CancerEBRTNCT07754864
Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Education on Pre-treatment Anxiety, Post-treatment Experience, and Satisfaction Among Adult Patients Diagnosed With Cancer Receiving External Beam Radiotherapy in Oman
A study testing VR-based education in people with Cancer, run by Oman Ministry of Health at 1 site in Oman.
Trial summary
Introduction: External Beam Radiotherapy is a common strategy used in the treatment of various cancers, and the patient undergoing treatment using this strategy many times experiences anxiety and stress. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- VR-based education
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 siteOman
- Study dates
- 9 Feb 2026to Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients aged 18 years or above
- Willing to participate
- Provide informed consent
- Scheduled for their first external beam radiotherapy treatment
Who cannot join
- Pediatric cancer patients
- Scheduled for head \& neck external beam radiotherapy
- Previously underwent radiotherapy treatment
- Have severe visual or hearing difficulties
- Require emergency radiotherapy treatment
- Have a history of psychiatric illness
Show all 9Show fewer
- Require ICU admission
- Experience severe motion sickness or vertigo
- Unable to tolerate the VR headset
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Introduction: External Beam Radiotherapy is a common strategy used in the treatment of various cancers, and the patient undergoing treatment using this strategy many times experiences anxiety and stress. While patient education is essential for anxiety management, traditional methods may not adequately address the complex needs of patients in Oman, where no standardized pre-treatment education protocols exist. Virtual Reality (VR) technology offers promising potential for enhancing patient education and reducing anxiety.
Purpose/Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based education in reducing anxiety levels, improving treatment experience, and increasing satisfaction among adult patients with cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in Oman.
Read more
Research Design: A randomized control trial will be conducted with 122 patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy from SQCCCRC (Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care \& Research Center) and the National Oncology Center (NOC) in Royal Hospital. These patients will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (VR-based education) or the control group (standard education). The intervention group will view an educational VR video via immersive headsets, while the control group will receive standard care.
Study Instruments: Anxiety levels will be measured using the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI), the Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ) will be used to measure treatment experience, and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) will be used to measure patient satisfaction.
Plan for Data Analysis: The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29 will be used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics in terms of mean, standard deviation, frequencies, and percentages will be used to summarize patient characteristics. Paired t-tests will be used to compare pre- and post-intervention anxiety levels within each group. Independent t-tests will be used to assess differences between the intervention and control groups. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to control confounding variables such as age, education level, and baseline anxiety scores.
Expected Outcomes: The researcher predicts that VR education will lower anxiety levels while delivering better patient experiences and higher satisfaction than traditional education methods. Current study findings will guide patient education protocol development and help to establish standardized pre-radiotherapy education guideline standards in Oman
Read the detailed description
Introduction Cancer and its treatments often inflict considerable physical and psychological distress on patients, despite advancements in treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Among these treatments, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a common method that utilizes ionizing radiation to target and eradicate malignant cells. However, the experience can be daunting for patients, often leading to anxiety. To mitigate these adverse psychological effects, patient education has emerged as a crucial component of cancer care by providing patients with comprehensive information about their condition, the necessity for radiotherapy, and the technology involved, healthcare professionals can alleviate concerns and improve understanding. The abstract nature of radiation and its potential side effects can be difficult to visualize, leading to heightened anxiety and misperceptions. In recent years, virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing patient education and support in various healthcare settings. VR offers an immersive, computer-generated simulation of real or imagined environments, providing users with a sense of presence and interaction. In the context of cancer care, VR can illustrate the objectives and processes of radiotherapy in a visually compelling manner, which is difficult to achieve with traditional methods, by allowing patients to virtually experience the radiotherapy process. VR interventions have been associated with significant reductions in anxiety.
Cancer Care in Oman:
Cancer is a significant health concern in Oman and is the leading cause of death, accounting for 6% of all disease-related mortality. The Oman National Cancer Registry, established in 1985, plays a crucial role in monitoring cancer incidence and trends; as a result, cancer diagnosis notification has been mandatory since 2001, ensuring comprehensive data collection. Radiation therapy was not available in Oman; the government sponsored approximately 250 patients annually to receive radiation treatment abroad before 2004. The National Oncology Center (NOC) at the Royal Hospital in Muscat, launched in 2004, is the oldest center and treats around 70% of all cancer cases in Oman.
External Beam Radiotherapy External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) is an external irradiation source, usually a linear generator, that is used in this procedure to precisely administer high levels of radiation to cancer regions while lowering the dosage to nearby healthy tissues. To meet patients' psychological and physical requirements as they progress throughout the complicated radiation treatment (RT) process, patient education is crucial. Patients may experience physical and psychological impacts from RT and cancer treatment. Many patients experience anxiety, particularly at the commencement of treatment. Traditional methods include slides, printed materials, and in-person interactions, as well as video materials that have improved patient satisfaction and decreased anxiety. Virtual Reality (VR) is a powerful tool for patient education, as immersive virtual experiences can decrease anxiety. Virtual integration of patient education in radiotherapy (VIPER), using videoconferencing, is a feasible and acceptable method for patient education. Although the combined client-provider decision-making guidelines allow the multidisciplinary healthcare team to repeat and strengthen training and give patients several chances to raise concerns, it can also result in unequal education, misunderstandings, and false presumptions. One typical emotional reaction to malignancy is anxiety while preparing for radiotherapy. Long before the initial consultation, patients want to know about the radiation process. A patient's request for details is influenced by several aspects, such as who they are interested in receiving it from, at what time they want it, and in what style. The Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ) can measure how patients experience the external RT session process and the environment in the treatment room.
Virtual Reality in Healthcare:
Over the past two decades, VR has found various applications in healthcare, offering immersive and non-immersive experiences. VR has evolved through two generations of technology: First-generation SLEs used machines to replicate real-life experiences, while more recent advancements include sophisticated software and hardware. VR enhances patient understanding of medical treatments like radiation therapy. For instance, VR can be used to educate patients about the radiotherapy process, reducing anxiety. VR serves as a distraction intervention to relieve symptoms such as anxiety. It is used during medical procedures to reduce anxiety. Studies have shown VR's effectiveness in reducing anxiety, particularly in patients undergoing medical interventions and cancer treatment. VR offers oncology sufferers emotional, physical, and emotional assistance.
Virtual Reality and Patient Education:
Virtual Reality (VR) can be enjoyable, which is important for learning, as a pleasant experience means higher engagement and understanding. VR educational sessions reduce their anxiety levels and allow patients to utilize audio and geographical aspects during radiation treatments to have an actual treatment experience. Personalized VR experiences can give patients a better understanding of how radiotherapy will be used to treat their cancer and can decrease anxiety. VR-based education is feasible and acceptable about their illness and satisfaction with treatment. VR experience should be guided by a healthcare professional considering the timing of the experience and its incorporation into an education session. Studies show that VR educational sessions can enhance cancer patients' preparation for radiation therapy by increasing their understanding of treatment and reducing anxiety. Patients with poor health literacy abilities may benefit most from media in the form of video tutorials. VRRT provides RT clients with a novel educational experience, particularly in allowing them to see how to treat and the significance of their position during treatment and the physical location within the human body. Patients are highly satisfied and experience enhanced understanding with VR education tools. Patients appreciate the 3D vision display provided by VR, which effectively improves RT understanding. Patients' knowledge requirements on the RT procedure can be met using virtual reality (VR), which enables them to communicate within the environment, familiarize themselves with the RT tools, and see what will occur throughout the course of treatment. Many patients request additional details that they are not provided. VR provides additional information that traditional teaching sessions cannot provide, with patients referring to VR video's capacity to improve comprehension of the treatment's visual and auditory features. Healthcare providers also report a significant amount of satisfaction using VR, recognizing its benefits for treatment and simplicity of application. RT units may benefit from including a virtual reality teaching setting as an additional patient education resource. VR offers an exceptional educational experience with minimal intervention from clinical staff. VR could minimize the need for one-on-one consultations, which could decrease the burden on employees. VR education should be individualized to meet the needs of each patient.
Anxiety in Cancer Patients:
Anxiety is a natural emotional reaction to receiving a cancer prognosis and receiving therapy. Cancer-related anxiety can lead to impaired social functioning and fatigue. Anxiety may arise from various reasons, including reaction to the cancer diagnosis, severe pain, long-term treatments, treatment side effects, and feeling of burden or dependence on others. Procedural anxiety can occur during or in anticipation of the procedure and may lead to behavioral disruptions, such as avoiding or terminating medical procedures. High levels of anxiety can negatively impact health, increasing treatment nonadherence, promoting unhealthy lifestyle factors, and chronically activating stress hormones. Anxiety can affect patients' learning capacity. Anxiety levels decrease once RT starts, falling from 29.9% to 17.4%. The State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) is commonly used to measure procedural anxiety. To minimize anxiety, successful instruction needs to tackle patient issues, give sufficient details for consent to be informed, and get patients ready for the RT procedure, addressing potential adverse outcomes. Non-pharmacological interventions such as virtual reality (VR) have shown promise in reducing anxiety. Relaxation techniques and counseling are also recommended. Virtual reality (VR) is utilized to reduce anxiety and distress in cancer patients, offering relaxation through immersive experiences. Patients with cancer have different information requirements depending on the patient's age, gender, socioeconomic status, and level of education, as well as cultural differences that can affect how patients express and cope with anxiety. Patient education is a cornerstone of cancer treatment preparation. Providing information before, during, and after RT helps gain patient trust and ensures they feel valued. Education can alleviate concerns by informing patients about their ailment, the need for RT, and the technology used. Patients with inadequate health literacy could benefit most from interactive instructional videos. VR educational sessions can enhance cancer patients' preparation for radiation therapy by increasing their understanding of treatment and reducing anxiety. Pretreatment education through written materials and multimedia can reduce anxiety in patients undergoing radiotherapy. A radiotherapy therapist's declaration of a particular individual technique can lead to patients feeling more informed and greater satisfaction, although it may not always decrease anxiety.
Patient Experience:
The technical settings and instruments have a significant impact on the patient's treatment experience in the external radiotherapy (RT) context, as this is because the patient's view of RT processes and instruments is crucial to assess as a supplement to devices like treatment results and consistency. Patients and their caregivers may experience both the emotional and physical effects of radiation therapy. Mask-related anxiety can significantly affect the experience of patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Important roles are also played by data obstacles, health care professional (HCP) engagement, and incentives for improved information dissemination. The Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ) evaluates the patient's experiences of the external RT method, including anxiety and adapting throughout the external radiation therapy technique, as well as aims to evaluate the patient's impressions of the RT procedure and the therapeutic area setting. Information should be tailored based on patient characteristics, as certain clients would rather have fewer details or engage their relatives in their care to reduce their anxiety. Cultural factors can affect how patients express and cope with anxiety, and physicians may avoid informing patients of their diagnosis, with families disagreeing with disclosure. Patient experience significantly affects treatment adherence and outcomes. Patients who are unprepared, lack engagement, are unwilling to follow evidence-based radiation regimens that enhance clinical results, and have a diminished capacity for self-management of care. Disruption of treatment due to anxiety may have negative consequences for the outcome. Several strategies can enhance the patient's experience in radiotherapy, like providing patient-specific information and support by utilizing multiple teaching strategies available to them. Employing Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and patient advocacy to inform future studies. Using virtual reality (VR) to educate and prepare patients for radiotherapy. VR can reduce anxiety and enhance satisfaction. Offering calming video content during treatment. Creating a mindfulness-promoting environment with VR. Radiotherapy Therapists (RTTs) can provide pre-radiation treatment patient instructions to improve patients' anxiety and overall experiences. Making sure clients receive on-time and adequate instruction could help them feel less anxious before receiving radiation therapy and could also help address the related effects on patients and healthcare facilities. The use of interventions applicable to radiotherapy that are administered to improve patient comfort, increase patient compliance, and reduce patient anxiety.
Patient Satisfaction:
Patient satisfaction is influenced by a multitude of factors, reflecting the complex nature of healthcare delivery. Accessibility to healthcare services, including ease of access, convenience, and availability of care, significantly impacts patient satisfaction. Information provision plays a crucial role, as patients value being well-informed about their condition, treatment options, and potential side effects. Patient expectations are a critical determinant, with satisfaction resulting from a comparison of perceived performance or outcome in relation to these expectations. A positive patient experience can enhance confidence in the health system and help patients cope with the disease. Patient-centered care models that prioritize patient needs and preferences are essential. Providing comprehensive and accessible information about cancer, treatment options, and potential side effects empowers patients and enhances satisfaction. Enhancing the physical environment of healthcare facilities can create a more comfortable and welcoming experience for patients. Offering support services such as counseling, support groups, and palliative care can address the behavioral and emotional requirements of clients and their relatives. Utilizing virtual reality (VR) and other innovative technologies can improve patient education, reduce anxiety, and enhance the overall treatment experience. Continuous quality improvement initiatives that incorporate patient feedback can help identify areas for improvement and ensure that services meet patient expectations.
VR Applications in Radiotherapy:
VR applications in radiotherapy show promising results in various aspects of patient care and education. VR-based education programs enhance patients' comprehension of radiotherapy treatment. Patients report a better understanding of how radiotherapy will be used to treat their cancer after VR sessions. VR interventions are associated with significant reductions in anxiety related to radiotherapy. Patients report that VR improves their treatment experience, making it more tolerable. VR use during external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can lead to a significant decrease in heart rate, indicating reduced physiological distress. VR experiences increase patient engagement and satisfaction. VR is being implemented in various ways to support patients and improve radiotherapy education. VR applications provide detailed insights into upcoming procedures, helping patients understand the radiotherapy process. These tools often include simulated RT clinical equipment, such as linear accelerators and treatment couches, with realistic movements and sounds. VR allows patients to view a virtual simulation of themselves receiving radiotherapy, with visible radiation beams delivered to target volumes. Virtual environments for radiotherapy training (VERT) enhance understanding of radiation therapy planning concepts among staff.
Chapter Summary This chapter synthesizes key findings from the literature, provides a critical analysis of the evidence, presents the rationale for the current study, and outlines the framework for the methodology. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the context and justification for investigating the use of virtual reality (VR) in cancer care, particularly in the Omani context. The main gap in Arab countries, especially in Oman, is that no study addresses the effectiveness of VR-based education in patients with cancer undergoing EBRT.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- VR-based education
- Keywords
- Virtual Reality, Education, Anxiety, Treatment Experience, Patients Satisfaction, Cancer, External Beam Radiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VR-based educationDevice
an educational VR video via immersive headsets
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VR-based education group (intervention group) | Experimental | The intervention group will view an educational VR video via immersive headsets Receives: Device: VR-based education |
| The Control / Comparison group (standard education) | No intervention | The control group will receive standard care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anxiety
▪ Anxiety is measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); the scale ranges from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 80 per subscale, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome for anxiety
Measured: Up to 7 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Patient Experience
▪ Patient experience is measured using the Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ). Measures how patients experience the external radiation therapy session process and treatment room environment. The minimum value varies by individual subscale depending on the number of items (e.g., the individual item minimum is typically 1 or 0). The maximum value varies by individual subscale depending on item aggregation (multidimensional 23-item structure divided into specific themes). Higher scores on negative subscales (such as situational unease) reflect a worse outcome or higher distress, whereas higher scores on positive subscales (such as situational repose) reflect a better comfort outcome.
Measured: Up to 7 months
▪ Patient satisfaction
▪ Patient satisfaction is measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18). Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18): individual items are scored on a 1-to-5 Likert scale, where higher scores mean a better outcome (higher satisfaction).
Measured: Up to 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2026
- Study start9 Feb 2026
- Primary completionAug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- VR-based education group (The intervention group) will view an educational VR video via immersive headsets
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oman Ministry of Health
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07754864
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MoH/CSR/25/29966
- Other IDs
- BFP/GRG/HSS/25/039
- Acronym
- EBRT
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: All IPDs are confidential in this randomized clinical trial.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Education on Pre-treatment Anxiety, Post-treatment Experience, and Satisfaction Among Adult Patients Diagnosed With Cancer Receiving External Beam Radiotherapy in Oman
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07754864
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EBRT / MoH/CSR/25/29966
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- Virtual Reality, Education, Anxiety, Treatment Experience, Patients Satisfaction, Cancer, External Beam Radiotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Oman Ministry of HealthOther government
- Study start
- 9 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: External Beam Radiotherapy is a common strategy used in the treatment of various cancers, and the patient undergoing treatment using this strategy many times experiences anxiety and stress. While patient education is essential for anxiety management, traditional methods may not adequately address the complex needs of patients in Oman, where no standardized pre-treatment education protocols exist. Virtual Reality (VR) technology offers promising potential for enhancing patient education and reducing anxiety.
Purpose/Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based education in reducing anxiety levels, improving treatment experience, and increasing satisfaction among adult patients with cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in Oman.
Research Design: A randomized control trial will be conducted with 122 patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy from SQCCCRC (Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care \& Research Center) and the National Oncology Center (NOC) in Royal Hospital. These patients will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (VR-based education) or the control group (standard education). The intervention group will view an educational VR video via immersive headsets, while the control group will receive standard care.
Study Instruments: Anxiety levels will be measured using the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI), the Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ) will be used to measure treatment experience, and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) will be used to measure patient satisfaction.
Plan for Data Analysis: The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29 will be used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics in terms of mean, standard deviation, frequencies, and percentages will be used to summarize patient characteristics. Paired t-tests will be used to compare pre- and post-intervention anxiety levels within each group. Independent t-tests will be used to assess differences between the intervention and control groups. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to control confounding variables such as age, education level, and baseline anxiety scores.
Expected Outcomes: The researcher predicts that VR education will lower anxiety levels while delivering better patient experiences and higher satisfaction than traditional education methods. Current study findings will guide patient education protocol development and help to establish standardized pre-radiotherapy education guideline standards in Oman
Detailed description
Introduction Cancer and its treatments often inflict considerable physical and psychological distress on patients, despite advancements in treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Among these treatments, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a common method that utilizes ionizing radiation to target and eradicate malignant cells. However, the experience can be daunting for patients, often leading to anxiety. To mitigate these adverse psychological effects, patient education has emerged as a crucial component of cancer care by providing patients with comprehensive information about their condition, the necessity for radiotherapy, and the technology involved, healthcare professionals can alleviate concerns and improve understanding. The abstract nature of radiation and its potential side effects can be difficult to visualize, leading to heightened anxiety and misperceptions. In recent years, virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing patient education and support in various healthcare settings. VR offers an immersive, computer-generated simulation of real or imagined environments, providing users with a sense of presence and interaction. In the context of cancer care, VR can illustrate the objectives and processes of radiotherapy in a visually compelling manner, which is difficult to achieve with traditional methods, by allowing patients to virtually experience the radiotherapy process. VR interventions have been associated with significant reductions in anxiety.
Cancer Care in Oman:
Cancer is a significant health concern in Oman and is the leading cause of death, accounting for 6% of all disease-related mortality. The Oman National Cancer Registry, established in 1985, plays a crucial role in monitoring cancer incidence and trends; as a result, cancer diagnosis notification has been mandatory since 2001, ensuring comprehensive data collection. Radiation therapy was not available in Oman; the government sponsored approximately 250 patients annually to receive radiation treatment abroad before 2004. The National Oncology Center (NOC) at the Royal Hospital in Muscat, launched in 2004, is the oldest center and treats around 70% of all cancer cases in Oman.
External Beam Radiotherapy External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) is an external irradiation source, usually a linear generator, that is used in this procedure to precisely administer high levels of radiation to cancer regions while lowering the dosage to nearby healthy tissues. To meet patients' psychological and physical requirements as they progress throughout the complicated radiation treatment (RT) process, patient education is crucial. Patients may experience physical and psychological impacts from RT and cancer treatment. Many patients experience anxiety, particularly at the commencement of treatment. Traditional methods include slides, printed materials, and in-person interactions, as well as video materials that have improved patient satisfaction and decreased anxiety. Virtual Reality (VR) is a powerful tool for patient education, as immersive virtual experiences can decrease anxiety. Virtual integration of patient education in radiotherapy (VIPER), using videoconferencing, is a feasible and acceptable method for patient education. Although the combined client-provider decision-making guidelines allow the multidisciplinary healthcare team to repeat and strengthen training and give patients several chances to raise concerns, it can also result in unequal education, misunderstandings, and false presumptions. One typical emotional reaction to malignancy is anxiety while preparing for radiotherapy. Long before the initial consultation, patients want to know about the radiation process. A patient's request for details is influenced by several aspects, such as who they are interested in receiving it from, at what time they want it, and in what style. The Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ) can measure how patients experience the external RT session process and the environment in the treatment room.
Virtual Reality in Healthcare:
Over the past two decades, VR has found various applications in healthcare, offering immersive and non-immersive experiences. VR has evolved through two generations of technology: First-generation SLEs used machines to replicate real-life experiences, while more recent advancements include sophisticated software and hardware. VR enhances patient understanding of medical treatments like radiation therapy. For instance, VR can be used to educate patients about the radiotherapy process, reducing anxiety. VR serves as a distraction intervention to relieve symptoms such as anxiety. It is used during medical procedures to reduce anxiety. Studies have shown VR's effectiveness in reducing anxiety, particularly in patients undergoing medical interventions and cancer treatment. VR offers oncology sufferers emotional, physical, and emotional assistance.
Virtual Reality and Patient Education:
Virtual Reality (VR) can be enjoyable, which is important for learning, as a pleasant experience means higher engagement and understanding. VR educational sessions reduce their anxiety levels and allow patients to utilize audio and geographical aspects during radiation treatments to have an actual treatment experience. Personalized VR experiences can give patients a better understanding of how radiotherapy will be used to treat their cancer and can decrease anxiety. VR-based education is feasible and acceptable about their illness and satisfaction with treatment. VR experience should be guided by a healthcare professional considering the timing of the experience and its incorporation into an education session. Studies show that VR educational sessions can enhance cancer patients' preparation for radiation therapy by increasing their understanding of treatment and reducing anxiety. Patients with poor health literacy abilities may benefit most from media in the form of video tutorials. VRRT provides RT clients with a novel educational experience, particularly in allowing them to see how to treat and the significance of their position during treatment and the physical location within the human body. Patients are highly satisfied and experience enhanced understanding with VR education tools. Patients appreciate the 3D vision display provided by VR, which effectively improves RT understanding. Patients' knowledge requirements on the RT procedure can be met using virtual reality (VR), which enables them to communicate within the environment, familiarize themselves with the RT tools, and see what will occur throughout the course of treatment. Many patients request additional details that they are not provided. VR provides additional information that traditional teaching sessions cannot provide, with patients referring to VR video's capacity to improve comprehension of the treatment's visual and auditory features. Healthcare providers also report a significant amount of satisfaction using VR, recognizing its benefits for treatment and simplicity of application. RT units may benefit from including a virtual reality teaching setting as an additional patient education resource. VR offers an exceptional educational experience with minimal intervention from clinical staff. VR could minimize the need for one-on-one consultations, which could decrease the burden on employees. VR education should be individualized to meet the needs of each patient.
Anxiety in Cancer Patients:
Anxiety is a natural emotional reaction to receiving a cancer prognosis and receiving therapy. Cancer-related anxiety can lead to impaired social functioning and fatigue. Anxiety may arise from various reasons, including reaction to the cancer diagnosis, severe pain, long-term treatments, treatment side effects, and feeling of burden or dependence on others. Procedural anxiety can occur during or in anticipation of the procedure and may lead to behavioral disruptions, such as avoiding or terminating medical procedures. High levels of anxiety can negatively impact health, increasing treatment nonadherence, promoting unhealthy lifestyle factors, and chronically activating stress hormones. Anxiety can affect patients' learning capacity. Anxiety levels decrease once RT starts, falling from 29.9% to 17.4%. The State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) is commonly used to measure procedural anxiety. To minimize anxiety, successful instruction needs to tackle patient issues, give sufficient details for consent to be informed, and get patients ready for the RT procedure, addressing potential adverse outcomes. Non-pharmacological interventions such as virtual reality (VR) have shown promise in reducing anxiety. Relaxation techniques and counseling are also recommended. Virtual reality (VR) is utilized to reduce anxiety and distress in cancer patients, offering relaxation through immersive experiences. Patients with cancer have different information requirements depending on the patient's age, gender, socioeconomic status, and level of education, as well as cultural differences that can affect how patients express and cope with anxiety. Patient education is a cornerstone of cancer treatment preparation. Providing information before, during, and after RT helps gain patient trust and ensures they feel valued. Education can alleviate concerns by informing patients about their ailment, the need for RT, and the technology used. Patients with inadequate health literacy could benefit most from interactive instructional videos. VR educational sessions can enhance cancer patients' preparation for radiation therapy by increasing their understanding of treatment and reducing anxiety. Pretreatment education through written materials and multimedia can reduce anxiety in patients undergoing radiotherapy. A radiotherapy therapist's declaration of a particular individual technique can lead to patients feeling more informed and greater satisfaction, although it may not always decrease anxiety.
Patient Experience:
The technical settings and instruments have a significant impact on the patient's treatment experience in the external radiotherapy (RT) context, as this is because the patient's view of RT processes and instruments is crucial to assess as a supplement to devices like treatment results and consistency. Patients and their caregivers may experience both the emotional and physical effects of radiation therapy. Mask-related anxiety can significantly affect the experience of patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Important roles are also played by data obstacles, health care professional (HCP) engagement, and incentives for improved information dissemination. The Radiotherapy Experience Questionnaire (RTEQ) evaluates the patient's experiences of the external RT method, including anxiety and adapting throughout the external radiation therapy technique, as well as aims to evaluate the patient's impressions of the RT procedure and the therapeutic area setting. Information should be tailored based on patient characteristics, as certain clients would rather have fewer details or engage their relatives in their care to reduce their anxiety. Cultural factors can affect how patients express and cope with anxiety, and physicians may avoid informing patients of their diagnosis, with families disagreeing with disclosure. Patient experience significantly affects treatment adherence and outcomes. Patients who are unprepared, lack engagement, are unwilling to follow evidence-based radiation regimens that enhance clinical results, and have a diminished capacity for self-management of care. Disruption of treatment due to anxiety may have negative consequences for the outcome. Several strategies can enhance the patient's experience in radiotherapy, like providing patient-specific information and support by utilizing multiple teaching strategies available to them. Employing Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and patient advocacy to inform future studies. Using virtual reality (VR) to educate and prepare patients for radiotherapy. VR can reduce anxiety and enhance satisfaction. Offering calming video content during treatment. Creating a mindfulness-promoting environment with VR. Radiotherapy Therapists (RTTs) can provide pre-radiation treatment patient instructions to improve patients' anxiety and overall experiences. Making sure clients receive on-time and adequate instruction could help them feel less anxious before receiving radiation therapy and could also help address the related effects on patients and healthcare facilities. The use of interventions applicable to radiotherapy that are administered to improve patient comfort, increase patient compliance, and reduce patient anxiety.
Patient Satisfaction:
Patient satisfaction is influenced by a multitude of factors, reflecting the complex nature of healthcare delivery. Accessibility to healthcare services, including ease of access, convenience, and availability of care, significantly impacts patient satisfaction. Information provision plays a crucial role, as patients value being well-informed about their condition, treatment options, and potential side effects. Patient expectations are a critical determinant, with satisfaction resulting from a comparison of perceived performance or outcome in relation to these expectations. A positive patient experience can enhance confidence in the health system and help patients cope with the disease. Patient-centered care models that prioritize patient needs and preferences are essential. Providing comprehensive and accessible information about cancer, treatment options, and potential side effects empowers patients and enhances satisfaction. Enhancing the physical environment of healthcare facilities can create a more comfortable and welcoming experience for patients. Offering support services such as counseling, support groups, and palliative care can address the behavioral and emotional requirements of clients and their relatives. Utilizing virtual reality (VR) and other innovative technologies can improve patient education, reduce anxiety, and enhance the overall treatment experience. Continuous quality improvement initiatives that incorporate patient feedback can help identify areas for improvement and ensure that services meet patient expectations.
VR Applications in Radiotherapy:
VR applications in radiotherapy show promising results in various aspects of patient care and education. VR-based education programs enhance patients' comprehension of radiotherapy treatment. Patients report a better understanding of how radiotherapy will be used to treat their cancer after VR sessions. VR interventions are associated with significant reductions in anxiety related to radiotherapy. Patients report that VR improves their treatment experience, making it more tolerable. VR use during external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can lead to a significant decrease in heart rate, indicating reduced physiological distress. VR experiences increase patient engagement and satisfaction. VR is being implemented in various ways to support patients and improve radiotherapy education. VR applications provide detailed insights into upcoming procedures, helping patients understand the radiotherapy process. These tools often include simulated RT clinical equipment, such as linear accelerators and treatment couches, with realistic movements and sounds. VR allows patients to view a virtual simulation of themselves receiving radiotherapy, with visible radiation beams delivered to target volumes. Virtual environments for radiotherapy training (VERT) enhance understanding of radiation therapy planning concepts among staff.
Chapter Summary This chapter synthesizes key findings from the literature, provides a critical analysis of the evidence, presents the rationale for the current study, and outlines the framework for the methodology. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the context and justification for investigating the use of virtual reality (VR) in cancer care, particularly in the Omani context. The main gap in Arab countries, especially in Oman, is that no study addresses the effectiveness of VR-based education in patients with cancer undergoing EBRT.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- VR-based education group (The intervention group) will view an educational VR video via immersive headsets
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VR-based education group (intervention group) | Experimental | Device: VR-based educationThe intervention group will view an educational VR video via immersive headsets |
| The Control / Comparison group (standard education) | No intervention | –The control group will receive standard care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patients aged 18 years or above
- Willing to participate
- Provide informed consent
- Scheduled for their first external beam radiotherapy treatment
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pediatric cancer patients
- Scheduled for head \& neck external beam radiotherapy
- Previously underwent radiotherapy treatment
- Have severe visual or hearing difficulties
- Require emergency radiotherapy treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VR-based educationan educational VR video via immersive headsets | Device | VR-based education group (intervention group) |
Primary outcome
Anxiety
Time frame: Up to 7 months
▪ Anxiety is measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); the scale ranges from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 80 per subscale, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome for anxiety
2 secondary outcomes
Patient Experience
Time frame: Up to 7 months
▪ Patient satisfaction
Time frame: Up to 7 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. All IPDs are confidential in this randomized clinical trial.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing VR-based education in people with Cancer, run by Oman Ministry of Health at 1 site in Oman.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Oman. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anxiety (time frame: Up to 7 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2026.