Appendicitis, AcutePedAppy-iAENCT07794618
Video-Based Grading of Intraoperative Adverse Events in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy
An observational study of Appendicitis, Acute and Appendectomy, run by Ahmet Burak Doğan, MD at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children, and laparoscopic appendectomy is its standard treatment. Although intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are recognized as an important determinant of surgical safety and outcome, no validated tool exists for grading them in children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Appendicitis, Acute, Appendectomy, Intraoperative Complications
- What is being tested?
- Laparoscopic appendectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 31 Aug 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: Consecutive children aged 5 to under 18 years who present to a single tertiary academic pediatric surgery department with non-complicated acute appendicitis and undergo laparoscopic appendectomy performed by the principal investigator, and whose parents or legal guardians provide written informed consent.
Who may be able to join
- Age 5 to under 18 years.
- Diagnosis of non-complicated acute appendicitis, based on clinical, laboratory and imaging findings.
- Laparoscopic appendectomy planned.
- General condition allowing standard surgical management and its associated complication risk (ASA Physical Status I or II).
- Written informed consent provided by a parent or legal guardian.
- For children aged 7 to under 18 years, additional written assent; for children aged 5 to 6 years, verbal agreement obtained with no active objection observed.
Who cannot join
- Complicated appendicitis (perforation, periappendicular abscess, or peritonitis).
- Emergency surgery for a non-appendicitis indication (e.g. ileus, intussusception).
- Elective interval appendectomy (late procedure following complicated appendicitis).
- Comorbidity corresponding to ASA Physical Status III or higher.
- Conditions that markedly increase surgical risk, such as a known coagulation disorder or immunodeficiency.
- Intraoperative conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery (post-hoc exclusion, as it changes the surgical technique).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery
Kayseri, Kayseri, 38039
Ahmet Burak Doğan, MD, +90 352 207 66 66 ext. 20801, abdogan@erciyes.edu.tr
Ahmet Burak Doğan, MD
About this study
Official title: Grading of Intraoperative Adverse Events With the ClassIntra Classification System and Their Association With Postoperative Complications in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Prospective Video-Based Pilot Study
Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children, and laparoscopic appendectomy is its standard treatment. Although intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are recognized as an important determinant of surgical safety and outcome, no validated tool exists for grading them in children. ClassIntra, an internationally validated five-level severity classification of intraoperative adverse events, has been validated in adults. Its use in children is limited to two single-centre cohorts - one in pediatric neurosurgery and one in a mixed pediatric robotic surgery programme - in which it was applied prospectively by the operating teams. Its inter-rater reliability has never been assessed in a pediatric population, it has not been applied to video-recorded pediatric procedures, and no study has focused on pediatric appendectomy. Likewise, the association between intraoperatively graded event severity and postoperative complication severity graded with the pediatric-specific Clavien-Madadi classification has not been examined in children.
This prospective, single-center, single-surgeon, video-based pilot study (IDEAL Framework Stage 2a) evaluates whether ClassIntra can be feasibly applied to the laparoscopic phase of pediatric appendectomy. Eighty children aged 5 to under 18 years undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for non-complicated acute appendicitis will be enrolled. Operative videos will be recorded, de-identified, assigned a case code, and independently assessed in randomized order by two pediatric surgeons from outside the operating institution, who remain blinded to all postoperative clinical data. Each observed event is characterized on three levels: event type (E1-E7), mechanism (GERT categories M1-M4), and severity (ClassIntra Grade I-V). Postoperative complications within 30 days are graded separately with the Clavien-Madadi classification by the principal investigator, independently of the video assessment.
Read more
The primary outcome is the feasibility of ClassIntra in this setting, evaluated as a progression-criteria profile rather than a composite rule, using three pre-specified criteria: inter-rater reliability (Gwet's AC1 >= 0.60, the key indicator), applicable coverage (proportion of non-assessable cases < 5%), and discriminative capacity (at least three of the five ClassIntra grades represented in the cohort). Secondary outcomes are descriptive: iAE incidence with Wilson score confidence intervals and the distribution of event types, mechanisms and severity grades. Exploratory hypotheses examine the association of intraoperative event severity with adherence to the institutional Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, with time to medical readiness for discharge, and with Clavien-Madadi-graded postoperative complication severity.
The study involves no additional intervention, investigational product, or extra procedure for the participating children; care follows institutional standards throughout. Its purpose is to provide feasibility evidence and calibration parameters for subsequent multicenter validation studies, not to establish the validity of the classification system itself.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale
Systematic classification of intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) is a prerequisite for measuring surgical safety. In adults, ClassIntra (Dell-Kuster et al., 2020) grades intraoperative events on five severity levels (Grade I-V) and has been internationally validated. In children, no population-specific instrument exists and pediatric experience with ClassIntra is limited to a small number of reports: a neurosurgical pilot congress abstract (Drexler et al., 2022; n=21), a full-text prospective neurosurgical cohort from the same group (Middelkamp, Drexler et al., World Neurosurgery 2025; n=47), and a prospective multidisciplinary pediatric robotic surgery programme in which ClassIntra was recorded alongside Clavien-Dindo grading (Vinit et al., Annals of Surgery 2023; n=300, of which 83 digestive and 105 urological or gynaecological procedures). In none of these was ClassIntra applied to video recordings, in none was its inter-rater reliability assessed, and none focused on appendectomy. The iAE profile of pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy - the most common pediatric surgical procedure - has not been systematically documented.
For postoperative complications, a pediatric-validated instrument does exist: the Clavien-Madadi classification (Madadi-Sanjani et al., 2023; ERNICA validation 2024). The relationship between intraoperative event severity and postoperative complication severity has not been studied in children.
Design
Prospective, single-center, single-surgeon, video-based pilot study, positioned at Stage 2a (Development) of the IDEAL Framework for surgical innovation. Single-arm observational cohort; no control group and no comparison arm. The principal investigator performs all operations and does not serve as a rater; the investigator acts only as arbiter in case of unresolved disagreement between raters.
Video Assessment Protocol
Operations are recorded in 1920x1080 H.264 MP4 format. Recordings are de-identified, assigned a case code (PA-XXX), and distributed to raters in randomized order. Two independent pediatric surgery specialists from outside the operating institution serve as raters; a third specialist is pre-designated as reserve. Raters have no access to postoperative clinical data, which prevents halo effects. Raters undergo a three-stage training program before assessment begins: theoretical training (2 weeks), calibration sessions (2 weeks), and certification; an inter-rater reliability threshold of 0.60 is targeted at first calibration, with an additional calibration round if not reached.
The assessment window is deliberately restricted to the laparoscopic phase, from insertion of the laparoscope into the abdomen until its withdrawal. Skin incision, port placement, fascial closure and anesthesia-related events are outside the assessment window. This partial application of ClassIntra is a pre-specified scope decision made for reasons of pilot scope management and rater workload, and is reported as a limitation. The study is not a retrospective analysis of an existing video archive: all videos are obtained prospectively after ethics approval, in accordance with the study protocol.
Three-Level Event Characterization
Each identified intraoperative event is characterized on three levels:
- Level 1, event type: E1 bleeding, E2 thermal injury, E3 avulsion, E4 serosal tear, E5 injury to adjacent organ, E6 detached clip, E7 spillage (pediatric adaptation after Sanmoto 2025).
- Level 2, mechanism: GERT categories M1 excessive force/distance, M2 insufficient force/distance, M3 wrong orientation, M4 insufficient visualization (Bonrath 2013), a procedure-independent internationally validated framework.
- Level 3, severity: ClassIntra Grade I-V (Dell-Kuster 2020), applied to the laparoscopic phase.
In parallel and independently of the video assessment, postoperative complications occurring within 30 days are graded by the principal investigator using the Clavien-Madadi classification from routine clinical follow-up data. No automatic conversion between complication classification systems is performed.
Relationship to Institutional ERAS Care
The department applies a 20-item Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol as routine care for all children undergoing appendectomy, independently of this study. Protocol adherence and recovery data (including time to medical readiness for discharge) are therefore documented for all participants as part of routine care, and are used in this study only as exploratory secondary variables. Enrollment in any other study is neither an inclusion criterion nor a requirement for participation in this study.
Statistical Approach
Inter-rater reliability is assessed with Gwet's AC1 as the primary measure, with weighted Kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient reported as supporting measures. As a pre-specified sensitivity analysis, AC1 is additionally computed in the subset of videos with at least one identified intraoperative adverse event; if this subset comprises fewer than 15 videos, the subset analysis is reported descriptively only. Event incidence is reported with Wilson score confidence intervals. Exploratory hypotheses are analyzed with logistic regression (ERAS protocol adherence) and Spearman rank correlation (time to medical readiness for discharge; Clavien-Madadi severity). No adjustment for multiple testing is applied, as these analyses are explicitly exploratory; effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals are emphasized over p-values. Missing data are managed with a pre-specified, proportion-dependent three-scenario strategy. Statistical analysis is conducted under the responsibility of the principal investigator.
Sample Size
A target of 80 patients is based on published precedent for reliability pilot studies rather than on a confirmatory power calculation. This sample supports estimation of AC1 with acceptable precision (approximately +/-0.10 around an expected AC1 of 0.65) but does not provide statistical power for confirmatory hypothesis testing; secondary results are therefore reported as effect-size estimates.
Known Limitations
The single-surgeon, single-center design limits generalizability and is a deliberate pilot choice. Findings are restricted to non-complicated appendicitis and cannot be extrapolated to other pediatric procedures. Video-based assessment may under-detect anesthesia-related and organizational events. Post-hoc exclusion of conversion cases lowers the estimated incidence of high-grade events. The hybrid ClassIntra/Clavien-Madadi structure has not previously been tested in a pediatric population, so no accuracy benchmark exists. Accordingly, this study provides feasibility evidence, not validity evidence; multicenter studies are required for the latter.
- Conditions
- Appendicitis, Acute, Appendectomy, Intraoperative Complications, Patient Safety, Pediatric Surgery
- Being tested
- Laparoscopic appendectomy
- Keywords
- ClassIntra, Clavien-Madadi, Intraoperative adverse events, Laparoscopic appendectomy, Video-based assessment, Inter-rater reliability, Gwet's AC1, IDEAL Framework Stage 2a, Pediatric surgery, Surgical safety
- Medical subject headings
- Appendicitis, Intraoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laparoscopic appendectomyProcedure or surgery
Laparoscopic appendectomy performed as standard institutional care for non-complicated acute appendicitis. The study assigns no intervention: the procedure is routine care, and its operative video is recorded and independently graded for intraoperative adverse events during the laparoscopic phase.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy cohort | Children aged 5 to under 18 years undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for non-complicated acute appendicitis, whose operative video is recorded and independently graded for intraoperative adverse events. No intervention is assigned; all care follows institutional standards. Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic appendectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Inter-Rater Reliability of ClassIntra Grading (Key Feasibility Indicator)
Agreement between two independent, blinded pediatric surgeon raters on the ClassIntra severity grade assigned to the laparoscopic phase of each operation, quantified with Gwet's AC1. The pre-specified feasibility threshold is AC1 >= 0.60. Weighted Kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient are reported as supporting measures. As a pre-specified sensitivity analysis, AC1 is additionally computed in the subset of videos with at least one identified intraoperative adverse event, since agreement on event-free cases is expected to be high and uninformative about grading discrimination. This is the key indicator of the feasibility profile; the three feasibility criteria are reported separately as progression criteria and are not combined into a composite rule.
Measured: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation); reliability computed across the evaluable cohort at database lock, approximately 10 months after study start.
Applicable Coverage of ClassIntra (Supporting Feasibility Indicator)
Proportion of enrolled cases that cannot be graded with ClassIntra by the raters, for any reason including insufficient video quality or incomplete assessment. The pre-specified feasibility threshold is a non-assessable proportion below 5%. Reported as a proportion with a 95% confidence interval, together with the reason for each non-assessable case.
Measured: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation); computed across the enrolled cohort at database lock, approximately 10 months after study start.
Discriminative Capacity of ClassIntra (Supporting Feasibility Indicator)
Number of distinct ClassIntra severity grades (of the five possible grades, I to V) represented in the study cohort. The pre-specified feasibility threshold is representation of at least three of the five grades. The full grade distribution is additionally reported descriptively. No entropy or dispersion threshold is applied.
Measured: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation); computed across the evaluable cohort at database lock, approximately 10 months after study start.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Incidence of Intraoperative Adverse Events
Proportion of operations in which at least one intraoperative adverse event is identified by the raters during the laparoscopic phase, reported as a point estimate with a Wilson score 95% confidence interval.
Measured: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation).
Distribution of Intraoperative Adverse Events by Event Type, Mechanism and Severity
Descriptive frequency map of all identified intraoperative adverse events across three levels: event type (E1 bleeding, E2 thermal injury, E3 avulsion, E4 serosal tear, E5 injury to adjacent organ, E6 detached clip, E7 spillage), mechanism (M1 excessive force or distance, M2 insufficient force or distance, M3 wrong orientation, M4 insufficient visualization), and ClassIntra severity grade (I to V). Events that cannot be assigned a mechanism are reported in a separate category.
Measured: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation).
Association Between Intraoperative Event Severity and Institutional ERAS Protocol Adherence (Exploratory)
Association between the presence of at least one ClassIntra Grade II or higher intraoperative adverse event and adherence to the institution's routine 20-item Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol, analyzed with logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Adherence data are obtained from routine clinical records, as the protocol is applied to all patients as standard care. This analysis is exploratory and hypothesis-generating; no adjustment for multiple testing is applied.
Measured: Index hospitalization, from admission to actual discharge (typically up to 72 hours).
Association Between Intraoperative Event Severity and Time to Medical Readiness for Discharge (Exploratory)
Correlation between ClassIntra severity grade and the time from arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit until documented medical readiness for discharge, analyzed with Spearman rank correlation and reported as a correlation coefficient with a 95% confidence interval. Exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
Measured: From arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit until medical readiness for discharge, typically up to 48 hours.
Association Between Intraoperative Event Severity and Postoperative Complication Severity (Exploratory)
Correlation between ClassIntra severity grade assigned from the operative video and Clavien-Madadi grade of postoperative complications occurring within 30 days, assigned independently by the principal investigator from routine clinical follow-up data. Analyzed with Spearman rank correlation and a cross-tabulation, reported with a 95% confidence interval. Exploratory and hypothesis-generating; this is the first such analysis reported in a pediatric population.
Measured: 30 days after surgery.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026
- Primary completion15 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Appendicitis, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ahmet Burak Doğan, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Ahmet Burak Doğan, MD, TC Erciyes University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07794618
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PedAppy-iAE-2026
- Other IDs
- 2026/407
- Acronym
- PedAppy-iAE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared. The primary study material consists of pediatric operative video recordings, which cannot be shared without breaching the consent given by families and the applicable national data protection law; consent was obtained specifically for use within this study. De-identified aggregate results and the full classification codebook will be published with the primary report, and methodological details will be made available to investigators on reasonable request to the principal investigator.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Grading of Intraoperative Adverse Events With the ClassIntra Classification System and Their Association With Postoperative Complications in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Prospective Video-Based Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07794618
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PedAppy-iAE / PedAppy-iAE-2026
- Conditions
- Appendicitis, Acute, Appendectomy, Intraoperative Complications, Patient Safety, Pediatric Surgery
- Keywords
- ClassIntra, Clavien-Madadi, Intraoperative adverse events, Laparoscopic appendectomy, Video-based assessment, Inter-rater reliability, Gwet's AC1, IDEAL Framework Stage 2a
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ahmet Burak Doğan, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children, and laparoscopic appendectomy is its standard treatment. Although intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are recognized as an important determinant of surgical safety and outcome, no validated tool exists for grading them in children. ClassIntra, an internationally validated five-level severity classification of intraoperative adverse events, has been validated in adults. Its use in children is limited to two single-centre cohorts - one in pediatric neurosurgery and one in a mixed pediatric robotic surgery programme - in which it was applied prospectively by the operating teams. Its inter-rater reliability has never been assessed in a pediatric population, it has not been applied to video-recorded pediatric procedures, and no study has focused on pediatric appendectomy. Likewise, the association between intraoperatively graded event severity and postoperative complication severity graded with the pediatric-specific Clavien-Madadi classification has not been examined in children.
This prospective, single-center, single-surgeon, video-based pilot study (IDEAL Framework Stage 2a) evaluates whether ClassIntra can be feasibly applied to the laparoscopic phase of pediatric appendectomy. Eighty children aged 5 to under 18 years undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for non-complicated acute appendicitis will be enrolled. Operative videos will be recorded, de-identified, assigned a case code, and independently assessed in randomized order by two pediatric surgeons from outside the operating institution, who remain blinded to all postoperative clinical data. Each observed event is characterized on three levels: event type (E1-E7), mechanism (GERT categories M1-M4), and severity (ClassIntra Grade I-V). Postoperative complications within 30 days are graded separately with the Clavien-Madadi classification by the principal investigator, independently of the video assessment.
The primary outcome is the feasibility of ClassIntra in this setting, evaluated as a progression-criteria profile rather than a composite rule, using three pre-specified criteria: inter-rater reliability (Gwet's AC1 >= 0.60, the key indicator), applicable coverage (proportion of non-assessable cases < 5%), and discriminative capacity (at least three of the five ClassIntra grades represented in the cohort). Secondary outcomes are descriptive: iAE incidence with Wilson score confidence intervals and the distribution of event types, mechanisms and severity grades. Exploratory hypotheses examine the association of intraoperative event severity with adherence to the institutional Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, with time to medical readiness for discharge, and with Clavien-Madadi-graded postoperative complication severity.
The study involves no additional intervention, investigational product, or extra procedure for the participating children; care follows institutional standards throughout. Its purpose is to provide feasibility evidence and calibration parameters for subsequent multicenter validation studies, not to establish the validity of the classification system itself.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale
Systematic classification of intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) is a prerequisite for measuring surgical safety. In adults, ClassIntra (Dell-Kuster et al., 2020) grades intraoperative events on five severity levels (Grade I-V) and has been internationally validated. In children, no population-specific instrument exists and pediatric experience with ClassIntra is limited to a small number of reports: a neurosurgical pilot congress abstract (Drexler et al., 2022; n=21), a full-text prospective neurosurgical cohort from the same group (Middelkamp, Drexler et al., World Neurosurgery 2025; n=47), and a prospective multidisciplinary pediatric robotic surgery programme in which ClassIntra was recorded alongside Clavien-Dindo grading (Vinit et al., Annals of Surgery 2023; n=300, of which 83 digestive and 105 urological or gynaecological procedures). In none of these was ClassIntra applied to video recordings, in none was its inter-rater reliability assessed, and none focused on appendectomy. The iAE profile of pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy - the most common pediatric surgical procedure - has not been systematically documented.
For postoperative complications, a pediatric-validated instrument does exist: the Clavien-Madadi classification (Madadi-Sanjani et al., 2023; ERNICA validation 2024). The relationship between intraoperative event severity and postoperative complication severity has not been studied in children.
Design
Prospective, single-center, single-surgeon, video-based pilot study, positioned at Stage 2a (Development) of the IDEAL Framework for surgical innovation. Single-arm observational cohort; no control group and no comparison arm. The principal investigator performs all operations and does not serve as a rater; the investigator acts only as arbiter in case of unresolved disagreement between raters.
Video Assessment Protocol
Operations are recorded in 1920x1080 H.264 MP4 format. Recordings are de-identified, assigned a case code (PA-XXX), and distributed to raters in randomized order. Two independent pediatric surgery specialists from outside the operating institution serve as raters; a third specialist is pre-designated as reserve. Raters have no access to postoperative clinical data, which prevents halo effects. Raters undergo a three-stage training program before assessment begins: theoretical training (2 weeks), calibration sessions (2 weeks), and certification; an inter-rater reliability threshold of 0.60 is targeted at first calibration, with an additional calibration round if not reached.
The assessment window is deliberately restricted to the laparoscopic phase, from insertion of the laparoscope into the abdomen until its withdrawal. Skin incision, port placement, fascial closure and anesthesia-related events are outside the assessment window. This partial application of ClassIntra is a pre-specified scope decision made for reasons of pilot scope management and rater workload, and is reported as a limitation. The study is not a retrospective analysis of an existing video archive: all videos are obtained prospectively after ethics approval, in accordance with the study protocol.
Three-Level Event Characterization
Each identified intraoperative event is characterized on three levels:
- Level 1, event type: E1 bleeding, E2 thermal injury, E3 avulsion, E4 serosal tear, E5 injury to adjacent organ, E6 detached clip, E7 spillage (pediatric adaptation after Sanmoto 2025).
- Level 2, mechanism: GERT categories M1 excessive force/distance, M2 insufficient force/distance, M3 wrong orientation, M4 insufficient visualization (Bonrath 2013), a procedure-independent internationally validated framework.
- Level 3, severity: ClassIntra Grade I-V (Dell-Kuster 2020), applied to the laparoscopic phase.
In parallel and independently of the video assessment, postoperative complications occurring within 30 days are graded by the principal investigator using the Clavien-Madadi classification from routine clinical follow-up data. No automatic conversion between complication classification systems is performed.
Relationship to Institutional ERAS Care
The department applies a 20-item Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol as routine care for all children undergoing appendectomy, independently of this study. Protocol adherence and recovery data (including time to medical readiness for discharge) are therefore documented for all participants as part of routine care, and are used in this study only as exploratory secondary variables. Enrollment in any other study is neither an inclusion criterion nor a requirement for participation in this study.
Statistical Approach
Inter-rater reliability is assessed with Gwet's AC1 as the primary measure, with weighted Kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient reported as supporting measures. As a pre-specified sensitivity analysis, AC1 is additionally computed in the subset of videos with at least one identified intraoperative adverse event; if this subset comprises fewer than 15 videos, the subset analysis is reported descriptively only. Event incidence is reported with Wilson score confidence intervals. Exploratory hypotheses are analyzed with logistic regression (ERAS protocol adherence) and Spearman rank correlation (time to medical readiness for discharge; Clavien-Madadi severity). No adjustment for multiple testing is applied, as these analyses are explicitly exploratory; effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals are emphasized over p-values. Missing data are managed with a pre-specified, proportion-dependent three-scenario strategy. Statistical analysis is conducted under the responsibility of the principal investigator.
Sample Size
A target of 80 patients is based on published precedent for reliability pilot studies rather than on a confirmatory power calculation. This sample supports estimation of AC1 with acceptable precision (approximately +/-0.10 around an expected AC1 of 0.65) but does not provide statistical power for confirmatory hypothesis testing; secondary results are therefore reported as effect-size estimates.
Known Limitations
The single-surgeon, single-center design limits generalizability and is a deliberate pilot choice. Findings are restricted to non-complicated appendicitis and cannot be extrapolated to other pediatric procedures. Video-based assessment may under-detect anesthesia-related and organizational events. Post-hoc exclusion of conversion cases lowers the estimated incidence of high-grade events. The hybrid ClassIntra/Clavien-Madadi structure has not previously been tested in a pediatric population, so no accuracy benchmark exists. Accordingly, this study provides feasibility evidence, not validity evidence; multicenter studies are required for the latter.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy cohort | – | Procedure: Laparoscopic appendectomyChildren aged 5 to under 18 years undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for non-complicated acute appendicitis, whose operative video is recorded and independently graded for intraoperative adverse events. No intervention is assigned; all care follows institutional standards. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Consecutive children aged 5 to under 18 years who present to a single tertiary academic pediatric surgery department with non-complicated acute appendicitis and undergo laparoscopic appendectomy performed by the principal investigator, and whose parents or legal guardians provide written informed consent.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 5 to under 18 years.
- Diagnosis of non-complicated acute appendicitis, based on clinical, laboratory and imaging findings.
- Laparoscopic appendectomy planned.
- General condition allowing standard surgical management and its associated complication risk (ASA Physical Status I or II).
- Written informed consent provided by a parent or legal guardian.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Complicated appendicitis (perforation, periappendicular abscess, or peritonitis).
- Emergency surgery for a non-appendicitis indication (e.g. ileus, intussusception).
- Elective interval appendectomy (late procedure following complicated appendicitis).
- Comorbidity corresponding to ASA Physical Status III or higher.
- Conditions that markedly increase surgical risk, such as a known coagulation disorder or immunodeficiency.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic appendectomyLaparoscopic appendectomy performed as standard institutional care for non-complicated acute appendicitis. The study assigns no intervention: the procedure is routine care, and its operative video is recorded and independently graded for intraoperative adverse events during the laparoscopic phase. | Procedure or surgery | Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy cohort |
Primary outcome
Inter-Rater Reliability of ClassIntra Grading (Key Feasibility Indicator)
Time frame: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation); reliability computed across the evaluable cohort at database lock, approximately 10 months after study start.
Agreement between two independent, blinded pediatric surgeon raters on the ClassIntra severity grade assigned to the laparoscopic phase of each operation, quantified with Gwet's AC1. The pre-specified feasibility threshold is AC1 >= 0.60. Weighted Kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient are reported as supporting measures. As a pre-specified sensitivity analysis, AC1 is additionally computed in the subset of videos with at least one identified intraoperative adverse event, since agreement on event-free cases is expected to be high and uninformative about grading discrimination. This is the key indicator of the feasibility profile; the three feasibility criteria are reported separately as progression criteria and are not combined into a composite rule.
Applicable Coverage of ClassIntra (Supporting Feasibility Indicator)
Time frame: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation); computed across the enrolled cohort at database lock, approximately 10 months after study start.
Proportion of enrolled cases that cannot be graded with ClassIntra by the raters, for any reason including insufficient video quality or incomplete assessment. The pre-specified feasibility threshold is a non-assessable proportion below 5%. Reported as a proportion with a 95% confidence interval, together with the reason for each non-assessable case.
Discriminative Capacity of ClassIntra (Supporting Feasibility Indicator)
Time frame: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation); computed across the evaluable cohort at database lock, approximately 10 months after study start.
Number of distinct ClassIntra severity grades (of the five possible grades, I to V) represented in the study cohort. The pre-specified feasibility threshold is representation of at least three of the five grades. The full grade distribution is additionally reported descriptively. No entropy or dispersion threshold is applied.
5 secondary outcomes
Incidence of Intraoperative Adverse Events
Time frame: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation).
Distribution of Intraoperative Adverse Events by Event Type, Mechanism and Severity
Time frame: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation).
Association Between Intraoperative Event Severity and Institutional ERAS Protocol Adherence (Exploratory)
Time frame: Index hospitalization, from admission to actual discharge (typically up to 72 hours).
Association Between Intraoperative Event Severity and Time to Medical Readiness for Discharge (Exploratory)
Time frame: From arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit until medical readiness for discharge, typically up to 48 hours.
Association Between Intraoperative Event Severity and Postoperative Complication Severity (Exploratory)
Time frame: 30 days after surgery.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared. The primary study material consists of pediatric operative video recordings, which cannot be shared without breaching the consent given by families and the applicable national data protection law; consent was obtained specifically for use within this study. De-identified aggregate results and the full classification codebook will be published with the primary report, and methodological details will be made available to investigators on reasonable request to the principal investigator.
Related trials for Appendicitis, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Comparison of Pro-Adrenomedullin, C-Reactive Protein, and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis
Acute Appendicitis
Recruiting
Feasibility and Safety of a Pediatric ERAS Protocol for Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Acute Appendicitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Patient Choice Between Antibiotics and Appendectomy in Uncomplicated Appendicitis (FRENCH 47 - ALACARTE)
Acute Appendicitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retrospective Acute Care Appendectomy Study
Acute Appendicitis
Not yet recruiting
Immediate Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Interval Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Early Appendicular Mass
Appendicular Mass, Acute Appendicitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Appendicitis, Acute and Appendectomy, run by Ahmet Burak Doğan, MD at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ahmet Burak Doğan, MD (+90 352 207 66 66 ext. 20801, abdogan@erciyes.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Inter-Rater Reliability of ClassIntra Grading (Key Feasibility Indicator) (time frame: Intraoperative period (laparoscopic phase of each operation); reliability computed across the evaluable cohort at database lock, approximately 10 months after study start.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2026.