well-being among healthy adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can Optimal Bedtime derived from data collected by a consumer smartwatch increase the objective total sleep time?
  • Can Optimal Bedtime derived from data collected by a consumer smartwatch reduce the count of lapse in a next-day Psychomotor Vigilance Task?
  • Can Optimal Bedtime derived from data collected by a consumer smartwatch increase subjective sleep quality?
Read more

Researchers will compare Optimal Bedtime with a placebo bedtime and an unguided baseline in a cross-over design.

Participants will:

  • Be randomized 1:1 to either Optimal Bedtime then placebo or placebo then Optimal Bedtime.
  • Wear a consumer smartwatch for 6 weeks, 2 weeks in each of baseline, Optimal Bedtime, and placebo.
  • Complete a Psychomotor Vigilance Task and a subjective well-being survey every morning.
Being tested
Optimal Bedtime, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Fatigue

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Optimal BedtimeBehavioural

    Also called Smart Bedtime

    Optimal Bedtime recommendations informed by the estimated dim-light melatonin onset from a consumer smartwatch, adjusted for the desired total sleep time of the participant and delivered via a mobile application twice a day.

  • PlaceboBehavioural

    Placebo bedtime recommendations based on the desired total sleep time and desired wake-up time of the participant with a daily random jitter within ± 30 minutes, delivered via a mobile application twice a day.

Study groups in NCT07889466
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Optimal Bedtime then placeboOtherOptimal Bedtime recommendation for two weeks followed by placebo bedtime recommendation for two weeks (randomized crossover)
Receives: Behavioral: Optimal Bedtime; Behavioral: Placebo
Placebo then Optimal BedtimeOtherPlacebo bedtime recommendation for two weeks followed by Optimal Bedtime recommendation for two weeks (randomized crossover)
Receives: Behavioral: Optimal Bedtime; Behavioral: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Total Sleep Time

    Smartwatch-derived objective total sleep time in minutes.

    Measured: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  2. Change from Baseline and Placebo in the Count of Lapse in Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT)

    Count of responses with reaction time greater than 500 milliseconds in a PVT session.

    Measured: 6 weeks, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  3. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Subjective Sleep Quality

    Self-reported sleep quality score on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100, higher indicating more favorable.

    Measured: 6 weeks, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Sleep Efficiency

    Objective total sleep time divided by time in bed, in percentage points.

    Measured: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  2. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Sleep Fragmentation Index

    Waking bouts per 100 min of objective total sleep time.

    Measured: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  3. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Wake After Sleep Onset

    Objective total time awake after sleep onset and before wake onset, in minutes.

    Measured: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  4. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Deep Sleep Duration

    Smartwatch-derived deep sleep duration in minutes.

    Measured: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  5. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Deep Sleep Percentage

    Smartwatch-derived deep sleep in percentage of objective total sleep time.

    Measured: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  6. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Duration

    Smartwatch-derived REM sleep duration in minutes.

    Measured: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  7. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Percentage

    Smartwatch-derived REM sleep in percentage of objective total sleep time.

    Measured: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  8. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Mean Response Speed

    Mean reciprocal reaction time in a PVT session, in per second.

    Measured: 6 weeks, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  9. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Mean Slowest-10% Response Speed

    Mean reciprocal reaction time over the slowest 10% responses in a PVT session, in per second.

    Measured: 6 week, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  10. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Subjective Alertness

    Daily self-reported alertness score on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100, higher indicating more favorable.

    Measured: 6 weeks, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  11. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Subjective Happiness

    Self-reported happiness score on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100, higher indicating more favorable.

    Measured: 6 weeks, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  12. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Subjective Energy

    Self-reported energy score on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100, higher indicating more favorable.

    Measured: 6 weeks, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  13. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Subjective Health

    Self-reported health score on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100, higher indicating more favorable.

    Measured: 6 weeks, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

  14. Change from Baseline and Placebo in Subjective Calmness

    Self-reported calmness score on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100, higher indicating more favorable.

    Measured: 6 weeks, daily in baseline, placebo, and intervention.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2026
  2. Study start11 Jun 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Randomization will be used to limit bias and achieve an equal distribution of participants to the two crossover arms (intervention then placebo or placebo then intervention).
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
203 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07889466
Sponsor's protocol ID
2411001487
Acronym
LS4
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
15 Oct 2026
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Optimal Bedtime in people with Sleep and Alertness, Fatigue, Mood, and Performance, run by Massachusetts Institute of Technology at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline and Placebo in Total Sleep Time (time frame: 6 weeks, nightly in baseline, placebo, and intervention.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Circadian-informed Optimal Bedtime (NCT07889466) | AzTrials