Skin AgingMD-AGENCT07873112
Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the MD60000 Device in the Treatment of Skin Imperfections Due to Aging.
A study testing MD60000 in people with Skin Aging, run by Promoitalia Group Spa at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Here is the English translation of the summary: The Clinical Investigation Plan with code CIP-01-25 outlines a single-center, uncontrolled, single-arm clinical study sponsored by Promoitalia Group S.p.A. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Skin Aging
- What is being tested?
- MD60000
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 6 Oct 2026to 1 Apr 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged between 18 and 65 years.
- Presence of facial skin defects/wrinkles with a Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale (LWSS) score ≥ 1 at baseline.
- Signed written informed consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Subjects aged under 18 or over 65 years.
- Presence of concomitant skin diseases, active infections, or inflammation in the area to be treated.
- Known severe allergies, hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or any component of the investigational product, or history of anaphylactic reactions.
- History of autoimmune diseases, severe chronic/systemic pathologies, or bleeding/coagulation disorders.
- History of hypertrophic scars, keloids, or abnormal cicatrization.
- Recent aesthetic treatments (e.g., dermal fillers, botulinum toxin, laser, chemical peels) in the target anatomical area within the preceding months.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women (negative pregnancy test required at screening for women of childbearing potential).
- Concomitant conditions or therapies that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise subject safety or interfere with study evaluations.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Clinica santa maria la bruna
Torre del Greco, Napoli, 80059
Giuseppe Ferraro, +39 366 465 48 16, giuseppe.ferraro@unimol.it
About this study
Here is the English translation of the summary:
The Clinical Investigation Plan with code CIP-01-25 outlines a single-center, uncontrolled, single-arm clinical study sponsored by Promoitalia Group S.p.A. and conducted at the Casa di Cura Santa Maria La Bruna in Torre del Greco under the responsibility of Principal Investigator Giuseppe Ferraro, with Teia Research S.r.l. acting as the CRO. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the aesthetic performance and safety of the MD60000 medical device, an intradermal, biodegradable, sterile, and isotonic gel based on 3.3% linear hyaluronic acid integrated with PLA, intended for the correction of skin imperfections caused by physiological skin aging, such as facial wrinkles. The investigation is conducted pursuant to Article 61 of the European Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 (MDR) in order to collect clinical data for regulatory conformity assessment, adhering to ISO 14155 standards and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Read more
The study design involves enrolling forty-three adult patients aged between eighteen and sixty-five years with facial skin defects characterized by a baseline score of one or higher on the Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale. Patients with skin diseases, active infections, or recent aesthetic treatments in the same anatomical area are excluded, as well as pregnant or breastfeeding women, individuals with a history of allergic reactions to the components, autoimmune diseases, coagulation disorders, or a predisposition to hypertrophic scars or keloids. Participation for each subject ranges between forty-five and sixty-five days, while the overall estimated duration of the entire clinical investigation is approximately six months.
The procedural pathway comprises four main visits. During the first screening and baseline visit, eligibility criteria are verified, informed consent and medical history are collected, and baseline photographic evaluations and wrinkle severity assessments are performed. If conditions permit, the first treatment session can occur on the same day, during which the clinician performs an intradermal injection of MD60000 up to a maximum volume of two milliliters. A similar second treatment session follows after an interval of at least fourteen days. The final phase consists of a follow-up visit thirty days after the second treatment, during which final photographs are taken and data regarding patient satisfaction and safety are collected.
Treatment efficacy is measured using primary and secondary metrics. The primary performance endpoint is defined as the improvement in the Lemperle scale score between the initial baseline visit and the final follow-up, considered clinically relevant if a median reduction of one point or greater is achieved, confirmed statistically using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The secondary endpoint assesses the patient's subjective satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) thirty days after the completion of treatment, met if at least seventy percent of participants report an rating of improved, much improved, or excellent.
Regarding safety, the study evaluates the frequency, severity, and causal relationship of any adverse events or effects occurring during the investigation. The safety profile is considered acceptable in the absence of device-related serious adverse events or device deficiencies, provided that unexpected, mild, device-related adverse events do not exceed a maximum threshold of ten percent. Statistical analysis involves evaluating the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population set for safety parameters and the Per-Protocol (PP) set for performance metrics.
Read the detailed description
This single-center, non-controlled, single-arm clinical investigation (Code: CIP-01-25) is conducted pursuant to Article 61 of the European Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) to evaluate the aesthetic performance and safety profile of the MD60000 medical device. MD60000 is a sterile, biodegradable, and isotonic intradermal gel containing 3.3% linear hyaluronic acid, poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and a physiological buffer. As a Class III device intended purely for non-medical aesthetic enhancement, its primary mechanism of action relies on tissue volume augmentation via the hydrophilic properties of hyaluronic acid to correct age-related facial skin defects and wrinkles.
Given that MD60000 is non-innovative and comparable to existing hyaluronic acid-based intradermal fillers with a well-established history of clinical use, this investigation is designed to confirm conformity for regulatory purposes with a minimized sample size and protocol complexity. A total of 43 adult subjects presenting with facial skin defects (Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale [LWSS] $\ge 1$) will be enrolled. No control group is included, as no spontaneous improvement is expected for age-related static wrinkles without intervention.
The study workflow spans up to 65 days per participant and consists of two intradermal injection sessions (at Baseline/Day 0 and Day 21 $\pm 6$ days) using up to 2 mL of product per session depending on defect severity. Final clinical assessments are performed at a follow-up visit 30 days after the second injection.
Primary aesthetic performance is quantified through validated objective wrinkle grading using the LWSS, where success is defined as a median individual score improvement of $\ge 1$ point from baseline to the 30-day post-treatment follow-up. Secondary performance focuses on subject-reported satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Safety evaluation involves continuous monitoring of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse device effects (ADEs/SADEs), and device deficiencies according to EN ISO 14155 standards. Statistical analyses will be performed on the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population for safety metrics and on the Per-Protocol (PP) population for primary and secondary performance endpoints.
- Conditions
- Skin Aging
- Being tested
- MD60000
- Keywords
- skin, aging, wrinkles, medical device, Hyaluronic acid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MD60000Device
Intradermal gel composition containing 3.3% linear high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid combined with polylactic acid (PLA). Administered via intradermal injection in two separate treatment sessions to evaluate aesthetic performance on skin aging/wrinkles and safety outcomes over a 30-day follow-up period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MD60000 Treatment Group | Experimental | Subjects will receive two intradermal injections of MD60000 gel (3.3% linear hyaluronic acid combined with polylactic acid / PLA) administered during the treatment phase, with performance and safety evaluated over a 30-day follow-up period. Receives: Device: MD60000 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline in Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (LWSS) Score
Change in wrinkle severity evaluated using the Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (LWSS). The scale ranges from 0 (no wrinkles) to 5 (very deep wrinkles, redundant fold). A lower score indicates greater aesthetic improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit
Incidence and Severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Device Defect Logs
Assessment of device safety evaluated through the recording, incidence, severity, and causal relationship of local and systemic adverse events, local injection site reactions (e.g., erythema, edema, pain), and device defects throughout the study duration.
Measured: From baseline (Day 0) up to 30 (± 7) days post-treatment
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Rating
Assessment of overall aesthetic improvement rated by the Investigator using the GAIS 5-point scale (1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Worse).
Measured: 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit
Secondary outcomes (2)
Subject Satisfaction Score Measured by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Subject-assessed aesthetic improvement using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), a 5-point ordinal scale (1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Worse). Success is defined as at least 70% of subjects reporting a score of 3 or lower.
Measured: 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit (Visit 4)
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Device Deficiencies
Incidence, frequency, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), device-related adverse effects (ADEs/SADEs), and device deficiencies recorded throughout the study.
Measured: From baseline (Day 0) through 30 (± 7) days post-treatment follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2026
- Study start6 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion6 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Skin AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Promoitalia Group Spa
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07873112
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIP-01-25
- Acronym
- MD-AGE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lee JH, Kim J, Lee YN, Choi S, Lee YI, Suk J, Lee JH. The efficacy of intradermal hyaluronic acid filler as a skin quality booster: A prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Feb;23(2):409-416. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15944. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
PubMed 37705328
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the MD60000 Device in the Treatment of Skin Imperfections Due to Aging.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07873112
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MD-AGE / CIP-01-25
- Conditions
- Skin Aging
- Keywords
- skin, aging, wrinkles, medical device, Hyaluronic acid
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Promoitalia Group SpaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 6 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 6 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Here is the English translation of the summary:
The Clinical Investigation Plan with code CIP-01-25 outlines a single-center, uncontrolled, single-arm clinical study sponsored by Promoitalia Group S.p.A. and conducted at the Casa di Cura Santa Maria La Bruna in Torre del Greco under the responsibility of Principal Investigator Giuseppe Ferraro, with Teia Research S.r.l. acting as the CRO. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the aesthetic performance and safety of the MD60000 medical device, an intradermal, biodegradable, sterile, and isotonic gel based on 3.3% linear hyaluronic acid integrated with PLA, intended for the correction of skin imperfections caused by physiological skin aging, such as facial wrinkles. The investigation is conducted pursuant to Article 61 of the European Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 (MDR) in order to collect clinical data for regulatory conformity assessment, adhering to ISO 14155 standards and the Declaration of Helsinki.
The study design involves enrolling forty-three adult patients aged between eighteen and sixty-five years with facial skin defects characterized by a baseline score of one or higher on the Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale. Patients with skin diseases, active infections, or recent aesthetic treatments in the same anatomical area are excluded, as well as pregnant or breastfeeding women, individuals with a history of allergic reactions to the components, autoimmune diseases, coagulation disorders, or a predisposition to hypertrophic scars or keloids. Participation for each subject ranges between forty-five and sixty-five days, while the overall estimated duration of the entire clinical investigation is approximately six months.
The procedural pathway comprises four main visits. During the first screening and baseline visit, eligibility criteria are verified, informed consent and medical history are collected, and baseline photographic evaluations and wrinkle severity assessments are performed. If conditions permit, the first treatment session can occur on the same day, during which the clinician performs an intradermal injection of MD60000 up to a maximum volume of two milliliters. A similar second treatment session follows after an interval of at least fourteen days. The final phase consists of a follow-up visit thirty days after the second treatment, during which final photographs are taken and data regarding patient satisfaction and safety are collected.
Treatment efficacy is measured using primary and secondary metrics. The primary performance endpoint is defined as the improvement in the Lemperle scale score between the initial baseline visit and the final follow-up, considered clinically relevant if a median reduction of one point or greater is achieved, confirmed statistically using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The secondary endpoint assesses the patient's subjective satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) thirty days after the completion of treatment, met if at least seventy percent of participants report an rating of improved, much improved, or excellent.
Regarding safety, the study evaluates the frequency, severity, and causal relationship of any adverse events or effects occurring during the investigation. The safety profile is considered acceptable in the absence of device-related serious adverse events or device deficiencies, provided that unexpected, mild, device-related adverse events do not exceed a maximum threshold of ten percent. Statistical analysis involves evaluating the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population set for safety parameters and the Per-Protocol (PP) set for performance metrics.
Detailed description
This single-center, non-controlled, single-arm clinical investigation (Code: CIP-01-25) is conducted pursuant to Article 61 of the European Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) to evaluate the aesthetic performance and safety profile of the MD60000 medical device. MD60000 is a sterile, biodegradable, and isotonic intradermal gel containing 3.3% linear hyaluronic acid, poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and a physiological buffer. As a Class III device intended purely for non-medical aesthetic enhancement, its primary mechanism of action relies on tissue volume augmentation via the hydrophilic properties of hyaluronic acid to correct age-related facial skin defects and wrinkles.
Given that MD60000 is non-innovative and comparable to existing hyaluronic acid-based intradermal fillers with a well-established history of clinical use, this investigation is designed to confirm conformity for regulatory purposes with a minimized sample size and protocol complexity. A total of 43 adult subjects presenting with facial skin defects (Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale [LWSS] $\ge 1$) will be enrolled. No control group is included, as no spontaneous improvement is expected for age-related static wrinkles without intervention.
The study workflow spans up to 65 days per participant and consists of two intradermal injection sessions (at Baseline/Day 0 and Day 21 $\pm 6$ days) using up to 2 mL of product per session depending on defect severity. Final clinical assessments are performed at a follow-up visit 30 days after the second injection.
Primary aesthetic performance is quantified through validated objective wrinkle grading using the LWSS, where success is defined as a median individual score improvement of $\ge 1$ point from baseline to the 30-day post-treatment follow-up. Secondary performance focuses on subject-reported satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Safety evaluation involves continuous monitoring of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse device effects (ADEs/SADEs), and device deficiencies according to EN ISO 14155 standards. Statistical analyses will be performed on the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population for safety metrics and on the Per-Protocol (PP) population for primary and secondary performance endpoints.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MD60000 Treatment Group | Experimental | Device: MD60000Subjects will receive two intradermal injections of MD60000 gel (3.3% linear hyaluronic acid combined with polylactic acid / PLA) administered during the treatment phase, with performance and safety evaluated over a 30-day follow-up period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults aged between 18 and 65 years.
- Presence of facial skin defects/wrinkles with a Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale (LWSS) score ≥ 1 at baseline.
- Signed written informed consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Subjects aged under 18 or over 65 years.
- Presence of concomitant skin diseases, active infections, or inflammation in the area to be treated.
- Known severe allergies, hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or any component of the investigational product, or history of anaphylactic reactions.
- History of autoimmune diseases, severe chronic/systemic pathologies, or bleeding/coagulation disorders.
- History of hypertrophic scars, keloids, or abnormal cicatrization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MD60000Intradermal gel composition containing 3.3% linear high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid combined with polylactic acid (PLA). Administered via intradermal injection in two separate treatment sessions to evaluate aesthetic performance on skin aging/wrinkles and safety outcomes over a 30-day follow-up period. | Device | MD60000 Treatment Group |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline in Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (LWSS) Score
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit
Change in wrinkle severity evaluated using the Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (LWSS). The scale ranges from 0 (no wrinkles) to 5 (very deep wrinkles, redundant fold). A lower score indicates greater aesthetic improvement.
Incidence and Severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Device Defect Logs
Time frame: From baseline (Day 0) up to 30 (± 7) days post-treatment
Assessment of device safety evaluated through the recording, incidence, severity, and causal relationship of local and systemic adverse events, local injection site reactions (e.g., erythema, edema, pain), and device defects throughout the study duration.
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Rating
Time frame: 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit
Assessment of overall aesthetic improvement rated by the Investigator using the GAIS 5-point scale (1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Worse).
2 secondary outcomes
Subject Satisfaction Score Measured by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time frame: 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit (Visit 4)
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Device Deficiencies
Time frame: From baseline (Day 0) through 30 (± 7) days post-treatment follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37705328Lee JH, Kim J, Lee YN, Choi S, Lee YI, Suk J, Lee JH. The efficacy of intradermal hyaluronic acid filler as a skin quality booster: A prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Feb;23(2):409-416. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15944. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Skin Aging
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Facial Skin Quality and Quality of Life After VYC-12L Treatment in Breast Cancer Survivors
Quality of Life, Breast Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Integrated Actionable Aging Assessment for Cancer Patients Pilot
Breast Cancer, Hodgkin Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Research on Deep-Plane Rejuran S Injection for Improvement in the Apperance of Periorbital Hollowing Using a Cannula Technique
Periorbital Hollowing, Skin Aging
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Evaluation of Dual-Plane Technique PN-Based Treatment for Horizontal Neck Lines Using DNA Fragment Opmizing Technology Polynucleotide (DOT PN)
Skin Aging, Horizontal Neck Lines
Recruiting
Ultraformer MPT Combined With Fractional CO2 Versus Fractional CO2 Alone for Facial Rejuvenation
Skin Aging
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MD60000 in people with Skin Aging, run by Promoitalia Group Spa at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Grazia Iannacci (+39 331 591 3106, Executive.assistant@webpromoitalia.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline in Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (LWSS) Score (time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07873112, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2026.