Retinopathy of PrematurityNCT07839923
Prospective Evaluation of iCam-OCT
An observational study of Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by Siloam Vision at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, non-significant-risk clinical study sponsored by Siloam Vision, Inc. to evaluate whether ophthalmologists can assess retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using images from the iCam-OCT device as effectively as with the current standard, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 weeks and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- What is being tested?
- imaged with i-Cam OCT
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Jan 2026to 15 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 weeks and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population is premature infants indicated for ROP screening - approximately 40 such infants will be enrolled in total, matching AAP screening guidelines (birth weight <1500g or gestational age ≤30 weeks; or birth weight 1500-2000g or gestational age >30 weeks if judged at-risk by the attending pediatrician or neonatologist).
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Inability to obtain informed consent from the parent or guardian or
- The infant is deemed clinically unstable for research imaging by the neonatology team.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This is a prospective, non-significant-risk clinical study sponsored by Siloam Vision, Inc. to evaluate whether ophthalmologists can assess retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using images from the iCam-OCT device as effectively as with the current standard, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). Results will support an FDA 510(k) submission. A separate follow-up study (undilated OCT imaging, with dilation only before the BIO exam) is planned once this study completes.
Device. The iCam-OCT is a handheld, swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) system operating at 1040nm and 400kHz, with 7-micron depth resolution and a 12mm scan depth. It captures an ultra-widefield (197°) field of view - the widest reported for OCT - in a contact-based, non-mydriatic mode, with scans under one second and a full bilateral exam averaging 1-2 minutes. It's designed for supine imaging of infants/small children who can't use conventional tabletop OCT. It's a Class 1 laser product conforming to IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60825-1, and ANSI Z80.36-2021. Over a dozen prior publications using earlier iCam-OCT prototypes (500+ patients, 1700+ imaging sessions) reported no adverse events and found the images clinically useful for ROP staging, zone assessment, and detection of related pathologies.
Read more
Sites and population. Two sites: Oregon Health \& Science University (Doernbecher NICU) and Children's Hospital Colorado Anschutz. Both sites are new to the device and unaffiliated with the sponsor. Enrollment target is a minimum of 40 premature infants meeting AAP ROP-screening criteria (birth weight <1500g or gestational age ≤30 weeks; or birth weight 1500-2000g or gestational age >30 weeks if deemed at-risk). At least 30 infants must have ROP (stage 1 or worse in any zone) and at least 10 without ROP, with at least 20 subjects per site. Main exclusions are inability to obtain parental consent or clinical instability precluding research imaging.
Study design. After informed consent, each infant undergoes both a BIO exam (by an independent, ROP-experienced ophthalmologist unaffiliated with the sponsor) and iCam-OCT imaging, in randomized order, following pupil dilation per routine care. Imaging is performed by a trained/certified operator (ophthalmologist, nurse, technician, or coordinator) using a standardized protocol with up to six suggested scan views (posterior, temporal, nasal, temporal/nasal ora serrata, posterior HD). Anonymized OCT images are then graded independently by three masked, ROP-experienced ophthalmologists for image quality (0-3 scale) and clinical utility (usefulness for confirming normal structures or detecting pathology), and separately for ROP zone/stage/plus disease, without knowledge of the BIO findings.
Endpoints and performance goals.
Primary: percent of OCT image sets graded acceptable (score ≥2) for both quality and clinical utility - goal ≥85%.
Secondary: sensitivity/specificity of OCT-based ROP detection vs. BIO (goals >90% sensitivity, >70% specificity); documentation/visualization of full retinal vascularization to the ora serrata (same goals); and documentation of the vascular/avascular border in eyes with incomplete vascularization (same goals).
Safety: tracking of systemic AEs (nurse-initiated pauses), ocular AEs (corneal abrasion, conjunctival irritation, infection, need for topical medication), and any other AEs.
Discordant cases - infants classified "no ROP" by BIO but flagged as stage 1+ by OCT (potential false positives relative to the BIO gold standard) - get extra scrutiny: a coordinator reviews subsequent hospital records for later-diagnosed ROP, and all three graders reconvene to reach consensus on whether the OCT findings represent true early-stage ROP that BIO missed, versus immature retina with a defined vascular border. Clinical management throughout the study is driven by BIO only, not by OCT findings.
Statistics. The eye is the unit of analysis; each eye is graded independently by all three masked graders, and sensitivity/specificity are computed per grader and averaged. Sample size (n=30 for the ROP-positive group) was powered via a non-inferiority test assuming 85% BIO sensitivity (from a cited 2018 Biten et al. study), a 5% non-inferiority margin, and one-sided alpha of 0.05, yielding ~80% power. Supportive analyses include per-grader McNemar's tests for OCT/BIO discordance and non-inferiority testing of OCT sensitivity against the fixed 85% literature benchmark (not a within-study BIO comparison).
Safety monitoring. Risks are characterized as low (corneal abrasion, subconjunctival hemorrhage, infection - similar to standard contact ROP exams) plus general risks of apnea/bradycardia inherent to examining fragile premature infants. Dr. Benjamin Young serves as the independent safety monitor overseeing adverse event review; AEs/SAEs must be reported to the IRB within 5 days.
- Conditions
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- Being tested
- imaged with i-Cam OCT
- Medical subject headings
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
imaged with i-Cam OCTDevice
enrolled infant undergoes both a BIO exam and iCam-OCT imaging (order randomized) during the same dilated eye exam
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patient cohort | The study participants are premature infants who meet the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) screening criteria for ROP evaluation. Specifically, eligible infants must have either a birth weight under 1500g or a gestational age of 30 weeks or less, or, alternatively, a birth weight between 1500-2000g or a gestational age over 30 weeks if their attending pediatrician or neonatologist believes they're at risk for ROP. Receives: Device: imaged with i-Cam OCT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Quality
The primary outcome measure is the clinical quality and utility of iCam-OCT images, as judged by three independent, masked, ROP-experienced ophthalmologist graders.
Measured: study visit - day 1
Secondary outcomes (1)
Presence or absence of ROP
Agreement between OCT image grading and BIO exam findings on whether ROP is present, defined as stage 1 or worse in any zone, with or without pre-plus or plus disease. Measured as sensitivity (target >90%) and specificity (target >70%), with BIO as the reference standard.
Measured: study visit - day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2026
- Study start28 Jan 2026
- Primary completion15 Jul 2026
- Study completion15 Aug 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Retinopathy of PrematurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Siloam Vision
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Oregon Health and Science University, Children's Hospital Colorado
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John P Campbell, MD, Study chair, Siloam Vision
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07839923
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SVCT-CIP-005 V04
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: There is a plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Evaluation of iCam-OCT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07839923
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SVCT-CIP-005 V04
- Conditions
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Siloam VisionIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Oregon Health and Science University, Children's Hospital Colorado
- Study start
- 28 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, non-significant-risk clinical study sponsored by Siloam Vision, Inc. to evaluate whether ophthalmologists can assess retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using images from the iCam-OCT device as effectively as with the current standard, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). Results will support an FDA 510(k) submission. A separate follow-up study (undilated OCT imaging, with dilation only before the BIO exam) is planned once this study completes.
Device. The iCam-OCT is a handheld, swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) system operating at 1040nm and 400kHz, with 7-micron depth resolution and a 12mm scan depth. It captures an ultra-widefield (197°) field of view - the widest reported for OCT - in a contact-based, non-mydriatic mode, with scans under one second and a full bilateral exam averaging 1-2 minutes. It's designed for supine imaging of infants/small children who can't use conventional tabletop OCT. It's a Class 1 laser product conforming to IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60825-1, and ANSI Z80.36-2021. Over a dozen prior publications using earlier iCam-OCT prototypes (500+ patients, 1700+ imaging sessions) reported no adverse events and found the images clinically useful for ROP staging, zone assessment, and detection of related pathologies.
Sites and population. Two sites: Oregon Health \& Science University (Doernbecher NICU) and Children's Hospital Colorado Anschutz. Both sites are new to the device and unaffiliated with the sponsor. Enrollment target is a minimum of 40 premature infants meeting AAP ROP-screening criteria (birth weight <1500g or gestational age ≤30 weeks; or birth weight 1500-2000g or gestational age >30 weeks if deemed at-risk). At least 30 infants must have ROP (stage 1 or worse in any zone) and at least 10 without ROP, with at least 20 subjects per site. Main exclusions are inability to obtain parental consent or clinical instability precluding research imaging.
Study design. After informed consent, each infant undergoes both a BIO exam (by an independent, ROP-experienced ophthalmologist unaffiliated with the sponsor) and iCam-OCT imaging, in randomized order, following pupil dilation per routine care. Imaging is performed by a trained/certified operator (ophthalmologist, nurse, technician, or coordinator) using a standardized protocol with up to six suggested scan views (posterior, temporal, nasal, temporal/nasal ora serrata, posterior HD). Anonymized OCT images are then graded independently by three masked, ROP-experienced ophthalmologists for image quality (0-3 scale) and clinical utility (usefulness for confirming normal structures or detecting pathology), and separately for ROP zone/stage/plus disease, without knowledge of the BIO findings.
Endpoints and performance goals.
Primary: percent of OCT image sets graded acceptable (score ≥2) for both quality and clinical utility - goal ≥85%.
Secondary: sensitivity/specificity of OCT-based ROP detection vs. BIO (goals >90% sensitivity, >70% specificity); documentation/visualization of full retinal vascularization to the ora serrata (same goals); and documentation of the vascular/avascular border in eyes with incomplete vascularization (same goals).
Safety: tracking of systemic AEs (nurse-initiated pauses), ocular AEs (corneal abrasion, conjunctival irritation, infection, need for topical medication), and any other AEs.
Discordant cases - infants classified "no ROP" by BIO but flagged as stage 1+ by OCT (potential false positives relative to the BIO gold standard) - get extra scrutiny: a coordinator reviews subsequent hospital records for later-diagnosed ROP, and all three graders reconvene to reach consensus on whether the OCT findings represent true early-stage ROP that BIO missed, versus immature retina with a defined vascular border. Clinical management throughout the study is driven by BIO only, not by OCT findings.
Statistics. The eye is the unit of analysis; each eye is graded independently by all three masked graders, and sensitivity/specificity are computed per grader and averaged. Sample size (n=30 for the ROP-positive group) was powered via a non-inferiority test assuming 85% BIO sensitivity (from a cited 2018 Biten et al. study), a 5% non-inferiority margin, and one-sided alpha of 0.05, yielding ~80% power. Supportive analyses include per-grader McNemar's tests for OCT/BIO discordance and non-inferiority testing of OCT sensitivity against the fixed 85% literature benchmark (not a within-study BIO comparison).
Safety monitoring. Risks are characterized as low (corneal abrasion, subconjunctival hemorrhage, infection - similar to standard contact ROP exams) plus general risks of apnea/bradycardia inherent to examining fragile premature infants. Dr. Benjamin Young serves as the independent safety monitor overseeing adverse event review; AEs/SAEs must be reported to the IRB within 5 days.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patient cohort | – | Device: imaged with i-Cam OCTThe study participants are premature infants who meet the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) screening criteria for ROP evaluation. Specifically, eligible infants must have either a birth weight under 1500g or a gestational age of 30 weeks or less, or, alternatively, a birth weight between 1500-2000g or a gestational age over 30 weeks if their attending pediatrician or neonatologist believes they're at risk for ROP. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 weeks and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population is premature infants indicated for ROP screening - approximately 40 such infants will be enrolled in total, matching AAP screening guidelines (birth weight <1500g or gestational age ≤30 weeks; or birth weight 1500-2000g or gestational age >30 weeks if judged at-risk by the attending pediatrician or neonatologist).
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Inability to obtain informed consent from the parent or guardian or
- The infant is deemed clinically unstable for research imaging by the neonatology team.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| imaged with i-Cam OCTenrolled infant undergoes both a BIO exam and iCam-OCT imaging (order randomized) during the same dilated eye exam | Device | Patient cohort |
Primary outcome
Clinical Quality
Time frame: study visit - day 1
The primary outcome measure is the clinical quality and utility of iCam-OCT images, as judged by three independent, masked, ROP-experienced ophthalmologist graders.
1 secondary outcome
Presence or absence of ROP
Time frame: study visit - day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. There is a plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available.
Related trials for Retinopathy of Prematurity
RecruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Collect Data on How Aflibercept (Eylea) Given Using a Paediatric Dosing Device is Used in Preterm Babies With Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United Kingdom (UK)
Retinopathy of Prematurity, Preterm Infants
RecruitingObservational study
The Correlation Between Red Cell Transfusion and Complications of Prematurity
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP), Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)
RecruitingObservational study
Imaging Retinal Vasculature in Infant Eyes
Retinopathy of Prematurity
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, PK and PD of FLQ-101 in Premature Neonates
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Recruiting
Analyzing Retinal Microanatomy in Retinopathy of Prematurity to Improve Care
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John P Campbell, MD study chair
Siloam Vision
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by Siloam Vision at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Quality (time frame: study visit - day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.