AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative MorbidityNCT07853196

Effects of Hyaluronic Acid Complex and Dexamethasone on Pain, Swelling, and Trismus After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

A study testing Hyaluronic Acid Complex, Dexamethasone and Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental) in people with Postoperative Morbidity, run by Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University at 1 site in Cyprus.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of a hyaluronic acid complex and dexamethasone on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus following mandibular third molar surgery, compared with a control group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 years
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Morbidity
What is being tested?
Hyaluronic Acid Complex, Dexamethasone and Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteCyprus
Study dates
5 Mar 2026to 25 Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 35 years.
  • No systemic disease.
  • No regular medication use.
  • Non-smoker.
  • Not pregnant or lactating.
  • Presence of an asymptomatic partially impacted mandibular third molar indicated for prophylactic surgical extraction.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of acute pericoronitis.
  • Presence of an abscess or acute odontogenic infection.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Cyprus1 site
  • NEW Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University

    Mórfou, Guzelyurt, 99750

Other trials in Cyprus

About this study

Official title: Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Hyaluronic Acid Complex and Dexamethasone on Postoperative Pain, Edema, and Trismus Following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of a hyaluronic acid complex and dexamethasone on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus following mandibular third molar surgery, compared with a control group. Participants were evaluated in three groups: a hyaluronic acid complex group, a dexamethasone group, and a control group. Postoperative pain, facial swelling, and limitation of mouth opening were assessed during the postoperative follow-up period to compare postoperative outcomes among the groups.

Being tested
Hyaluronic Acid Complex, Dexamethasone, Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)
Keywords
Mandibular Third Molar Surgery, Dexamethasone, Postoperative Pain, Facial Swelling, Trismus, Hyaluronic Acid
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative, Trismus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hyaluronic Acid ComplexDrug

    Monovisc® (Anika Therapeutics, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA), containing 22 mg/mL cross-linked, high-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate, was used. A 0.2 mL volume of the preparation (equivalent to 4.4 mg sodium hyaluronate) was applied directly into the extraction socket using a sterile applicator. SPONGOSTAN™ Dental absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge was subsequently placed into the socket to enhance retention of the preparation.

  • DexamethasoneDrug

    DEKORT® 8 mg/2 mL solution for I.M./I.V. injection (DEVA Holding A.Ş., Türkiye) was used. A 1.5 mL volume of the solution, corresponding to 6 mg dexamethasone, was absorbed into a SPONGOSTAN™ Dental absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge and placed directly into the extraction socket.

  • Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)Device

    SPONGOSTAN™ Dental absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge (MS0005; 1 × 1 × 1 cm; Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson) was placed directly into the extraction socket. In the control group, the gelatin sponge was used without hyaluronic acid or dexamethasone.

Study groups in NCT07853196
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupActive comparatorFollowing mandibular third molar extraction, SPONGOSTAN™ Dental absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge (MS0005; 1 × 1 × 1 cm; Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson) was placed into the extraction socket. No hyaluronic acid complex or dexamethasone was administered. The surgical site was primarily closed with 3/0 silk sutures, which were removed on postoperative day 7.
Receives: Device: Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)
Hyaluronic Acid Complex GroupExperimentalFollowing mandibular third molar extraction, 0.2 mL of Monovisc® (22 mg/mL cross-linked high-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate; Anika Therapeutics, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA), corresponding to 4.4 mg of sodium hyaluronate, was applied directly into the extraction socket. SPONGOSTAN™ Dental was subsequently placed to enhance retention within the socket. The surgical site was primarily closed with 3/0 silk sutures, which were removed on postoperative day 7.
Receives: Drug: Hyaluronic Acid Complex; Device: Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)
Dexamethasone GroupExperimentalFollowing mandibular third molar extraction, 1.5 mL of DEKORT® 8 mg/2 mL I.M./I.V. solution for injection (DEVA Holding A.Ş., Türkiye), corresponding to 6 mg of dexamethasone, was absorbed into SPONGOSTAN™ Dental and placed into the extraction socket. The surgical site was primarily closed with 3/0 silk sutures, which were removed on postoperative day 7.
Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone; Device: Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative Pain Assessed Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Postoperative pain was assessed using a patient-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated unbearable/worst pain. Participants indicated their perceived pain intensity on the scale. No preoperative VAS measurement was performed

    Measured: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  2. Facial Swelling Assessed Using Facial Measurements

    Facial swelling was assessed in millimeters (mm) using a flexible measuring tape. Three anatomical distances were measured: tragus to labial commissure, tragus to pogonion, and mandibular angle to lateral canthus. The arithmetic mean of the three measurements was calculated for each participant. Postoperative percentage change from the preoperative baseline was calculated as [(postoperative mean - preoperative mean) / |preoperative mean|] × 100. Positive values indicated an increase in facial measurements.

    Measured: Preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  3. Trismus Assessed by Maximum Interincisal Mouth Opening

    Trismus was assessed by measuring maximum interincisal mouth opening in millimeters (mm) using a digital caliper. The distance between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors was measured once at each assessment. Postoperative percentage change from the preoperative baseline was calculated as [(postoperative value - preoperative value) / |preoperative value|] × 100. Negative values indicated a reduction in maximum mouth opening.

    Measured: Preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Oct 2026
  2. Study start5 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completion25 Jul 2026
  4. Study completion25 Jul 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07853196
Sponsor's protocol ID
KSTU//2026/009
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
26 Sep 2026
Last updated
6 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared, as no IPD sharing plan was established for this study.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in