Polycythemia VeraVeRavieNCT07839858
A Study of Real-world Use and Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Strategies for the Treatment of Second-line Polycythemia Vera in France
An observational study of Polycythemia Vera, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 51 sites in France.
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to assess which cytoreductive treatments are currently administered in standard practice as second-line therapy to patients with polycythemia vera (PV) in France and to find out the reasons physicians switch treatments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Polycythemia Vera
- How many people
- 237 participants
- Where
- 51 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 13 Mar 2025to 14 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with PV who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023.
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patient diagnosed with PV after 01 Jan 2014 according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
- Patient ≥ 18 years of age at the time of PV diagnosis.
- Patient who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 01 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2023.
Who cannot join
- Patient alive at study initiation who opposed to data use for research purposes.
- Patient who died before study initiation and who had opposed to data use for research purpose prior to their death.
- Patient who took part in an interventional clinical trial(s) between 01 January 2022 and 31 December 2023.
Trial locations and contacts
51 sites in 1 country.
51 sites in 1 country
France51 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aix-en-Provence, 13616
Novartis Investigative Site
Amiens, 80054
Novartis Investigative Site
Angers, 49933
Novartis Investigative Site
Antony, 92160
Novartis Investigative Site
Arras, 62022
Novartis Investigative Site
Aurillac, 15000
Novartis Investigative Site
Avignon, 84000
Novartis Investigative Site
Bayonne, Bayonne Cedex, 64109
Novartis Investigative Site
Béziers, 34525
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, 33076
Novartis Investigative Site
Brest, 29200
Novartis Investigative Site
Cesson-Sévigné, 35576
Novartis Investigative Site
Challes-les-Eaux, 73190
Novartis Investigative Site
Chambéry, 73000
Novartis Investigative Site
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Novartis Investigative Site
Corbeil-Essonnes, 91100
Novartis Investigative Site
Dunkirk, 59240
Novartis Investigative Site
Essey-lès-Nancy, 54270
Novartis Investigative Site
Grenoble, 38043
Novartis Investigative Site
Le Bouscat, 33110
Novartis Investigative Site
Le Chesnay, 78150
Novartis Investigative Site
Le Coudray, 28630
Novartis Investigative Site
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275
Novartis Investigative Site
Le Mans, 72000
Novartis Investigative Site
Libourne, 33505
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59037
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69373
Novartis Investigative Site
Marseille, 13005
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, 34295
Novartis Investigative Site
Morlaix Cdex, 29672
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantes, 44277
Novartis Investigative Site
Nîmes, 30029
Novartis Investigative Site
Orléans, 45100
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75013
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75014
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75015
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75475
Novartis Investigative Site
Perpignan, 66046
Novartis Investigative Site
Pessac, 33604
Novartis Investigative Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69310
Novartis Investigative Site
Poitiers, 86021
Novartis Investigative Site
Quimper, 29000
Novartis Investigative Site
Rennescedex9, 35033
Novartis Investigative Site
Rochefort, 17301
Novartis Investigative Site
Roubaix, 59100
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Priest Jarez, Pays de la Loire Region, 42270
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint-Brieuc, 22000
Novartis Investigative Site
St-Malo, 35400
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, 67085
Novartis Investigative Site
Trévenans, 90400
Novartis Investigative Site
Troyes, 10003
About this study
Official title: Real-world Use and Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Strategies for the Treatment of Second-line Polycythemia Vera: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Non-interventional Study in France
The aim of this study was to assess which cytoreductive treatments are currently administered in standard practice as second-line therapy to patients with polycythemia vera (PV) in France and to find out the reasons physicians switch treatments. In addition, the research aimed to describe real-world effectiveness of second-line cytoreductive therapies and the occurrence of adverse events of special interest.
Study data were collected from the medical charts of patients who initiated a second-line cytoreductive agent for the treatment of PV and received their first dose between 1 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2023.
- Conditions
- Polycythemia Vera
- Keywords
- Polycythemia Vera, Second-line cytoreductive treatment, Real-world data
- Medical subject headings
- Polycythemia Vera
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PV Cohort | Adult PV patients who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Patients per Type of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Secondary outcomes (39)
Proportion of Patients per Type of First-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients per Type of Third-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Up to approximately 12 months
Initial Dose of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Received for Each Type of Treatment
Measured: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Duration of Each Line of Treatment
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 12 months
Duration Between PV Diagnosis and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Initiation
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients With Treatment Interruptions and Dose Modification During Second-line Treatment
Measured: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients by Number of Dose Modifications During Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Dose modifications were categorized as an increase or decrease in dose.
Measured: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients Who Permanently Discontinued Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients by Reasons for Switching to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients by Reasons for Switching to Third-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients per Type of Concomitant Treatment/Procedure During Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients Who had a Bone Marrow Biopsy Following PV Diagnosis and the Timing of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Relation to First-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Timing of bone marrow biopsy was categorized as:
- Prior to first-line treatment
- Prior to second-line treatment
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients Who had a Bone Marrow Biopsy Following PV Diagnosis and the Timing of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Relation to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Timing of bone marrow biopsy was categorized as:
- During second-line treatment
- After second-line treatment
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients Achieving Hematocrit Control
Hematocrit control was defined as hematocrit < 45% with the absence of phlebotomy eligibility during the last 3 months.
Measured: Approximately 6 months
Proportion of Patients Achieving Clinicohematologic Response
Proportion of patients achieving clinicohematologic response according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria (complete or partial).
Complete clinicohematologic response was defined by:
- Hematocrit < 45% without phlebotomies during the last 3 months, and
- Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10^9/L, and
- White blood cell count ≤ 10 x 10^9/L, and
- Normal spleen size evaluated by physical examination and/or by imaging.
Partial clinicohematologic response was defined by:
In patients who do not fulfill the criteria for complete response, hematocrit < 45% without phlebotomy for 3 months OR response in 3 of the other criteria.
Measured: Approximately 6 months
Proportion of Patients Achieving Symptom Response
Proportion of patients achieving symptom response according to the ELN criteria. Symptom response is defined as an absolute 10-point improvement in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form - Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS).
The MPN-SAF TSS (or MPN-10) is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that measures symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. The instrument assesses 10 key disease-related symptoms, each scored from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), generating a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden, and changes in the score are commonly used to evaluate clinical benefit and treatment response in both clinical practice and clinical trials
Measured: Approximately 6 months
Proportion of Patients Achieving Molecular Response
Proportion of patients achieving molecular response according to the ELN criteria (complete or partial).
Complete molecular response was defined by the reduction of any specific molecular abnormality to undetectable levels.
Partial molecular response was defined by:
- A reduction of ≥ 50% from baseline value in patients with < 50% mutant allele burden at baseline OR
- A reduction of ≥ 25% from baseline value in patients with ≥ 50% mutant allele burden at baseline.
Measured: Approximately 6 months
Proportion of Patients With Occurrence of Disease Progression Events
Disease progression events include acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and PV related death.
Measured: Up to 6 approximately months
Proportion of Patients With Occurrence of Thromboembolic or Hemorrhagic Events
Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events include arterial thrombotic, venous thrombotic, and hemorrhage.
Measured: Up to 6 approximately months
Proportion of Patients by Sex
Measured: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Age
Measured: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Proportion of Patients With Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk Factors
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients With a History of Medical Conditions
Medical conditions include cancer, autoimmune disease, and opportunistic infection.
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients With Other Ongoing Comorbidities
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients per Number and Type of Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Events Prior to First-line Treatment
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients per Number and Type of Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Events Between First- and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Baseline
Duration Between Most Recent Thromboembolic or Hemorrhagic Event and Initiation of First and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients by Reason for Initiating First-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients per Type of Pre-specified Emergency Treatment/Procedure Administered Prior to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Initiation
Emergency treatments/procedures include antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, and phlebotomies.
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients by Number of Phlebotomies Required in the 3 Months Prior to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Measured: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Proportion of Patients by PV Symptoms
PV symptoms include splenomegaly, pruritus, fatigue, and bone pain.
Measured: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
MPN-SAF TSS Score
The MPN-SAF TSS (or MPN-10) is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that measures symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. The instrument assesses 10 key disease-related symptoms, each scored from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), generating a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden, and changes in the score are commonly used to evaluate clinical benefit and treatment response in both clinical practice and clinical trials.
Measured: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Hemoglobin Level
Measured: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Hematocrit Level
Measured: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Leukocyte Count
Measured: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Platelet Count
Measured: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Proportion of Patients by Type of Mutation
Measured: Baseline
Mutant Allele Burden
Mutant allele burden is a molecular measure that quantifies the proportion of cells harboring a specific disease-associated mutation (e.g., JAK2 V617F, CALR, or MPL) within a patient sample. It is usually reported as the variant allele frequency (VAF), representing the percentage of mutant alleles among all alleles analyzed, and serves as an indicator of the size of the malignant clone in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Changes in mutant allele burden may provide insight into the biological activity of the disease and the molecular effects of therapy.
Mutant allele burden was categorized as ≥ 50% or < 50%.
Measured: Baseline
Proportion of Patients With Pre-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest Occurring After Initiation of the Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Pre-specified adverse events of special interest include thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, infection, weight gain, psychological disorders, nonmelanoma skin cancer, skin disorders, and autoimmune disorders.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2026
- Study start13 Mar 2025
- Primary completion14 Oct 2025
- Study completion14 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Polycythemia VeraStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 237 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07839858
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CINC424BFR01
- Acronym
- VeRavie
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Real-world Use and Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Strategies for the Treatment of Second-line Polycythemia Vera: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Non-interventional Study in France
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07839858
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VeRavie / CINC424BFR01
- Conditions
- Polycythemia Vera
- Keywords
- Polycythemia Vera, Second-line cytoreductive treatment, Real-world data
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 237 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to assess which cytoreductive treatments are currently administered in standard practice as second-line therapy to patients with polycythemia vera (PV) in France and to find out the reasons physicians switch treatments. In addition, the research aimed to describe real-world effectiveness of second-line cytoreductive therapies and the occurrence of adverse events of special interest.
Study data were collected from the medical charts of patients who initiated a second-line cytoreductive agent for the treatment of PV and received their first dose between 1 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2023.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PV Cohort | – | –Adult PV patients who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with PV who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or female patient diagnosed with PV after 01 Jan 2014 according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
- Patient ≥ 18 years of age at the time of PV diagnosis.
- Patient who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 01 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2023.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient alive at study initiation who opposed to data use for research purposes.
- Patient who died before study initiation and who had opposed to data use for research purpose prior to their death.
- Patient who took part in an interventional clinical trial(s) between 01 January 2022 and 31 December 2023.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Proportion of Patients per Type of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
39 secondary outcomes
Proportion of Patients per Type of First-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients per Type of Third-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months
Initial Dose of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Received for Each Type of Treatment
Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Duration of Each Line of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 12 months
Duration Between PV Diagnosis and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Initiation
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients With Treatment Interruptions and Dose Modification During Second-line Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients by Number of Dose Modifications During Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients Who Permanently Discontinued Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients by Reasons for Switching to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients by Reasons for Switching to Third-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients per Type of Concomitant Treatment/Procedure During Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months
Proportion of Patients Who had a Bone Marrow Biopsy Following PV Diagnosis and the Timing of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Relation to First-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients Who had a Bone Marrow Biopsy Following PV Diagnosis and the Timing of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Relation to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients Achieving Hematocrit Control
Time frame: Approximately 6 months
Proportion of Patients Achieving Clinicohematologic Response
Time frame: Approximately 6 months
Proportion of Patients Achieving Symptom Response
Time frame: Approximately 6 months
Proportion of Patients Achieving Molecular Response
Time frame: Approximately 6 months
Proportion of Patients With Occurrence of Disease Progression Events
Time frame: Up to 6 approximately months
Proportion of Patients With Occurrence of Thromboembolic or Hemorrhagic Events
Time frame: Up to 6 approximately months
Proportion of Patients by Sex
Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Age
Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Proportion of Patients With Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk Factors
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients With a History of Medical Conditions
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients With Other Ongoing Comorbidities
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients per Number and Type of Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Events Prior to First-line Treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients per Number and Type of Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Events Between First- and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Duration Between Most Recent Thromboembolic or Hemorrhagic Event and Initiation of First and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients by Reason for Initiating First-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients per Type of Pre-specified Emergency Treatment/Procedure Administered Prior to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Initiation
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients by Number of Phlebotomies Required in the 3 Months Prior to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Proportion of Patients by PV Symptoms
Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
MPN-SAF TSS Score
Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Hemoglobin Level
Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Hematocrit Level
Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Leukocyte Count
Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Platelet Count
Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)
Proportion of Patients by Type of Mutation
Time frame: Baseline
Mutant Allele Burden
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of Patients With Pre-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest Occurring After Initiation of the Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Polycythemia Vera
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of Pelabresib (DAK539) and Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis (MF)
Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF)
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Trial of Bomedemstat in Participants With Polycythemia Vera (MK-3543-025).
Polycythemia Vera
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Momelotinib in Combination With Luspatercept in Participants With Transfusion Dependent Myelofibrosis
Primary Myelofibrosis, Myelofibrosis; Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Ropeg-Interferon in People With Polycythemia Vera
Polycythemia Vera (PV), JAK2 Mutation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2, Open-Label Study of DISC-3405 in Participants With Polycythemia Vera (PV)
Polycythemia Vera (PV)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
51 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Polycythemia Vera, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 51 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 51 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Patients per Type of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment (time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.