Complete EdentulismNCT07806669
Functional Evaluation for 3D Printed Complete Dentures
A study testing Conventionally Fabricated Complete Denture and Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete Denture in people with Complete Edentulism, run by Taipei Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Complete dentures have a long history and remain one of the principal treatment options for patients with complete edentulism. However, conventional fabrication involves a complex series of clinical and laboratory procedures, and the final prosthesis cannot be reproduced with complete accuracy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Complete Edentulism
- What is being tested?
- Conventionally Fabricated Complete Denture and Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete Denture
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 14 Feb 2025to 5 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must be 20 years of age or older.
- Participants must be completely edentulous in both the maxilla and mandible, with at least three months having elapsed since the most recent tooth extraction.
- Participants must have sufficient cognitive ability to understand the study procedures and be able to read and complete the study questionnaires.
- Participants must voluntarily agree to participate in all study procedures after receiving and understanding the study information.
Who cannot join
- Individuals who are unable to read or complete the study questionnaires.
- Individuals with temporomandibular disorders that impair normal mouth opening and closing or prevent them from performing movements according to the investigators' instructions.
- Individuals with maxillary or mandibular defects resulting from congenital conditions or surgical procedures.
- Individuals whose physical or psychological health is considered unsuitable for study participation, as determined by the investigator or primary contact.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Complete dentures have a long history and remain one of the principal treatment options for patients with complete edentulism. However, conventional fabrication involves a complex series of clinical and laboratory procedures, and the final prosthesis cannot be reproduced with complete accuracy. With recent advances in digital dentistry, integrating digital technologies into complete denture fabrication has become an important area of research. Current evidence indicates that digitally fabricated three-dimensional (3D)-printed complete dentures can reduce the number of clinical procedures and shorten treatment time. Nevertheless, clinical evidence comparing the performance of conventionally fabricated and digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two types of complete dentures using various subjective and objective outcome measures after each participant has used both dentures for a specified period.
Read the detailed description
- Introduction In recent years, advances in digital technology have led to a growing body of research on digital complete dentures. For example, in challenging single-arch complete denture cases involving an irregular opposing occlusal plane, digital technology can simplify conventional procedures, including adjustment of the opposing dentition and accurate transfer of the adjusted occlusal scheme to the definitive denture. Digital denture workflows can effectively reduce the number of patient visits. Moreover, the number and duration of clinical adjustments required after denture delivery do not differ significantly between digital and conventional dentures. Digital denture fabrication methods can generally be divided into two categories: additive manufacturing and subtractive manufacturing. Additive manufacturing, commonly known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, offers several advantages, including convenience, rapid production, and relatively low cost. Its disadvantages include comparatively weaker material properties and limited esthetics because of the relatively uniform color of printed dentures. Subtractive manufacturing involves milling the denture from a prefabricated material block. Because these materials are industrially polymerized in advance, they generally have greater strength and dimensional stability than 3D-printed materials. However, milling results in greater material waste and higher manufacturing costs. Several studies have evaluated the adaptation of 3D-printed dentures. Comparisons involving different printing techniques and printing orientations have demonstrated that the adaptation of 3D-printed dentures is comparable to that of dentures fabricated using the conventional pack-and-press technique. An intraoral clinical study also demonstrated that digitally fabricated dentures, whether produced through 3D printing or milling, provide sufficient accuracy and intraoral adaptation for clinical use. During the processing of conventional complete dentures, substantial material deformation may occur during flasking and polymerization. This deformation can cause displacement of the artificial teeth and result in occlusal discrepancies. A clinical study by Saurabh et al. reported that digitally fabricated dentures resulted in less displacement of the artificial teeth and required fewer adjustments after fabrication than conventional dentures. Digital technologies for removable denture fabrication continue to evolve, with ongoing improvements in both accuracy and material strength. Nevertheless, additional studies are required to clarify the differences in their actual clinical performance. In that study, intraoral scanning was used to obtain impressions for digital denture fabrication. For edentulous ridges, impressions obtained exclusively through intraoral scanning may provide less adequate border extension than conventional impressions made using custom trays. This is because the oral mucosa and surrounding soft tissues are mobile, making the scanning conditions fundamentally different from those encountered during the fabrication of fixed prostheses. Therefore, complete dentures fabricated solely from intraoral scans may have less favorable border extension and peripheral sealing than conventionally fabricated dentures, potentially resulting in reduced stability and masticatory efficiency. In another intraoral clinical study, a custom tray was fabricated following a preliminary impression using the conventional workflow. Border molding and a definitive impression were subsequently performed intraorally. After the master cast was produced and the artificial teeth were arranged, the denture setup was scanned to create a standard tessellation language (STL) file. The same digital file was then used to fabricate both a 3D-printed denture and a milled denture. After the patients had worn each denture for a specified period, the two dentures were compared. Patient satisfaction with both digital dentures was greater than that with their existing dentures. The digital dentures also demonstrated favorable intraoral stability, comfort, esthetics, speech, and occlusal performance. These findings indicate that the quality of digital dentures is sufficiently stable and acceptable for clinical use. However, the intraoral performance of the definitive denture depends on obtaining an accurate and complete impression and recording the maxillomandibular relationship precisely. Although conventional procedures can provide a complete definitive impression, they do not reduce the number or duration of clinical procedures. Therefore, it is important to investigate how digital technologies can be integrated into the conventional complete denture workflow to obtain complete and accurate impressions, reduce the number of patient visits, and produce definitive dentures whose clinical performance is comparable to that of conventionally fabricated dentures.
- Study Objective The objective of this study is to compare the clinical performance of digitally fabricated and conventionally fabricated complete dentures. After each participant has worn both types of dentures for a specified period, their performance will be evaluated using objective clinical assessments and subjective patient-reported outcome measures. The study will determine whether digitally fabricated complete dentures provide superior or comparable clinical performance to conventional complete dentures.
- Study Design This study is designed as a randomized, single-blinded crossover clinical trial. Participants will be randomly allocated to two groups, with an anticipated enrollment of five participants per group and a total sample size of 10 participants.
Group 1: Participants will first wear conventionally fabricated complete dentures for six weeks and will subsequently wear digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks. Questionnaires and clinical performance assessments will be administered after each six-week intervention period.
Group 2: Participants will first wear digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks and will subsequently wear conventionally fabricated complete dentures for six weeks. Questionnaires and clinical performance assessments will be administered after each six-week intervention period.
Clinical Procedures Conventional complete denture workflow
At the first visit, preliminary impressions will be obtained using alginate, and diagnostic casts will be produced. Custom acrylic resin impression trays will subsequently be fabricated using autopolymerizing resin (Ostron, GC Co.).
At the second visit, border molding will be performed using the custom trays and thermoplastic border-molding compound (Peri Compound, GC Co.). Definitive impressions will then be obtained using a silicone impression material (Exadenture, GC Co.), and the master casts will be produced. Record bases and occlusion rims will subsequently be fabricated on the master casts.
At the third visit, the record bases and occlusion rims will be used to determine the occlusal vertical dimension and record the centric relation. The master casts will then be mounted on an articulator, and the artificial teeth will be arranged.
At the fourth visit, the trial dentures will be evaluated intraorally to assess esthetics, speech, and occlusion. If no problems are identified, the dentures will be processed using the conventional flasking and heat-polymerization technique.
At the fifth visit, the definitive dentures will be adjusted and delivered. Follow-up adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. After the participant has worn the dentures for six weeks, clinical performance assessments will be conducted, and fabrication of the second set of dentures will begin.
Digital complete denture workflow
At the first visit, preliminary impressions will be obtained using alginate, and diagnostic casts will be produced. The casts will be digitized using a 3Shape scanning system. Record bases will then be designed digitally and fabricated using a 3D printer (NextDent 5100) and a printable material (NextDent Try-In). Wax occlusion rims will subsequently be fabricated on the printed record bases.
At the second visit, the record bases and occlusion rims will be used to determine the occlusal vertical dimension. Border molding and peripheral sealing will be performed using a thermoplastic border-molding compound. A definitive closed-mouth impression will then be obtained using a silicone impression material while the participant occludes at the predetermined vertical dimension. The dental midline and occlusal plane will be marked on the occlusion rims, and facial photographs will be obtained.
After the master casts are produced from the definitive impressions, they will be scanned to create STL files. The facial photographs will be integrated into the denture design software to assist with the digital arrangement of the artificial teeth. After completion of the design, the definitive complete dentures will be fabricated directly using a 3D printer and NextDent Denture 3D+ material.
At the third visit, the dentures will be evaluated intraorally, the occlusion will be adjusted, and the definitive dentures will be delivered. Follow-up adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Clinical performance assessments will be conducted after the participant has worn the dentures for six weeks. At the end of the study, each participant will be allowed to select the set of dentures that they prefer to continue wearing.
- Conditions
- Complete Edentulism
- Being tested
- Conventionally Fabricated Complete Denture, Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete Denture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventionally Fabricated Complete DentureDevice
Participants will receive maxillary and mandibular complete dentures fabricated using a conventional workflow. The procedure includes preliminary alginate impressions, fabrication of custom impression trays, border molding, definitive impressions, recording of the maxillomandibular relationship, trial denture evaluation, and conventional flasking and heat-polymerization. Participants will wear the conventional complete dentures for six weeks. Clinical adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Subjective and objective outcome assessments will be conducted at the end of the six-week intervention period.
Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete DentureDevice
articipants will receive maxillary and mandibular complete dentures fabricated using a digital workflow. Diagnostic casts will be scanned, and 3D-printed record bases and occlusion rims will be used to record the maxillomandibular relationship and obtain closed-mouth definitive impressions following border molding. The master casts and facial photographs will be digitized and used for computer-aided denture design. The definitive complete dentures will be fabricated using a 3D-printing system. Participants will wear the 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks. Clinical adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Subjective and objective outcome assessments will be conducted at the end of the six-week intervention period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional-to-Digital Sequence | Experimental | Participants will wear conventional complete dentures for six weeks, followed by 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks. Receives: Device: Conventionally Fabricated Complete Denture; Device: Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete Denture |
| Digital-to-Conventional Sequence | Experimental | Participants will wear 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks, followed by conventional complete dentures for six weeks. Receives: Device: Conventionally Fabricated Complete Denture; Device: Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete Denture |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
3D model analysis compare and Tissue surface adaptation
he master casts and the intaglio surfaces of the corresponding definitive complete dentures will be scanned to generate STL files. Each denture scan will be superimposed on its corresponding master cast scan using 3D analysis software. The root mean square deviation between the two surfaces will be calculated in millimeters to assess and compare the dimensional accuracy of conventionally fabricated and 3D-printed complete dentures. A lower deviation indicates greater dimensional accuracy.
The master casts produced from the conventional custom-tray impression and the closed-mouth impression will be scanned to generate STL files. The two tissue surfaces will be superimposed using 3D analysis software. The root mean square deviation between the surfaces will be calculated in millimeters to quantify the differences between the two impression techniques.
Measured: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Secondary outcomes (4)
Maximum Occlusal Force
Maximum occlusal force will be evaluated using pressure-sensitive dental film (Dental Prescale II, GC Co.) immediately after denture delivery and after six months of denture use. The film will be placed intraorally, and participants will be instructed to bite firmly for three minutes. The film will then be removed and scanned. The pressure-induced color changes will be analyzed using the corresponding software to calculate the maximum occlusal force. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Masticatory Performance
Masticatory performance will be evaluated using color-changeable chewing gum. In accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, participants will chew the gum once per second for 60 seconds, alternating between the left and right sides for a total of 30 chewing cycles on each side. The chewed gum will then be placed on the color scale (from 1 to 10 )provided by the manufacturer, photographed, and analyzed using the corresponding software to obtain a masticatory performance score. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Patient Satisfaction
Participants will complete two questionnaires immediately after denture delivery and after wearing each type of denture for six months.
The first questionnaire will assess patient satisfaction with the dentures. It will comprise 12 items concerning denture use and clinical performance. For each item, participants will indicate their level of satisfaction by marking a point on a 10-cm visual analog scale. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
he second questionnaire, the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous Patients (OHIP-EDENT), will assess oral health-related quality of life. It will comprise 19 items addressing the effects of denture use on participants' daily activities, psychological well-being, and social functioning. Each item will be rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2026
- Study start14 Feb 2025
- Primary completion31 Oct 2025
- Study completion5 Nov 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Complete EdentulismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sung Sang Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07806669
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N202410051
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Functional Evaluation for 3D Printed Complete Dentures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07806669
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- N202410051
- Conditions
- Complete Edentulism
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sung Sang Corporation
- Study start
- 14 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Nov 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Complete dentures have a long history and remain one of the principal treatment options for patients with complete edentulism. However, conventional fabrication involves a complex series of clinical and laboratory procedures, and the final prosthesis cannot be reproduced with complete accuracy. With recent advances in digital dentistry, integrating digital technologies into complete denture fabrication has become an important area of research. Current evidence indicates that digitally fabricated three-dimensional (3D)-printed complete dentures can reduce the number of clinical procedures and shorten treatment time. Nevertheless, clinical evidence comparing the performance of conventionally fabricated and digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two types of complete dentures using various subjective and objective outcome measures after each participant has used both dentures for a specified period.
Detailed description
- Introduction In recent years, advances in digital technology have led to a growing body of research on digital complete dentures. For example, in challenging single-arch complete denture cases involving an irregular opposing occlusal plane, digital technology can simplify conventional procedures, including adjustment of the opposing dentition and accurate transfer of the adjusted occlusal scheme to the definitive denture. Digital denture workflows can effectively reduce the number of patient visits. Moreover, the number and duration of clinical adjustments required after denture delivery do not differ significantly between digital and conventional dentures. Digital denture fabrication methods can generally be divided into two categories: additive manufacturing and subtractive manufacturing. Additive manufacturing, commonly known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, offers several advantages, including convenience, rapid production, and relatively low cost. Its disadvantages include comparatively weaker material properties and limited esthetics because of the relatively uniform color of printed dentures. Subtractive manufacturing involves milling the denture from a prefabricated material block. Because these materials are industrially polymerized in advance, they generally have greater strength and dimensional stability than 3D-printed materials. However, milling results in greater material waste and higher manufacturing costs. Several studies have evaluated the adaptation of 3D-printed dentures. Comparisons involving different printing techniques and printing orientations have demonstrated that the adaptation of 3D-printed dentures is comparable to that of dentures fabricated using the conventional pack-and-press technique. An intraoral clinical study also demonstrated that digitally fabricated dentures, whether produced through 3D printing or milling, provide sufficient accuracy and intraoral adaptation for clinical use. During the processing of conventional complete dentures, substantial material deformation may occur during flasking and polymerization. This deformation can cause displacement of the artificial teeth and result in occlusal discrepancies. A clinical study by Saurabh et al. reported that digitally fabricated dentures resulted in less displacement of the artificial teeth and required fewer adjustments after fabrication than conventional dentures. Digital technologies for removable denture fabrication continue to evolve, with ongoing improvements in both accuracy and material strength. Nevertheless, additional studies are required to clarify the differences in their actual clinical performance. In that study, intraoral scanning was used to obtain impressions for digital denture fabrication. For edentulous ridges, impressions obtained exclusively through intraoral scanning may provide less adequate border extension than conventional impressions made using custom trays. This is because the oral mucosa and surrounding soft tissues are mobile, making the scanning conditions fundamentally different from those encountered during the fabrication of fixed prostheses. Therefore, complete dentures fabricated solely from intraoral scans may have less favorable border extension and peripheral sealing than conventionally fabricated dentures, potentially resulting in reduced stability and masticatory efficiency. In another intraoral clinical study, a custom tray was fabricated following a preliminary impression using the conventional workflow. Border molding and a definitive impression were subsequently performed intraorally. After the master cast was produced and the artificial teeth were arranged, the denture setup was scanned to create a standard tessellation language (STL) file. The same digital file was then used to fabricate both a 3D-printed denture and a milled denture. After the patients had worn each denture for a specified period, the two dentures were compared. Patient satisfaction with both digital dentures was greater than that with their existing dentures. The digital dentures also demonstrated favorable intraoral stability, comfort, esthetics, speech, and occlusal performance. These findings indicate that the quality of digital dentures is sufficiently stable and acceptable for clinical use. However, the intraoral performance of the definitive denture depends on obtaining an accurate and complete impression and recording the maxillomandibular relationship precisely. Although conventional procedures can provide a complete definitive impression, they do not reduce the number or duration of clinical procedures. Therefore, it is important to investigate how digital technologies can be integrated into the conventional complete denture workflow to obtain complete and accurate impressions, reduce the number of patient visits, and produce definitive dentures whose clinical performance is comparable to that of conventionally fabricated dentures.
- Study Objective The objective of this study is to compare the clinical performance of digitally fabricated and conventionally fabricated complete dentures. After each participant has worn both types of dentures for a specified period, their performance will be evaluated using objective clinical assessments and subjective patient-reported outcome measures. The study will determine whether digitally fabricated complete dentures provide superior or comparable clinical performance to conventional complete dentures.
- Study Design This study is designed as a randomized, single-blinded crossover clinical trial. Participants will be randomly allocated to two groups, with an anticipated enrollment of five participants per group and a total sample size of 10 participants.
Group 1: Participants will first wear conventionally fabricated complete dentures for six weeks and will subsequently wear digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks. Questionnaires and clinical performance assessments will be administered after each six-week intervention period.
Group 2: Participants will first wear digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks and will subsequently wear conventionally fabricated complete dentures for six weeks. Questionnaires and clinical performance assessments will be administered after each six-week intervention period.
Clinical Procedures Conventional complete denture workflow
At the first visit, preliminary impressions will be obtained using alginate, and diagnostic casts will be produced. Custom acrylic resin impression trays will subsequently be fabricated using autopolymerizing resin (Ostron, GC Co.).
At the second visit, border molding will be performed using the custom trays and thermoplastic border-molding compound (Peri Compound, GC Co.). Definitive impressions will then be obtained using a silicone impression material (Exadenture, GC Co.), and the master casts will be produced. Record bases and occlusion rims will subsequently be fabricated on the master casts.
At the third visit, the record bases and occlusion rims will be used to determine the occlusal vertical dimension and record the centric relation. The master casts will then be mounted on an articulator, and the artificial teeth will be arranged.
At the fourth visit, the trial dentures will be evaluated intraorally to assess esthetics, speech, and occlusion. If no problems are identified, the dentures will be processed using the conventional flasking and heat-polymerization technique.
At the fifth visit, the definitive dentures will be adjusted and delivered. Follow-up adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. After the participant has worn the dentures for six weeks, clinical performance assessments will be conducted, and fabrication of the second set of dentures will begin.
Digital complete denture workflow
At the first visit, preliminary impressions will be obtained using alginate, and diagnostic casts will be produced. The casts will be digitized using a 3Shape scanning system. Record bases will then be designed digitally and fabricated using a 3D printer (NextDent 5100) and a printable material (NextDent Try-In). Wax occlusion rims will subsequently be fabricated on the printed record bases.
At the second visit, the record bases and occlusion rims will be used to determine the occlusal vertical dimension. Border molding and peripheral sealing will be performed using a thermoplastic border-molding compound. A definitive closed-mouth impression will then be obtained using a silicone impression material while the participant occludes at the predetermined vertical dimension. The dental midline and occlusal plane will be marked on the occlusion rims, and facial photographs will be obtained.
After the master casts are produced from the definitive impressions, they will be scanned to create STL files. The facial photographs will be integrated into the denture design software to assist with the digital arrangement of the artificial teeth. After completion of the design, the definitive complete dentures will be fabricated directly using a 3D printer and NextDent Denture 3D+ material.
At the third visit, the dentures will be evaluated intraorally, the occlusion will be adjusted, and the definitive dentures will be delivered. Follow-up adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Clinical performance assessments will be conducted after the participant has worn the dentures for six weeks. At the end of the study, each participant will be allowed to select the set of dentures that they prefer to continue wearing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional-to-Digital Sequence | Experimental | Device: Conventionally Fabricated Complete Denture, Device: Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete DentureParticipants will wear conventional complete dentures for six weeks, followed by 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks. |
| Digital-to-Conventional Sequence | Experimental | Device: Conventionally Fabricated Complete Denture, Device: Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete DentureParticipants will wear 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks, followed by conventional complete dentures for six weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participants must be 20 years of age or older.
- Participants must be completely edentulous in both the maxilla and mandible, with at least three months having elapsed since the most recent tooth extraction.
- Participants must have sufficient cognitive ability to understand the study procedures and be able to read and complete the study questionnaires.
- Participants must voluntarily agree to participate in all study procedures after receiving and understanding the study information.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Individuals who are unable to read or complete the study questionnaires.
- Individuals with temporomandibular disorders that impair normal mouth opening and closing or prevent them from performing movements according to the investigators' instructions.
- Individuals with maxillary or mandibular defects resulting from congenital conditions or surgical procedures.
- Individuals whose physical or psychological health is considered unsuitable for study participation, as determined by the investigator or primary contact.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventionally Fabricated Complete DentureParticipants will receive maxillary and mandibular complete dentures fabricated using a conventional workflow. The procedure includes preliminary alginate impressions, fabrication of custom impression trays, border molding, definitive impressions, recording of the maxillomandibular relationship, trial denture evaluation, and conventional flasking and heat-polymerization. Participants will wear the conventional complete dentures for six weeks. Clinical adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Subjective and objective outcome assessments will be conducted at the end of the six-week intervention period. | Device | Conventional-to-Digital Sequence, Digital-to-Conventional Sequence |
| Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete Denturearticipants will receive maxillary and mandibular complete dentures fabricated using a digital workflow. Diagnostic casts will be scanned, and 3D-printed record bases and occlusion rims will be used to record the maxillomandibular relationship and obtain closed-mouth definitive impressions following border molding. The master casts and facial photographs will be digitized and used for computer-aided denture design. The definitive complete dentures will be fabricated using a 3D-printing system. Participants will wear the 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks. Clinical adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Subjective and objective outcome assessments will be conducted at the end of the six-week intervention period. | Device | Conventional-to-Digital Sequence, Digital-to-Conventional Sequence |
Primary outcome
3D model analysis compare and Tissue surface adaptation
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
he master casts and the intaglio surfaces of the corresponding definitive complete dentures will be scanned to generate STL files. Each denture scan will be superimposed on its corresponding master cast scan using 3D analysis software. The root mean square deviation between the two surfaces will be calculated in millimeters to assess and compare the dimensional accuracy of conventionally fabricated and 3D-printed complete dentures. A lower deviation indicates greater dimensional accuracy. The master casts produced from the conventional custom-tray impression and the closed-mouth impression will be scanned to generate STL files. The two tissue surfaces will be superimposed using 3D analysis software. The root mean square deviation between the surfaces will be calculated in millimeters to quantify the differences between the two impression techniques.
4 secondary outcomes
Maximum Occlusal Force
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Masticatory Performance
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Complete Edentulism
Recruiting
Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Scans Using Non Calibrated Splinting Scanbodies
Edentulism Complete
Active, not recruiting
Titanium Versus Nano-Carbon CAD/CAM Frameworks for All-on-4 Implant Supported Hybrid Prosthesis.
Complete Edentulism
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Open-Mouth and Closed-Mouth Impression Techniques for Complete Dentures
Edentulism
Recruiting
Nutritional Intervention for Older Adults With Complete Dentures
Edentulism Complete, Denture, Complete
Recruiting
Microbial Adhesion and Peri-Implant Tissue Health in All-on-Four Hybrid Prostheses Supported by Zantex or Zirconia Frameworks
Complete Edentulism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventionally Fabricated Complete Denture and Digitally Fabricated 3D-Printed Complete Denture in people with Complete Edentulism, run by Taipei Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
3D model analysis compare and Tissue surface adaptation (time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.