AzTrials
AzTrials

Physical FitnessNCT07769411

Effects of a 12-Week Dance Intervention on Physical Fitness and Cognitive Function in Female College Students

A study testing 12-Week Dance Intervention and Regular Physical Education in people with Physical Fitness and Cognitive Function, run by Jiangsu University of Science and Technology at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aimed to examine the effects of a 12-week dance intervention on physical fitness and cognitive function in female college students. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted among 108 first-year female college students from two intact physical education classes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 20 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Physical Fitness, Cognitive Function
What is being tested?
12-Week Dance Intervention and Regular Physical Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
108 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Mar 2026to 2 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 20 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female students aged 18-20 years. First-year college students enrolled in one of the two participating physical education classes.
  • No formal dance training during the previous six months. Medically able to participate in moderate-intensity exercise, as confirmed by the university annual health screening.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosed neurological or psychological disorders that could affect cognitive testing.
  • Major musculoskeletal injuries that could interfere with participation in physical activity.
  • Cardiovascular conditions or other contraindications that could make exercise unsafe.
  • Language or cognitive difficulties preventing valid completion of questionnaires or cognitive tests.
  • Failure to meet the inclusion criteria or refusal to participate before allocation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Jiangsu University of Science and Technology

    Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212100

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effects of Dance on Cognitive Function and Physical Fitness Among Female College Students

This study aimed to examine the effects of a 12-week dance intervention on physical fitness and cognitive function in female college students. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted among 108 first-year female college students from two intact physical education classes. The two classes were assigned to either a dance intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group received a 12-week dance program during university physical education classes, while participants in the control group continued their regular physical education program. Physical fitness was assessed using lung capacity, sit-and-reach, standing long jump, 50-m sprint, and 1000-m run tests. Cognitive function was assessed using the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), Adult Executive Functioning Inventory (ADEXI), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Assessments were conducted before and after the 12-week intervention to compare changes between the two groups.

Read the detailed description

This study was designed as a 12-week cluster-randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of dance participation on physical fitness and cognitive function among female college students. Participants were recruited from two intact physical education classes at Jiangsu University of Science and Technology. A total of 108 eligible first-year female students participated in the study.

Randomization was performed at the class level. The two intact classes were randomly allocated to either the experimental group (n=54) or the control group (n=54). The experimental group participated in a structured dance intervention during university physical education classes for 12 weeks. The dance program emphasized rhythmic movement, repeated practice of dance steps and turns, coordination, expressive movement, and short dance routines. The control group continued the regular university physical education program, which included activities such as running, ball games, and general fitness exercises.

Physical fitness and cognitive function were assessed before and after the intervention. Physical fitness assessments included lung capacity, sit-and-reach flexibility, standing long jump, 50-m sprint, and 1000-m run. Cognitive assessments included the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), Adult Executive Functioning Inventory (ADEXI), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). The study compared changes from baseline to post-intervention between the experimental and control groups.

Being tested
12-Week Dance Intervention, Regular Physical Education
Keywords
Dance, Female College Students, Exercise, Physical Fitness, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial, Cognitive Function
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 12-Week Dance InterventionBehavioural

    A structured dance program delivered during university physical education classes for 12 weeks. The intervention focused on rhythmic movement, dance steps, turns, coordination, expressive movement, and short dance routines.

  • Regular Physical EducationBehavioural

    Participants continued their regular university physical education program during the 12-week study period, including running, ball games, fitness drills, and general skill practice.

Study groups in NCT07769411
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dance Intervention GroupExperimentalParticipants in this group received a structured 12-week dance intervention during university physical education classes. The program included rhythmic movement, repeated practice of dance steps and turns, coordination exercises, expressive movement, and short dance routines.
Receives: Behavioral: 12-Week Dance Intervention
Regular Physical Education Control GroupActive comparatorParticipants in this group continued the regular university physical education program during the 12-week study period, including running, ball games, fitness drills, and general skill practice.
Receives: Behavioral: Regular Physical Education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Lung Capacity

    Lung capacity was measured in milliliters (mL) using the standardized National Student Physical Health Standard (2014 Revision). Higher values indicate greater lung capacity. Change from baseline to immediately after the 12-week intervention was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)

  2. Change in Sit-and-Reach Flexibility

    Sit-and-reach performance was measured in centimeters (cm) using the standardized National Student Physical Health Standard (2014 Revision). Higher values indicate greater flexibility. Change from baseline to immediately after the 12-week intervention was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)

  3. Change in Standing Long Jump

    Standing long jump performance was measured in centimeters (cm) using the standardized National Student Physical Health Standard (2014 Revision). Greater distance indicates better lower-limb explosive power. Change from baseline to immediately after the 12-week intervention was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)

  4. Change in 50-Meter Sprint Performance

    The 50-meter sprint was used to assess running speed and was recorded in seconds (s). Lower completion times indicate better sprint performance. Change from baseline to immediately after the 12-week intervention was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)

  5. Change in 1000-Meter Run Performance

    The 1000-meter run was used to assess endurance performance and was recorded in minutes (min). Lower completion times indicate better endurance performance. Change from baseline to immediately after the 12-week intervention was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)

  6. Change in Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) Score

    The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) consists of 25 items assessing everyday lapses in attention, memory, and action. Higher scores indicate more frequent cognitive failures. Change in total score from baseline to immediately after the 12-week intervention was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)

  7. Change in Adult Executive Functioning Inventory (ADEXI) Score

    The Adult Executive Functioning Inventory (ADEXI) consists of 14 items assessing working memory and inhibitory control. Higher scores indicate poorer executive functioning. Change in total score from baseline to immediately after the 12-week intervention was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)

  8. Change in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Score

    The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) was used to assess processing speed and attention. Participants matched digits with corresponding symbols within 90 seconds. Higher scores indicate better processing speed and attention. Change in score from baseline to immediately after the 12-week intervention was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completion2 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion2 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study used a cluster-randomized, parallel-group design. Two intact physical education classes were randomized at the class level to either a 12-week dance intervention group or a regular physical education control group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
108 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07769411
Sponsor's protocol ID
JUST-DANCE-2026-001
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
14 Aug 2026
Last updated
19 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the publication will be available upon reasonable request. Shared data may include participant-level baseline characteristics, physical fitness outcomes, and cognitive function outcomes. No directly identifying participant information will be shared.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 12-Week Dance Intervention and Regular Physical Education in people with Physical Fitness and Cognitive Function, run by Jiangsu University of Science and Technology at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Lung Capacity (time frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention (12 weeks)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in