Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)DEP-VADS-ORTHONCT07851818
Screening Psychosocial Distress in Head and Neck Cancer
An observational study of Head and Neck Cancer (H&N), run by Hôpital NOVO.
Trial summary
This prospective, multicenter study aims to assess the presence of psychosocial distress using the Distress Thermometer in patients treated for head and neck cancer at the initiation of their speech-language therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
- What is being tested?
- Psychosocial distress screening using the Distress Thermometer
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 Nov 2026to 30 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population will consist of patients receiving care for head and neck cancer at participating centers and referred for speech-language therapy as part of their clinical management. Participants will be recruited at the initiation of speech-language therapy
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients aged 18 years or older
- Patients managed following a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract
- Requiring speech-language pathology care
- Initiation of curative-intent treatment dating back less than one month
- Sufficient understanding of the French language to complete the study questionnaires
- Patient who has been informed about the research and has not expressed any objection to participating
Who cannot join
- Palliative care initiated
- Severe cognitive impairment preventing the completion of the questionnaire
- Clinical condition preventing participation
- Severe, unstabilized psychiatric disorders
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Psychosocial Distress Screening in Patients Treated for Head and Neck Cancer : The Value of Screening in Speech-Language Therapy Practice
This prospective, multicenter study aims to assess the presence of psychosocial distress using the Distress Thermometer in patients treated for head and neck cancer at the initiation of their speech-language therapy. It also seeks to evaluate the evolution of this distress over a two-month period, as well as its correlation with patient engagement in therapy, functional disorders, and overall quality of life (assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HN35 questionnaires). By capturing longitudinal changes in distress levels, functional impairments, and patient commitment to therapy, this research seeks to clarify the SLP's role in comprehensive supportive oncology care and optimize timely psychological referrals for vulnerable patients.
The study hypothesizes that a significant proportion of patients experience clinically meaningful psychosocial distress (score ≥ 4 on the Distress Thermometer) at the start of speech-language therapy. It is also expected that this distress correlates with lower therapeutic engagement and impaired quality of life, and that early screening by speech-language pathologists will improve the timely referral of patients to psychological support professionals.
Read the detailed description
The announcement of cancer marks a major turning point in the lives of those affected, profoundly impacting the physical, psychological, and social dimensions of their daily lives1. Head and neck cancer (HNC) perfectly illustrates this reality, as it is frequently associated in the literature with pain, disfigurement, dysfunction, and psychosocial distress2. Referred to in the literature as "Head and Neck Cancer," it encompasses a group of malignant tumors affecting a complex anatomical region situated at the crossroads of the respiratory, phonatory, and digestive systems. The impairment of two vital functions, respiration and swallowing, as well as phonation, highlights the vulnerable and traumatic nature of this cancer3. In 2022, global cancer statistics recorded nearly 947,000 new cases of head and neck cancer, placing it 7th among the most frequent cancers worldwide4. Predominantly male, its incidence is nevertheless increasing in women, partly due to increased exposure to certain risk factors (tobacco and alcohol consumption), as well as an increase in tumors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV)5. In France, the National Cancer Institute6 estimates that approximately 15,000 new cases of HNC are diagnosed each year, causing nearly 3,600 deaths.
Survivors of HNC report significant repercussions on their daily functioning, particularly regarding eating, speech, pain, and physical appearance7. HNC treatments are heavy and frequently rely on various approaches combining surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy2,8. While these strategies improve tumor control, they also expose patients to often persistent adverse effects. Long-term psychosocial disorders (anxiety, mood disorders, fatigue, depression) also alter the patient's overall quality of life. The fear of no longer being able to speak or be heard, the fear of suffocating or no longer being able to eat normally are major anxiety-inducing factors9. More tragically, psychological disorders may be responsible for higher suicide rates in HNC patients. A 2025 systematic review with meta-analysis demonstrates a suicide risk incidence three times higher than that of the general population, particularly among men10.
The psychological, social, and behavioral dimensions associated with cancer are therefore essential components of the disease, influencing both the patient's experience, their adaptation to the diagnosis, and their engagement in care11. Over the past two decades, psychosocial (or emotional) distress has progressively been recognized as a central issue in psycho-oncology, to the point of being qualified as the "sixth vital sign," after temperature, respiration, heart rate, blood pressure, and pain12. This recognition reflects a major evolution in care models, now integrating psychological and social dimensions into the global assessment of cancers patients. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, distress is defined as " a multifactorial unpleasant experience of a psychological (i.e., cognitive, behavioral, and emotional), social, spiritual, and/or physical nature that may interfere with a person's ability to cope effectively with cancer, its physical symptoms, and its treatment. Distress spans a continuum, ranging from common and normal feelings of vulnerability, sadness, and fears, to problems that can become disabling, such as depression, anxiety, panic, social isolation, as well as existential and spiritual crisis. ".3 Among HNC patients, this issue appears particularly prominent. HNC ranks high among those generating very high levels of distress, behind lung cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and Hodgkin's lymphoma13. Emotional distress also represents a major clinical challenge. Zabora et al. (2001) emphasize that when left unrecognised and unmanaged, it can compromise therapeutic outcomes, impair quality of life, and increase healthcare costs14. Despite its high prevalence demonstrated in HNC patients, psychosocial distress is still poorly screened and insufficiently managed in routine care3. It is therefore frequently under-identified and undertreated in clinical practice15. However, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations emphasize the implementation of regular screening at various key moments of the care pathway, particularly at diagnostic disclosure, during treatments, and during post-therapeutic follow-up, to allow early identification of struggling patients3.
To identify the level and nature of distress, the Distress Thermometer was designed and recommended by the NCCN in 199716. On a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no distress and 10 maximum distress, the person graphically indicates their feelings over the past week. The Distress Thermometer is a reliable and validated instrument, widely tested internationally, and translated into 21 languages, including French17. A threshold of 4 is frequently used to identify clinically significant distress, although this may vary across populations and cultural contexts. The Distress Thermometer is completed by the Canadian Problem List, allowing the collection of the patient's physical, emotional, social, practical, and spiritual concerns18.
The assessment of the needs of HNC patients is part of the foundations of speech-language pathology (SLP) evaluation19. The SLP care of patients, often undergoing major surgeries, is particularly complex and addresses individuals largely confronted with major disruptions in their social reference points9. Assessments of voice, speech, and swallowing must be performed by the SLP, who will propose appropriate interventions to maintain these functions upstream of treatment. Speech therapy also extends to the management of post-treatment complications, such as trismus or radiation-induced fibrosis. According to Zuydam et al. (2023), establishing a solid therapeutic relationship makes it possible to identify patient concerns19. Indeed, unmet needs have been identified in 60% to 70% of patients diagnosed with HNC20. Taking these different dimensions into account is therefore part of a perspective of improving care outcomes, preserving patients' quality of life, and increasing their satisfaction with care21. This cross-functional competency of psychosocial support, offered by professionals involved in regular cancer care, appears essential here and must not be underestimated22 . Although psychosocial distress screening is recommended throughout the cancer care pathway, ils integration into routine clinical practice remains poorly documented, particulary in the field of speech-language pathology. Speech-language pathologists play a specific role in care pathway of patients with HNC because their involvement is early and regular and focuses on the functional consequences of cancer and its treatments. This close and repeated contact with patients may place them in a relevant position to identify psychosocial difficulties encountered during care.
To date, no study has specifically investigated the relevance of integrating systematic psychosocial distress screening by speech-language pathologists at the beginning of care in patients treated for HNC. The DEP-VADS-ORTHO study may therefore contribute to assessing the relevance of incorporating the Distress Thermometer into routine speech-language pathology practice and to better defining the role of speech-language pathologists within the multidisciplinary care pathway of these patients.
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
- Being tested
- Psychosocial distress screening using the Distress Thermometer
- Keywords
- Head and Neck Neoplasms, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Psychological Distress, Emotional Distress, Language therapies, Quality of Life, Patient Engagement, Supportive Care Oncology
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Patient Participation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Psychosocial distress screening using the Distress ThermometerOther
Administration of the Distress Thermometer and its accompanying Problem List to patients at the initiation of speech-language therapy to identify clinically significant psychosocial distress (score ≥ 4).
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of patients presenting with psychosocial distress at the initiation of speech language therapy
Proportion of patients identified as experiencing clinically significant psychosocial distress during their first speech-language therapy session, evaluated using the Distress Thermometer (score ≥ 4)
Measured: At the first speech-language therapy session (baseline)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Correlation between psychosocial distress score and indicators of patient engagement in speech-language therapy
Assessment of the correlation between psychosocial distress score (measured by the Distress Thermometer) and indicators of patient engagement in speech-language therapy, including the number of canceled appointments, the number of rescheduled appointments, and the patient engagement score evaluated by the speech-language pathologist using the revised Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale (HRERS-RV)
Measured: Baseline (first speech-language therapy session) and 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Correlation between psychosocial distress score, functional disorders, and quality of life
Description: Evaluation of the correlation between the psychosocial distress score (measured by the Distress Thermometer and its Problem List) and scores assessing functional disorders and quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-HN35 questionnaires
Measured: Baseline (first speech-language therapy session) and 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Change in psychosocial distress score over time
Evaluation of the variation in the psychosocial distress score using the Distress Thermometer between T0 (baseline, first speech-language therapy session) and T1 (2 months after baseline, ±10 days)
Measured: From baseline (first speech-language therapy session) to 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Change in quality of Life scores over time
Evaluation of the variation in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores between T0 (baseline, first speech-language therapy session) and T1 (2 months after baseline, ±10 days).
Measured: From baseline (first speech-language therapy session) to 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Change in functional disorder scores over time
Evaluation of the variation in EORTC QLQ-HN35 scores between T0 (baseline, first speech-language therapy session) and T1 (2 months after baseline, ±10 days).
Measured: From baseline (first speech-language therapy session) to 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Screening acceptance rate
Proportion of patients who agree to undergo the psychosocial distress screening among all eligible and approached patients
Measured: Baseline (first speech-language therapy session)
Rate of patient referral to psychological support professionals
Proportion of patients who benefit from a referral to a psychological or psychosocial support professional following the screening
Measured: Throughout the 2-month study period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2026
- Study start30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hôpital NOVO
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marion LEROUX, Study chair, Hôpital NOVOAlexandra POULAIN, Principal investigator, SMR Val Rosay
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07851818
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHRD1626
- Other IDs
- 2026-A01692-49
- Acronym
- DEP-VADS-ORTHO
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Psychosocial Distress Screening in Patients Treated for Head and Neck Cancer : The Value of Screening in Speech-Language Therapy Practice
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07851818
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEP-VADS-ORTHO / CHRD1626
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
- Keywords
- Head and Neck Neoplasms, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Psychological Distress, Emotional Distress, Language therapies, Quality of Life, Patient Engagement, Supportive Care Oncology
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hôpital NOVOUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective, multicenter study aims to assess the presence of psychosocial distress using the Distress Thermometer in patients treated for head and neck cancer at the initiation of their speech-language therapy. It also seeks to evaluate the evolution of this distress over a two-month period, as well as its correlation with patient engagement in therapy, functional disorders, and overall quality of life (assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HN35 questionnaires). By capturing longitudinal changes in distress levels, functional impairments, and patient commitment to therapy, this research seeks to clarify the SLP's role in comprehensive supportive oncology care and optimize timely psychological referrals for vulnerable patients.
The study hypothesizes that a significant proportion of patients experience clinically meaningful psychosocial distress (score ≥ 4 on the Distress Thermometer) at the start of speech-language therapy. It is also expected that this distress correlates with lower therapeutic engagement and impaired quality of life, and that early screening by speech-language pathologists will improve the timely referral of patients to psychological support professionals.
Detailed description
The announcement of cancer marks a major turning point in the lives of those affected, profoundly impacting the physical, psychological, and social dimensions of their daily lives1. Head and neck cancer (HNC) perfectly illustrates this reality, as it is frequently associated in the literature with pain, disfigurement, dysfunction, and psychosocial distress2. Referred to in the literature as "Head and Neck Cancer," it encompasses a group of malignant tumors affecting a complex anatomical region situated at the crossroads of the respiratory, phonatory, and digestive systems. The impairment of two vital functions, respiration and swallowing, as well as phonation, highlights the vulnerable and traumatic nature of this cancer3. In 2022, global cancer statistics recorded nearly 947,000 new cases of head and neck cancer, placing it 7th among the most frequent cancers worldwide4. Predominantly male, its incidence is nevertheless increasing in women, partly due to increased exposure to certain risk factors (tobacco and alcohol consumption), as well as an increase in tumors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV)5. In France, the National Cancer Institute6 estimates that approximately 15,000 new cases of HNC are diagnosed each year, causing nearly 3,600 deaths.
Survivors of HNC report significant repercussions on their daily functioning, particularly regarding eating, speech, pain, and physical appearance7. HNC treatments are heavy and frequently rely on various approaches combining surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy2,8. While these strategies improve tumor control, they also expose patients to often persistent adverse effects. Long-term psychosocial disorders (anxiety, mood disorders, fatigue, depression) also alter the patient's overall quality of life. The fear of no longer being able to speak or be heard, the fear of suffocating or no longer being able to eat normally are major anxiety-inducing factors9. More tragically, psychological disorders may be responsible for higher suicide rates in HNC patients. A 2025 systematic review with meta-analysis demonstrates a suicide risk incidence three times higher than that of the general population, particularly among men10.
The psychological, social, and behavioral dimensions associated with cancer are therefore essential components of the disease, influencing both the patient's experience, their adaptation to the diagnosis, and their engagement in care11. Over the past two decades, psychosocial (or emotional) distress has progressively been recognized as a central issue in psycho-oncology, to the point of being qualified as the "sixth vital sign," after temperature, respiration, heart rate, blood pressure, and pain12. This recognition reflects a major evolution in care models, now integrating psychological and social dimensions into the global assessment of cancers patients. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, distress is defined as " a multifactorial unpleasant experience of a psychological (i.e., cognitive, behavioral, and emotional), social, spiritual, and/or physical nature that may interfere with a person's ability to cope effectively with cancer, its physical symptoms, and its treatment. Distress spans a continuum, ranging from common and normal feelings of vulnerability, sadness, and fears, to problems that can become disabling, such as depression, anxiety, panic, social isolation, as well as existential and spiritual crisis. ".3 Among HNC patients, this issue appears particularly prominent. HNC ranks high among those generating very high levels of distress, behind lung cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and Hodgkin's lymphoma13. Emotional distress also represents a major clinical challenge. Zabora et al. (2001) emphasize that when left unrecognised and unmanaged, it can compromise therapeutic outcomes, impair quality of life, and increase healthcare costs14. Despite its high prevalence demonstrated in HNC patients, psychosocial distress is still poorly screened and insufficiently managed in routine care3. It is therefore frequently under-identified and undertreated in clinical practice15. However, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations emphasize the implementation of regular screening at various key moments of the care pathway, particularly at diagnostic disclosure, during treatments, and during post-therapeutic follow-up, to allow early identification of struggling patients3.
To identify the level and nature of distress, the Distress Thermometer was designed and recommended by the NCCN in 199716. On a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no distress and 10 maximum distress, the person graphically indicates their feelings over the past week. The Distress Thermometer is a reliable and validated instrument, widely tested internationally, and translated into 21 languages, including French17. A threshold of 4 is frequently used to identify clinically significant distress, although this may vary across populations and cultural contexts. The Distress Thermometer is completed by the Canadian Problem List, allowing the collection of the patient's physical, emotional, social, practical, and spiritual concerns18.
The assessment of the needs of HNC patients is part of the foundations of speech-language pathology (SLP) evaluation19. The SLP care of patients, often undergoing major surgeries, is particularly complex and addresses individuals largely confronted with major disruptions in their social reference points9. Assessments of voice, speech, and swallowing must be performed by the SLP, who will propose appropriate interventions to maintain these functions upstream of treatment. Speech therapy also extends to the management of post-treatment complications, such as trismus or radiation-induced fibrosis. According to Zuydam et al. (2023), establishing a solid therapeutic relationship makes it possible to identify patient concerns19. Indeed, unmet needs have been identified in 60% to 70% of patients diagnosed with HNC20. Taking these different dimensions into account is therefore part of a perspective of improving care outcomes, preserving patients' quality of life, and increasing their satisfaction with care21. This cross-functional competency of psychosocial support, offered by professionals involved in regular cancer care, appears essential here and must not be underestimated22 . Although psychosocial distress screening is recommended throughout the cancer care pathway, ils integration into routine clinical practice remains poorly documented, particulary in the field of speech-language pathology. Speech-language pathologists play a specific role in care pathway of patients with HNC because their involvement is early and regular and focuses on the functional consequences of cancer and its treatments. This close and repeated contact with patients may place them in a relevant position to identify psychosocial difficulties encountered during care.
To date, no study has specifically investigated the relevance of integrating systematic psychosocial distress screening by speech-language pathologists at the beginning of care in patients treated for HNC. The DEP-VADS-ORTHO study may therefore contribute to assessing the relevance of incorporating the Distress Thermometer into routine speech-language pathology practice and to better defining the role of speech-language pathologists within the multidisciplinary care pathway of these patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population will consist of patients receiving care for head and neck cancer at participating centers and referred for speech-language therapy as part of their clinical management. Participants will be recruited at the initiation of speech-language therapy
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult patients aged 18 years or older
- Patients managed following a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract
- Requiring speech-language pathology care
- Initiation of curative-intent treatment dating back less than one month
- Sufficient understanding of the French language to complete the study questionnaires
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Palliative care initiated
- Severe cognitive impairment preventing the completion of the questionnaire
- Clinical condition preventing participation
- Severe, unstabilized psychiatric disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial distress screening using the Distress ThermometerAdministration of the Distress Thermometer and its accompanying Problem List to patients at the initiation of speech-language therapy to identify clinically significant psychosocial distress (score ≥ 4). | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Proportion of patients presenting with psychosocial distress at the initiation of speech language therapy
Time frame: At the first speech-language therapy session (baseline)
Proportion of patients identified as experiencing clinically significant psychosocial distress during their first speech-language therapy session, evaluated using the Distress Thermometer (score ≥ 4)
7 secondary outcomes
Correlation between psychosocial distress score and indicators of patient engagement in speech-language therapy
Time frame: Baseline (first speech-language therapy session) and 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Correlation between psychosocial distress score, functional disorders, and quality of life
Time frame: Baseline (first speech-language therapy session) and 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Change in psychosocial distress score over time
Time frame: From baseline (first speech-language therapy session) to 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Change in quality of Life scores over time
Time frame: From baseline (first speech-language therapy session) to 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Change in functional disorder scores over time
Time frame: From baseline (first speech-language therapy session) to 2 months after baseline (±10 days)
Screening acceptance rate
Time frame: Baseline (first speech-language therapy session)
Rate of patient referral to psychological support professionals
Time frame: Throughout the 2-month study period
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Head and Neck Cancer Strategies
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N), Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
SumMET: Study of [225Ac]Ac-FL-261 in Participants With Solid Tumors Overexpressing c-MET
Solid Tumor, NSCLC
Not yet recruiting
Oral Care Program for Mouth Side Effects During Head and Neck Radiation Therapy
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N), Oral Mucositis (Ulcerative) Due to Radiation
Recruiting
Swallowing Rehabilitation Program for Head and Neck Tumor Patients
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Marion LEROUX study chair
Hôpital NOVO
Alexandra POULAIN principal investigator
SMR Val Rosay
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Head and Neck Cancer (H&N), run by Hôpital NOVO.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Véronique DA COSTA (0130755069, veronique.dacosta@ght-novo.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of patients presenting with psychosocial distress at the initiation of speech language therapy (time frame: At the first speech-language therapy session (baseline)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2026.