AzTrials
AzTrials

Unilateral Alveolar Cleft of MaxillaNCT07786259

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate With Bovine Bone Graft for Unilateral Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction

A study testing BMAC-Enriched Bovine Bone Grafting and Bovine Bone Grafting in people with Unilateral Alveolar Cleft of Maxilla, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized clinical trial evaluated whether adding autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) to a bovine-derived bone graft improves healing and bone regeneration in patients undergoing reconstruction of a unilateral alveolar cleft. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 25 years
Conditions the study is for
Unilateral Alveolar Cleft of Maxilla
What is being tested?
BMAC-Enriched Bovine Bone Grafting and Bovine Bone Grafting
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Mar 2025to 16 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with unilateral alveolar clefts requiring repair.
  • Patients with good oral hygiene and good general health.
  • Patients free from any systemic disease that may affect normal bone healing.
  • Patients aged 7 to 25 years.
  • Absence of blood disorders that might cause complications following bone marrow aspiration.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with bilateral alveolar clefts.
  • Patients with local maxillary pathosis that may interfere with surgery.
  • Immunocompromised patients.
  • Patients with syndromes associated with alveolar cleft.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University

    Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, 31527

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Combined With Bovine Bone Graft for Unilateral Alveolar Cleft Repair (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

This randomized clinical trial evaluated whether adding autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) to a bovine-derived bone graft improves healing and bone regeneration in patients undergoing reconstruction of a unilateral alveolar cleft. Sixteen participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bovine bone graft combined with BMAC or bovine bone graft alone. Participants were followed for 6 months. Clinical assessments included postoperative pain, soft-tissue healing, fistula recurrence, and tooth eruption. Radiographic assessments included alveolar bone level, CT-derived graft radiodensity, and three-dimensional volumetric measurements of graft integration, resorption, and defect fill.

Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University. The study investigated the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) combined with a bovine-derived particulate bone graft for reconstruction of unilateral alveolar cleft defects. Eligible participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the study group or the control group using a simple lottery method.

Participants in the study group received bovine-derived particulate bone graft combined with autologous BMAC, whereas participants in the control group received bovine-derived bone graft without BMAC. For the study group, BMAC was mixed with the bovine graft at a ratio of 1 mL of BMAC per 1 cc of graft approximately 10 minutes before implantation. The interval was used as a standardized procedural step to allow contact and wetting of the graft particles and was not considered a biologically validated incubation period.

Both groups underwent standardized alveolar cleft reconstruction and were followed for 6 months. Clinical evaluation included postoperative pain, soft-tissue healing, fistula recurrence, and tooth eruption. Radiographic evaluation included assessment of alveolar bone level using the Chelsea scale, CT-derived graft radiodensity, and three-dimensional volumetric analysis to assess graft integration, graft resorption, and effective defect fill.

Being tested
BMAC-Enriched Bovine Bone Grafting, Bovine Bone Grafting
Keywords
Alveolar Cleft, Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate, BMAC, Bovine Bone Graft, Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting, Bone Regeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BMAC-Enriched Bovine Bone GraftingProcedure or surgery

    Autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) was prepared from bone marrow aspirated from the anterior iliac crest and combined with bovine-derived particulate bone graft. BMAC was mixed with the graft at a ratio of 1 mL per 1 cc approximately 10 minutes before implantation into the alveolar cleft defect.

  • Bovine Bone GraftingProcedure or surgery

    The unilateral alveolar cleft defect was reconstructed using bovine-derived particulate bone graft without the addition of BMAC.

Study groups in NCT07786259
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BMAC-Enriched Bovine Bone GraftExperimentalParticipants received a bovine-derived particulate bone graft combined with autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) for reconstruction of the unilateral alveolar cleft.
Receives: Procedure: BMAC-Enriched Bovine Bone Grafting
Bovine Bone Graft AloneActive comparatorParticipants received a bovine-derived particulate bone graft alone for reconstruction of the unilateral alveolar cleft.
Receives: Procedure: Bovine Bone Grafting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Graft Take at 6 Months

    Graft take was assessed using three-dimensional CT-derived volumetric analysis. It was calculated as the percentage of the grafted volume that remained integrated within the reconstructed alveolar cleft at the 6-month follow-up.

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Graft Resorption at 6 Months

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  2. Effective Defect Fill at 6 Months

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  3. Integrated Graft Volume at 6 Months

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  4. CT-Derived Graft Radiodensity at 6 Months

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  5. Chelsea Scale Bone Level Assessment at 6 Months

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  6. Soft-Tissue Healing

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  7. Nasal Regurgitation/Oronasal Fistula Recurrence

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

  8. Tooth Eruption

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion16 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion16 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bovine-derived bone graft combined with BMAC or bovine-derived bone graft alone.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07786259
Sponsor's protocol ID
BMAC-AC-01
Other IDs
OS-2312
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
21 Aug 2026
Last updated
25 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data underlying the reported clinical and radiographic results may be shared upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the study investigators and applicable institutional and ethical requirements.

Publications

  • Kuhl S, Payer M, Kirmeier R, Wildburger A, Wegscheider W, Jakse N. The influence of bone marrow aspirates and concentrates on the early volume stability of maxillary sinus grafts with deproteinized bovine bone mineral - first results of a RCT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):221-5. doi: 10.1111/clr.12101. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

    PubMed 23294470
  • Chahla J, Mannava S, Cinque ME, Geeslin AG, Codina D, LaPrade RF. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Harvesting and Processing Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Apr 10;6(2):e441-e445. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.10.024. eCollection 2017 Apr.

    PubMed 28580265
  • Shabaan AA, Salahuddin A, Aboulmagd I, Ragab R, Salah KA, Rashid A, Ayad HM, El Aty Ahmed WA, Refahee SM. Alveolar cleft reconstruction using bone marrow aspirate concentrate and iliac cancellous bone: A 12-month randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Nov;27(11):6667-6675. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05276-9. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

    PubMed 37794139

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing BMAC-Enriched Bovine Bone Grafting and Bovine Bone Grafting in people with Unilateral Alveolar Cleft of Maxilla, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Graft Take at 6 Months (time frame: 6 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07786259, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in