AzTrials
AzTrials

Surgical AnesthesiaNCT07814703

Intercostobrachial Nerve Block vs Erector Spinae Block for Medial Arm A-V Fistula Surgery

A study testing intercostobrachial nerve block and ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in people with Surgical Anesthesia, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided Intercostobrachial Nerve Block with Supraclavicular Block versus Ultrasound -guided Erector Spinae block with Supraclavicular Block for Medial Arm A-V Fistula Surgery Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Surgical Anesthesia
What is being tested?
intercostobrachial nerve block and ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
158 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Apr 2026to 1 Jun 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ESRD patient undergoing creation AVF in the medial side of the arm.

Who cannot join

  • 1. Patient refusal 2. Drug allergies 3. Body Mass Index of 35 kg/m² or more 4. Coagulation abnormalities 5. Severe heart, kidney, and liver diseases, 6. Pregnancy 7. Vasculitis 8. Unstable hemodynamics 9. Upper extremity neuropathy 10. Mental illness 11. Seizures 12. Contralateral chest problems 13. Infection at site of injection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

taghreed shabaan korany, assistant lecturer contact

00201007195396

Taghreedshaban60@gmail.com

Amr hamdy Mahmoud, lecturer contact

00201004349592

amrhamdy69@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fayoum University hospital

    Al Fayyum, Madīnat Al Fayyūm, Faiyum Governorate, 4312

    taghreed shabaan korany, Msc, 00201007195396, Taghreedshaban60@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided Intercostobrachial Nerve Block With Supraclavicular Block Versus Ultrasound -Guided Erector Spinae Block With Supraclavicular Block for Medial Arm A-V Fistula Surgery: Observer Blinded Randomized Comparative Study

Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided Intercostobrachial Nerve Block with Supraclavicular Block versus Ultrasound -guided Erector Spinae block with Supraclavicular Block for Medial Arm A-V Fistula Surgery

Read the detailed description

Intravenous access will be obtained with an 18-gauge intravenous (IV) cannula in the contralateral upper limb of the surgical site and monitors (pulse oximeter, electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure and capnography) will be applied.

All patients will receive 5 L/min of oxygen was delivered via a face mask.

In all patients, the SCPB was performed before the assigned supplemental block. Patients were placed supine with the head turned approximately 30° away from the surgical side and a small towel positioned between the scapulae to optimize access. After aseptic preparation, a high-frequency linear US probe (6 - 12 MHz) of ultrasound US machine (LOGIQ P7) covered with a sterile sheath was placed in the coronal-oblique plane just superior to the clavicle and lateral to the sternocleidomastoid muscle to visualize the subclavian artery medially, the brachial plexus divisions as a cluster of hypoechoic round structures lateral to the artery, and the first rib and pleura as hyperechoic lines deep to the artery.

Lidocaine 1% was injected at the entry site of the needle, Using an in-plane lateral-to-medial approach, a 22-G, 80-mm insulated block needle was advanced under continuous US guidance toward the "corner pocket" bordered by the subclavian artery medially, the first rib inferiorly, and the brachial plexus laterally. After negative aspiration, 5 - 10 mL of was injected into the corner pocket, and the needle was redirected to deposit additional 3 - 5 mL aliquots around the remaining plexus divisions to ensure circumferential spread, for a total of a mixture of 15 ml each of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine.

In group (I), following the SCPB, the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) was blocked using Ultrasound-Guided Intercostobrachial Nerve Block Procedure after SCPB, the ICBN was blocked under US guidance at the mid-axillary level. The patient was positioned supine with the arm abducted to 90°. A high-frequency linear probe (6 - 12 MHz) was placed transversely over the mid-axillary line at the level of the 2nd-3rd intercostal spaces. The axillary vein and artery were first visualized, then the probe was adjusted superficially to identify the fascial plane between the subcutaneous tissue and the serratus anterior muscle.

The ICBN appeared as a small hyperechoic oval or linear structure within this plane. Using an in-plane, posterio-anterior needle approach, an 80-mm block needle was advanced into the fascial plane. After confirming negative aspiration, 10 ml of the same local anesthetic mixture was administered (0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine), and real-time sonographic imaging confirmed the spread of local anesthetic along the plane both anteriorly and posteriorly.

In group (E) for the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block. At first the patient will be placed in a lateral decubitus with the operation site up and we will count the vertebrae from cephalad to caudal direction until we reach T2 spinous process as the first palpable spinous process is C7. Ultrasound probe will be placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the T2 spinous process. linear transducer was placed on the superior-posterior aspect of the operation site shoulder close to the neck to observe the short axis view of the transverse processes of T2 and T3. The same type of block needle was inserted and advanced in a caudad-to-cephalad direction toward the space between the two transverse processes using in-plane ultrasound guidance. Immediately after penetrating the anterior fascia of the erector spinae muscles, 10 ml of the same local anesthetic mixture was administered.

Twenty minutes after the completion of the nerve blocks, a pinprick test showed that the entire upper arm and lateral aspect of the left upper chest wall were anesthetized. Thereafter, surgery was initiated.

Being tested
intercostobrachial nerve block, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intercostobrachial nerve blockProcedure or surgery

    the intercostobrachial nerve will be blocked using Ultrasound-Guided Procedure after SCPB, the ICBN was blocked under US guidance at the mid-axillary level. The patient was positioned supine with the arm abducted to 90°. A high-frequency linear probe will be placed transversely over the mid-axillary line at the level of the 2nd-3rd intercostal spaces. The axillary vein and artery were first visualized, then the probe was adjusted superficially to identify the fascial plane between the subcutaneous tissue and the serratus anterior muscle. The ICBN appeared as a small hyperechoic oval or linear structure within this plane. Using an in-plane, posterio-anterior needle approach, an 80-mm block needle was advanced into the fascial plane. After confirming negative aspiration, 10 ml of the same local anesthetic mixture was administered (0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine)

  • ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blockProcedure or surgery

    patient will be placed in a lateral decubitus with the operation site up and we will count the vertebrae from cephalad to caudal direction until we reach T2 spinous process as the first palpable spinous process is C7. Ultrasound probe will be placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the T2 spinous process. linear transducer was placed on the superior-posterior aspect of the operation site shoulder close to the neck to observe the short axis view of the transverse processes of T2 and T3. The same type of block needle was inserted and advanced in a caudad-to-cephalad direction toward the space between the two transverse processes using in-plane ultrasound guidance. Immediately after penetrating the anterior fascia of the erector spinae muscles, 10 ml of the same local anesthetic mixture was administered

Study groups in NCT07814703
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
intercostobrachial nerve blockActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: intercostobrachial nerve block
ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blockActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. achievement of complete sensory block

    pinprick test showed that the entire upper arm and lateral aspect of the left upper chest wall are anesthetized

    Measured: 20 minutes after the completion of the nerve blocks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
158 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07814703
Sponsor's protocol ID
D475
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
6 Sep 2026
Last updated
11 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing intercostobrachial nerve block and ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in people with Surgical Anesthesia, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact taghreed shabaan korany, assistant lecturer (00201007195396, Taghreedshaban60@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

achievement of complete sensory block (time frame: 20 minutes after the completion of the nerve blocks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in