AzTrials
AzTrials

Pediatric Ankle FractureNCT07872124

Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Pediatric Ankle Fracture Detection

An observational study of Pediatric Ankle Fracture, run by Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective observational study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) for detecting ankle fractures in children presenting to the emergency department with acute isolated ankle trauma. Children aged 5-17 years who met at least one Ottawa Ankle Rule criterion were included. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Pediatric Ankle Fracture
What is being tested?
Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS)
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jul 2024to 1 Jul 2025
How long will I take part?
14 Days
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: The study population consisted of pediatric patients presenting with acute ankle trauma to the emergency department of a tertiary academic referral hospital. Consecutive patients were screened for study eligibility during the study period. The study focused on children for whom ankle radiography was clinically indicated according to the Ottawa Ankle Rules.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 5-17 years
  • Presentation to the emergency department with acute isolated ankle trauma
  • Fulfillment of at least one Ottawa Ankle Rule criterion
  • Written informed consent provided by the participant's legal guardian

Who cannot join

  • Polytrauma
  • Penetrating ankle injury
  • Clinically obvious deformity requiring immediate reduction
  • Previous surgery to the affected ankle
  • Inability to undergo point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS)
  • Refusal of informed consent
  • Repeated eligible presentation after a participant had already been enrolled in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, Küçükçekmece, 34303

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Pediatric Ankle Fracture Detection: High Sensitivity But Reduced Specificity Around Open Physes

This prospective observational study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) for detecting ankle fractures in children presenting to the emergency department with acute isolated ankle trauma. Children aged 5-17 years who met at least one Ottawa Ankle Rule criterion were included.

The primary objective was to determine how accurately bedside POCUS identifies pediatric ankle fractures compared with a predefined reference standard. The study also evaluated whether the presence of open growth plates influenced ultrasound interpretation.

Read the detailed description

This was a prospective, single-center observational diagnostic accuracy study conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary academic referral hospital. Consecutive children presenting with acute isolated ankle trauma were screened for eligibility. Participants were eligible if they were 5-17 years of age and fulfilled at least one Ottawa Ankle Rule criterion.

All POCUS examinations were performed before radiographic imaging using a high-frequency linear transducer. The distal tibia, distal fibula, talus, calcaneus, and navicular were systematically evaluated in longitudinal and transverse planes, with particular attention to the region of maximal tenderness. A POCUS examination was considered positive when cortical discontinuity, step-off, or focal cortical irregularity compatible with fracture was identified and negative when these findings were absent.

POCUS examinations were performed by three emergency medicine residents who had completed a structured musculoskeletal POCUS training program consisting of theoretical and hands-on training followed by supervised ankle ultrasonography examinations. POCUS operators were blinded to radiographic findings at the time of ultrasound interpretation.

All participants underwent clinical assessment and three-view conventional radiography. Fracture status was determined using a prospectively defined composite reference standard. Radiographically confirmed fractures were classified as fracture-positive. Computed tomography was selectively performed in patients with negative or equivocal radiographs when persistent clinical concern warranted further imaging. Orthopedic assessment was incorporated into routine clinical care, and participants were prospectively tracked for 14 days for subsequent emergency department visits, additional imaging, or changes in management.

The diagnostic performance of POCUS was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios, overall diagnostic accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Being tested
Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS)
Keywords
Point-of-Care Ultrasonography, Pediatric Ankle Trauma, Diagnostic Accuracy, Physeal Fracture, Salter-Harris Fracture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS)Diagnostic test

    Bedside point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) of the injured ankle was performed before conventional radiography using a high-frequency linear transducer (5-15 MHz). The distal tibia, distal fibula, talus, calcaneus, and navicular were systematically evaluated in longitudinal and transverse planes, with particular attention to the region of maximal tenderness. POCUS was classified as positive when cortical discontinuity, step-off, or focal cortical irregularity compatible with fracture was identified and as negative when these findings were absent.

Study groups in NCT07872124
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Children With Acute Ankle TraumaChildren aged 5-17 years presenting to the emergency department with acute isolated ankle trauma and meeting at least one Ottawa Ankle Rule criterion. All participants underwent bedside point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) before conventional radiography. Fracture status was determined using a prospectively defined composite reference standard.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of POCUS for Pediatric Ankle Fracture Detection

    Diagnostic performance of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) for detecting ankle fractures was assessed against the prospectively defined composite reference standard. Performance measures included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and overall diagnostic accuracy, with 95% confidence intervals where applicable.

    Measured: Index emergency department visit, with fracture status verified through 14 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Anatomical Distribution of False-Positive POCUS Findings

    The anatomical distribution of false-positive POCUS findings was assessed to evaluate whether open physeal anatomy contributed to incorrect fracture-positive ultrasound interpretations. False-positive examinations were defined as POCUS findings suggestive of fracture that were not confirmed as fractures by the composite reference standard. False-positive findings were categorized according to anatomical location, including physeal and non-physeal sites.

    Measured: Index emergency department visit, with fracture status verified through 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Oct 2026
  2. Study start1 Jul 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
Target duration
14 Days
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07872124
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024.07.152 / KAEK/2024.07.152
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
7 Oct 2026
Last updated
13 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data underlying the reported results may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to applicable ethical and institutional requirements.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pediatric Ankle Fracture, run by Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic Accuracy of POCUS for Pediatric Ankle Fracture Detection (time frame: Index emergency department visit, with fracture status verified through 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in