Acute Ischemic StrokeNCT07828379
Post-Market Active Surveillance and Health Economic Evaluation of Cerebrovascular Diagnostic and Therapeutic Devices
An observational study of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, run by Changhai Hospital.
Trial summary
The research focuses on "post-market active surveillance and health economic evaluation of non-pharmacological therapies and innovative cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices". Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Ischemic Stroke, Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, Extracranial Arterial Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 2,000 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 1 Sep 2028
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients with acute ischemic stroke, intracranial arterial stenosis, extracranial arterial stenosis, intracranial aneurysm and chronic subdural hematoma who receive cerebrovascular interventional therapy
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years; patients with ischemic stroke receiving acute reperfusion therapy (i.e., endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis); informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative, and availability for follow-up.
- Aged 35-80 years; symptomatic moderate-to-severe intracranial arterial stenosis (50-99%, confirmed by DSA) with contralateral intracranial arterial stenosis <50%. Symptomatic stenosis is defined as transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke or other relevant neurological symptoms caused by internal carotid artery stenosis within the preceding 6 months; informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative, and availability for follow-up.
- Aged 35-80 years; symptomatic moderate-to-severe stenosis (50-99%) of the origin of the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery confirmed by ultrasound, CTA or DSA. Symptomatic stenosis is defined as transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke or other relevant neurological symptoms caused by stenosis of the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery within the preceding 6 months; asymptomatic severe stenosis (70%-99%) of the origin of the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery; informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative, and availability for follow-up.
- Age ≥18 years; ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysm diagnosed by digital subtraction angiography; meeting the surgical indications for flow-diverting devices, intracranial stents or coil embolization; patients who provide informed consent for this study and agree to follow-up imaging examinations.
- Age >18 years; chronic subdural hematoma confirmed by CT and meeting the indications for middle meningeal artery embolization; patients who provide informed consent for this study and agree to follow-up imaging examinations.
Who cannot join
- Participation in another clinical trial of drugs or devices within the past 3 months or ongoing participation in such trials.
- Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Cohort
- Contraindications to stenting; participation in another clinical trial of drugs or devices within the past 6 months or ongoing participation in such trials.
- Extracranial Arterial Stenosis Cohort
- Contraindications to interventional therapy including stenting or balloon angioplasty; participation in another clinical trial of drugs or devices within the past 6 months or ongoing participation in such trials.
- Intracranial Aneurysm Cohort
Show all 9Show fewer
- Coexistence of other cerebrovascular diseases; severe systemic disease with an expected survival time of less than 2 years; history of contrast medium allergy; patients refusing or unable to complete follow-up.
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma Cohort
- Indications for craniotomy or urgent subdural hematoma evacuation; severe systemic disease with an expected survival time of less than 1 year; history of contrast medium allergy, etc.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
The research focuses on "post-market active surveillance and health economic evaluation of non-pharmacological therapies and innovative cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices". Partnering with top-tier domestic institutions including the National Medical Administration Center, Regional Drug Evaluation Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, and the School of Public Health, Fudan University, the project intends to:
Establish standards for post-market active surveillance of cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices and develop an intelligent surveillance system; Build a nationwide collaborative network covering multi-level medical institutions, and conduct serial cohort studies on cerebrovascular diseases based on the surveillance platform; Carry out safety, effectiveness and health economic evaluations for cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices using data collected from the network and platform, so as to provide scientific evidence for the full-life-cycle regulation of such devices.
Read the detailed description
Cerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of disability and adult mortality in China,with a high overall incidence. The rapid advancement and widespread application of neurointerventional techniques have driven an annual increase in the volume of cerebrovascular interventional procedures. Consequently, various cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices-including multiple domestically developed innovative devices-have gained market approval following pre-market clinical trials,thereby expanding clinical treatment options. However, pre-market studies are often limited by small sample sizes, restricted population representativeness, short observation periods, and highly controlled clinical environments, making it difficult to fully evaluate device performance in real-world clinical settings. Therefore, strengthening post-market device regulation and establishing a comprehensive post-market active surveillance system are critical. These measures are essential for the timely detection and management of clinical risks,ensuring patient safety, accumulating real-world data (RWD), and supporting the optimization of health policies and healthcare reimbursement decisions. China has long prioritized the post-market surveillance of medical devices. Since initiating a pilot program for medical device adverse event (MDAE) monitoring in 2002, China successively promulgated the Measures for the Monitoring and Re-evaluation of Medical Device Adverse Events (Trial) in 2008 and the revised Measures for the Monitoring and Re-evaluation of Medical Device Adverse Events in 2018 to strengthen device surveillance. Furthermore, the newly revised Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Medical Devices (State Council Decree No.739 of the People's Republic of China), promulgated in 2021, emphasize full-lifecycle, full-process and full-chain oversight of medical devices. Throughout this progression, China has established the Medical Device Adverse Event Reporting and Management System, anchored by provincial MDAE monitoring centers. This system enables medical institutions and manufacturers that identify adverse events to submit reports, increasing the volume of adverse event submissions and improving risk monitoring and control capacity. However, it is notable that China's existing post-market regulatory framework for medical devices still faces a significant challenge: the lack of an active surveillance system. The current reporting system, which designates medical device registrants as the primary responsible entities, is voluntary rather than mandatory. This inevitably leads to inherent flaws such as low reporting rates, high misreporting rates, the inability to calculate true incidence rates, and delayed signal detection. Consequently, the real-world safety, effectiveness, and health economics of medical devices cannot be comprehensively evaluated, posing potential risks to public health safety and the efficient utilization of healthcare resources. Therefore, it is imperative to transition from a passive surveillance model to an active surveillance paradigm characterized by proactive data collection and active outcome analysis. Although active surveillance takes various forms, conducting real-world active surveillance based on healthcare data has become a prevailing trend. This is driven by the enhanced integration and application of healthcare data, alongside continuous advancements in analytical techniques. For instance, in 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated the Medical Device Epidemiology Network (MDEpiNet)-a multi-stakeholder collaborative platform involving healthcare institutions, academic organizations, device manufacturers, and patient advocacy groups. This initiative aims to conduct surveillance research by sharing resources across network members and integrating RWD, including electronic health records (EHR), cohort studies, and healthcare claims data. In recent years, China has initiated pilot programs for active post-market surveillance of medical devices (i.e., the medical device vigilance system) in regions such as Jiangsu, yielding preliminary results. Overall, however, the implementation of real-world evaluation still faces significant challenges: 1. Lack of a unified national surveillance system: Inefficient cross-hospital collaboration hinders standardized data integration and creates isolated information silos. 2. Absence of a multi-center collaborative network: The surveillance framework is solely regulator-led, leaving healthcare institutions (core data providers) with insufficient incentives for active data submission and early risk alerting. 3. Deficient long-term follow-up workflows: Incomplete longitudinal follow-up data limits the availability of health economic evidence to support healthcare policy design. China has unique national conditions: a vast territory, large population, heterogeneous regional epidemiological profiles, and unbalanced socioeconomic and healthcare resources. Combined with the broad clinical adoption of post-market cerebrovascular devices (domestic innovative devices in particular) and the massive volume of real-world data they generate, the above challenges will be further exacerbated when rolling out nationwide active surveillance. Therefore, the successful implementation of active medical device surveillance tailored to China's context relies on several key strategies: First, coordinating inter-hospital collaboration through departments with core advantages in cross-sector coordination to construct a national system and achieve data harmonization across medical institutions.Second, empowering medical institutions as the primary executing entities of active surveillance by leveraging specialized academic influence to build collaborative networks and research-sharing mechanisms, thereby incentivizing institutional participation.Third, establishing research cohorts with standardized disease follow-up protocols to acquire robust long-term follow-up data for comprehensive longitudinal and health economic evaluations.
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke, Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, Extracranial Arterial Stenosis, Intracranial Aneurysms, Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- Being tested
- Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke, Intracranial Aneurysm, Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic StrokeProcedure or surgery
Also called Intracranial Arterial Stenting, Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting, Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty, Extracranial Arterial Angioplasty and Stenting
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma;Flow-Diverter Implantation;Coil Embolization;Endovascular Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysm;Extracranial Arterial Angioplasty and Stenting;Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty;Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting;Intracranial Arterial Stenting.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acute Ischemic Stroke | In the acute large-vessel occlusion stroke cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be conducted for thrombectomy stents, aspiration catheters and other devices. This meets the guideline requirement that "the surveillance platform should include hospitals representative of regions, diseases and device usage". Data generated from the use of the above-mentioned devices will be analyzed to implement active surveillance. Receives: Procedure: Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke | |
| Intracranial Arterial Stenosis ICAS | In the intracranial arterial stenosis cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be performed for balloons, intracranial stents and other devices. This satisfies the guideline requirement that "the surveillance platform should include hospitals representative of regions, diseases and device usage". Data from the use of the above-mentioned devices will be analyzed to implement active surveillance. | |
| Extracranial Arterial Stenosis ECAS | In the extracranial arterial stenosis cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be conducted for optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanners, vertebral artery orifice drug-eluting stents and other related devices. This complies with the guideline requirement that the surveillance platform covers hospitals representative of regional distribution, disease types and device application scenarios. Data related to the clinical use of the above devices will be analyzed to complete active surveillance. | |
| Intracranial Aneurysm IA | In the intracranial aneurysm cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be conducted for flow-diverter devices, adjunctive embolization stents and other interventional devices. This complies with the guideline requirement that "the surveillance platform should include hospitals representative of regions, diseases and device usage". Data generated from the use of the above-mentioned devices will be analyzed to implement active surveillance. | |
| Chronic Subdural Hematoma CSDH | In the chronic subdural hematoma cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be conducted for middle meningeal artery embolization materials and related devices. This complies with the guideline requirement that "the surveillance platform should include hospitals representative of regions, diseases and device usage". Data generated from the use of the above-mentioned devices will be analyzed to implement active surveillance. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional Outcome
Functional Outcome: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 90 days
Successful Vascular Recanalization Rate
Successful Vascular Recanalization Rate: eTICI grade of target vessel reperfusion after thrombectomy.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Changhai HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Changhai Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07828379
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PostMkt AS&HEE for Cerebrovasc
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Participant privacy and data-protection requirements. IPD contains identifiable personal information, and sharing would risk breach of patient confidentiality. Incomplete or ongoing analysis of the dataset. The investigators have not finished planned analyses and publications. Restrictions from informed consent. Study participants were not consented to release their raw individual-level data. Intellectual property and sponsor-related constraints. Data ownership limits public distribution of IPD.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post-Market Active Surveillance and Health Economic Evaluation of Cerebrovascular Diagnostic and Therapeutic Devices
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07828379
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PostMkt AS&HEE for Cerebrovasc
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke, Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, Extracranial Arterial Stenosis, Intracranial Aneurysms, Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Changhai HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The research focuses on "post-market active surveillance and health economic evaluation of non-pharmacological therapies and innovative cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices". Partnering with top-tier domestic institutions including the National Medical Administration Center, Regional Drug Evaluation Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, and the School of Public Health, Fudan University, the project intends to:
Establish standards for post-market active surveillance of cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices and develop an intelligent surveillance system; Build a nationwide collaborative network covering multi-level medical institutions, and conduct serial cohort studies on cerebrovascular diseases based on the surveillance platform; Carry out safety, effectiveness and health economic evaluations for cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices using data collected from the network and platform, so as to provide scientific evidence for the full-life-cycle regulation of such devices.
Detailed description
Cerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of disability and adult mortality in China,with a high overall incidence. The rapid advancement and widespread application of neurointerventional techniques have driven an annual increase in the volume of cerebrovascular interventional procedures. Consequently, various cerebrovascular diagnostic and therapeutic devices-including multiple domestically developed innovative devices-have gained market approval following pre-market clinical trials,thereby expanding clinical treatment options. However, pre-market studies are often limited by small sample sizes, restricted population representativeness, short observation periods, and highly controlled clinical environments, making it difficult to fully evaluate device performance in real-world clinical settings. Therefore, strengthening post-market device regulation and establishing a comprehensive post-market active surveillance system are critical. These measures are essential for the timely detection and management of clinical risks,ensuring patient safety, accumulating real-world data (RWD), and supporting the optimization of health policies and healthcare reimbursement decisions. China has long prioritized the post-market surveillance of medical devices. Since initiating a pilot program for medical device adverse event (MDAE) monitoring in 2002, China successively promulgated the Measures for the Monitoring and Re-evaluation of Medical Device Adverse Events (Trial) in 2008 and the revised Measures for the Monitoring and Re-evaluation of Medical Device Adverse Events in 2018 to strengthen device surveillance. Furthermore, the newly revised Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Medical Devices (State Council Decree No.739 of the People's Republic of China), promulgated in 2021, emphasize full-lifecycle, full-process and full-chain oversight of medical devices. Throughout this progression, China has established the Medical Device Adverse Event Reporting and Management System, anchored by provincial MDAE monitoring centers. This system enables medical institutions and manufacturers that identify adverse events to submit reports, increasing the volume of adverse event submissions and improving risk monitoring and control capacity. However, it is notable that China's existing post-market regulatory framework for medical devices still faces a significant challenge: the lack of an active surveillance system. The current reporting system, which designates medical device registrants as the primary responsible entities, is voluntary rather than mandatory. This inevitably leads to inherent flaws such as low reporting rates, high misreporting rates, the inability to calculate true incidence rates, and delayed signal detection. Consequently, the real-world safety, effectiveness, and health economics of medical devices cannot be comprehensively evaluated, posing potential risks to public health safety and the efficient utilization of healthcare resources. Therefore, it is imperative to transition from a passive surveillance model to an active surveillance paradigm characterized by proactive data collection and active outcome analysis. Although active surveillance takes various forms, conducting real-world active surveillance based on healthcare data has become a prevailing trend. This is driven by the enhanced integration and application of healthcare data, alongside continuous advancements in analytical techniques. For instance, in 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated the Medical Device Epidemiology Network (MDEpiNet)-a multi-stakeholder collaborative platform involving healthcare institutions, academic organizations, device manufacturers, and patient advocacy groups. This initiative aims to conduct surveillance research by sharing resources across network members and integrating RWD, including electronic health records (EHR), cohort studies, and healthcare claims data. In recent years, China has initiated pilot programs for active post-market surveillance of medical devices (i.e., the medical device vigilance system) in regions such as Jiangsu, yielding preliminary results. Overall, however, the implementation of real-world evaluation still faces significant challenges: 1. Lack of a unified national surveillance system: Inefficient cross-hospital collaboration hinders standardized data integration and creates isolated information silos. 2. Absence of a multi-center collaborative network: The surveillance framework is solely regulator-led, leaving healthcare institutions (core data providers) with insufficient incentives for active data submission and early risk alerting. 3. Deficient long-term follow-up workflows: Incomplete longitudinal follow-up data limits the availability of health economic evidence to support healthcare policy design. China has unique national conditions: a vast territory, large population, heterogeneous regional epidemiological profiles, and unbalanced socioeconomic and healthcare resources. Combined with the broad clinical adoption of post-market cerebrovascular devices (domestic innovative devices in particular) and the massive volume of real-world data they generate, the above challenges will be further exacerbated when rolling out nationwide active surveillance. Therefore, the successful implementation of active medical device surveillance tailored to China's context relies on several key strategies: First, coordinating inter-hospital collaboration through departments with core advantages in cross-sector coordination to construct a national system and achieve data harmonization across medical institutions.Second, empowering medical institutions as the primary executing entities of active surveillance by leveraging specialized academic influence to build collaborative networks and research-sharing mechanisms, thereby incentivizing institutional participation.Third, establishing research cohorts with standardized disease follow-up protocols to acquire robust long-term follow-up data for comprehensive longitudinal and health economic evaluations.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acute Ischemic Stroke | – | Procedure: Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic StrokeIn the acute large-vessel occlusion stroke cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be conducted for thrombectomy stents, aspiration catheters and other devices. This meets the guideline requirement that "the surveillance platform should include hospitals representative of regions, diseases and device usage". Data generated from the use of the above-mentioned devices will be analyzed to implement active surveillance. |
| Intracranial Arterial Stenosis ICAS | – | –In the intracranial arterial stenosis cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be performed for balloons, intracranial stents and other devices. This satisfies the guideline requirement that "the surveillance platform should include hospitals representative of regions, diseases and device usage". Data from the use of the above-mentioned devices will be analyzed to implement active surveillance. |
| Extracranial Arterial Stenosis ECAS | – | –In the extracranial arterial stenosis cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be conducted for optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanners, vertebral artery orifice drug-eluting stents and other related devices. This complies with the guideline requirement that the surveillance platform covers hospitals representative of regional distribution, disease types and device application scenarios. Data related to the clinical use of the above devices will be analyzed to complete active surveillance. |
| Intracranial Aneurysm IA | – | –In the intracranial aneurysm cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be conducted for flow-diverter devices, adjunctive embolization stents and other interventional devices. This complies with the guideline requirement that "the surveillance platform should include hospitals representative of regions, diseases and device usage". Data generated from the use of the above-mentioned devices will be analyzed to implement active surveillance. |
| Chronic Subdural Hematoma CSDH | – | –In the chronic subdural hematoma cohort, full-life-cycle surveillance will be conducted for middle meningeal artery embolization materials and related devices. This complies with the guideline requirement that "the surveillance platform should include hospitals representative of regions, diseases and device usage". Data generated from the use of the above-mentioned devices will be analyzed to implement active surveillance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients with acute ischemic stroke, intracranial arterial stenosis, extracranial arterial stenosis, intracranial aneurysm and chronic subdural hematoma who receive cerebrovascular interventional therapy
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥18 years; patients with ischemic stroke receiving acute reperfusion therapy (i.e., endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis); informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative, and availability for follow-up.
- Aged 35-80 years; symptomatic moderate-to-severe intracranial arterial stenosis (50-99%, confirmed by DSA) with contralateral intracranial arterial stenosis <50%. Symptomatic stenosis is defined as transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke or other relevant neurological symptoms caused by internal carotid artery stenosis within the preceding 6 months; informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative, and availability for follow-up.
- Aged 35-80 years; symptomatic moderate-to-severe stenosis (50-99%) of the origin of the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery confirmed by ultrasound, CTA or DSA. Symptomatic stenosis is defined as transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke or other relevant neurological symptoms caused by stenosis of the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery within the preceding 6 months; asymptomatic severe stenosis (70%-99%) of the origin of the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery; informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative, and availability for follow-up.
- Age ≥18 years; ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysm diagnosed by digital subtraction angiography; meeting the surgical indications for flow-diverting devices, intracranial stents or coil embolization; patients who provide informed consent for this study and agree to follow-up imaging examinations.
- Age >18 years; chronic subdural hematoma confirmed by CT and meeting the indications for middle meningeal artery embolization; patients who provide informed consent for this study and agree to follow-up imaging examinations.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Participation in another clinical trial of drugs or devices within the past 3 months or ongoing participation in such trials.
- Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Cohort
- Contraindications to stenting; participation in another clinical trial of drugs or devices within the past 6 months or ongoing participation in such trials.
- Extracranial Arterial Stenosis Cohort
- Contraindications to interventional therapy including stenting or balloon angioplasty; participation in another clinical trial of drugs or devices within the past 6 months or ongoing participation in such trials.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic StrokeAlso: Intracranial Arterial Stenting, Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting, Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty, Extracranial Arterial Angioplasty and StentingMiddle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma;Flow-Diverter Implantation;Coil Embolization;Endovascular Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysm;Extracranial Arterial Angioplasty and Stenting;Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty;Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting;Intracranial Arterial Stenting. | Procedure or surgery | Acute Ischemic Stroke |
Primary outcome
Functional Outcome
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 90 days
Functional Outcome: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days.
Successful Vascular Recanalization Rate
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 90 days
Successful Vascular Recanalization Rate: eTICI grade of target vessel reperfusion after thrombectomy.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Participant privacy and data-protection requirements. IPD contains identifiable personal information, and sharing would risk breach of patient confidentiality. Incomplete or ongoing analysis of the dataset. The investigators have not finished planned analyses and publications. Restrictions from informed consent. Study participants were not consented to release their raw individual-level data. Intellectual property and sponsor-related constraints. Data ownership limits public distribution of IPD.
Related trials for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial With Blinded Endpoint Assessment of Early Tirofiban After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, run by Changhai Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yu Zhou (860213116178, yzhou_2011@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional Outcome (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 90 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2026.