AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatic Cystic EchinococcosisNCT07793448

Omentoplasty Versus Tube Drainage for Residual Cavity Management in Complicated Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis

A study testing omentoplasty and External Tube Drainage in people with Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis, run by Ataturk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective comparative study evaluated two surgical techniques for residual cavity management following conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis. Patients undergoing surgery were managed with either omentoplasty or tube drainage. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis
What is being tested?
omentoplasty and External Tube Drainage
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Mar 2020to 10 Mar 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-80 years.
  • Complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis requiring surgical treatment.
  • Cyst diameter ≥8 cm.
  • Cysts located in hepatic segments IV, V, VI, VII, or VIII.
  • WHO-IWGE CE2 or CE3b cyst stage.
  • Presence of at least one complication or high-risk feature, including rupture, adjacent organ involvement, cholangitis, biliary communication, or cyst infection.
  • ASA physical status ≤III.

Who cannot join

  • WHO-IWGE CE1 or CE3a cyst stage.
  • Cysts located in hepatic segments I, II, or III.
  • Extensive multiple hepatic cysts.
  • Previous surgery for hepatic cystic echinococcosis.
  • Malignancy.
  • Pregnancy.
  • ASA physical status >III.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine

    Erzurum, Erzurum, 25240

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Omentoplasty Versus Tube Drainage for Residual Cavity Management After Conservative Surgery for Complicated Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Prospective Comparative Study

This prospective comparative study evaluated two surgical techniques for residual cavity management following conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis. Patients undergoing surgery were managed with either omentoplasty or tube drainage. The study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between the two techniques, with particular emphasis on postoperative complications and residual cavity-related complications. Long-term follow-up was also performed to assess recurrence and other clinical outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Cystic echinococcosis of the liver may be associated with complications such as biliary communication, infection, rupture, cholangitis, and involvement of adjacent structures. Following conservative surgical treatment, appropriate management of the residual hepatic cavity remains an important component of surgical care.

This prospective, single-center comparative study was conducted at Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine and included adult patients undergoing conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis. Eligible patients were allocated to residual cavity management with either omentoplasty or tube drainage according to a predetermined alternating allocation strategy.

The study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of these two residual cavity management techniques. Postoperative outcomes included overall postoperative complications, surgical site infection, biliary fistula, and residual cavity-related complications. Operative characteristics and other relevant perioperative outcomes were also evaluated.

All surgical procedures were performed by the same surgical team using a standardized perioperative approach. Patients received albendazole treatment according to the institutional treatment protocol. Following surgery, patients underwent clinical and radiological follow-up using ultrasonography and/or computed tomography as clinically appropriate. Long-term follow-up was used to evaluate recurrence and other relevant clinical outcomes.

The primary objective of the study was to determine whether the method used for residual cavity management was associated with differences in postoperative outcomes after conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis.

Being tested
omentoplasty, External Tube Drainage
Keywords
Cystic Echinococcosis, Hydatid Cyst, Liver, Omentoplasty, Tube Drainage, Residual Cavity, Conservative Surgery, Biliary Fistula
Medical subject headings
Echinococcosis, Biliary Fistula

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • omentoplastyProcedure or surgery

    After conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis, the residual cavity was obliterated using a pedicled omental flap (omentoplasty) to reduce dead space and cavity-related complications.

  • External Tube DrainageProcedure or surgery

    After conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis, an external tube drain was placed into the residual cavity for postoperative drainage and monitoring.

Study groups in NCT07793448
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Omentoplasty GroupExperimentalParticipants underwent conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis followed by omentoplasty for residual cavity management.
Receives: Procedure: omentoplasty
Tube Drainage GroupActive comparatorParticipants underwent conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis followed by external tube drainage for residual cavity management.
Receives: Procedure: External Tube Drainage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative Residual Cavity-Related Complications

    Incidence of postoperative complications related to the residual hepatic cyst cavity, including residual cavity infection, abscess formation, or other cavity-related complications, compared between the omentoplasty and tube drainage groups.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Postoperative Bile Leakage

    Incidence of postoperative bile leakage, defined as clinically evident biliary drainage after surgery, compared between the omentoplasty and tube drainage groups.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery

  2. Surgical Site Infection

    Incidence of postoperative surgical site infection compared between the omentoplasty and tube drainage groups.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery

  3. Overall Postoperative Complications

    Incidence of overall postoperative complications compared between the omentoplasty and tube drainage groups

    Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery

  4. Operative Time

    Duration of surgery from skin incision to completion of skin closure, compared between the omentoplasty and tube drainage groups

    Measured: During surgery

  5. Recurrence of Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis

    Comparison of the incidence of hepatic cystic echinococcosis recurrence between the omentoplasty and tube drainage groups during long-term follow-up

    Measured: Up to at least 60 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2026
  2. Study start10 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion10 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion10 Mar 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were assigned to two parallel groups undergoing either omentoplasty or tube drainage for residual cavity management following conservative surgery for complicated hepatic cystic echinococcosis.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07793448
Sponsor's protocol ID
ATAUNI-HCE-OPTD-2020
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
26 Aug 2026
Last updated
28 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared due to patient confidentiality and ethical considerations. Aggregate study results will be reported in the planned scientific publication.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing omentoplasty and External Tube Drainage in people with Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis, run by Ataturk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative Residual Cavity-Related Complications (time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in