AzTrials
AzTrials

Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Aggressive B-cell LymphomasNCT07804173

Tumour Immune and Ki-67 Scoring Methods as Prognostic Biomarkers in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas

An observational study of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma with heterogeneity in its clinical presentations, biological behaviour and response to therapy (1-4). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Oct 2026to 1 Feb 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Blocks obtained from patients diagnosed as Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas

Who may be able to join

  • • Patients diagnosed with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS) and other aggressive large B-cell lymphomas, according to current WHO/ICC diagnostic principles.
  • Histopathological diagnosis obtained by excisional biopsy, core biopsy or adequate tissue biopsy.
  • Availability of FFPE tissue blocks with sufficient viable tumor for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining.
  • Diagnostic tissue obtained before the initiation of definitive systemic therapy.
  • Available minimum clinical data: age, sex, date of diagnosis, treatment status, and follow-up/survival status.
  • For survival analysis: cases with documented follow-up date or date of death/progression.

Who cannot join

  • • Inadequate tissue, exhausted block or severe fixation/processing artifact preventing reliable IHC interpretation.
  • Extensive necrosis, crush artifact or decalcification artifact in the only available diagnostic tissue.
  • Relapse biopsy after chemotherapy without available pretreatment diagnostic tissue.
  • Primary Hodgkin lymphoma, indolent B-cell lymphoma without transformation, T-cell lymphoma or metastatic non-lymphoid malignancy.
  • Cases lacking essential clinical outcome data for prognostic analysis (except for descriptive staining analysis).
  • HIV-associated, post-transplant or primary CNS DLBCL may be excluded or analyzed separately due to distinct biology.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Aliaa Bakr Ahmed, MD contact

01062157907

aliaa.bakr@med.sohag.edu.eg

Aliaa Bakr Ahmed, MD contact

01062157907

aliaa.bek0@gmail.com

Egypt1 site
  • Sohag university

    Sohag, 82511

    Aliaa Ahmed, 01062157907, aliaa.bek0@gmail.com

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Tumour Immune "Hotness" and Ki-67 Scoring Methods as Prognostic Biomarkers in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas: An Immunohistochemical Study

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma with heterogeneity in its clinical presentations, biological behaviour and response to therapy (1-4). Nevertheless, despite R-CHOP chemotherapy being successful, a high percentage of patients relapsed early or were primary refractory, highlighting the urgent need for more accurate prognostic biomarkers (2,5).

With the emergence of new discoveries in cancer immunology, the focus has shifted to the tumour microenvironment (TME). The density and presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), especially CD3+ T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes, are key determinants of the anti-tumour immune response (6-8). Now tumours are classified by their immune 'hotness'. 'Hot' tumours, with high T-cell infiltration, are associated with a better prognosis, whereas 'cold' tumours, with immune exclusion or desertion, are associated with a poorer prognosis (9-10).

Read more

On the other hand, the Ki-67 proliferation index is still the gold standard marker to measure the growth fraction of neoplastic cells (11). However, the optimal scoring method is yet to be established (12-13). Prognostic information may be obtained by global scoring (i.e. the proliferation index averaged over the whole tumour) and hotspot scoring (i.e. the area of maximum proliferation) (14-15).

In aggressive lymphomas the hotspot index could be a better representation of the highly proliferative clones that drive clinical progression (16-17). The present study was done to assess the combined effect of immune infiltration (CD3/CD8) and proliferation (Ki-67) to build a more accurate prognostic model for patients with DLBCL and other aggressive B-cell lymphomas treated

Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Patients with DLBCL/aggressive B-cell lymphomas with assessed by CD3 and Ki67 proliferation index immunohistochemical staining

    Measured: One or two days after staining sections with the markers]

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07804173
Sponsor's protocol ID
Soh-Med-26-8--11PD
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
31 Aug 2026
Last updated
4 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Aliaa Bakr Ahmed, MD (01062157907, aliaa.bakr@med.sohag.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Patients with DLBCL/aggressive B-cell lymphomas with assessed by CD3 and Ki67 proliferation index immunohistochemical staining (time frame: One or two days after staining sections with the markers]). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in