ParaffinomaPhase 2/3NCT07828002
The GranStone Trial
A Phase 2/3 study testing empagliflozin (Jardiance) 25 mg and Losartan 100 mg in people with Paraffinoma and Granuloma, Foreign-Body, run by Martin Blomberg Jensen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study will investigate whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can reduce the risk of kidney stone formation in patients with paraffin disease, a condition caused by the injection of paraffin oil into muscle tissue for cosmetic muscle enlargement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Paraffinoma, Granuloma, Foreign-Body
- What is being tested?
- empagliflozin (Jardiance) 25 mg and Losartan 100 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Apr 2029
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent by participant
- Male
- 18-70 years
- Paraffin granuloma disease with hypercalcemia, hypoparathyroidism, hypercalciuria or a history of nephrolithiasis
Who cannot join
- eGFR < 30 ml/min
- Cancer (past or present, except basal cell skin cancer or squamous cell skin cancer), which in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the results of the trial
- Type 1 DM
- Known chronic kidney disease in whom RAS-blockade and SGLT2-inhibition is indicated.
- Severely impaired liver function
- History of organ transplantation
Show all 9Show fewer
- Receiving therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ATII antagonist within 8 weeks prior to enrollment or previous intolerance of an SGLT2 inhibitor or ATII antagonist.
- Known history of angioedema
- Mental incapacity, language barriers or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol, which may preclude adequate understanding or cooperation during the trial, as judged by the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site
Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev
Herlev, 2730
Emil B Wriedt, MD, +451185797, emil.brink.wriedt@regionh.dk
Emil B Wriedt, MD
About this study
Official title: Prevention of Kidney Stones Due to Paraffin Oil Induced Granuloma: A Prospective Interventional Study
This study will investigate whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can reduce the risk of kidney stone formation in patients with paraffin disease, a condition caused by the injection of paraffin oil into muscle tissue for cosmetic muscle enlargement.
Paraffin disease can lead to chronic inflammation, disturbances in calcium regulation, high blood calcium levels, kidney stones, and impaired kidney function. Previous studies from Herlev-Gentofte Hospital have shown that kidney stones occur in nearly half of affected patients, while approximately one-third develop reduced kidney function. Current treatment primarily consists of high-dose corticosteroids, which can reduce blood calcium levels but cause substantial adverse effects and may not adequately control the underlying disease process.
Read more
Both empagliflozin and losartan are widely used medications with documented kidney-protective effects in other chronic kidney diseases. This randomized clinical trial will evaluate whether either treatment can prevent kidney stone formation and slow kidney-related complications in patients with paraffin disease.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can prevent kidney stone formation and improve kidney health in patients with paraffin disease.
Read the detailed description
Cosmetic treatments are becoming increasingly popular, now also encompassing injection of different sorts of fillers. One such approach is the injection of paraffin oil into muscular regions for the sole purpose of enhancing muscular size. During the last 4 years we have experienced that injections with paraffin oil are being more widely used than anticipated. Usage is mainly seen in the younger segment of the male Danish population, causing severe morbidity including hypercalcemia, kidney stones and renal failure in patients often in their thirties. Injected paraffin oil causes foreign body reactions, leading to inflammation and granuloma formation. Granulomas are rich in macrophages capable of producing large amount of activated vitamin D (1,25OH2D3) that may cause severe hypercalcemia. Although, the link between foreign body granuloma, and hypercalcemia has been known for more than 60 years sparse evidence-based treatments exist to control calcium and vitamin D balance in these patients. Physiologically, cutaneous produced or orally absorbed 25OH2D3 (cholecalciferol) needs activation before it can activate the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and exert its actions. This activation occurs through hydroxylation by CYP27B1 in the kidneys creating the active 1,25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol). CYP27B1 is the rate-limiting step in calcitriol synthesis and is tightly regulated under physiologic conditions. Control of high 1,25(OH)2D3 is achieved by a feedback system, where 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulates the enzyme CYP24A1, which in turn hy-droxylate 1,25(OH)2D3 to the inactive 1,24,25OH2D3. Several other players, e.g. parathy-roid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) regulate calcium homeostasis. However, in macrophages, CYP27B1 is upregulated by interleukin 2, and the inhibiting enzyme CYP24A1 is not upregulated. Therefore, granulomas can produce large amounts of 1,25OH2D3, and this production is not counteracted by the otherwise tight regulatory and physiological mechanisms. Unimpeded 1,25OH2D3 in turn increase calcium absorption from the intestines, reabsorption from the kidneys and to some extent calcium release from bones, all leading to hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia is a late feature of accelerated 25OH2D3 activation, as several counter regulatory mechanisms will attempt to maintain normocalcemia. As a result, these patients suffer from nephrolithiasis or progressive kidney disease due to nephrocalcinosis and/or nephrolithiasis, with some patients progressing to end stage renal dis-ease (ESRD).
SGLT2 inhibitors were developed for treatment of type 2 diabetes to lower blood glucose levels but they had a more pronounced effect in patients with heart or renal failure irrespective of diabetes status. SGLT2 inhibitors could prevent or reduce eGFR decline in patients with renal failure and it appeared in some trials that it could also lower the risk of nephrolithiasis. SGLT2 inhibitors have few adverse effects in non-diabetics and may be used to prevent progression of paraffin oil disease by protecting the kidney and reducing the risk of kidney stones in these patients. ACEi's and ARB's have also been shown to reduce progression of kidney disease. Although the data on prevention of kidney stones is less convincing for ACEi/ARB's the renoprotective effects make them a potential treatment option.
Data from our cohort of patients:
During our initial investigation of 88 patients, milder symptoms of hypercalcemia were often accompanied by hypercalcuria with increased risk of kidney stones and later nephrocalcinosis and ultimately progressive renal failure and vascular calcification as seen in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or CKD. 3 deaths have been recorded in our cohort of young men, so paraffin disease leads to significant morbidity, but presumably also increased mortality. Currently, paraffin disease is still very sparsely described in the medical literature. The number of affected individuals is presumably large because early disease causes few symptoms and many of these men rarely seek medical attention. At the section of Endocrinology at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, there is currently more than 310 young males who injected paraffin oil prior to referral. In the first published cohort of 88 males (32 ± 7 years (mean ± SD)) who injected paraffin oil 6 years prior to their first visit, the minority (42%) have managed to maintain an apparent normal calcium metabolism (normocalcemic and normoparathyoid), while the majority have developed an abnormal calcium metabolism ranging from normocalcemic and hypoparathyroid (24%) to hypercalcemic and hypoparathyroid (34%). Renal stone formers ranging from 22 % in patients with an apparent normal calcium homeostasis to a stunning 47-48% in those with abnormal calcium homeostasis (5-10% in back-ground population). Importantly, a significant number of patients (approx. 30%) had already developed mild to severe renal impairment with reduced eGFR. Most patients tended to have increased inflammatory markers (interleukine-2 receptor (IL-2R) and/or pepti-dyldipeptidase (ACE)) - even in those with apparent normal calcium metabolism. Surgical resection may improve both local reactions and pain. However, due to granuloma formation within muscle tissue and oilmigration, it is difficult to remove all the granuloma tissue. Currently, first line of treatment for paraffin disease is prednisolone, which has proven effective in lowering calcium levels in all our patients. However, patients require relatively large (15-75 mg daily) and long term (years) doses of prednisolone to achieve and maintain normal or near normal calcium levels with many possible adverse effects. Noteworthy, after 4 years observation we have not yet seen any decrease in inflammatory markers in any male suggesting that prednisolone monotherapy is not enough when you have large amount of granuloma tissue. Paraffin disease mimics sarcoidosis, both being granulomatous diseases with hypercalcemia due to macrophage mediated 25OH2D3 activation. Interestingly, RAAS activation has been shown to contribute to sarcoidosis granuloma formation in an ex vivo model, highlighting an additional potential role for treatment with ACEi/ARB's. However, paraffin disease appears to be much more progressive, not self-limiting and require more aggressive treatment probably because the volume of granulomatous tissue is so huge.
Since ACEi's, ARB's and SGLTi's are the only drug classes consistently shown to slow progression in CKD in a non-diabetic population, we hypothesize that these treatments will be effective in a cohort of patients with hypercalcemia due to paraffin oil induced granulomatous disease. Furthermore, we hypothesize that SGLTi will have a greater effect due to the potential decrease in incident nephrolithiasis. However, the ketosis associated with this treatment may not be beneficial, which clearly justifies the face-to-face comparison.
Losartan was chosen over an ACE inhibitor due to ease of administration and proven safety in patients with severe kidney disease. Additionally, it has been suggested that ARB's have greater efficacy than ACEi's on survival in patients with granulomatous disease due to sarcoidosis.
This research project will investigate whether it is of value to initiate nephroprotective treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ARB in patients with hypercalciuria due to paraffin oil induced granulomatous disease.
- Conditions
- Paraffinoma, Granuloma, Foreign-Body
- Being tested
- empagliflozin (Jardiance) 25 mg, Losartan 100 mg
- Keywords
- Nephrocalcinosis, Nephrolithiasis, Paraffin Oil, Intra-Muscular Oil Injection, Hypercalcemia, Vitamin D, Paraffinoma, Foreign-Body Granuloma
- Medical subject headings
- Granuloma, Foreign-Body, Nephrocalcinosis, Nephrolithiasis, Hypercalcemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
empagliflozin (Jardiance) 25 mgDrug
Once daily 25 mg tablet PO
Losartan 100 mgDrug
Once daily 100 mg tablet PO
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Empagliflozin | Experimental | Once daily 25 mg tablet PO Receives: Drug: empagliflozin (Jardiance) 25 mg |
| Losartan | Active comparator | Once daily 100 mg tablet PO Receives: Drug: Losartan 100 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Image verified new or increased nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis (from 0-24 months).
The individual components of the composite outcome are defined as follows:
- If nephrolithiasis- or nephrocalcinosis burden occurs after baseline or aggravates by more than 20% at follow-up it is counted as a positive outcome.
- Any CT scans conducted as a part of a participant's routine medical care or hospital visits will also be used.
- In the event that a participant undergoes more than 1 CT scan, it will be counted as a positive outcome if any of the scans shows nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis accord-ing to the criteria above.
- Symptomatic kidney stone as defined as visible passage of a stone in the urine accom-panied by flank/groin/abdominal pain will also be counted as a positive outcome.
Measured: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Secondary outcomes (30)
Change in calcium homeostasis after 12 and 24 months
Change in calcium homeostasis after 12 and 24 months defined by either: 1A Change in p-Calcium ion concentration (mmol/L); 1B Change in p-PTH concen-tration (pmol/L); 1C Change in urine calcium excretion (mmol/L).
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73 m²)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in p-Creatinine (μmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in average daily prednisolone dosage (mg) based on cumulative average prednisolone dose.
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in inflammatory activity of the granulomas.
Change in inflammatory activity evaluated by changes in p-IL-2R (kU/L) and p-ACE (U/L).
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in physical- and mental health scores assessed by the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36).
The SF-36 consists of 36 questions designed to assess overall health status. Results are transformed onto a scale from 0 (worst possible health) to 100 (best possible health).
Measured: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum albumin (g/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine albumin (mg/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in serum vitamin D metabolites
Changes in serum 25OHD, and 24,25(OH)2D3, and 1,25(OH)2D
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other indices of cardiac function as measured by transthoracic echocardiography.
Measured: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Incident or worsening signs of: Systolic- and/or diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, structural heart disease including valvular pathology
Measured: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in CT Hounsfield Units in the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae
Measured: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in Coronary Artery Calcium Score on CT-scan
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score measured using the Agatston method on non-contrast cardiac CT; higher scores indicate greater coronary calcified plaque burden.
Measured: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in self-reported kidney stones.
Measured: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in BUN (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum phosphate (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine phosphate (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum magnesium (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine magnesium (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum iron (µmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum ferritin (µg/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum FGF23 (ng/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum Klotho
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine Ka (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine Na (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine pH
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine citrate (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine oxalate (μmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine bicarbonate (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine uric acid (mmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ParaffinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Open-Label, 2-arm parallel comparative trial with minimization randomization.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Martin Blomberg Jensen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Martin Blomberg Jensen, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Investigators
- Martin B Jensen, Professor, Principal investigator, Herlev Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07828002
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026-525608-85-00
- Other IDs
- 2026-525608-85-00
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
PubMed 24141714The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group; Herrington WG, Staplin N, Wanner C, Green JB, Hauske SJ, Emberson JR, Preiss D, Judge P, Mayne KJ, Ng SYA, Sammons E, Zhu D, Hill M, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Brenner S, Cheung AK, Liu ZH, Li J, Hooi LS, Liu W, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Levin A, Cherney D, Maggioni AP, Pontremoli R, Deo R, Goto S, Rossello X, Tuttle KR, Steubl D, Petrini M, Massey D, Eilbracht J, Brueckmann M, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Haynes R. Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):117-127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204233. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
PubMed 36331190Fares J, El Fadel O, Zhao J, Li M, Sun J, Roman J, Loizidis G, Summer R. Mortality and Health Outcomes Among Patients With Sarcoidosis Treated With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers. Chest. 2025 Mar;167(3):772-780. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
PubMed 39313185Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S; RENAAL Study Investigators. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 20;345(12):861-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011161.
PubMed 11565518Crouser ED, Julian MW, Locke LW, Bicer S, Mitchell JR, Singha A, Kramer PJ, Rajaram MVS, Raman SV. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Regulates Sarcoidosis Granulomatous Inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug 15;210(4):497-507. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202402-0265OC.
PubMed 38941161Yahyavi SK, Theilade S, Hansen D, Berg JO, Andreassen CH, Lorenzen M, Jorgensen A, Juul A, Faber J, Eldrup E, Blomberg Jensen M. Treatment options for hypercalcemia after cosmetic oil injections: Lessons from human tissue cultures and a pilot intervention study. Bone. 2022 Jan;154:116244. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116244. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
PubMed 34757214Yahyavi SK, Wall-Gremstrup G, Makki A, Juel J, Theilade S, Berg JO, Juul A, Momsen O, Eldrup E, Blomberg Jensen M. Debulking Surgery After Muscular Paraffin Oil Injections: Effects on Calcium Homeostasis and Patient Satisfaction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 18;110(3):649-657. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae606.
PubMed 39225149Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Rasmussen S, Thijs L, Ibsen H, Jeppesen J. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation. 2006 Feb 7;113(5):664-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.579342.
PubMed 16461839Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, Ducimetiere P, Benetos A. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001 May;37(5):1236-41. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.5.1236.
PubMed 11358934Schillaci G, Pucci G, Pirro M, Monacelli M, Scarponi AM, Manfredelli MR, Rondelli F, Avenia N, Mannarino E. Large-artery stiffness: a reversible marker of cardiovascular risk in primary hyperparathyroidism. Atherosclerosis. 2011 Sep;218(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 May 18.
PubMed 21645899Eldrup E, Theilade S, Lorenzen M, Andreassen CH, Poulsen KH, Nielsen JE, Hansen D, El Fassi D, Berg JO, Bagi P, Jorgensen A, Blomberg Jensen M. Hypercalcemia After Cosmetic Oil Injections: Unraveling Etiology, Pathogenesis, and Severity. J Bone Miner Res. 2021 Feb;36(2):322-333. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4179. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
PubMed 32931047Alexander RT, McArthur E, Jandoc R, Welk B, Hayward JS, Jain AK, Braam B, Flockerzi V, Garg AX, Quinn RR. Antihypertensive medications and the risk of kidney stones in older adults: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertens Res. 2017 Sep;40(9):837-842. doi: 10.1038/hr.2017.42. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
PubMed 28331214Xie X, Liu Y, Perkovic V, Li X, Ninomiya T, Hou W, Zhao N, Liu L, Lv J, Zhang H, Wang H. Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With CKD: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 May;67(5):728-41. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
PubMed 26597926Anderegg MA, Schietzel S, Bargagli M, Bally L, Faller N, Moor MB, Cereghetti GM, Roumet M, Trelle S, Fuster DG. Empagliflozin in nondiabetic individuals with calcium and uric acid kidney stones: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2025 Jan;31(1):286-293. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03330-x. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
PubMed 39747681Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, de Boer RA, DeMets D, Hernandez AF, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Lam CSP, Martinez F, Shah SJ, Desai AS, Jhund PS, Belohlavek J, Chiang CE, Borleffs CJW, Comin-Colet J, Dobreanu D, Drozdz J, Fang JC, Alcocer-Gamba MA, Al Habeeb W, Han Y, Cabrera Honorio JW, Janssens SP, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Merkely B, O'Meara E, Saraiva JFK, Tereshchenko SN, Thierer J, Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Verma S, Pham VN, Wilderang U, Zaozerska N, Bachus E, Lindholm D, Petersson M, Langkilde AM; DELIVER Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 22;387(12):1089-1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206286. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
PubMed 36027570
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention of Kidney Stones Due to Paraffin Oil Induced Granuloma: A Prospective Interventional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07828002
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2026-525608-85-00
- Conditions
- Paraffinoma, Granuloma, Foreign-Body
- Keywords
- Nephrocalcinosis, Nephrolithiasis, Paraffin Oil, Intra-Muscular Oil Injection, Hypercalcemia, Vitamin D, Paraffinoma, Foreign-Body Granuloma
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Martin Blomberg JensenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will investigate whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can reduce the risk of kidney stone formation in patients with paraffin disease, a condition caused by the injection of paraffin oil into muscle tissue for cosmetic muscle enlargement.
Paraffin disease can lead to chronic inflammation, disturbances in calcium regulation, high blood calcium levels, kidney stones, and impaired kidney function. Previous studies from Herlev-Gentofte Hospital have shown that kidney stones occur in nearly half of affected patients, while approximately one-third develop reduced kidney function. Current treatment primarily consists of high-dose corticosteroids, which can reduce blood calcium levels but cause substantial adverse effects and may not adequately control the underlying disease process.
Both empagliflozin and losartan are widely used medications with documented kidney-protective effects in other chronic kidney diseases. This randomized clinical trial will evaluate whether either treatment can prevent kidney stone formation and slow kidney-related complications in patients with paraffin disease.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can prevent kidney stone formation and improve kidney health in patients with paraffin disease.
Detailed description
Cosmetic treatments are becoming increasingly popular, now also encompassing injection of different sorts of fillers. One such approach is the injection of paraffin oil into muscular regions for the sole purpose of enhancing muscular size. During the last 4 years we have experienced that injections with paraffin oil are being more widely used than anticipated. Usage is mainly seen in the younger segment of the male Danish population, causing severe morbidity including hypercalcemia, kidney stones and renal failure in patients often in their thirties. Injected paraffin oil causes foreign body reactions, leading to inflammation and granuloma formation. Granulomas are rich in macrophages capable of producing large amount of activated vitamin D (1,25OH2D3) that may cause severe hypercalcemia. Although, the link between foreign body granuloma, and hypercalcemia has been known for more than 60 years sparse evidence-based treatments exist to control calcium and vitamin D balance in these patients. Physiologically, cutaneous produced or orally absorbed 25OH2D3 (cholecalciferol) needs activation before it can activate the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and exert its actions. This activation occurs through hydroxylation by CYP27B1 in the kidneys creating the active 1,25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol). CYP27B1 is the rate-limiting step in calcitriol synthesis and is tightly regulated under physiologic conditions. Control of high 1,25(OH)2D3 is achieved by a feedback system, where 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulates the enzyme CYP24A1, which in turn hy-droxylate 1,25(OH)2D3 to the inactive 1,24,25OH2D3. Several other players, e.g. parathy-roid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) regulate calcium homeostasis. However, in macrophages, CYP27B1 is upregulated by interleukin 2, and the inhibiting enzyme CYP24A1 is not upregulated. Therefore, granulomas can produce large amounts of 1,25OH2D3, and this production is not counteracted by the otherwise tight regulatory and physiological mechanisms. Unimpeded 1,25OH2D3 in turn increase calcium absorption from the intestines, reabsorption from the kidneys and to some extent calcium release from bones, all leading to hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia is a late feature of accelerated 25OH2D3 activation, as several counter regulatory mechanisms will attempt to maintain normocalcemia. As a result, these patients suffer from nephrolithiasis or progressive kidney disease due to nephrocalcinosis and/or nephrolithiasis, with some patients progressing to end stage renal dis-ease (ESRD).
SGLT2 inhibitors were developed for treatment of type 2 diabetes to lower blood glucose levels but they had a more pronounced effect in patients with heart or renal failure irrespective of diabetes status. SGLT2 inhibitors could prevent or reduce eGFR decline in patients with renal failure and it appeared in some trials that it could also lower the risk of nephrolithiasis. SGLT2 inhibitors have few adverse effects in non-diabetics and may be used to prevent progression of paraffin oil disease by protecting the kidney and reducing the risk of kidney stones in these patients. ACEi's and ARB's have also been shown to reduce progression of kidney disease. Although the data on prevention of kidney stones is less convincing for ACEi/ARB's the renoprotective effects make them a potential treatment option.
Data from our cohort of patients:
During our initial investigation of 88 patients, milder symptoms of hypercalcemia were often accompanied by hypercalcuria with increased risk of kidney stones and later nephrocalcinosis and ultimately progressive renal failure and vascular calcification as seen in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or CKD. 3 deaths have been recorded in our cohort of young men, so paraffin disease leads to significant morbidity, but presumably also increased mortality. Currently, paraffin disease is still very sparsely described in the medical literature. The number of affected individuals is presumably large because early disease causes few symptoms and many of these men rarely seek medical attention. At the section of Endocrinology at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, there is currently more than 310 young males who injected paraffin oil prior to referral. In the first published cohort of 88 males (32 ± 7 years (mean ± SD)) who injected paraffin oil 6 years prior to their first visit, the minority (42%) have managed to maintain an apparent normal calcium metabolism (normocalcemic and normoparathyoid), while the majority have developed an abnormal calcium metabolism ranging from normocalcemic and hypoparathyroid (24%) to hypercalcemic and hypoparathyroid (34%). Renal stone formers ranging from 22 % in patients with an apparent normal calcium homeostasis to a stunning 47-48% in those with abnormal calcium homeostasis (5-10% in back-ground population). Importantly, a significant number of patients (approx. 30%) had already developed mild to severe renal impairment with reduced eGFR. Most patients tended to have increased inflammatory markers (interleukine-2 receptor (IL-2R) and/or pepti-dyldipeptidase (ACE)) - even in those with apparent normal calcium metabolism. Surgical resection may improve both local reactions and pain. However, due to granuloma formation within muscle tissue and oilmigration, it is difficult to remove all the granuloma tissue. Currently, first line of treatment for paraffin disease is prednisolone, which has proven effective in lowering calcium levels in all our patients. However, patients require relatively large (15-75 mg daily) and long term (years) doses of prednisolone to achieve and maintain normal or near normal calcium levels with many possible adverse effects. Noteworthy, after 4 years observation we have not yet seen any decrease in inflammatory markers in any male suggesting that prednisolone monotherapy is not enough when you have large amount of granuloma tissue. Paraffin disease mimics sarcoidosis, both being granulomatous diseases with hypercalcemia due to macrophage mediated 25OH2D3 activation. Interestingly, RAAS activation has been shown to contribute to sarcoidosis granuloma formation in an ex vivo model, highlighting an additional potential role for treatment with ACEi/ARB's. However, paraffin disease appears to be much more progressive, not self-limiting and require more aggressive treatment probably because the volume of granulomatous tissue is so huge.
Since ACEi's, ARB's and SGLTi's are the only drug classes consistently shown to slow progression in CKD in a non-diabetic population, we hypothesize that these treatments will be effective in a cohort of patients with hypercalcemia due to paraffin oil induced granulomatous disease. Furthermore, we hypothesize that SGLTi will have a greater effect due to the potential decrease in incident nephrolithiasis. However, the ketosis associated with this treatment may not be beneficial, which clearly justifies the face-to-face comparison.
Losartan was chosen over an ACE inhibitor due to ease of administration and proven safety in patients with severe kidney disease. Additionally, it has been suggested that ARB's have greater efficacy than ACEi's on survival in patients with granulomatous disease due to sarcoidosis.
This research project will investigate whether it is of value to initiate nephroprotective treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ARB in patients with hypercalciuria due to paraffin oil induced granulomatous disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Open-Label, 2-arm parallel comparative trial with minimization randomization.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Empagliflozin | Experimental | Drug: empagliflozin (Jardiance) 25 mgOnce daily 25 mg tablet PO |
| Losartan | Active comparator | Drug: Losartan 100 mgOnce daily 100 mg tablet PO |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Signed informed consent by participant
- Male
- 18-70 years
- Paraffin granuloma disease with hypercalcemia, hypoparathyroidism, hypercalciuria or a history of nephrolithiasis
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- eGFR < 30 ml/min
- Cancer (past or present, except basal cell skin cancer or squamous cell skin cancer), which in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the results of the trial
- Type 1 DM
- Known chronic kidney disease in whom RAS-blockade and SGLT2-inhibition is indicated.
- Severely impaired liver function
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| empagliflozin (Jardiance) 25 mgOnce daily 25 mg tablet PO | Drug | Empagliflozin |
| Losartan 100 mgOnce daily 100 mg tablet PO | Drug | Losartan |
Primary outcome
Image verified new or increased nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis (from 0-24 months).
Time frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
The individual components of the composite outcome are defined as follows: * If nephrolithiasis- or nephrocalcinosis burden occurs after baseline or aggravates by more than 20% at follow-up it is counted as a positive outcome. * Any CT scans conducted as a part of a participant's routine medical care or hospital visits will also be used. * In the event that a participant undergoes more than 1 CT scan, it will be counted as a positive outcome if any of the scans shows nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis accord-ing to the criteria above. * Symptomatic kidney stone as defined as visible passage of a stone in the urine accom-panied by flank/groin/abdominal pain will also be counted as a positive outcome.
30 secondary outcomes
Change in calcium homeostasis after 12 and 24 months
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73 m²)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in p-Creatinine (μmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in average daily prednisolone dosage (mg) based on cumulative average prednisolone dose.
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in inflammatory activity of the granulomas.
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in physical- and mental health scores assessed by the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36).
Time frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum albumin (g/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine albumin (mg/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in serum vitamin D metabolites
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other indices of cardiac function as measured by transthoracic echocardiography.
Time frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Incident or worsening signs of: Systolic- and/or diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, structural heart disease including valvular pathology
Time frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in CT Hounsfield Units in the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae
Time frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in Coronary Artery Calcium Score on CT-scan
Time frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in self-reported kidney stones.
Time frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in BUN (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum phosphate (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine phosphate (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum magnesium (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine magnesium (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum iron (µmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum ferritin (µg/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum FGF23 (ng/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum Klotho
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine Ka (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine Na (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine pH
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine citrate (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine oxalate (μmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine bicarbonate (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine uric acid (mmol/L)
Time frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24141714World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 36331190The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group; Herrington WG, Staplin N, Wanner C, Green JB, Hauske SJ, Emberson JR, Preiss D, Judge P, Mayne KJ, Ng SYA, Sammons E, Zhu D, Hill M, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Brenner S, Cheung AK, Liu ZH, Li J, Hooi LS, Liu W, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Levin A, Cherney D, Maggioni AP, Pontremoli R, Deo R, Goto S, Rossello X, Tuttle KR, Steubl D, Petrini M, Massey D, Eilbracht J, Brueckmann M, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Haynes R. Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):117-127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204233. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
- Background: PubMed 39313185Fares J, El Fadel O, Zhao J, Li M, Sun J, Roman J, Loizidis G, Summer R. Mortality and Health Outcomes Among Patients With Sarcoidosis Treated With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers. Chest. 2025 Mar;167(3):772-780. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
- Background: PubMed 11565518Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S; RENAAL Study Investigators. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 20;345(12):861-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011161.
- Background: PubMed 38941161Crouser ED, Julian MW, Locke LW, Bicer S, Mitchell JR, Singha A, Kramer PJ, Rajaram MVS, Raman SV. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Regulates Sarcoidosis Granulomatous Inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug 15;210(4):497-507. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202402-0265OC.
- Background: PubMed 34757214Yahyavi SK, Theilade S, Hansen D, Berg JO, Andreassen CH, Lorenzen M, Jorgensen A, Juul A, Faber J, Eldrup E, Blomberg Jensen M. Treatment options for hypercalcemia after cosmetic oil injections: Lessons from human tissue cultures and a pilot intervention study. Bone. 2022 Jan;154:116244. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116244. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
- Background: PubMed 39225149Yahyavi SK, Wall-Gremstrup G, Makki A, Juel J, Theilade S, Berg JO, Juul A, Momsen O, Eldrup E, Blomberg Jensen M. Debulking Surgery After Muscular Paraffin Oil Injections: Effects on Calcium Homeostasis and Patient Satisfaction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 18;110(3):649-657. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae606.
- Background: PubMed 16461839Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Rasmussen S, Thijs L, Ibsen H, Jeppesen J. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation. 2006 Feb 7;113(5):664-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.579342.
- Background: PubMed 11358934Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, Ducimetiere P, Benetos A. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001 May;37(5):1236-41. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.5.1236.
- Background: PubMed 21645899Schillaci G, Pucci G, Pirro M, Monacelli M, Scarponi AM, Manfredelli MR, Rondelli F, Avenia N, Mannarino E. Large-artery stiffness: a reversible marker of cardiovascular risk in primary hyperparathyroidism. Atherosclerosis. 2011 Sep;218(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 May 18.
- Background: PubMed 32931047Eldrup E, Theilade S, Lorenzen M, Andreassen CH, Poulsen KH, Nielsen JE, Hansen D, El Fassi D, Berg JO, Bagi P, Jorgensen A, Blomberg Jensen M. Hypercalcemia After Cosmetic Oil Injections: Unraveling Etiology, Pathogenesis, and Severity. J Bone Miner Res. 2021 Feb;36(2):322-333. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4179. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
- Background: PubMed 28331214Alexander RT, McArthur E, Jandoc R, Welk B, Hayward JS, Jain AK, Braam B, Flockerzi V, Garg AX, Quinn RR. Antihypertensive medications and the risk of kidney stones in older adults: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertens Res. 2017 Sep;40(9):837-842. doi: 10.1038/hr.2017.42. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Paraffinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hypercalcemia Caused by Intramuscular Injection of Paraffinoil
Hypercalcemia, Renal Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Martin B Jensen, Professor principal investigator
Herlev Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing empagliflozin (Jardiance) 25 mg and Losartan 100 mg in people with Paraffinoma and Granuloma, Foreign-Body, run by Martin Blomberg Jensen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Martin B Jensen, Professor (+4538687318, martin.blomberg.jensen@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Image verified new or increased nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis (from 0-24 months). (time frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07828002, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2026.