Amyloid Light Chain (AL) AmyloidosisPhase 3NCT07793422
Study to Evaluate Change in Disease Activity and Adverse Events of Subcutaneous Etentamig Compared With Daratumumab Plus Cyclophosphamide Plus Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Adults With Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis
A Phase 3 study testing Etentamig, Daratumumab and Cyclophosphamide in people with Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis, run by AbbVie.
Trial summary
Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by abnormal plasma cells producing misfolded light chain proteins that deposit in organs, leading to organ dysfunction and failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis
- What is being tested?
- Etentamig, Daratumumab and Cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 370 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 29 Nov 2026to Dec 2034
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histopathological diagnosis of amyloidosis based on detection by immunohistochemistry and polarizing light microscopy of green bi-refringent material in congo red-stained tissue specimens (in an organ other than bone marrow) or characteristic electron microscopy appearance.
- Evidence of a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder (serum or urine monoclonal protein, abnormal free light-chain ratio, or clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow).
- Measurable disease of amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis as defined by difference in free light chains (dFLC) >= 50 mg/L
- No history of treatment with anti-amyloidosis therapy.
- Presence of an amyloid-related systemic syndrome with at least 1 organ impacted by AL amyloidosis according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria.
- Considered AL amyloidosis cardiac risk stage 1, 2, or 3a (or 3b [randomized portion only]).
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <= 2.
Who cannot join
- Known allergic reaction, significant sensitivity, or intolerance to constituents of the study treatments.
- Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection.
- History of other active malignancies within the past 3 years (with specified exceptions).
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Etentamig (ABBV-383) Compared to Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis
Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by abnormal plasma cells producing misfolded light chain proteins that deposit in organs, leading to organ dysfunction and failure. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etentamig compared to daratumumab plus cyclophosphamide plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in participants with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.
Etentamig is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. This is an open-label study. The study consists of 2 parts: a Safety Run-in where participatns will receive etentamig, and a Randomized Portion with 2 treatment arms where participants will receive etentamig, or Dara-CyBorD. Approximately 370 participants will be enrolled in the study at approximately 130 sites worldwide.
Read more
Participants will receive injected etentamig, in the Safety Run-in. Participants will receive injected etentamig, or Dara-CyBorD per the local label, in the Randomized Portion of the study. The total study duration is approximately 96 months.
There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care due to study procedures. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effects of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.
- Conditions
- Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis
- Being tested
- Etentamig, Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone
- Keywords
- Amyloid Light Chain Amyloidosis, Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloidosis, Etentamig, ABBV-383, VCd
- Medical subject headings
- Amyloidosis, Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EtentamigDrug
Injection
DaratumumabDrug
Injection
CyclophosphamideDrug
Oral
BortezomibDrug
Injection
DexamethasoneDrug
Oral
BortezomibDrug
Infusion
CyclophosphamideDrug
Infusion
DexamethasoneDrug
Infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Etentamig | Experimental | Participants receive etentamig, as part of a 96 month study duration. Receives: Drug: Etentamig |
| Randomized Portion: Etentamig | Experimental | Participants will receive etentamig , as part of a 96 month study duration. Receives: Drug: Etentamig |
| Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone | Active comparator | Participants will receive daratumumab plus cyclophosphamide plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in accordance with the local approved label, as part of a 96 month study duration.. Receives: Drug: Daratumumab; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Bortezomib; Drug: Dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. Safety and tolerability assessed through adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and other safety assessments.
Measured: Up to Approximately 96 Months
Randomized Portion: Complete Hematologic Response (HemeCR) Rate
HemeCR rate is defined as the proportion of subjects with the best overall response of hemeCR as determined by International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) and assessed by the independent review committee (IRC)
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)
MOD-PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MOD-PFS event or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. MOD-PFS includes: Development of hematologic progressive disease per consensus guidelines or high-risk difference in free light chain (dFLC) progression; Clinical manifestation of cardiac failure (defined as need for cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); Clinical manifestation of renal failure (defined as development of end-stage renal disease needing hemodialysis or renal transplant); Death. MOD-PFS will be assessed by an Independent Review Committee.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Secondary outcomes (27)
Safety Run-In: Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)
MOD-PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MOD-PFS event or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. MOD-PFS includes: Development of hematologic progressive disease per consensus guidelines or high-risk difference in free light chain (dFLC) progression; Clinical manifestation of cardiac failure (defined as need for cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); Clinical manifestation of renal failure (defined as development of end-stage renal disease needing hemodialysis or renal transplant); Death.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
Percentage of participants achieving hematologic very good partial response or better based on International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Cardiac Response Rate
Percentage of participants achieving cardiac response as assessed per graded criteria.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Renal Response Rate
Percentage of participants achieving renal response as assessed per the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) criteria.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Liver Response Rate
Percentage of participants achieving liver response as assessed per the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) criteria.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Next Treatment
Time from randomization to initiation of next anti-AL amyloidosis treatment.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Complete Hematologic Response
Time from randomization to first documentation of complete hematologic response (hemeCR) as determined by International Amyloidosis Criteria Committee.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Complete Hematologic Response
Duration of complete hematologic response (hemeCR) defined as the time from first documentation of hemeCR to the date of loss of hemeCR.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Time to Cardiac Response
Time from randomization to first achievement of cardiac response.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Renal Response
Time from randomization to first achievement of renal response.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Liver Response
Time from randomization to first achievement of liver response.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Cardiac Response
Time from first achievement of cardiac response to cardiac progression.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Renal Progression
Time from first achievement of renal response to renal progression.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Liver Response
Time from first achievement of liver response to liver progression.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Cardiac Progression
Time from randomization to first occurrence of cardiac progression.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Renal Progression
Time from randomization to first occurrence of renal progression.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Liver Progression
Time from randomization to first occurrence of liver progression.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Etentamig
Cmax of etentamig.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Etentamig
Tmax of etentamig.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Etentamig
AUC of etentamig.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA)
Immunogenicity assessed through summary of antidrug antibody (ADA) status, ADA titers, and neutralizing antidrug antibodies (NAbs), if NAbs samples are analyzed.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Physical Functioning as Measured by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Physical Component Summary Score
The SF-36 v2 is a 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life across eight domains. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Mental Functioning as Measured by SF-36 v2 Mental Component Summary Score
The SF-36 v2 is a 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life across eight domains. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire assessing cancer-specific quality of life. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Fatigue as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire assessing cancer-specific quality of life. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Disease Symptoms as Measured by Additional EORTC Questionnaire Symptom Scales/Items
The EORTC questionnaires assess cancer-specific symptoms and quality of life.
Measured: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2026
- Study start29 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2034 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2034 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Amyloid Light Chain (AL) AmyloidosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 370 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- ABBVIE INC., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07793422
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M24-473
- Other IDs
- 2026-525253-37-00
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible clinical trial data sharing. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Etentamig (ABBV-383) Compared to Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07793422
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M24-473
- Conditions
- Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis
- Keywords
- Amyloid Light Chain Amyloidosis, Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloidosis, Etentamig, ABBV-383, VCd
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 370 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 29 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2034 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2034 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by abnormal plasma cells producing misfolded light chain proteins that deposit in organs, leading to organ dysfunction and failure. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etentamig compared to daratumumab plus cyclophosphamide plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in participants with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.
Etentamig is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. This is an open-label study. The study consists of 2 parts: a Safety Run-in where participatns will receive etentamig, and a Randomized Portion with 2 treatment arms where participants will receive etentamig, or Dara-CyBorD. Approximately 370 participants will be enrolled in the study at approximately 130 sites worldwide.
Participants will receive injected etentamig, in the Safety Run-in. Participants will receive injected etentamig, or Dara-CyBorD per the local label, in the Randomized Portion of the study. The total study duration is approximately 96 months.
There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care due to study procedures. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effects of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Etentamig | Experimental | Drug: EtentamigParticipants receive etentamig, as part of a 96 month study duration. |
| Randomized Portion: Etentamig | Experimental | Drug: EtentamigParticipants will receive etentamig , as part of a 96 month study duration. |
| Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone | Active comparator | Drug: Daratumumab, Drug: Cyclophosphamide, Drug: Bortezomib, Drug: DexamethasoneParticipants will receive daratumumab plus cyclophosphamide plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in accordance with the local approved label, as part of a 96 month study duration.. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Histopathological diagnosis of amyloidosis based on detection by immunohistochemistry and polarizing light microscopy of green bi-refringent material in congo red-stained tissue specimens (in an organ other than bone marrow) or characteristic electron microscopy appearance.
- Evidence of a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder (serum or urine monoclonal protein, abnormal free light-chain ratio, or clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow).
- Measurable disease of amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis as defined by difference in free light chains (dFLC) >= 50 mg/L
- No history of treatment with anti-amyloidosis therapy.
- Presence of an amyloid-related systemic syndrome with at least 1 organ impacted by AL amyloidosis according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Known allergic reaction, significant sensitivity, or intolerance to constituents of the study treatments.
- Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection.
- History of other active malignancies within the past 3 years (with specified exceptions).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EtentamigInjection | Drug | Randomized Portion: Etentamig, Safety Run-in: Etentamig |
| DaratumumabInjection | Drug | Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone |
| CyclophosphamideOral | Drug | Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone |
| BortezomibInjection | Drug | Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone |
| DexamethasoneOral | Drug | Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone |
| BortezomibInfusion | Drug | Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone |
| CyclophosphamideInfusion | Drug | Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone |
| DexamethasoneInfusion | Drug | Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to Approximately 96 Months
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. Safety and tolerability assessed through adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and other safety assessments.
Randomized Portion: Complete Hematologic Response (HemeCR) Rate
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
HemeCR rate is defined as the proportion of subjects with the best overall response of hemeCR as determined by International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) and assessed by the independent review committee (IRC)
Randomized Portion: Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
MOD-PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MOD-PFS event or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. MOD-PFS includes: Development of hematologic progressive disease per consensus guidelines or high-risk difference in free light chain (dFLC) progression; Clinical manifestation of cardiac failure (defined as need for cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); Clinical manifestation of renal failure (defined as development of end-stage renal disease needing hemodialysis or renal transplant); Death. MOD-PFS will be assessed by an Independent Review Committee.
27 secondary outcomes
Safety Run-In: Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Cardiac Response Rate
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Renal Response Rate
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Liver Response Rate
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Next Treatment
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Complete Hematologic Response
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Complete Hematologic Response
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Time to Cardiac Response
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Renal Response
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Liver Response
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Cardiac Response
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Renal Progression
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Liver Response
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Cardiac Progression
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Renal Progression
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Liver Progression
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Etentamig
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Etentamig
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Etentamig
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA)
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Physical Functioning as Measured by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Physical Component Summary Score
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Mental Functioning as Measured by SF-36 v2 Mental Component Summary Score
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Scale Score
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Fatigue as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale Score
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Disease Symptoms as Measured by Additional EORTC Questionnaire Symptom Scales/Items
Time frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. AbbVie is committed to responsible clinical trial data sharing. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information.
Related trials for Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis
RecruitingObservational study
Screening for AL Amyloidosis in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Study of Captisol Enabled Melphalan and Pharmacokinetics for Patients With Multiple Myeloma or Light Chain Amyloidosis That Are Receiving an Autologous Transplant.
Multiple Myeloma, Amyloidosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax-Dexamethasone in Relapsed and/or Refractory t(11;14) Amyloidosis
AL Amyloidosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Daratumumab Maintenance Therapy for Improving Survival in Patients With Light Chain Amyloidosis, EMILIA Trial
AL Amyloidosis
RecruitingObservational study
SMS-Based Remote Symptom Monitoring for Patients With Plasma Cell Disorders
AL Amyloidosis, Multiple Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
ABBVIE INC. study director
AbbVie
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Etentamig, Daratumumab and Cyclophosphamide in people with Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis, run by AbbVie.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact ABBVIE CALL CENTER (844-663-3742, abbvieclinicaltrials@abbvie.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (time frame: Up to Approximately 96 Months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2026.