DementiaSANDBOXNCT07842029
Evaluation of Blood-Based Biomarkers and Remote Cognitive Assessment for Dementia Triage (SANDBOX)
An observational study of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment, run by Prima Mente at 12 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Dementia is a leading cause of death in the UK, and long waits for diagnosis can delay access to care and treatment. The SANDBOX study is a research study in NHS Memory Clinics investigating whether providing clinicians with additional test results could help them diagnose dementia earlier. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dementia, Cognitive Impairment
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 13 Nov 2025to 30 Nov 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults aged 50 years or older with subjective or objective cognitive impairment who have been referred to Memory Clinics for diagnostic clarification. Participants are recruited from Memory Clinic waiting lists across multiple NHS sites in England and Wales and are awaiting secondary care assessment for memory concerns. The study population includes individuals experiencing cognitive difficulties but without a prior dementia diagnosis.
Who may be able to join
- The participant is willing and able to provide informed consent for participation in the study, or if unable to consent, a consultee (nearest of kin or holder of Power of Attorney) is available to make a declaration.
- Eligibility for recruitment in Scotland is restricted to participants who are able to provide informed consent themselves; participants requiring consultee consent will not be recruited in Scotland.
- Male or female, aged 50 years or older.
- The participant is currently on a waiting list for a participating Memory Clinic.
- The participant lives within traveling distance to a study site.
- The participant agrees to complete all study procedures, including genetic testing.
Who cannot join
- The participant may not enter the study if any of the following criteria apply:
- The participant has known or anticipated challenges with venous blood sampling.
- The participant is not fluent in English.
- The participant has a historical diagnosis of dementia.
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Hayley Holt, PhD contact
12 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom12 sites, 11 recruiting
- Recruiting
Bradford District Care Foundation Trust
Bradford, BD9 6DP
Ireen Mumba, +44 07385113354, ireen.mumba@bdct.nhs.uk
Gregor Russell
- Recruiting
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
Bridgend, CF31 1RQ
Cerys Evenden, +44 01656 752477, Cerys.Evenden@wales.nhs.uk
Eleanor James, +44 01685 728803, Eleanor.James@wales.nhs.uk
- Active, not recruiting
Hywel Dda University Health Board
Llanelli, SA148QF
- Recruiting
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, Greater London, W6 8RF
Rylie Johnson, +44 2033115228, rylie.johnson@nhs.net
Richard Perry
- Recruiting
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
London, London, NW5 3EG
Joe Gilbert, +44 07858679543, joe.gilbert2@nhs.net
Guy Harman
- Recruiting
West London NHS Trust
London, London, UB1 3HW
Petya Apostolova, +44 07517 988317, petya.apostolova1@nhs.net
Malgorzata Raczek
- Recruiting
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
London, Surrey, KT22 7AD
Aisling Quinn, 01372 216584, Aisling.Quinn@sabp.nhs.uk
Ramin Nilforooshan
- Recruiting
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL
Claire Airey, 07974 096892, Claire.airey@cntw.nhs.uk
Meher Lad
- Recruiting
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board Clinical Research Centre
Newport, Wales, NP20 2UB
Heeam Nassa, 01633 238480, ABB.RandD@wales.nhs.uk
Chineze Ivenso
- Recruiting
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Penarth, CF64 2XX
Matthew Forrester, +44 02921826908, Matthew.Forester@wales.nhs.uk
Biju Mohamed
- Recruiting
Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Reading, RG6 7BE
Mathew Baker, +44 07411339048, research@berkshire.nhs.uk
Rohan Vanderputt
- Recruiting
Swansea Bay University Health Board
Swansea, SA2 8PP
Caradog Thomas, +44 01792957587, caradog.thomas@wales.nhs.uk
Alison Blows, +44 01792 957588, Alison.Blows@wales.nhs.uk
About this study
Official title: SANDBOX: Scalable Assessment of Neurodegenerative Diagnosis Via Biomarkers and Online Examination
Dementia is a leading cause of death in the UK, and long waits for diagnosis can delay access to care and treatment. The SANDBOX study is a research study in NHS Memory Clinics investigating whether providing clinicians with additional test results could help them diagnose dementia earlier.
Adults aged 50 or over who have been referred to a Memory Clinic by their GP may be invited to take part. Taking part is voluntary and will not affect a participant's care. Participation adds to their NHS care and does not replace or delay it.
Read more
Participants complete three assessments: a blood test that measures two proteins which can indicate whether Alzheimer's-related changes may be happening in the brain (not currently available on the NHS); a genetic test for the APOE gene, which influences Alzheimer's risk; and a cognitive assessment of memory and thinking that includes a recorded speech task analysed for subtle language changes. All results are shared with the participant's clinician.
This research will help determine whether this approach can support earlier dementia diagnosis and improve care for patients across the UK.
Read the detailed description
The SANDBOX study evaluates an approach to integrating blood-based biomarkers, APOE4 genetic testing, and digitally administered cognitive assessments into Memory Clinic diagnostic pathways. The primary aim is to assess whether this approach improves efficiency of dementia diagnosis and patient flow through Memory Clinic services.
Participants will undergo baseline assessment including venous blood draw (42.5 mL) for analysis of plasma phosphorylated tau-217, epigenetic markers in cell-free DNA, and APOE4 genotyping. Dried blood spot samples will be collected via finger-prick.
Digital cognitive testing will be conducted using CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) and recorded speech analysis.
Blood biomarker and genetic results will be withheld from clinical teams until participants have a Memory Clinic appointment scheduled, to prevent bias in triage decisions. Results will then be shared with clinicians to support diagnostic assessment. All participants will be offered genetic counseling regarding APOE4 status.
A follow-up assessment occurs at 12 months (repeat blood draws and cognitive testing). Psychological impact of genetic disclosure will be monitored using validated questionnaires (Health Anxiety Inventory, CES-D, EQ-5D-5L, IGT-AD Scale).
Health economic analysis will evaluate cost-effectiveness of the triage system compared to standard UK practice. AI-based exploratory analyses will investigate relationships between biomarkers and dementia progression.
- Conditions
- Dementia, Cognitive Impairment
- Keywords
- SANDBOX, dementia, cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, Alzheimer's, Neurodegeneration
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia, Cognitive Dysfunction, Nerve Degeneration
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Memory Clinic Performance Metrics
Time from the date of referral to the participant's Memory Clinic to the date of their first clinical assessment appointment. Reported as the mean number of days from referral to assessment.
Measured: From referral into the Memory Service through first Memory Clinic assessment (up to 12 months)
Usability and Acceptability of Biomarker Enabled Approach-Clinician Feedback
Clinician feedback on the usability and acceptability of the biomarker-enabled approach is assessed using a structured questionnaire. Responses are recorded using categorical Likert-type scales (e.g., Very satisfied to Very dissatisfied), scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction or perceived effectiveness of the triage system. We will aggregate scores into a composite overall acceptability score.
Measured: Every 3 months throughout the study (up to 36 months)
Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
Health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The instrument includes five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each scored on a 5-level scale ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). Domain responses are combined into a single EQ-5D-5L index score, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Health-Related Quality of Life - Self Rated Overall Health (EQ VAS)
Self-reported health status measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The VAS ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst health imaginable and 100 represents the best health imaginable. Higher VAS scores indicate better self-reported health status.
Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Secondary outcomes (15)
Plasma Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers (PrecivityAD2)
Plasma Alzheimer's disease biomarkers measured using the PrecivityAD2 blood test (C2N Diagnostics), including the amyloid beta 42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40), percent phosphorylated tau-217 (%p-tau217). The Amyloid Probability Score (APS2) is a composite algorithm score derived from these biomarkers and ranges from 0 to 100, correlated with clinical diagnosis and cognitive performance. Higher APS2 values indicate a greater likelihood of brain amyloid pathology consistent with Alzheimer's disease. APS2 values from 0-47 are interpreted as negative for brain amyloid plaques, while higher scores indicate increased probability of amyloid positivity.
Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1) and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Epigenetic Biomarkers in Cell-Free DNA
Methylation biomarkers in cell-free DNA analyzed by our models for associations with dementia-related clinical variables, including diagnosis and cognitive performance.
Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 6 months (Study Visit 4), and 12 months (Study Visit 5)
Digital Cognitive Testing Performance (CANTAB)
Cognitive performance measured by CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) across multiple domains including episodic memory, visuospatial working memory, attention, associative learning, decision-making, visual-constructional ability, planning, processing speed, and task switching. Performance is reported as standardized z-scores and percentiles relative to an age-matched reference population. Z-scores range from negative to positive values, where 0 represents average performance; positive values indicate above-average cognitive performance and negative values indicate below-average performance.
Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Voice-Based Biomarkers from Free Speech Analysis
Speech parameters analysed from digitally recorded free speech tasks (narration of a complex scene with delayed repetition). Participants verbally describe the "cookie jar" scene and, after completing the CANTAB digital cognitive assessment, are asked to repeat the narration from memory. Speech recordings are analysed to derive quantitative speech parameters reflecting language production, including measures of fluency, lexical complexity, and acoustic features.These parameters are combined into a composite score reflecting evidence of dementia-related changes in speed, which is evaluated for associations with cognitive impairment.
Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Clinical and Demographic Data
Diagnosis, in-clinic cognitive test results, and demographic variables to characterise the study population and explore associations with dementia biomarkers.
Measured: Study Visit 2, occurring at variable timepoints up to 12 months after baseline depending on clinic wait times
Acceptability and Feedback of Biomarker Enabled-Approach
Participant acceptability of the genetic risk disclosure and biomarker enabled approach assessed using a study-specific 8-item questionnaire. The questionnaire includes categorical response options such as Likert-type ratings (e.g., strongly disagree to strongly agree), ordinal satisfaction scales (e.g., very satisfied to very dissatisfied), binary responses, and open-ended feedback. Responses are analysed descriptively to assess participant perceptions of the genetic risk disclosure and diagnostic process.
Measured: 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3) and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Psychological impact of genetic disclosure: Assessment of Anxiety Symptoms (Health Anxiety Inventory)
Health anxiety symptoms assessed using the Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI). The HAI consists of multiple items assessing concerns about health and illness, with responses scored on a Likert-type scale and summed to generate a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 54, with higher scores indicating greater health-related anxiety.
Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Psychological impact of genetic disclosure: Assessment of Depression Symptoms (CES-D)
Depressive symptoms assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D includes 20 items assessing symptoms of depression over the past week. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.
Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Genetic Risk Perception and Understanding (IGT-AD Scale)
Genetic risk perception and understanding assessed using the REVEAL Impact of Genetic Testing in Alzheimer's Disease (IGT-AD) Scale. The questionnaire includes multiple items rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (often). Item scores are summed to produce a total score, with higher scores indicating greater psychological impact or concern related to receiving genetic testing results.
Measured: 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Per-Patient Cost of Biomarker Enabled Approach Implementation
Cost estimates per patient derived from resource requirements for blood collection, phlebotomy services, dried blood spot kits, biomarker laboratory analysis (PrecivityAD2 and epigenetic markers), genetic testing, and remote cognitive testing infrastructure.
Measured: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), calculated from resource utilisation data
Diagnostic Efficiency Compared to Standard UK Practice
Time from GP referral to clinical diagnosis in study participants compared to standard UK practice using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data as the comparator.
Measured: Measured from baseline through Memory Clinic diagnosis (up to 12 months); compared to CPRD data throughout study duration (up to 36 months)
Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) Gained
Incremental quality-adjusted life-years gained due to earlier diagnosis and access to pharmacological (e.g., donepezil) and non-pharmacological care (e.g., dementia support workers, caregiver support), calculated from EQ-5D-5L data using health economic modeling.
Measured: Study duration (up to 36 months) with health economic modeling projecting outcomes over ≥10 years
Cost-Effectiveness by APOE4 Carrier Status (Subgroup Analysis)
Incremental cost-effectiveness results stratified by APOE4 carrier status (non-carrier, heterozygous carrier, homozygous carrier) to evaluate variability in outcomes and cost per QALY gained based on genetic risk category.
Measured: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), with health economic modeling
Health Economic Model Robustness
Results of probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses to quantify the impact of data uncertainty and structural model assumptions on cost-effectiveness estimates.
Measured: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), with final analysis upon study completion
Healthcare Resource Utilisation
Healthcare resource utilisation following diagnostic evaluation, measured as the number of further investigations requested or avoided per participant (e.g., additional bloods, MRI, or other diagnostic tests), derived from a survey completed by the treating clinical team. The number of investigations are used to characterise healthcare resource use associated with the diagnostic pathway.
Measured: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2026
- Study start13 Nov 2025
- Primary completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Prima Mente
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ivan Koychev, Imperial College London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07842029
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SB-001
- Other IDs
- 347200
- Acronym
- SANDBOX
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SANDBOX: Scalable Assessment of Neurodegenerative Diagnosis Via Biomarkers and Online Examination
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07842029
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SANDBOX / SB-001
- Conditions
- Dementia, Cognitive Impairment
- Keywords
- SANDBOX, dementia, cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, Alzheimer's, Neurodegeneration
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Prima MenteIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dementia is a leading cause of death in the UK, and long waits for diagnosis can delay access to care and treatment. The SANDBOX study is a research study in NHS Memory Clinics investigating whether providing clinicians with additional test results could help them diagnose dementia earlier.
Adults aged 50 or over who have been referred to a Memory Clinic by their GP may be invited to take part. Taking part is voluntary and will not affect a participant's care. Participation adds to their NHS care and does not replace or delay it.
Participants complete three assessments: a blood test that measures two proteins which can indicate whether Alzheimer's-related changes may be happening in the brain (not currently available on the NHS); a genetic test for the APOE gene, which influences Alzheimer's risk; and a cognitive assessment of memory and thinking that includes a recorded speech task analysed for subtle language changes. All results are shared with the participant's clinician.
This research will help determine whether this approach can support earlier dementia diagnosis and improve care for patients across the UK.
Detailed description
The SANDBOX study evaluates an approach to integrating blood-based biomarkers, APOE4 genetic testing, and digitally administered cognitive assessments into Memory Clinic diagnostic pathways. The primary aim is to assess whether this approach improves efficiency of dementia diagnosis and patient flow through Memory Clinic services.
Participants will undergo baseline assessment including venous blood draw (42.5 mL) for analysis of plasma phosphorylated tau-217, epigenetic markers in cell-free DNA, and APOE4 genotyping. Dried blood spot samples will be collected via finger-prick.
Digital cognitive testing will be conducted using CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) and recorded speech analysis.
Blood biomarker and genetic results will be withheld from clinical teams until participants have a Memory Clinic appointment scheduled, to prevent bias in triage decisions. Results will then be shared with clinicians to support diagnostic assessment. All participants will be offered genetic counseling regarding APOE4 status.
A follow-up assessment occurs at 12 months (repeat blood draws and cognitive testing). Psychological impact of genetic disclosure will be monitored using validated questionnaires (Health Anxiety Inventory, CES-D, EQ-5D-5L, IGT-AD Scale).
Health economic analysis will evaluate cost-effectiveness of the triage system compared to standard UK practice. AI-based exploratory analyses will investigate relationships between biomarkers and dementia progression.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults aged 50 years or older with subjective or objective cognitive impairment who have been referred to Memory Clinics for diagnostic clarification. Participants are recruited from Memory Clinic waiting lists across multiple NHS sites in England and Wales and are awaiting secondary care assessment for memory concerns. The study population includes individuals experiencing cognitive difficulties but without a prior dementia diagnosis.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- The participant is willing and able to provide informed consent for participation in the study, or if unable to consent, a consultee (nearest of kin or holder of Power of Attorney) is available to make a declaration.
- Eligibility for recruitment in Scotland is restricted to participants who are able to provide informed consent themselves; participants requiring consultee consent will not be recruited in Scotland.
- Male or female, aged 50 years or older.
- The participant is currently on a waiting list for a participating Memory Clinic.
- The participant lives within traveling distance to a study site.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The participant may not enter the study if any of the following criteria apply:
- The participant has known or anticipated challenges with venous blood sampling.
- The participant is not fluent in English.
- The participant has a historical diagnosis of dementia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Memory Clinic Performance Metrics
Time frame: From referral into the Memory Service through first Memory Clinic assessment (up to 12 months)
Time from the date of referral to the participant's Memory Clinic to the date of their first clinical assessment appointment. Reported as the mean number of days from referral to assessment.
Usability and Acceptability of Biomarker Enabled Approach-Clinician Feedback
Time frame: Every 3 months throughout the study (up to 36 months)
Clinician feedback on the usability and acceptability of the biomarker-enabled approach is assessed using a structured questionnaire. Responses are recorded using categorical Likert-type scales (e.g., Very satisfied to Very dissatisfied), scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction or perceived effectiveness of the triage system. We will aggregate scores into a composite overall acceptability score.
Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The instrument includes five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each scored on a 5-level scale ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). Domain responses are combined into a single EQ-5D-5L index score, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Health-Related Quality of Life - Self Rated Overall Health (EQ VAS)
Time frame: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Self-reported health status measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The VAS ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst health imaginable and 100 represents the best health imaginable. Higher VAS scores indicate better self-reported health status.
15 secondary outcomes
Plasma Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers (PrecivityAD2)
Time frame: Baseline (Study Visit 1) and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Epigenetic Biomarkers in Cell-Free DNA
Time frame: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 6 months (Study Visit 4), and 12 months (Study Visit 5)
Digital Cognitive Testing Performance (CANTAB)
Time frame: Baseline (Study Visit 1), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Voice-Based Biomarkers from Free Speech Analysis
Time frame: Baseline (Study Visit 1), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Clinical and Demographic Data
Time frame: Study Visit 2, occurring at variable timepoints up to 12 months after baseline depending on clinic wait times
Acceptability and Feedback of Biomarker Enabled-Approach
Time frame: 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3) and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Psychological impact of genetic disclosure: Assessment of Anxiety Symptoms (Health Anxiety Inventory)
Time frame: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Psychological impact of genetic disclosure: Assessment of Depression Symptoms (CES-D)
Time frame: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Genetic Risk Perception and Understanding (IGT-AD Scale)
Time frame: 12 months (Study Visit 4)
Per-Patient Cost of Biomarker Enabled Approach Implementation
Time frame: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), calculated from resource utilisation data
Diagnostic Efficiency Compared to Standard UK Practice
Time frame: Measured from baseline through Memory Clinic diagnosis (up to 12 months); compared to CPRD data throughout study duration (up to 36 months)
Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) Gained
Time frame: Study duration (up to 36 months) with health economic modeling projecting outcomes over ≥10 years
Cost-Effectiveness by APOE4 Carrier Status (Subgroup Analysis)
Time frame: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), with health economic modeling
Health Economic Model Robustness
Time frame: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), with final analysis upon study completion
Healthcare Resource Utilisation
Time frame: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dementia
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Hayley Holt, PhD contact
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment, run by Prima Mente at 12 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Victoria B Medina, MRes (+447493339995, victoria@primamente.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Memory Clinic Performance Metrics (time frame: From referral into the Memory Service through first Memory Clinic assessment (up to 12 months)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.