AzTrials
AzTrials

Eccentric Cycling Exercise TrainingNCT07815366

Effectiveness of Eccentric Cycling Exercise in Ambulatory Rehabilitation for Patients With Cardiopulmonary Diseases: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Eccentric cycling exercise in people with Eccentric Cycling Exercise Training, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

In eccentric cycling exercise (ECC), the cyclist must oppose backwards moving pedals on a specialized motor-driven ergometer. Throughout this process, the force applied on the pedals exceeds the torque generated by the lengthening muscle (negative work), concurrently generating and storing elastic recoil energy . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Eccentric Cycling Exercise Training
What is being tested?
Eccentric cycling exercise
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
7 Sep 2026to 1 Jul 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy participants without known Cardiopulmonary disease.
  • Provided written informed consent
  • Wiling to voluntarily exercise for 3 month on the eccentric ergometer without a specific indication for rehabilitation

Who cannot join

  • Inability to follow the exercise procedure.
  • Vulnerable participants (e.g. minors, participants incapable of judgment or participants under tutelage) will not be included into the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Switzerland1 site
  • Universitätsspital Zürich

    Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

In eccentric cycling exercise (ECC), the cyclist must oppose backwards moving pedals on a specialized motor-driven ergometer. Throughout this process, the force applied on the pedals exceeds the torque generated by the lengthening muscle (negative work), concurrently generating and storing elastic recoil energy . During ECC the cyclist is able to reach fourfold higher forces compared to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON). At identical work-rates however, ECC is associated with a lower cardiac output 5 and requires up to 80% less oxygen uptake than CON. Hence, ECC is described as a promising and efficient exercise method with low metabolic costs. ECC exhibits greater effectiveness compared to CON, especially in terms of increasing muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy, six-minute walk distance (6MWD).

Acute studies during cycle ergometries have proven that ECC is effective to provide exercise at beneficial levels with low metabolic demand, even at low intensities in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary conditions, such as pulmonary hypertension or COPD.

However, whether these benefits can be achieved in a real world setting such as an ambulatory rehabilitation is unknown. Therefore, the rational of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ECC vs. standard training in healthy individuals during a three-month time period.

Read the detailed description

In eccentric cycling exercise (ECC), the cyclist must oppose backwards moving pedals on a specialized motor-driven ergometer. Throughout this process, the force applied on the pedals exceeds the torque generated by the lengthening muscle (negative work), concurrently generating and storing elastic recoil energy. During ECC the cyclist is able to reach fourfold higher forces compared to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON) . At identical work-rates however, ECC is associated with a lower cardiac output 5 and requires up to 80% less oxygen uptake 6 than CON. Hence, ECC is described as a promising and efficient exercise method with low metabolic costs. Some studies suggests that ECC may exhibit greater effectiveness compared to CON, especially in terms of increasing muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy, six-minute walk distance (6MWD).

A loss in muscle mass and sarcopenia is present also in the non-diseased population and is increasing with age. A yearly loss of muscle mass in the general population is around 1% at the age of 40 and increases to 2% at the age of 70. This loss in muscle mass can be accelerated in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary diseases and especially in patients with lung cancer undergoing systemic therapies, mainly as chemotherapy.

A recent systematic review with meta-analysis, including studies with a total of 867 patients with lung cancer, conclusively demonstrated that patients undergoing chemotherapy are at risk for a marked loss of skeletal muscle mass and sarcopenia.14 Another study found in around 50% of their lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy a significant reduction in muscle cross sectional area.15 Sarcopenia has a high burden of disease and has been found to be associated with significant lower survival in patients, as well as with a range of negative outcomes including disability, frailty, morbidity, and reduced quality of life. To prevent sarcopenia patients with cardiopulmonary disease, and patients undergoing chemotherapy should perform regular exercise training. Supervised exercise training and three months of rehabilitation have been shown to be effective, safe and well-tolerated in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary or pulmonary vascular disease. Therefore, a three-month ambulatory rehabilitation program provides a reliable option for these patients to exercise regularly in a supervised setting.

However, patients with advanced cardiopulmonary diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, or advanced stage lung cancer, often suffer from exercise intolerance. In patients whose cardiopulmonary limitations are so severe that they cannot even reach beneficial exercise intensities, the value of an ambulatory rehabilitation program needs to be carefully considered.

Nevertheless, with the features of ECC, even these patients are able to exercise at beneficial levels while maintaining a low metabolic demand. Previous studies have shown that ECC can be effective, even at low intensities, in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary conditions such as pulmonary hypertension or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Interestingly, patients additionally reported less perceived dyspnea with unchanged leg fatigue. Furthermore, ECC was associated with reduced pulmonary arterial pressure and improved right ventricular function.

However, whether these benefits can be achieved in a real world setting such as an ambulatory rehabilitation is unknown. Therefore, the rational of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ECC on healthy individuals during a three-month training period.

To study potential underlying physiology and effects of ECC in higher exercise intensities, we will also include an exploratory healthy control group that will train similarly as patients with cardiopulmonary disease on the ECC during three month.

This trial investigates the healthy control group.

Being tested
Eccentric cycling exercise
Keywords
eccentric cycling, rehabilitation, exercise
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Eccentric cycling exerciseProcedure or surgery

    Participants exercise for three month on an eccentric ergometer

Study groups in NCT07815366
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Eccentric cyclingExperimentalEccentric cycling for three month
Receives: Procedure: Eccentric cycling exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peak work rate

    Peak work rate will be measured using standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycling ergometer.

    Measured: Pre and post the three month exercise persiod

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Peak oxygen uptake

    Peak oxygen uptake will be measured using standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycling ergometer. The participant is connected with a metabolic unit via mouth peace. Oxygen uptake will be measured breath by breath.

    Measured: Pre and post the three month exercise period.

  2. Patient reported perceived dyspnea at peak exercise

    Patient reported perceived dyspnea at peak exercise will be measured using the Borg 10 item scale during standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycling ergometer. At peak exercise the participant will be ask on a scale from 1 to 10 how he would rate the dyspnea

    Measured: Pre and post three month exercise period

  3. Patient reported perceived leg fatigue

    Patient reported perceived leg fatigue at peak exercise will be measured using the Borg 10 item scale during standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycling ergometer. At peak exercise the participant will be ask on a scale from 1 to 10 how he would rate the leg fatigue.

    Measured: Pre and post three month exercise period.

  4. Peak quadriceps extension force

    The peak force that the quadriceps can produce during knee extension is measured on a isokinet.

    Measured: Pre and post three month exercise period.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2026
  2. Study start7 Sep 2026
  3. Primary completion1 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07815366
Sponsor's protocol ID
AmbEcc Healthy
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
7 Sep 2026
Last updated
11 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in