AzTrials
AzTrials

Retinopathy of PrematurityNCT07839923

Prospective Evaluation of iCam-OCT

An observational study of Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by Siloam Vision at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, non-significant-risk clinical study sponsored by Siloam Vision, Inc. to evaluate whether ophthalmologists can assess retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using images from the iCam-OCT device as effectively as with the current standard, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 weeks and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Retinopathy of Prematurity
What is being tested?
imaged with i-Cam OCT
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 Jan 2026to 15 Aug 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 weeks and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population is premature infants indicated for ROP screening - approximately 40 such infants will be enrolled in total, matching AAP screening guidelines (birth weight <1500g or gestational age ≤30 weeks; or birth weight 1500-2000g or gestational age >30 weeks if judged at-risk by the attending pediatrician or neonatologist).

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Inability to obtain informed consent from the parent or guardian or
  • The infant is deemed clinically unstable for research imaging by the neonatology team.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • OHSU

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

Other trials in United States

About this study

This is a prospective, non-significant-risk clinical study sponsored by Siloam Vision, Inc. to evaluate whether ophthalmologists can assess retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using images from the iCam-OCT device as effectively as with the current standard, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). Results will support an FDA 510(k) submission. A separate follow-up study (undilated OCT imaging, with dilation only before the BIO exam) is planned once this study completes.

Device. The iCam-OCT is a handheld, swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) system operating at 1040nm and 400kHz, with 7-micron depth resolution and a 12mm scan depth. It captures an ultra-widefield (197°) field of view - the widest reported for OCT - in a contact-based, non-mydriatic mode, with scans under one second and a full bilateral exam averaging 1-2 minutes. It's designed for supine imaging of infants/small children who can't use conventional tabletop OCT. It's a Class 1 laser product conforming to IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60825-1, and ANSI Z80.36-2021. Over a dozen prior publications using earlier iCam-OCT prototypes (500+ patients, 1700+ imaging sessions) reported no adverse events and found the images clinically useful for ROP staging, zone assessment, and detection of related pathologies.

Read more

Sites and population. Two sites: Oregon Health \& Science University (Doernbecher NICU) and Children's Hospital Colorado Anschutz. Both sites are new to the device and unaffiliated with the sponsor. Enrollment target is a minimum of 40 premature infants meeting AAP ROP-screening criteria (birth weight <1500g or gestational age ≤30 weeks; or birth weight 1500-2000g or gestational age >30 weeks if deemed at-risk). At least 30 infants must have ROP (stage 1 or worse in any zone) and at least 10 without ROP, with at least 20 subjects per site. Main exclusions are inability to obtain parental consent or clinical instability precluding research imaging.

Study design. After informed consent, each infant undergoes both a BIO exam (by an independent, ROP-experienced ophthalmologist unaffiliated with the sponsor) and iCam-OCT imaging, in randomized order, following pupil dilation per routine care. Imaging is performed by a trained/certified operator (ophthalmologist, nurse, technician, or coordinator) using a standardized protocol with up to six suggested scan views (posterior, temporal, nasal, temporal/nasal ora serrata, posterior HD). Anonymized OCT images are then graded independently by three masked, ROP-experienced ophthalmologists for image quality (0-3 scale) and clinical utility (usefulness for confirming normal structures or detecting pathology), and separately for ROP zone/stage/plus disease, without knowledge of the BIO findings.

Endpoints and performance goals.

Primary: percent of OCT image sets graded acceptable (score ≥2) for both quality and clinical utility - goal ≥85%.

Secondary: sensitivity/specificity of OCT-based ROP detection vs. BIO (goals >90% sensitivity, >70% specificity); documentation/visualization of full retinal vascularization to the ora serrata (same goals); and documentation of the vascular/avascular border in eyes with incomplete vascularization (same goals).

Safety: tracking of systemic AEs (nurse-initiated pauses), ocular AEs (corneal abrasion, conjunctival irritation, infection, need for topical medication), and any other AEs.

Discordant cases - infants classified "no ROP" by BIO but flagged as stage 1+ by OCT (potential false positives relative to the BIO gold standard) - get extra scrutiny: a coordinator reviews subsequent hospital records for later-diagnosed ROP, and all three graders reconvene to reach consensus on whether the OCT findings represent true early-stage ROP that BIO missed, versus immature retina with a defined vascular border. Clinical management throughout the study is driven by BIO only, not by OCT findings.

Statistics. The eye is the unit of analysis; each eye is graded independently by all three masked graders, and sensitivity/specificity are computed per grader and averaged. Sample size (n=30 for the ROP-positive group) was powered via a non-inferiority test assuming 85% BIO sensitivity (from a cited 2018 Biten et al. study), a 5% non-inferiority margin, and one-sided alpha of 0.05, yielding ~80% power. Supportive analyses include per-grader McNemar's tests for OCT/BIO discordance and non-inferiority testing of OCT sensitivity against the fixed 85% literature benchmark (not a within-study BIO comparison).

Safety monitoring. Risks are characterized as low (corneal abrasion, subconjunctival hemorrhage, infection - similar to standard contact ROP exams) plus general risks of apnea/bradycardia inherent to examining fragile premature infants. Dr. Benjamin Young serves as the independent safety monitor overseeing adverse event review; AEs/SAEs must be reported to the IRB within 5 days.

Being tested
imaged with i-Cam OCT
Medical subject headings
Retinopathy of Prematurity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • imaged with i-Cam OCTDevice

    enrolled infant undergoes both a BIO exam and iCam-OCT imaging (order randomized) during the same dilated eye exam

Study groups in NCT07839923
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patient cohortThe study participants are premature infants who meet the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) screening criteria for ROP evaluation. Specifically, eligible infants must have either a birth weight under 1500g or a gestational age of 30 weeks or less, or, alternatively, a birth weight between 1500-2000g or a gestational age over 30 weeks if their attending pediatrician or neonatologist believes they're at risk for ROP.
Receives: Device: imaged with i-Cam OCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical Quality

    The primary outcome measure is the clinical quality and utility of iCam-OCT images, as judged by three independent, masked, ROP-experienced ophthalmologist graders.

    Measured: study visit - day 1

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Presence or absence of ROP

    Agreement between OCT image grading and BIO exam findings on whether ROP is present, defined as stage 1 or worse in any zone, with or without pre-plus or plus disease. Measured as sensitivity (target >90%) and specificity (target >70%), with BIO as the reference standard.

    Measured: study visit - day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Sep 2026
  2. Study start28 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2026
  4. Study completion15 Aug 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07839923
Sponsor's protocol ID
SVCT-CIP-005 V04
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
14 Sep 2026
Last updated
24 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: There is a plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by Siloam Vision at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical Quality (time frame: study visit - day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in