Low Back PianNCT07854028
Strain Counter Strain and Muscle Energy Technique in Non-specific Low Back Pain
A study testing Group A and Group B in people with Low Back Pian, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Low back pain (LBP) is a condition characterized by fatigue, discomfort in the lumbosacral area, and a most common cause of disability . Low Back Pain (LBP) is defined as tiredness, discomfort or pain in the lower back region, radiating to lower extremities unilaterally or bilaterally. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pian
- What is being tested?
- Group A and Group B
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2026to 1 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants should age between 20-40 years.
- Both gender were included.
- Participants were required to have experienced LBP lasting three to six months.
- According to Simons' criteria participants were required to have at least 3 active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in their lower back muscles.
- 20-40% score on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), have Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] ≥ 4.
Who cannot join
- The patients with red flag conditions; disc prolapse, spinal stenosis, lumbar radiculopathy and spondylosis were excluded.
- Patients who had undergone previous surgery within the last six months, psychiatric or mental deficiencies, pregnancy, or lactation.
- Participants with conditions, like osteoporosis, kidney and gastrointestinal disorders.
- Individuals with a history of spinal surgery or spinal fractures.
- Participants with congenital leg length discrepancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000
Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD, +92 320 7866611, shakil.urrehman@riphah.edu.pk
About this study
Official title: Effects of Strain Counter Strain Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain
Low back pain (LBP) is a condition characterized by fatigue, discomfort in the lumbosacral area, and a most common cause of disability . Low Back Pain (LBP) is defined as tiredness, discomfort or pain in the lower back region, radiating to lower extremities unilaterally or bilaterally. Low back pain is a bit common issue that most of the population experience sooner or later in their lives .
Low back pain (LBP) is featured as pain and discomfort in the area between the costal margin and the inferior gluteal folds, with or without referred leg pain. Non-specific low back pain is the most common back pain, it is estimated that 70-80% of the entire population has experienced non-specific low back pain in their lifetime.
Read more
Nonspecific low back pain (LBP) is usually defined as pain, muscle tension, or stiffness localized below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds. It is the commonest musculoskeletal condition in the adult population and its prevalence amounts to 84%. Furthermore, it limits the activity of the affected population by 30.8% monthly and 38% every year. Consequently, CLBP poses a substantial economic burden on healthcare, social, and welfare systems.
Only 15% of non-specific low back pain can be identified, while the remaining 85% are non-specific. Sixty to eighty percent of LBP patients report pain or disability a year later, and up to 40% report chronic pain. However, understanding the specific etiology of chronic nonspecific LBP remains elusive because it results from a variety of factors that can interact with each other.
The diagnosis of Low Back Pain is divided into two, namely Specific and Non-specific Low Back Pain, In Specific Low Back Pain, there are certain pathophysiological mechanisms that cause symptoms such as infections of the spine, hernia nucleus pulposus, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, fractures, and tumors. In contrast to non-specific low back pain, where it is generally said that 80-90% of non-specific causes of low back pain are mechanical, and based on this percentage, 65-70% have no specific cause.
Additionally, LBP restricts occupational activities and is among the main causes of absenteeism. So, it leads to high costs of health care and decreases productivity. Various factors contribute to the development of chronic LBP. Physical factors, such as reduced muscle strength and endurance are prognostic factors for chronic LBP. The occupational load carriage has the potential to alter the carrier's body posture and may lead to greater forward trunk lean.
Besides, the presence and experience of nonspecific LBP could be affected by psychosocial factors, including anxiety and depression. These factors strongly influence the pain intensity during activity and degree of disability in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP. Apart from load carriage, other factors are also associated with LBP in these populations including a lack of physical fitness, higher fat mass, and long periods of sitting.
Pain is the main symptom and account for disability and lack of work participation. Physiological testing shows reduced lumbar flexibility and flexion-relaxation, poorer static balance , poorer proprioception and spinal segment stability, and lower physical fitness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with NLBP .
Quadratus lumborum (QL) is a deep trunk muscle, and its tightness can trigger symptoms of significant low back tightness and discomfort. Recurrent episodes (lasting more than 3 months) are common presentations of nonspecific LBP usually accompanied by limitation of movement, long-term disability, and decreased quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Infact, there is evidence that NSLBP subjects show an increase in center of pressure (CoP) displacement and velocity; and proprioceptive deficits, probably as a consequence of pain . Studies have reported LBP patients show significantly lower hip abductor and extensor strength compared to healthy adults and show weakening of the hip abductor or weakening of the hip extensors.
Quadratus Lumborum (QL) is a major cause of LBP difficulties, which frequently results in active and latent MTrP. Chronic LBP has been associated with changes in trunk muscle responses and increased muscle fatigability. This postural response alters the biomechanics of the spine, with the hips adopting an increased bend, which triggers a concomitant increase in the activation of the musculature surrounding the lower back and hip extensors.
The QL muscle is important in body mechanics and lumbar spine stabilization. Poor body mechanics and posture affects body positioning and stresses quadratus lumborum muscle which ultimately leads to myofascial trigger points in muscle. Increasing load also brings with it changes in spinal curvatures in both females and males. These increases in forward lean and back muscle activation, in addition to changes in spinal curvature, can heighten the risk of developing low back pain (LBP).
NSLBP has no definitive pathology regarding what is causing the pain but has been theorized to be caused by factors including poor posture, impaired flexibility, previous history of injury, heavy lifting, mental stress, and obesity. The prevalence of non-specific LBP increases with age, presenting a worse clinical course and a greater probability of transition to chronicity.
Manual therapy is a common treatment for severe low back pain. The strength and endurance of the trunk muscles play a crucial role in reducing pain, enhancing stability, and maintaining spinal function. Various treatments have been proposed for alleviating LBP, such as stretching exercises , heat therapy , massage therapy, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release.
Despite the number of treatment modalities detailed in the physiotherapy literature, there is no single conclusive treatment that has demonstrated to be effective for treating low back pain. Whole body vibration (WBV) is currently increasing in popularity as a treatment modality for alleviating pain, enhancing muscle activities and improving health-related quality of life.
The muscle energy technique is an active technique requiring the participant to contribute in an accurately regulated manner to the voluntary contraction of the muscle of a subject against the counterforce of an operator. MET is a manual therapy that utilizes gentle muscle contractions of the patient to relax muscles, lengthen them, and restore normal joint motion. This technique was pioneered in 1948 by Fred Mitchell, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, to enhance musculoskeletal function by mobilizing joints and stretching tight muscles and fascia.
The objective of MET is to promote muscle relaxation and lengthening, consequently enhancing joint range of motion (ROM). It is generally recognized as a gentle manual therapy technique for addressing limited motion in the spine and extremities. Depending on the comparative acuteness of the scenario, the contraction is generally started from or short of a previously identified obstacle of resistance. The mechanisms by which MET generates enhanced ROM is still under study. MET's effectiveness in relaxing the impacted muscles is due to the Golgi tendon organs inhibiting motor activity. Thus the shortened tissues attain a greater degree of ease and extra movement. The SCS method is an indirect manipulative method for treating muscle trigger points as its therapy action moves away from the restrictive obstacles, i.e. towards ease.
The strain counter strain (SCS) technique is one of the effective osteopathic treatment methods. It is a passive positional intervention aimed at relieving musculoskeletal dysfunction and pain. It is achieved by putting the tissues in an optimal position of comfort (POC). POC's aim is to decrease tender point irritability and normalize the dysfunction related to tissue. It is established by the soft and atraumatic nature of SCS methods as a secure and efficient primary mode of action in the therapy of painful muscles and the joints that affect them.
Osteopathic techniques including SCS have been addressed in peer-reviewed literature showing success. The intervention to treat chronic low back pain using SCS method can be regarded as a type of manipulative spinal soft tissue therapy because the pelvis, sacrum, and lower limbs are used passively in degrees of flexion, expansion, lateral flexion, and rotation in the placement of the lumbar spine and sacral areas.
This study will offer a thorough comparison of SCS and MET that could offer insight into their mechanisms and inform optimal clinical decision-making for long-term management of NSLBP and can help to understand which mechanism offers superior outcomes or if they are equally effective.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pian
- Being tested
- Group A, Group B
- Keywords
- Disability, Low Back Pain, Muscle energy technique, Strain Counter Strain
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group AOther
Group A will receive strain counter strain technique for Quadratus Lumborum, Gluteus Medius, Multifidus, Erector Spinae and Iliopsoas muscles, for 1 set with 3 repetitions separated by a 30 seconds rest period and 3 sessions for a week along with conventional treatment for a total of four weeks. Pre and post intervention values will be taken on 1st day and after 4 weeks
Group BOther
Group B will receive muscle energy technique for Quadratus Lumborum, Gluteus Medius, Iliopsoas, Multifidus and Erector Spinae muscles; for 2 sets, 3 repetitions in a single session with a break of two minutes in between each repetition and 3 sessions for a week along with conventional treatment for a total of four weeks. Measurements were made before and after the intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Strain Counter Strain | Experimental | Group A will receive strain counter strain technique for Quadratus Lumborum, Gluteus Medius, Multifidus, Erector Spinae and Iliopsoas muscles, for 1 set with 3 repetitions separated by a 30 seconds rest period and 3 sessions for a week along with conventional treatment for a total of four weeks. Pre and post intervention values will be taken on 1st day and after 4 weeks Common treatment will comprise moist heat for 10 minutes as an adjunct (2); Stretching of back, piriformis and hamstrings, hold the stretch for 30 seconds in 2 sets with 3 repetitions; and strengthening of back and abdominal muscles. Exercises consisted of 15 repetitions, 2 times with rest periods in between, with 3 sessions every week for a total of four weeks Receives: Other: Group A |
| Muscle Energy Techniques | Active comparator | Group B will receive muscle energy technique for Quadratus Lumborum, Gluteus Medius, Iliopsoas, Multifidus and Erector Spinae muscles; for 2 sets, 3 repetitions in a single session with a break of two minutes in between each repetition and 3 sessions for a week along with conventional treatment for a total of four weeks. Measurements were made before and after the intervention Common treatment will comprise moist heat for 10 minutes as an adjunct (2); Stretching of back, piriformis and hamstrings, hold the stretch for 30 seconds in 2 sets with 3 repetitions; and strengthening of back and abdominal muscles. Exercises consisted of 15 repetitions, 2 times with rest periods in between, with 3 sessions every week for a total of four weeks Receives: Other: Group B |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Oswestry Disability Index
Each component receives a score ranging from 0 to 5, with a score of 5 signifying the most severe disability. We calculate the index by dividing the total score by the range of scores. To obtain a numerical representation of the index as a percentage, we multiply the result by 100.
Measured: Baseline; 4 Weeks
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
This scale is commonly used in the scientific literature and clinical practice, as it is reliable and responsive in LBP (r=0.61) and has a minimal clinically important difference of 1.99 points. This is 11 points scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain"(26). NRS revealed that r = 0.95 with BPI pain interference; r = 0.68 with MODI, test-retest reliability is strong
Measured: Baseline; 4 Week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2026
- Study start1 Jun 2026
- Primary completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PianStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07854028
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Attia Batool
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Santos GK, Goncalves de Oliveira R, Campos de Oliveira L, Ferreira C de Oliveira C, Andraus RA, Ngomo S, Fusco A, Cortis C, DA Silva RA. Effectiveness of muscle energy technique in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec;58(6):827-837. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07424-X. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
PubMed 36169931Alahmari KA, Rengaramanujam K, Reddy RS, Samuel PS, Tedla JS, Kakaraparthi VN, Ahmad I. The immediate and short-term effects of dynamic taping on pain, endurance, disability, mobility and kinesiophobia in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 29;15(9):e0239505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239505. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32991582Batool K, Mehmood M, Jafar M, Gull M. Comparative efficacy of muscle energy technique and Bowen technique on hamstrings muscle tightness in chronic low back pain patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;40(9):2080-2084. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.9.8517.
PubMed 39416609Simson KJ, Miller CT, Ford J, Hahne A, Main L, Rantalainen T, Teo WP, Teychenne M, Connell D, Trudel G, Zheng G, Thickbroom G, Belavy DL. Optimising conservative management of chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 20;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1913-8.
PubMed 28427472Stokes IA, Fox JR, Henry SM. Trunk muscular activation patterns and responses to transient force perturbation in persons with self-reported low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):658-67. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0893-7. Epub 2005 May 20.
PubMed 15906102Kalantari M, ShahAli S, Dadgoo M, Tabatabaei A. The automatic activity of abdominal muscles during stable and unstable standing postural tasks in older adults with and without low back pain- A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04934-1.
PubMed 38565979
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Strain Counter Strain Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07854028
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Attia Batool
- Conditions
- Low Back Pian
- Keywords
- Disability, Low Back Pain, Muscle energy technique, Strain Counter Strain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Low back pain (LBP) is a condition characterized by fatigue, discomfort in the lumbosacral area, and a most common cause of disability . Low Back Pain (LBP) is defined as tiredness, discomfort or pain in the lower back region, radiating to lower extremities unilaterally or bilaterally. Low back pain is a bit common issue that most of the population experience sooner or later in their lives .
Low back pain (LBP) is featured as pain and discomfort in the area between the costal margin and the inferior gluteal folds, with or without referred leg pain. Non-specific low back pain is the most common back pain, it is estimated that 70-80% of the entire population has experienced non-specific low back pain in their lifetime.
Nonspecific low back pain (LBP) is usually defined as pain, muscle tension, or stiffness localized below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds. It is the commonest musculoskeletal condition in the adult population and its prevalence amounts to 84%. Furthermore, it limits the activity of the affected population by 30.8% monthly and 38% every year. Consequently, CLBP poses a substantial economic burden on healthcare, social, and welfare systems.
Only 15% of non-specific low back pain can be identified, while the remaining 85% are non-specific. Sixty to eighty percent of LBP patients report pain or disability a year later, and up to 40% report chronic pain. However, understanding the specific etiology of chronic nonspecific LBP remains elusive because it results from a variety of factors that can interact with each other.
The diagnosis of Low Back Pain is divided into two, namely Specific and Non-specific Low Back Pain, In Specific Low Back Pain, there are certain pathophysiological mechanisms that cause symptoms such as infections of the spine, hernia nucleus pulposus, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, fractures, and tumors. In contrast to non-specific low back pain, where it is generally said that 80-90% of non-specific causes of low back pain are mechanical, and based on this percentage, 65-70% have no specific cause.
Additionally, LBP restricts occupational activities and is among the main causes of absenteeism. So, it leads to high costs of health care and decreases productivity. Various factors contribute to the development of chronic LBP. Physical factors, such as reduced muscle strength and endurance are prognostic factors for chronic LBP. The occupational load carriage has the potential to alter the carrier's body posture and may lead to greater forward trunk lean.
Besides, the presence and experience of nonspecific LBP could be affected by psychosocial factors, including anxiety and depression. These factors strongly influence the pain intensity during activity and degree of disability in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP. Apart from load carriage, other factors are also associated with LBP in these populations including a lack of physical fitness, higher fat mass, and long periods of sitting.
Pain is the main symptom and account for disability and lack of work participation. Physiological testing shows reduced lumbar flexibility and flexion-relaxation, poorer static balance , poorer proprioception and spinal segment stability, and lower physical fitness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with NLBP .
Quadratus lumborum (QL) is a deep trunk muscle, and its tightness can trigger symptoms of significant low back tightness and discomfort. Recurrent episodes (lasting more than 3 months) are common presentations of nonspecific LBP usually accompanied by limitation of movement, long-term disability, and decreased quality of life.
Detailed description
Infact, there is evidence that NSLBP subjects show an increase in center of pressure (CoP) displacement and velocity; and proprioceptive deficits, probably as a consequence of pain . Studies have reported LBP patients show significantly lower hip abductor and extensor strength compared to healthy adults and show weakening of the hip abductor or weakening of the hip extensors.
Quadratus Lumborum (QL) is a major cause of LBP difficulties, which frequently results in active and latent MTrP. Chronic LBP has been associated with changes in trunk muscle responses and increased muscle fatigability. This postural response alters the biomechanics of the spine, with the hips adopting an increased bend, which triggers a concomitant increase in the activation of the musculature surrounding the lower back and hip extensors.
The QL muscle is important in body mechanics and lumbar spine stabilization. Poor body mechanics and posture affects body positioning and stresses quadratus lumborum muscle which ultimately leads to myofascial trigger points in muscle. Increasing load also brings with it changes in spinal curvatures in both females and males. These increases in forward lean and back muscle activation, in addition to changes in spinal curvature, can heighten the risk of developing low back pain (LBP).
NSLBP has no definitive pathology regarding what is causing the pain but has been theorized to be caused by factors including poor posture, impaired flexibility, previous history of injury, heavy lifting, mental stress, and obesity. The prevalence of non-specific LBP increases with age, presenting a worse clinical course and a greater probability of transition to chronicity.
Manual therapy is a common treatment for severe low back pain. The strength and endurance of the trunk muscles play a crucial role in reducing pain, enhancing stability, and maintaining spinal function. Various treatments have been proposed for alleviating LBP, such as stretching exercises , heat therapy , massage therapy, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release.
Despite the number of treatment modalities detailed in the physiotherapy literature, there is no single conclusive treatment that has demonstrated to be effective for treating low back pain. Whole body vibration (WBV) is currently increasing in popularity as a treatment modality for alleviating pain, enhancing muscle activities and improving health-related quality of life.
The muscle energy technique is an active technique requiring the participant to contribute in an accurately regulated manner to the voluntary contraction of the muscle of a subject against the counterforce of an operator. MET is a manual therapy that utilizes gentle muscle contractions of the patient to relax muscles, lengthen them, and restore normal joint motion. This technique was pioneered in 1948 by Fred Mitchell, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, to enhance musculoskeletal function by mobilizing joints and stretching tight muscles and fascia.
The objective of MET is to promote muscle relaxation and lengthening, consequently enhancing joint range of motion (ROM). It is generally recognized as a gentle manual therapy technique for addressing limited motion in the spine and extremities. Depending on the comparative acuteness of the scenario, the contraction is generally started from or short of a previously identified obstacle of resistance. The mechanisms by which MET generates enhanced ROM is still under study. MET's effectiveness in relaxing the impacted muscles is due to the Golgi tendon organs inhibiting motor activity. Thus the shortened tissues attain a greater degree of ease and extra movement. The SCS method is an indirect manipulative method for treating muscle trigger points as its therapy action moves away from the restrictive obstacles, i.e. towards ease.
The strain counter strain (SCS) technique is one of the effective osteopathic treatment methods. It is a passive positional intervention aimed at relieving musculoskeletal dysfunction and pain. It is achieved by putting the tissues in an optimal position of comfort (POC). POC's aim is to decrease tender point irritability and normalize the dysfunction related to tissue. It is established by the soft and atraumatic nature of SCS methods as a secure and efficient primary mode of action in the therapy of painful muscles and the joints that affect them.
Osteopathic techniques including SCS have been addressed in peer-reviewed literature showing success. The intervention to treat chronic low back pain using SCS method can be regarded as a type of manipulative spinal soft tissue therapy because the pelvis, sacrum, and lower limbs are used passively in degrees of flexion, expansion, lateral flexion, and rotation in the placement of the lumbar spine and sacral areas.
This study will offer a thorough comparison of SCS and MET that could offer insight into their mechanisms and inform optimal clinical decision-making for long-term management of NSLBP and can help to understand which mechanism offers superior outcomes or if they are equally effective.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Strain Counter Strain | Experimental | Other: Group AGroup A will receive strain counter strain technique for Quadratus Lumborum, Gluteus Medius, Multifidus, Erector Spinae and Iliopsoas muscles, for 1 set with 3 repetitions separated by a 30 seconds rest period and 3 sessions for a week along with conventional treatment for a total of four weeks. Pre and post intervention values will be taken on 1st day and after 4 weeks Common treatment will comprise moist heat for 10 minutes as an adjunct (2); Stretching of back, piriformis and hamstrings, hold the stretch for 30 seconds in 2 sets with 3 repetitions; and strengthening of back and abdominal muscles. Exercises consisted of 15 repetitions, 2 times with rest periods in between, with 3 sessions every week for a total of four weeks |
| Muscle Energy Techniques | Active comparator | Other: Group BGroup B will receive muscle energy technique for Quadratus Lumborum, Gluteus Medius, Iliopsoas, Multifidus and Erector Spinae muscles; for 2 sets, 3 repetitions in a single session with a break of two minutes in between each repetition and 3 sessions for a week along with conventional treatment for a total of four weeks. Measurements were made before and after the intervention Common treatment will comprise moist heat for 10 minutes as an adjunct (2); Stretching of back, piriformis and hamstrings, hold the stretch for 30 seconds in 2 sets with 3 repetitions; and strengthening of back and abdominal muscles. Exercises consisted of 15 repetitions, 2 times with rest periods in between, with 3 sessions every week for a total of four weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants should age between 20-40 years.
- Both gender were included.
- Participants were required to have experienced LBP lasting three to six months.
- According to Simons' criteria participants were required to have at least 3 active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in their lower back muscles.
- 20-40% score on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), have Numerical Pain Rating Scale [NPRS] ≥ 4.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The patients with red flag conditions; disc prolapse, spinal stenosis, lumbar radiculopathy and spondylosis were excluded.
- Patients who had undergone previous surgery within the last six months, psychiatric or mental deficiencies, pregnancy, or lactation.
- Participants with conditions, like osteoporosis, kidney and gastrointestinal disorders.
- Individuals with a history of spinal surgery or spinal fractures.
- Participants with congenital leg length discrepancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group AGroup A will receive strain counter strain technique for Quadratus Lumborum, Gluteus Medius, Multifidus, Erector Spinae and Iliopsoas muscles, for 1 set with 3 repetitions separated by a 30 seconds rest period and 3 sessions for a week along with conventional treatment for a total of four weeks. Pre and post intervention values will be taken on 1st day and after 4 weeks | Other | Strain Counter Strain |
| Group BGroup B will receive muscle energy technique for Quadratus Lumborum, Gluteus Medius, Iliopsoas, Multifidus and Erector Spinae muscles; for 2 sets, 3 repetitions in a single session with a break of two minutes in between each repetition and 3 sessions for a week along with conventional treatment for a total of four weeks. Measurements were made before and after the intervention | Other | Muscle Energy Techniques |
Primary outcome
Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame: Baseline; 4 Weeks
Each component receives a score ranging from 0 to 5, with a score of 5 signifying the most severe disability. We calculate the index by dividing the total score by the range of scores. To obtain a numerical representation of the index as a percentage, we multiply the result by 100.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline; 4 Week
This scale is commonly used in the scientific literature and clinical practice, as it is reliable and responsive in LBP (r=0.61) and has a minimal clinically important difference of 1.99 points. This is 11 points scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain"(26). NRS revealed that r = 0.95 with BPI pain interference; r = 0.68 with MODI, test-retest reliability is strong
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36169931Santos GK, Goncalves de Oliveira R, Campos de Oliveira L, Ferreira C de Oliveira C, Andraus RA, Ngomo S, Fusco A, Cortis C, DA Silva RA. Effectiveness of muscle energy technique in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec;58(6):827-837. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07424-X. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 32991582Alahmari KA, Rengaramanujam K, Reddy RS, Samuel PS, Tedla JS, Kakaraparthi VN, Ahmad I. The immediate and short-term effects of dynamic taping on pain, endurance, disability, mobility and kinesiophobia in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 29;15(9):e0239505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239505. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 39416609Batool K, Mehmood M, Jafar M, Gull M. Comparative efficacy of muscle energy technique and Bowen technique on hamstrings muscle tightness in chronic low back pain patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;40(9):2080-2084. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.9.8517.
- Background: PubMed 28427472Simson KJ, Miller CT, Ford J, Hahne A, Main L, Rantalainen T, Teo WP, Teychenne M, Connell D, Trudel G, Zheng G, Thickbroom G, Belavy DL. Optimising conservative management of chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 20;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1913-8.
- Background: PubMed 15906102Stokes IA, Fox JR, Henry SM. Trunk muscular activation patterns and responses to transient force perturbation in persons with self-reported low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):658-67. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0893-7. Epub 2005 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 38565979Kalantari M, ShahAli S, Dadgoo M, Tabatabaei A. The automatic activity of abdominal muscles during stable and unstable standing postural tasks in older adults with and without low back pain- A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04934-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Back Pian
Recruiting
Sound Sine Wave And Standard Physiotherapy In Mechanical Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group A and Group B in people with Low Back Pian, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD (+92 320 786661, Shakil.urrehman@riphah.edu.pk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Oswestry Disability Index (time frame: Baseline; 4 Weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07854028, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2026.