AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantOxyPerfNCT07779187

NRP + ex Situ HMPO2 vs NRP Alone in DCD Kidney Transplantation

A study testing Ex situ hypothermic oxygenated machine preservation in people with Kidney Transplant and DCD Kidney, run by Karolinska University Hospital at 3 sites in Sweden.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the combination of Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) at the time of organ procurement with ex situ Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HMPO2) of kidneys recovered from donors after circulatory death (DCD) is superior to NRP alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Transplant, DCD Kidney
What is being tested?
Ex situ hypothermic oxygenated machine preservation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
214 participants
Where
3 sitesSweden
Study dates
1 Jan 2027to 31 Dec 2030
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Donor kidneys:
  • All DCD donors in Sweden with consent for organ donation and where organ recovery is undertaken with NRP.
  • Kidney deemed transplantable by donor surgeon and responsible transplant surgeon (not discarded before or during procurement)
  • Recipients:
  • All adult patients (>18 yrs old) eligible for renal transplantation during study duration.
  • Recipient consented for surgery, matched to a DCD kidney.

Who cannot join

  • Donor kidneys:
  • 1. Kidney allocated outside of Sweden according to Scandiatransplant allocation rules.
  • Recipients:
  • Paediatric patients (<18 yrs old).
  • Participation in other clinical drug or medical devices trials.
  • Patient subject to combined transplant of kidney + other organ.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Gabriel C Oniscu, MD, PhD, FRCS contact

+46-702768684

gabriel.oniscu@regionstockholm.se

Sweden3 sites
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital

    Gothenburg

    Åsa Noren, MD, PhD, +46702901819, asa.m.noren@vgregion.se

    Mihai Oltean, MD, PhD, +46704906156, asa.m.noren@vgregion.se

  • Skåne University Hospital

    Malmö

    Alireza Biglarnia, MD, PhD, +46702377818, alireza.biglarnia@med.lu.se

  • Akademiska Hospital

    Uppsala

    Amir Sedigh, MD, PhD, +46708750525, amir.sedigh@akademiska.se

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Oxygenated Perfusion for Enhanced Renal Function in Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) Kidney Transplants (OxyPERF) - A National Swedish Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the combination of Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) at the time of organ procurement with ex situ Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HMPO2) of kidneys recovered from donors after circulatory death (DCD) is superior to NRP alone. The researchers will learn if the combined use of these technologies provides a benefit in terms of kidney transplant outcomes. The researchers will also learn about the patient quality of life after these transplants and if the use of these technologies is cost efficient. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does NRP +HMPO2 provides a better DCD kidney function at 1 year post-transplant compared to NRP alone.
  • Are the postoperative complications and outcomes different between the two groups?
  • Is the quality of life of recipients different between the two groups?
  • Is the use of NRP +HMPO2 a cost effective strategy? Researchers will compare NRP and HMPO2 with NRP alone to see if the combined use of the technologies provides better transplant outcomes.
Read more

Participants will:

  • Receive a kidney treated with one of the two strategies.
  • Visit the clinic as per usual clinical practice for checkups and tests
  • Report on their quality of life pre and post transplant
  • Undergo a kidney biopsy at one year to forecast long term transplant function
Read the detailed description

The trial is designed as a randomised, controlled, multicentre superiority trial with the primary endpoint of eGFR at one year after kidney transplant. The trial will be carried out in the four academic hospitals with renal transplant programs in Sweden: Stockholm, Gothenburg, Malmo and Uppsala. Randomisation 1:1 and eCRF will be done using RedCap.

Each eligible kidney for the trial will be randomised 1:1 between the following groups:

Group 1 - control group: Following in-situ NRP and in-situ flushing, the kidney will be packed in a storage box and stored on ice until back-table preparation before transplantation at the recipient centre.

Group 2 - intervention group: Following in-situ NRP and in-situ flushing, the kidney will be placed on the Kidney Assist Transporter HMPO2 device and perfused with oxygenated Belzers Machine Preservation Solution at a pulsatile pressure of 25 mmHg starting immediately after retrieval until back-table preparation before kidney transplantation at the transplant centre. Oxygen will be delivered at a rate of 100 ml/min via an oxygenator from a portable oxygen cylinder, resulting in a partial oxygen tension in the perfusate of 90 kPa (for reference, +/- 675 mmHg).

Kidney donors All standard allocation rules and recipient matching will be undertaken according to standard practice. Randomisation 1:1 of the kidneys between the two study arms will be done once the recovery of the organs is completed successfully with NRP and both kidneys are accepted for transplant. One kidney will be allocated to static cold storage preservation arm and the other to HMPO2 arm. If both kidneys are transplanted at the same centre, an additional stratification will determine which kidney will be transplanted first. If only one kidney is recovered or allocated to a Swedish centre, this will be randomised following a kidney alone randomisation procedure. Kidneys will be shared between the four transplant centres according to clinical protocols in place. The care of the donor and the NRP recovery procedure, will be performed according to standard practice.

Kidney recipients Written consent regarding trial participation will be sought from all patients on the waiting list or for the newly listed patients, at the time of listing. Kidney recipients will be selected according to national organ allocation rules, independent of participation in the trial. Surgery will be performed according to local clinical protocols and postoperative care managed according to standard of care. During the follow-up, biopsies will be performed according to the local standard of care and if indicated for clinical management. At the end of the one year follow up, a renal biopsy will be taken to determine the iBox score. The clinical care of the patients will reflect the current standard of care at the recipient hospital with no deviation from routine care protocols.

Modifications

  • Since the intervention is a one-time event occurring prior to transplantation, the assigned study intervention will not need to be modified or discontinued once the kidney is transplanted.
  • If the machine fails, the kidney will be end up being cold stored on the device. If these kidneys are transplanted, the recipient will still be included in the secondary modified intention-to-treat analysis according to the treatment actually received.

Adherence Since the intervention occurs prior to the transplantation procedure, there are no measures to assure adherence to study intervention. For data collection, all variables beside the 1-year study biopsy are part of standard of care after kidney transplantation so no additional measures are needed. As one year biopsy is not part of routine care in all centres, all study participants will be consented for the biopsy and will have the option to opt out. A subgroup analysis will be undertaken in those patients for whom a one year biopsy is undertaken. All study participants that consented to participation, will receive a written invitation for the biopsy performed at the local centre.

Follow up visits All follow-up visits and endpoint measures besides the 1-year biopsy are standard of care after renal transplantation in Sweden. The patient will receive an invitation for the 1-year biopsy if they've signed the informed consent for biopsy. Data will be collected from patient medical records after informed consent. Data will be accessed in medical records.

During the trial the following data will be retrieved:

  • Donor demographics
  • Recipient demographics
  • NRP and Preservation parameters
  • Surgical and clinical variables
  • Graft and patient survival
  • Follow-up data (including complications, adverse events, biopsy and biochemical markers)

Variables and data collection Data will be collected on RedCap for the trial. All blood sampling will be undertaken as part of the routine clinical follow-up with additional study specific samples as above.

Recruitment Approximately 100 kidney transplants from DCD donors are performed each year in Sweden. Although these numbers are expected to increase by about 20%-30% over the next 3 years, researchers planned recruitment on the current level of activity and are confident that 107 eligible kidney pair recipients will be recruited in 36 months (allowing for a the drop out in follow-up and for organs allocated in Scandiatransplant in the STAMP exchange and the payback system between countries). The researchers therefore estimate an enrolment of about 214 DCD kidney transplants during the study period.

Study duration The study is planned to start in January 2027 and with patient inclusion between March 2027 and December 2029, with a one year follow until December 2030. Written summary and presentation of findings in peer-reviewed journals is planned to be completed by March 2031.

Being tested
Ex situ hypothermic oxygenated machine preservation
Keywords
DCD kidneys, Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP), Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion, Patient reported outcomes, Kidney transplants, Randomised Control Trial, Health economic analysis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ex situ hypothermic oxygenated machine preservationDevice

    Ex situ preservation of NRP DCD kidneys with hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion

Study groups in NCT07779187
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NRP + HMPO2ExperimentalDCD kidneys recovered with NRP and undergoing ex situ HMPO2 initiated at donor hospital as the intervention
Receives: Device: Ex situ hypothermic oxygenated machine preservation
NRP aloneNo interventionDCD kidneys recovered with NRP followed by static cold storage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Renal function after transplantation

    Renal function estimated by the glomerular filtration rate at 1 year after transplantation as determined by the Lund Malmö revised formula for eGFR calculated based on creatinine value

    Measured: One year after transplantation

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. 1. the iBox score at one year

    iBOX scoring system is an innovative composite endpoint that has been validated by EMEA and FDA as the first surrogate end point for clinical studies. iBox is a risk prediction score that utilises multiple clinical and pathological relevant features (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibody, and kidney graft biopsy histopathology) at one-year post-transplant to predict the likelihood of the transplanted kidney to fail over fixed intervals (3, 5, and 7 years). The output is presented as a continuous mathematical percentage and the score is interpreted as the absolute statistical risk of losing the kidney graft.

    Measured: One year after transplantation

  2. Graft (uncensored and censored for recipient death) survival

    Survival rate of kidney transplant

    Measured: One year after transplant

  3. Patient survival

    Proportion of patient survivint

    Measured: One year after transplantation

  4. Delayed graft function

    Need for dialysis for all causes within the first 7 days after kidney transplantation.

    Measured: 7 days after transplantation

  5. Postoperative complications

    Post operative complications measured by the comprehensive complication index (CCI). CCI ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting higher number and more severe complications

    Measured: Three months and one year after transplant

  6. Incidence of acute rejection

    The proportion of patients having biopsy proven acute rejection episodes

    Measured: One year after transplantation

  7. Health economic analysis

    Health economic analysis and cost effectiveness analysis of using ex situ oxygenated machine perfusion in addition to NRP in DCD kidney transplantation

    Measured: One year post transplantation

  8. Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL)

    Recipient health related quality of life post transplantation measured specifically for individuals with chronic kidney disease. Range 0-100 with higher values reflecting better quality of life.

    Measured: Three months and one year after transplantation

  9. Kidney transplant questionnaire KTQ-25

    Evaluates the health related quality of life specifically in patients who have undergone a kidney transplant on a 7 point Likert scale with lower score reflecting a worse state.

    Measured: Three months and one year post transplant

  10. EQ-5D-5L

    A measure of generic health related quality of life and health status with three dimensions:

    • health state profile (range from 11111 -perfect health to 55555 worst health)
    • utility score (with a score of 1 representing perfect health and a score of 0 representing a health state equivalent to death)
    • visual analogue score ranging from 0 -worst health to 100 - best health

    Measured: Three months and one year post transplant.

  11. 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    Patient reported health-related quality of life measured on a 0-100 scale where 100 represents the best status and 0 the worst status.

    Measured: Three months and one year post transplant

  12. Biomarkers of kidney injury

    We will also measure various biomarkers of kidney injury and inflammation in perfusate, tissue, and blood samples, including lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, cardiolipin, Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin, Kidney Injury Molecule-1, Glutathione S-transferase, interleukin-18, fatty acid binding protein, and microRNA 21 and proteomic analyses.

    Measured: One year post transplantation

  13. Donor derived cell free DNA

    Quantification of kidney injury post transplant measured as absolute quantification and fractional abundance

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  14. D-dimers

    Measures the risk of microthrombosis in the kidney transplant with higher levels indicating micro thrombosis of the kidney.

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  15. Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL)

    Measures the level of acute kidney injury with higher level denoting more sever injuries.

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  16. cardiolipin antibodies

    Measures the risk of vascular complications and early graft failure with higher level denoting increased risk of transplant failure.

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  17. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1)

    Non invasive biomarker of early proximal tubular injury with level and risk of DGF and acute rejection

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  18. Glutathione S-Transferase (GST)

    Biomaker of kidney injury measuring the level of cellular damage in the kidney transplant with higher levels suggesting a greater degree of damage

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  19. Interleukin-18 (IL-18)

    Biomarker measured in the urine to identify acute ischemic and inflammatory injuries with higher levels indicating greater damage.

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  20. Liver-type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein (L-FABP)

    Non-invasive urine biomarker used to detect allograft ischemia and oxidative stress

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  21. microRNA-21 (miR-21)

    Non-invasive genetic biomarker to predict delayed graft function and monitor the progression of chronic tissue scarring.

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

  22. Urinary proteome analysis

    Cutting-edge diagnostic tool in kidney transplantation [1]. Instead of tracking a single protein, it measures patterns of hundreds of distinct protein fragments simultaneously to detect early allograft rejection and predict long-term organ survival.

    Measured: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
214 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07779187
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-01149
Other IDs
2025
Acronym
OxyPerf
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
17 Aug 2026
Last updated
21 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Merani S, Urban M, Westphal SG, Dong J, Miles CD, Maskin A, Hoffman A, Langnas AN. Improved Early Post-Transplant Outcomes and Organ Use in Kidney Transplant Using Normothermic Regional Perfusion for Donation after Circulatory Death: National Experience in the US. J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jan 1;238(1):107-118. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000880. Epub 2023 Sep 29.

    PubMed 37772721
  • Hessheimer AJ, Coll E, Torres F, Ruiz P, Gastaca M, Rivas JI, Gomez M, Sanchez B, Santoyo J, Ramirez P, Parrilla P, Marin LM, Gomez-Bravo MA, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Lopez-Monclus J, Bosca A, Lopez-Andujar R, Fundora-Suarez J, Villar J, Garcia-Sesma A, Jimenez C, Rodriguez-Laiz G, Llado L, Rodriguez JC, Barrera M, Charco R, Lopez-Baena JA, Briceno J, Pardo F, Blanco G, Pacheco D, Dominguez-Gil B, Sanchez Turrion V, Fondevila C. Normothermic regional perfusion vs. super-rapid recovery in controlled donation after circulatory death liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2019 Apr;70(4):658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.013. Epub 2018 Dec 22.

    PubMed 30582980
  • Mirshekar-Syahkal B, Summers D, Bradbury LL, Aly M, Bardsley V, Berry M, Norris JM, Torpey N, Clatworthy MR, Bradley JA, Pettigrew GJ. Local Expansion of Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Activity Improves Waitlisted Outcomes and Addresses Inequities of Access to Transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2017 Feb;17(2):390-400. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13968. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

    PubMed 27428662
  • Jochmans I, Brat A, Davies L, Hofker HS, van de Leemkolk FEM, Leuvenink HGD, Knight SR, Pirenne J, Ploeg RJ; COMPARE Trial Collaboration and Consortium for Organ Preservation in Europe (COPE). Oxygenated versus standard cold perfusion preservation in kidney transplantation (COMPARE): a randomised, double-blind, paired, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1653-1662. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32411-9.

    PubMed 33220737
  • Moers C, Pirenne J, Paul A, Ploeg RJ; Machine Preservation Trial Study Group. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):770-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1111038. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22356343
  • Schutter R, Moers C, Jochmans I, Gallinat A, Paul A, Treckmann J, Pirenne J, Monbaliu D, Strelniece A, Tieken I, Vogelaar S, Rahmel A, Leuvenink HGD, Ploeg RJ; Machine Preservation Trial Study Group. Cold Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Deceased-Donor Kidneys - at 10 Years. N Engl J Med. 2025 Nov 6;393(18):1859-1861. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2406608. No abstract available.

    PubMed 41191948
  • Oniscu GC, Mehew J, Butler AJ, Sutherland A, Gaurav R, Hogg R, Currie I, Jones M, Watson CJE. Improved Organ Utilization and Better Transplant Outcomes With In Situ Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death. Transplantation. 2023 Feb 1;107(2):438-448. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004280. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

    PubMed 35993664

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ex situ hypothermic oxygenated machine preservation in people with Kidney Transplant and DCD Kidney, run by Karolinska University Hospital at 3 sites in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gabriel C Oniscu, MD, PhD, FRCS (+46-702768684, gabriel.oniscu@regionstockholm.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Renal function after transplantation (time frame: One year after transplantation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07779187, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in