Substance Use (Drugs, Alcohol)NCT07843576
The ICEC Cluster Trial: Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative for Youth Substance Use Prevention in Rural America
A study testing Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative and School-Based Data Collection and Reporting without Network Coordinator Support in people with Substance Use (Drugs, Alcohol) and Tobacco Use, run by West Virginia University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate whether the Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative can help prevent alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among youth living in rural communities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Substance Use (Drugs, Alcohol), Tobacco Use, Adolescent Substance Use
- What is being tested?
- Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative and School-Based Data Collection and Reporting without Network Coordinator Support
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2026to Jul 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Student Participants
- Enrolled in grades 7 through 12 at a participating public school in a participating West Virginia county.
- Able to complete a confidential online survey during school hours.
- Parent or guardian has not opted the student out of participation.
- Student provides assent to participate.
- Adult Coalition Participants
Show all 10Show fewer
- Member of a participating County Prevention Coalition, implementation network, or stakeholder group.
- Participates in coalition planning, implementation, evaluation, or prevention activities.
- Able to complete coalition assessment questionnaires.
- Provides informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Student Participants
- Not enrolled in grades 7 through 12 at a participating public school.
- Attends a school in a non-participating county.
- Parent or guardian opts the student out of participation.
- Student declines assent or participation.
- Adult Coalition Participants
Show all 9Show fewer
- Not affiliated with a participating coalition or implementation network.
- Declines informed consent.
- Unable to complete coalition assessment procedures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
WVU School of Public Health- West Virginia Prevention Research Center
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Alfgeir L Kristjansson, PhD, 304-293-3129, alkristjansson@hsc.wvu.edu
Jessica Coffman, MA, 304-293-6283, jecoffman@hsc.wvu.edu
About this study
Official title: Shifting the Landscape in Primary Substance Use Prevention for Rural America: The Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative (ICEC) Cluster Trial
This study will evaluate whether the Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative can help prevent alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among youth living in rural communities. The study is coordinated through the West Virginia University Prevention Research Center and will be conducted in participating public schools and County Prevention Coalitions located in up to 36 rural counties in West Virginia. Students in grades 7 through 12 at participating public schools will complete confidential online surveys once each year for four years. The surveys will assess alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use, as well as family, peer, school, and community factors that may increase or decrease the risk of substance use. All participating counties will receive reports summarizing these survey results at the school and county levels.
Counties will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Counties in the intervention group will receive support from trained Network Coordinators who will work with local County Prevention Coalitions to review community data, engage local stakeholders, develop action plans, strengthen prevention efforts, and support implementation of community-selected prevention strategies. Counties in the comparison group will receive survey reports but will not receive this implementation support. The researchers will compare the two groups to determine whether the ICE Collaborative reduces youth alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use and improves community factors that support healthy youth development. The study will also evaluate whether the intervention strengthens community prevention coalitions, stakeholder engagement, resource development, and implementation of prevention programs and policies
- Being tested
- Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative, School-Based Data Collection and Reporting without Network Coordinator Support
- Keywords
- Substance Use Prevention, Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative (ICEC), Icelandic Prevention Model, Rural Communities, Community Mobilization
- Medical subject headings
- Substance-Related Disorders, Tobacco Use
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Integrated Community Engagement CollaborativeOther
Also called ICE Collaborative
The Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative is a community capacity-building framework designed to strengthen local prevention systems and reduce youth alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use. The intervention includes annual collection and dissemination of youth survey data, coalition development, stakeholder engagement, data-driven decision making, strategic planning, technical assistance, resource development, and implementation support. Network Coordinators housed within Regional Prevention Lead Organizations provide ongoing support to County Prevention Coalitions to facilitate community-driven prevention planning and implementation. Counties participate in repeated annual implementation cycles throughout the study period.
School-Based Data Collection and Reporting without Network Coordinator SupportOther
Annual collection of confidential school-based survey data from students in grades 7 through 12 and dissemination of school-level and county-level reports describing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use and associated risk and protective factors. Counties assigned to this condition receive data reports but do not receive implementation support, technical assistance, coalition development activities, or Network Coordinator assistance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ICE Collaborative With Network Coordinator Support | Experimental | Counties assigned to this arm will participate in the Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative. Students in grades 7 through 12 will complete annual confidential surveys, and counties will receive school-level and county-level reports summarizing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use and associated risk and protective factors. County Prevention Coalitions will receive implementation support from Network Coordinators, including coalition development, stakeholder engagement, dissemination and interpretation of local data, strategic planning, resource development, and support for implementation of locally selected prevention strategies through a structured community engagement process Receives: Other: Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative |
| Survey Reporting Only | Active comparator | Counties assigned to this arm will participate in annual school-based surveys of students in grades 7 through 12 and will receive school-level and county-level reports describing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use and associated risk and protective factors. Counties in this arm will not receive Network Coordinator support, coalition capacity-building activities, technical assistance, or implementation support provided through the Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative. Receives: Other: School-Based Data Collection and Reporting without Network Coordinator Support |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Past 30-Day Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug (ATOD) Use Prevalence
Past 30-day prevalence of tobacco cigarette use, electronic cigarette use, alcohol use, drunkenness, and cannabis use among students in grades 7 through 12 will be assessed using annual school-based online surveys. Tobacco and e-cigarette use will be assessed on a 7-point scale ranging from 1=Never used, to 7=More than 20 times per day. Alcohol, drunkenness, and cannabis use will be assessed on a 7-point count scale ranging from 1=0 times, to 7=40 times+. Outcomes will be reported separately as the percentage of students reporting each substance use behavior during the previous 30 days. Higher percentages indicate greater substance use prevalence.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Lifetime Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug (ATOD) Use Prevalence
Lifetime prevalence of tobacco cigarette use, electronic cigarette use, alcohol use, drunkenness, and cannabis use among students in grades 7 through 12 will be assessed using annual school-based online surveys. Outcomes will be reported separately as the percentage of students reporting lifetime use of each substance or behavior. Scoring for each of those variables will range from 1=0 times, to 7= 40 times+. Higher percentages indicate greater lifetime substance use prevalence.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change in Family Risk and Protective Factors
Family-domain scores will be assessed annually using student surveys measuring seven concepts: perceived parental support, family social support, time spent with parents, parental monitoring, social capital, parental reactions to substance use, and parental/sibling substance use. Composite scores will be calculated as follows: perceived parental support (5 items, 4-point Likert, range 4-20); family social support (3 items, 7-point Likert, range 3-21); time spent with parents (2 items, 5-point Likert, range 2-10); parental monitoring (2 items, 4-point Likert, range 2-8); social capital (2 items, 4-point Likert, range 2-8); parental reactions to substance use (5 items, 4-point Likert, range 4-16); and parental/sibling substance use (3 yes/no items). Higher scores on protective-factor measures indicate greater protection against youth substance use, while higher scores on risk-factor measures indicate greater exposure to substance use risk.
Measured: Baseline and annually through Year 5
Change in Peer Risk and Protective Factors
Peer-domain scores will be assessed annually using student surveys measuring five concepts: friend social support, peer substance use, peer delinquency, perceived peer respect for substance use, and perceived peer respect for delinquency. Composite scores will be calculated as follows: friend social support (3 items, 7-point Likert scale, range 3-21); peer substance use (5 items, 5-point Likert scale, range 5-25); peer delinquency (3 items, 5-point Likert scale, range 3-15); perceived peer respect for substance use (5 items, 5-point Likert scale, range 5-25); and perceived peer respect for delinquency (3 items, 5-point Likert scale, range 3-15). Higher scores on protective-factor measures indicate greater protection against youth substance use, while higher scores on risk-factor measures indicate greater exposure to substance use risk.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in School Risk and Protective Factors
School-domain scores will be assessed annually using student surveys measuring five concepts: supportive adults in school, supportive peers in school, motivation to learn and grow, school connectedness, and school absenteeism. Composite scores will be calculated as follows: supportive adults in school (5 items, 5-point Likert scale, range 5-25); supportive peers in school (4 items, 5-point Likert scale, range 4-20); motivation to learn and grow (5 items, 5-point Likert scale, range 5-25); school connectedness (composite score derived from survey items); and school absenteeism (2 items, 6-point count scale, range 2-12, with response options from none to 7 or more days). Higher scores on protective-factor measures indicate greater protection against youth substance use, while higher scores on risk-factor measures indicate greater exposure to substance use risk.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Leisure-Time Risk and Protective Factors
Leisure-time domain scores will be assessed annually using student surveys measuring three concepts: late outside hours, structured recreational activities, and unstructured activities. Composite scores will be calculated as follows: late outside hours (2 items, 8-point count scale, range 2-16, with responses from never to 7 or more days); structured recreational activities (7 items, 9-point frequency scale, range 7-63, with responses from less than once per week to seven times per week); and unstructured activities (6 items, 5-point frequency scale, range 6-30, with responses from never to four or more times per week). Higher scores on protective-factor measures indicate greater protection against youth substance use, while higher scores on risk-factor measures indicate greater exposure to substance use risk.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Implementation Integrity and Consistency
Implementation integrity and consistency will be assessed using the ICE Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment (ICE-IICA). Scores from 126 yes/no questions (scored 0/1) represent the percentage of required implementation activities completed across the ICE implementation process within each county. Higher scores indicate greater adherence to and consistency of implementation.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Role Structure and Clarity- Efficient Practices
County Prevention Coalition Role structure and clarity will be assessed using the Efficient Practices subscale of the Internal Coalition Effectiveness Instrument (ICEI). Higher scores indicate more efficient coalition practices.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Role Structure and Clarity- Coalition Efficiency Subscale
County Prevention Coalition Role structure and clarity will be assessed using the Coalition Efficiency subscale of the Communities That Care Coalition Functioning Survey (CFS). Higher scores indicate clearer coalition roles.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Cohesion and Collaboration- Relationship and Participation
County Prevention Coalition Cohesion and collaboration will be assessed using 10 items from the Relationships and Participation subscales of the Internal Coalition Effectiveness Instrument (ICEI). Higher scores indicate greater levels of collaboration, teamwork, and coalition member relationships.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Cohesion and Collaboration- CFS Cohesion and Participation Benefits
County Prevention Coalition Cohesion and collaboration will be assessed using the Cohesion and Participation Benefits subscales of the Communities That Care Coalition Functioning Survey (CFS) measured on a 5-point Likert scale with a total range from 10-50. Higher scores indicate greater cohesion and perceived benefits of participation.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Relational Coordination
County Prevention Coalition Relational coordination will be assessed using 6 items the Relational Coordination Survey measured on a 5-point Likert scale with a total range from 6-30. Higher scores indicate stronger communication, shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect among coalition members and partner organizations.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Strategic Planning Capacity
County Prevention Coalition Relational coordination will be assessed using 6 items the Relational Coordination Survey measured on a 5-point Likert scale with a total range from 6-30. Higher scores indicate stronger communication, shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect among coalition members and partner organizations.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Stakeholder Engagement
County Prevention Coalition Stakeholder engagement will be assessed using the Community Impact Scale (CIS) and coalition records documenting stakeholder participation. The CIS assesses stakeholder satisfaction, perceived benefits, motivation, engagement, and knowledge gained measured on a 5-point Likert scale with a total range from 10-50. Higher scores indicate greater stakeholder involvement and engagement in coalition activities.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Data-Driven Decision-Making Capacity
County Prevention Coalition Data-driven decision-making capacity will be assessed using an adapted version of the 3D-ME Inventory, the Data-Driven Decision-Making Questionnaire (DDDM-Q), and coalition records documenting dissemination and use of local survey data. In total 9 items will be applied and scored on a 5-point Likert scale with a range between 9 and 45. Higher scores indicate greater capacity to use data to guide coalition planning, resource allocation, and implementation decisions.
Measured: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Sep 2026
- Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2030 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Substance Use (Drugs, Alcohol)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by West Virginia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Counties will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative intervention or an active comparator condition. All participating counties will receive annual school-based youth surveys and school- and county-level data reports. Counties assigned to the intervention condition will additionally receive implementation support, technical assistance, coalition development support, and strategic planning assistance from Network Coordinators.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- West Virginia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alfgeir L Kristjansson, West Virginia University
- Investigators
- Alfgeir L Kristjansson, PhD, Principal investigator, West Virgina University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07843576
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00000478
- Other IDs
- R01DA063662
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Shifting the Landscape in Primary Substance Use Prevention for Rural America: The Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative (ICEC) Cluster Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07843576
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00000478
- Keywords
- Substance Use Prevention, Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative (ICEC), Icelandic Prevention Model, Rural Communities, Community Mobilization
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 25,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- West Virginia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate whether the Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative can help prevent alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among youth living in rural communities. The study is coordinated through the West Virginia University Prevention Research Center and will be conducted in participating public schools and County Prevention Coalitions located in up to 36 rural counties in West Virginia. Students in grades 7 through 12 at participating public schools will complete confidential online surveys once each year for four years. The surveys will assess alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use, as well as family, peer, school, and community factors that may increase or decrease the risk of substance use. All participating counties will receive reports summarizing these survey results at the school and county levels.
Counties will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Counties in the intervention group will receive support from trained Network Coordinators who will work with local County Prevention Coalitions to review community data, engage local stakeholders, develop action plans, strengthen prevention efforts, and support implementation of community-selected prevention strategies. Counties in the comparison group will receive survey reports but will not receive this implementation support. The researchers will compare the two groups to determine whether the ICE Collaborative reduces youth alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use and improves community factors that support healthy youth development. The study will also evaluate whether the intervention strengthens community prevention coalitions, stakeholder engagement, resource development, and implementation of prevention programs and policies
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Counties will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative intervention or an active comparator condition. All participating counties will receive annual school-based youth surveys and school- and county-level data reports. Counties assigned to the intervention condition will additionally receive implementation support, technical assistance, coalition development support, and strategic planning assistance from Network Coordinators.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ICE Collaborative With Network Coordinator Support | Experimental | Other: Integrated Community Engagement CollaborativeCounties assigned to this arm will participate in the Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative. Students in grades 7 through 12 will complete annual confidential surveys, and counties will receive school-level and county-level reports summarizing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use and associated risk and protective factors. County Prevention Coalitions will receive implementation support from Network Coordinators, including coalition development, stakeholder engagement, dissemination and interpretation of local data, strategic planning, resource development, and support for implementation of locally selected prevention strategies through a structured community engagement process |
| Survey Reporting Only | Active comparator | Other: School-Based Data Collection and Reporting without Network Coordinator SupportCounties assigned to this arm will participate in annual school-based surveys of students in grades 7 through 12 and will receive school-level and county-level reports describing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use and associated risk and protective factors. Counties in this arm will not receive Network Coordinator support, coalition capacity-building activities, technical assistance, or implementation support provided through the Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Student Participants
- Enrolled in grades 7 through 12 at a participating public school in a participating West Virginia county.
- Able to complete a confidential online survey during school hours.
- Parent or guardian has not opted the student out of participation.
- Student provides assent to participate.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Student Participants
- Not enrolled in grades 7 through 12 at a participating public school.
- Attends a school in a non-participating county.
- Parent or guardian opts the student out of participation.
- Student declines assent or participation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Community Engagement CollaborativeAlso: ICE CollaborativeThe Integrated Community Engagement (ICE) Collaborative is a community capacity-building framework designed to strengthen local prevention systems and reduce youth alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use. The intervention includes annual collection and dissemination of youth survey data, coalition development, stakeholder engagement, data-driven decision making, strategic planning, technical assistance, resource development, and implementation support. Network Coordinators housed within Regional Prevention Lead Organizations provide ongoing support to County Prevention Coalitions to facilitate community-driven prevention planning and implementation. Counties participate in repeated annual implementation cycles throughout the study period. | Other | ICE Collaborative With Network Coordinator Support |
| School-Based Data Collection and Reporting without Network Coordinator SupportAnnual collection of confidential school-based survey data from students in grades 7 through 12 and dissemination of school-level and county-level reports describing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use and associated risk and protective factors. Counties assigned to this condition receive data reports but do not receive implementation support, technical assistance, coalition development activities, or Network Coordinator assistance. | Other | Survey Reporting Only |
Primary outcome
Change in Past 30-Day Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug (ATOD) Use Prevalence
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Past 30-day prevalence of tobacco cigarette use, electronic cigarette use, alcohol use, drunkenness, and cannabis use among students in grades 7 through 12 will be assessed using annual school-based online surveys. Tobacco and e-cigarette use will be assessed on a 7-point scale ranging from 1=Never used, to 7=More than 20 times per day. Alcohol, drunkenness, and cannabis use will be assessed on a 7-point count scale ranging from 1=0 times, to 7=40 times+. Outcomes will be reported separately as the percentage of students reporting each substance use behavior during the previous 30 days. Higher percentages indicate greater substance use prevalence.
Change in Lifetime Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug (ATOD) Use Prevalence
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Lifetime prevalence of tobacco cigarette use, electronic cigarette use, alcohol use, drunkenness, and cannabis use among students in grades 7 through 12 will be assessed using annual school-based online surveys. Outcomes will be reported separately as the percentage of students reporting lifetime use of each substance or behavior. Scoring for each of those variables will range from 1=0 times, to 7= 40 times+. Higher percentages indicate greater lifetime substance use prevalence.
13 secondary outcomes
Change in Family Risk and Protective Factors
Time frame: Baseline and annually through Year 5
Change in Peer Risk and Protective Factors
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in School Risk and Protective Factors
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Leisure-Time Risk and Protective Factors
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Implementation Integrity and Consistency
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Role Structure and Clarity- Efficient Practices
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Role Structure and Clarity- Coalition Efficiency Subscale
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Cohesion and Collaboration- Relationship and Participation
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Cohesion and Collaboration- CFS Cohesion and Participation Benefits
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Relational Coordination
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Strategic Planning Capacity
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Stakeholder Engagement
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Change in Data-Driven Decision-Making Capacity
Time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Substance Use (Drugs, Alcohol)
Recruiting
The Trans-Led Care Study
Substance Abuse, Substance Addiction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Disease Intervention Specialist (DIS) for SUD
Substance Use Disorder (SUD), Opioid Use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
VR Mindfulness for People With HIV and Substance Use
HIV, Substance Use (Drugs, Alcohol)
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Not yet recruiting
The Community Paramedic Response and Overdose Outreach With Supportive Medical-Legal Services Study
Opioid Use Disorder, Overdose, Drug
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alfgeir L Kristjansson, PhD principal investigator
West Virgina University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Integrated Community Engagement Collaborative and School-Based Data Collection and Reporting without Network Coordinator Support in people with Substance Use (Drugs, Alcohol) and Tobacco Use, run by West Virginia University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alfgeir L Kristjansson, PhD (304-293-3129, alkristjansson@hsc.wvu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Past 30-Day Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug (ATOD) Use Prevalence (time frame: Baseline and Annually through Year 5). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.