Missing Tooth/TeethNCT07827950
Clinical Assessment of the Efficacy of Amy Check Versus Osstell Regarding the Accuracy of Implant Stability Measurements When Inserted With Graftless Closed Sinus Lifting: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
A study testing Implant with sinus lifting in people with Missing Tooth/Teeth, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to compare clinically the efficacy of Amy check device versus Osstell device in evaluating the implant stability of implants placed simultaneously with transcrestal sinus lifting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Missing Tooth/Teeth
- What is being tested?
- Implant with sinus lifting
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2025to 10 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient age should be > 18 years of age.
- Patients included are ASA I and ASA II.
- Both males and females will be included in the study.
- Patients with need of tooth replacements in the maxillary premolar and molar area where the residual alveolar bone height ranges from 4-7 mm. 5)Compliance with all requirements in the study and signing the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with immunological diseases or diseases affecting bone healing.
- Patients suffering from uncontrolled systemic diseases.
- Patients with active acute infection related to the planned implant site, maxillary sinusitis or pathosis.
- Patients with parafunctional occlusal habits.
- Patients with bad oral hygiene.
- Patients who are alcohol and drug abusers.
- Patients who smoke.
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of the study is to compare clinically the efficacy of Amy check device versus Osstell device in evaluating the implant stability of implants placed simultaneously with transcrestal sinus lifting.
- Conditions
- Missing Tooth/Teeth
- Being tested
- Implant with sinus lifting
- Medical subject headings
- Anodontia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implant with sinus liftingOther
- In Group (A): healing abutment is placed and the implant stability is measured using the Amy check device.
- In Group (B): smart peg is attached to the implant and the implant stability is measured using the Osstell device then the smart peg is detached and healing abutment is placed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Implant with sinus lifting |
| Group A (Study Group) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Implant with sinus lifting |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
implant stability
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2026
- Study start1 Feb 2025
- Primary completion28 Jul 2025
- Study completion10 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Missing Tooth/TeethStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Suez Canal UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Misr International University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dina yousry, Misr International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07827950
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Suez Canal University 904/2024
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Assessment of the Efficacy of Amy Check Versus Osstell Regarding the Accuracy of Implant Stability Measurements When Inserted With Graftless Closed Sinus Lifting: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07827950
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Suez Canal University 904/2024
- Conditions
- Missing Tooth/Teeth
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Misr International University
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to compare clinically the efficacy of Amy check device versus Osstell device in evaluating the implant stability of implants placed simultaneously with transcrestal sinus lifting.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Active comparator | Other: Implant with sinus lifting |
| Group A (Study Group) | Active comparator | Other: Implant with sinus lifting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient age should be > 18 years of age.
- Patients included are ASA I and ASA II.
- Both males and females will be included in the study.
- Patients with need of tooth replacements in the maxillary premolar and molar area where the residual alveolar bone height ranges from 4-7 mm. 5)Compliance with all requirements in the study and signing the informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with immunological diseases or diseases affecting bone healing.
- Patients suffering from uncontrolled systemic diseases.
- Patients with active acute infection related to the planned implant site, maxillary sinusitis or pathosis.
- Patients with parafunctional occlusal habits.
- Patients with bad oral hygiene.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implant with sinus lifting* In Group (A): healing abutment is placed and the implant stability is measured using the Amy check device. * In Group (B): smart peg is attached to the implant and the implant stability is measured using the Osstell device then the smart peg is detached and healing abutment is placed. | Other | Group A (Study Group), control group |
Primary outcome
implant stability
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Missing Tooth/Teeth
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
S-TiUltra Implant Study
Missing Tooth/Teeth
Recruiting
Dental Implant Healing With TNF-Alpha Inhibitors
Dental Implants, TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Recruiting
Effect of Changing Grafting Sequences During Sinus Lifting & Simultaneous Implant Placement in the Gained Bone Using Customized Surgical Guide
Vertical Bone Defects, Missing Tooth/Teeth
RecruitingObservational study
Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) Medical Device Registry of Z-Systems Zirconia Dental Products: Z-Systems Registry
Missing Teeth
Not yet recruiting
Multicenter Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Esthetic Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket-Shield Technique Versus Conventional Immediate Implantation in the Anterior Maxillary Esthetic Zone
Teeth Absent, Teeth Missing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implant with sinus lifting in people with Missing Tooth/Teeth, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
implant stability (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2026.