AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationSTEPP-3NCT07774104

A Structured Peer Support Intervention for Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

A study testing STEPP in people with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 3 sites in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized clinical trial is evaluating the impact of a structured peer support intervention (STEPP) on psychological distress and quality of life among patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
What is being tested?
STEPP
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
350 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Dec 2026to 31 Jul 2030
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (aged 18 years and older) with hematologic malignancies, scheduled to undergo autologous or allogeneic HSCT
  • Ability to speak, read, and respond to questions in English or Spanish to complete study procedures

Who cannot join

  • Patients undergoing HSCT for benign hematologic conditions
  • Patients with acute or unstable psychiatric or cognitive conditions (e.g., dementia) which the treating clinicians believe prohibits informed consent or compliance with study procedures
  • Patients undergoing HSCT for the second time

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Hermioni Amonoo, MD, MPP, MPH contact

617-732-5056

hermioni_amonoo@dfci.harvard.edu

Erica Chen, BS contact

echen43@bwh.harvard.edu

United States3 sites
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

    Hermioni Amonoo, MD, MPP, MPH, Hermioni_Amonoo@dfci.harvard.edu

  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

    Stephanie J Lee, MD, MPH, sjlee@fredhutch.org

  • Moffitt Cancer Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

    Heather Jim, PhD, heather.jim@moffitt.org

Other trials in United States

About this study

This randomized clinical trial is evaluating the impact of a structured peer support intervention (STEPP) on psychological distress and quality of life among patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Read the detailed description

Although peer support interventions benefit patients throughout the cancer care continuum, most existing interventions have been developed and tested in patients with solid tumors. Patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can especially benefit from structured peer support interventions to potentially address persistent gaps in psychosocial care. In the absence of evidence-based structured peer support interventions for HSCT recipients, the study investigators developed the STEPP intervention. STEPP pairs patients with HSCT survivors who are trained by clinical psychologists to deliver five manualized phone sessions prior to transplantation and through acute recovery. With this multi-site randomized clinical trial, the investigators aim to find out whether STEPP can improve psychological distress and quality of life, compared to a minimally enhanced usual care control condition, using validated assessment tools.

Being tested
STEPP, Minimally Enhanced Usual Care Control
Keywords
Peer Support, Stem Cell Transplantation, Psychological Distress, Social Support

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • STEPPBehavioural

    STEPP, a phone-delivered structured peer support intervention for patients preparing to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), consists of five sessions which integrates evidence-based strategies from cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and positive psychology with informational, emotional, and practical support. STEPP is manualized and delivered by an HSCT survivor who is trained and supervised by a clinical psychologist.

  • Minimally Enhanced Usual Care ControlOther

    The minimally enhanced usual care control condition entail standard psychosocial care provided by social work and a comprehensive list of peer support resources available through participants academic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers and national organizations.

Study groups in NCT07774104
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Structured Peer Support Program (STEPP)ExperimentalParticipants recruited from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Moffitt Cancer Center, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center who are randomized to the intervention/experimental arm will receive the STEPP intervention, which pairs patients preparing for their transplant hospitalization with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors for informational, emotional, and practical support. Participants will complete questionnaires (in person, over the computer or telephone, or by mail) at predetermined days per protocol.
Receives: Behavioral: STEPP
Minimally Enhanced Usual CareOtherParticipants recruited from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Moffitt Cancer Center, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center who are randomized to the minimally enhanced usual care control arm will receive standard psychosocial care provided by social work plus a comprehensive list of local, regional, and national peer support resources. Participants will complete questionnaires (in person, via computer or telephone, or by mail) at predetermined days per protocol.
Receives: Other: Minimally Enhanced Usual Care Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Anxiety Symptoms based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale

    Compare anxiety symptoms between the two groups at 8 weeks using the 7-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A).

    The HADS-A subscale score ranges from 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms.

    Measured: 8 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Anxiety Symptoms based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale

    Compare anxiety symptoms longitudinally between the two groups using the 7-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) subscale.

    The HADS-A subscale score ranges from 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms.

    Measured: 8 weeks to 24 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)

  2. Patient-Reported Quality of Life based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT)

    Compare quality of life longitudinally between the two groups using the 47-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT).

    The FACT-BMT consists of 5 subscales assessing well-being across the following domains: physical, functional, emotional, social, and bone marrow transplant symptoms. The FACT-BMT total score ranges from 0-148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: Up to 24 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)

  3. Patient-reported self-efficacy based on the Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale- transplant (CASE-t)

    Compare self-efficacy longitudinally between the two groups using the 17-item Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale- transplant (CASE-t).

    The CASE-t score ranges from 0-170, with higher scores indicating higher levels of patient's confidence in managing the impacts of transplant.

    Measured: Up to 24 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)

  4. Patient-reported perceived social support based on the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS).

    Compare social support longitudinally between the two groups using the 19-item Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS).

    The MOS Social Support Survey score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of patient's perceived social support

    Measured: Up to 24 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
350 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07774104
Sponsor's protocol ID
26-274
Other IDs
R01CA309099
Acronym
STEPP-3
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
14 Aug 2026
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing STEPP in people with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hermioni Amonoo, MD, MPP, MPH (617-732-5056, hermioni_amonoo@dfci.harvard.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Anxiety Symptoms based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale (time frame: 8 weeks (+/- 2 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in