AzTrials
AzTrials

Hypoxic-Ischemic EncephalopathyCOOLDECIDENCT07764315

EEG-Based Decision-Support Algorithm for Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in Term Newborns

An observational study of Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy and Perinatal Asphyxia, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluates how well a decision-support algorithm can tell apart mild forms of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) from moderate or severe forms in full-term newborns born after a lack of oxygen around birth (perinatal asphyxia). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 0 days to 1 day
How many people
310 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
16 Sep 2026to 16 Feb 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 0 days to 1 day
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Term newborns ≥ 36 weeks gestational age, birth weight ≥ 1800 g, with suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a context of perinatal asphyxia, whose non-compressed conventional EEG recordings are available in participating centers.

Who may be able to join

  • No parental opposition to the use of the child's medical data within 1 month of the mailed information notice
  • Gestational age ≥ 36 weeks of amenorrhea
  • Birth weight ≥ 1800 g
  • Born in a context of perinatal asphyxia (any cause) leading to suspected HIE, with EITHER biological signs of metabolic acidosis (pH ≤ 7 or base deficit ≥ 16 mmol/L or lactate ≥ 11 mmol/L within the first hour of life, any blood sample) OR a history of asphyxia with Apgar ≤ 5 at 10 minutes or need for ventilatory resuscitation continued at 10 minutes of life
  • Non-compressed conventional EEG (EEGc) recorded before the 6th hour of life
  • EEG including the signal of active electrodes Fp1, Fp2, T3 and T4

Who cannot join

  • Participation in a therapeutic biomedical research liable to modify the EEG tracing
  • Fewer than 20 minutes of artifact-free EEG recording
  • Signal from active electrodes Fp1, Fp2, T3 and T4 not exploitable

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Mathilde LETOUZEY, M.D contact

+ 33171738599

mathilde.letouzey@aphp.fr

About this study

Official title: Retrospective Multicenter Validation of a Conventional EEG-Based Decision-Support Algorithm to Discriminate Mild Versus Moderate/Severe Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in Term Newborns (Newborn Neuro Digital Project)

This retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluates how well a decision-support algorithm can tell apart mild forms of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) from moderate or severe forms in full-term newborns born after a lack of oxygen around birth (perinatal asphyxia). The algorithm reads the raw (non-compressed) EEG signal. Its output is compared with the reference reading of the full conventional EEG made by a panel of pediatric neurophysiologists together with the baby's clinical information. The study uses only medical data that already exists and asks nothing of the babies or their families.

Read the detailed description

The algorithm under investigation was developed in a previous retrospective clinical study (registered as NCT05114070; French CNIL/ethics ref CER-2021-023; approved by the Sorbonne University ethics committee) and is based on background-rhythm analysis of EEG. Newborns are analyzed in two subgroups: those who received a treatment liable to modify the EEG tracing, and those who did not. Conventional EEG recordings are collected from the neurophysiology departments of participating level-3 maternity hospitals over the period 01 January 2016 to 30 April 2026. No follow-up or sampling is performed.

Keywords
conventional EEG, therapeutic hypothermia, decision-support software, term newborn, diagnostic accuracy, medical device software
Medical subject headings
Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07764315
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Term newborns with suspected HIESingle study population: term newborns (≥ 36 weeks, ≥ 1800 g) with suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a context of perinatal asphyxia, with an available non-compressed conventional EEG. This is a diagnostic-accuracy validation study (STARD), not a comparative two-arm design. The treated / untreated distinction is a pre-specified analysis subgroup only, not a study group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm versus the gold standard for discriminating mild vs moderate/severe HIE

    Diagnostic performance computed against the reference EEG reading by pediatric neurophysiologists complemented by clinical data; 95% confidence intervals by the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.

    Measured: Within the first 6 hours of life

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. PPV, NPV, false-alarm ratio, accuracy, balanced accuracy and F1-score of the algorithm vs gold standard (overall and by subgroup)

    Secondary diagnostic-performance metrics computed overall and within the treated / untreated subgroups.

    Measured: Within the first 6 hours of life

  2. Proportion of transfers not leading to therapeutic hypothermia

    Share of included newborns not treated by therapeutic hypothermia at the time, including those transferred from a level 1/2a/2b maternity or managed within the same facility.

    Measured: During the initial hospitalization (up to 28 days of life)

  3. Evaluate the inter-rater agreement between the first two expert neurophysiologists

    Inter-rater agreement will be assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), with a 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: EEG recordings from the first 6 hours of life

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2026
  2. Study start16 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion16 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion16 Feb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
310 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07764315
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP261081
Acronym
COOLDECIDE
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
3 Aug 2026
Last updated
13 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: AP-HP is the sole owner of the data. Individual participant data are not planned to be shared; any use or transmission to a third party requires the sponsor's prior authorization, under conditions ensuring confidentiality and a level of protection equivalent to EU legislation.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy and Perinatal Asphyxia, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mathilde LETOUZEY, M.D (+ 33171738599, mathilde.letouzey@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm versus the gold standard for discriminating mild vs moderate/severe HIE (time frame: Within the first 6 hours of life). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in