Breast Cancer ScreeningNCT07745517
Evaluating Interventions for Breast Cancer Screening in Ghana
A study testing Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening Education and Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational Intervention in people with Breast Cancer Screening, run by University of Huddersfield at 1 site in Ghana.
Trial summary
This study aims to implement two interventions to determine the most effective one that can improve Ghanaian women's decision to get their breasts examined by a healthcare professional. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Screening
- What is being tested?
- Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening Education and Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational Intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 828 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGhana
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2026to 30 Nov 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be a female aged 25 years or older
- Must be resident in the Danfa community
- Must be someone who can confirm their availability for at least the next eight months after the initiation of the trial
Who cannot join
- Males
- Females aged <25 years
- Women who are not resident in the study setting
- Women who cannot be available for at least the next eight months after the initiation of the trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Ghana1 site
Danfa Community
Accra, Greater Accra Region
Alfred E Yawson, PhD, +233244662711, aeyawson@ug.edu.gh
Joshua Okyere, MPhil
About this study
Official title: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSE-LED AND TEXT MESSAGING INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE BREAST CANCER SCREENING IN GHANA: A MULTI-ARM RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
This study aims to implement two interventions to determine the most effective one that can improve Ghanaian women's decision to get their breasts examined by a healthcare professional. The two interventions are (1) a system where community health nurses will be leveraged to educate women on breast cancer screening; (2) a system where women will be sent text messages about breast cancer screening. Both interventions will be carried out over five months. A survey will be conducted before the intervention is introduced. Then, after the sixth month, another survey will be implemented to determine whether there have been changes. Only women who are 25 years or older will be included in the study.
Read the detailed description
Research Design This study will employ a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. Specifically, a multi-arm parallel RCT design will be used. Participants will be assigned to receive either a CHN-led intervention, a text messaging intervention, or be in the control group. This parallel RCT will be a superiority trial in nature (Spieth et al., 2016). It will seek to compare the two interventions and establish the intervention that is most effective in improving screening uptake, enhancing knowledge, and promoting positive health beliefs. Essentially, participants in the CHN-led and text messaging groups will receive the same information but delivered through distinct media. The baseline for this study will be collected as part of a larger prospective longitudinal study in Ghana, India, and Nepal (ID: SREIC/2025/067).
Description of interventions CHN-led intervention: Participants in this group will engage in structured CHN-led education sessions on breast cancer screening for five months. Each month will focus on a specific theme. The sessions will be facilitated by trained community health nurses who are experienced in health education and culturally competent in working with the study communities. The CHN will receive a brief orientation and training on the study protocol, educational content, and facilitation techniques to ensure consistency in facilitation. This intervention will take the form of bi-weekly sessions that last 60 minutes over five months. These sessions will cover understanding and demystifying breast cancer and its screening (month one), risk factors of breast cancer (month two), suggestive signs and symptoms to prompt early healthcare seeking (month three), costs and benefits of undergoing breast cancer screening (month four), and building confidence and intention to get screened (month five). The intervention will be interactive, incorporating group discussions and culturally tailored educational materials (a take-home pamphlet) to maximise engagement. To ensure engagement, the CHN will be required to monitor attendance, conduct post-session reflections, and do follow-up calls for those who may miss the session. In all five, CHNs will be recruited. Each CHN will serve 5 groups, each consisting of 11 participants.
Text messaging intervention: For this intervention, participants will receive text messages on breast cancer screening for five months. Similar to the CHN-led intervention, the text messaging intervention will cover the following topics: cover understanding and demystifying breast cancer and its screening (month one), risk factors of breast cancer (month two), suggestive signs and symptoms to prompt early healthcare seeking (month three), costs and benefits of undergoing breast cancer screening (month four), and building confidence and intention to get screened (Asare et al., 2024). Informed by the findings of Bonful et al. (2022), text messages will be sent to participants between 6:00am and 8:00pm two times a week - Wednesdays and Saturdays.
Control group: The control group will receive no interventions, but the standard care provided at the community level. This standard of care is the usual community healthcare information that borders on environmental hygiene, healthy eating, exercising, family planning and reproductive health, and motivations to seek prompt healthcare.
Sampling and randomisation procedures Previous studies have found a significantly lower risk of breast cancer among young women (<25 years) (Okyere et al., 2024; Xu \& Xu, 2023). Hence, only women aged ≥25 years will be eligible to participate in the study. Prospective participants must be people who will be residing in the Danfa community for the next nine months. Any woman who is below the eligible age or who knows for a fact that they will be unavailable throughout the duration of the study will be excluded. A list of all eligible participants will be drawn from the baseline study that will precede the RCT. With this baseline information, a simple random sampling technique will be used to select participants into the RCT.
To ensure balance across groups and minimise confounding, a priori stratification will be employed before randomisation. Participants will be stratified by age (≤50 years vs. >50 years) and screening history at baseline (i.e., ever undergone breast examination or no breast examination). After stratification, block randomisation will be used to assign participants to one of the three study arms in a 1:1:1 ratio. This technique will be adopted to guarantee that the number of participants in each stratum remains balanced throughout the study. This will be achieved by listing all participants and applying Microsoft Excel's random number generator to assign individuals to either arm of the study.
A study by Okyere et al. (2024) estimates a breast cancer screening prevalence of 18.39%. This study posits a 20% increase in screening uptake through the interventions. Therefore, with a power of 80% and design effect of 1.2, the sample size is estimated as:
Where:
- Zα is the Z-value for the significance level (for α=0.05, one-tailed: Zα=1.645),
- Zβ is the Z-value for the power (for 80% power, Zβ=0.84),
- p0 is the baseline proportion (control arm),
- p1 is the intervention arm proportion.
Adjusted sample size for design effect (effect=1.2):
Final sample size adjusted for non-response (rate=5%):
Total sample size for three arms:
Substituting the figures, the total sample size will be 828 (i.e., 276 participants per arm).
Data collection procedures Before the RCT, a baseline survey will be conducted. Three research assistants will be recruited and trained to assist with the collection of data. The research assistants will be people with at least a bachelor's degree in public health or nursing and have at least 12 months of experience conducting public health surveys. They will undertake a one-week intensive training that will cover issues of ethical responsibility, the research methodology, interrogation of the questionnaire, and some role plays.
The baseline survey will collect information about the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants (e.g., age in completed years, highest level of education attained, marital status, employment status, religion, health insurance coverage, and exposure to media), risk factors (i.e., family history, smoking status, alcohol consumption, etc.), and reproductive health characteristics (e.g., age at menarche, menopausal status, age at first sex, use of oral contraceptives, etc.). And so, the baseline study will assess the state of depression and anxiety among participants using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7) scale, respectively (Shevlin et al., 2022). Additionally, baseline assessment of the participants' attitudes to screening will be done using the attitude to cancer screening (ASCS-15) scale (Sarkhani et al., 2023). Each participant recruited into the baseline (pre-intervention survey) will be assigned a unique code that will be used to follow up on them after the implementation of the intervention.
Five months after the implementation of the intervention, a follow-up data collection will be conducted to measure key outcomes of interest. These include the proportion of women who would have the intention to screen post-intervention, the proportion of women who would have been screened post-intervention, the proportion of women with good attitudes to breast cancer screening post-intervention, and the breast cancer literacy rate post-intervention. Participants will be contacted in-person to minimise non-response and loss to follow-up. The questionnaire will be designed and administered using REDCAP (Harris et al., 2019). The data collection will be stored on my student OneDrive, which will be accessible only to my supervisors.
Data analyses All statistical analyses will be performed in STATA version 18 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) and Rv4.3.2. The study will adhere to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Descriptive analyses will be performed to compare screening uptake, attitude to screening, and screening intentions at baseline and post-intervention. Pearson's chi-square test will be used to assess whether the observed prevalence differs significantly. To mitigate attrition bias, the study will implement a rigorous intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, wherein all randomised participants will be analysed within their originally assigned groups, irrespective of adherence to the intervention or dropout status. This analytical strategy preserves the benefits of randomisation, provides an unbiased estimate of the intervention's effectiveness, and enhances the generalisability of the findings (Spieth et al., 2016)
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Screening
- Being tested
- Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening Education, Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational Intervention, Control Arm - standard of care
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Screening, Literacy, Experimental Studies
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Literacy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening EducationOther
The Community Health Nurse-led intervention differs from conventional health education programmes by using trained community health nurses who are embedded within the local healthcare system to deliver structured, interactive, and culturally responsive breast cancer screening education. Unlike one-time awareness campaigns, this intervention provides repeated biweekly sessions over five months, allowing progressive learning, reinforcement of key messages, and opportunities to address participant concerns and misconceptions.
Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational InterventionOther
The text messaging intervention is distinguished by its use of a structured, evidence-informed mobile health approach to deliver breast cancer screening information directly to participants' mobile phones. Unlike generic health reminder messages, the intervention follows the same thematic structure as the CHN-led programme, ensuring delivery of comprehensive breast cancer screening education rather than isolated screening prompts.
Control Arm - standard of careOther
The control group will receive standard community-level healthcare information routinely provided through existing primary healthcare services and will not receive any additional breast cancer screening-specific education, text messages, or structured intervention activities during the study period. This distinguishes the control condition from the intervention groups by maintaining usual care while allowing evaluation of the added effect of community health nurse-led education and text messaging interventions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Participants assigned to this arm will receive a structured community health nurse (CHN)-led breast cancer screening education programme delivered over five months. Trained CHNs will facilitate ten biweekly 60 minute interactive sessions, with each month focusing on a specific theme: understanding breast cancer and screening, risk factors, signs and symptoms, costs and benefits of screening, and building confidence and intention to undergo screening. CHNs will receive standardized training on the study protocol, educational content, and facilitation methods to ensure intervention fidelity. Sessions will incorporate group discussions and culturally appropriate take-home pamphlets to enhance engagement. Attendance will be monitored, post-session reflections conducted, and follow-up phone calls made to participants who miss sessions. Five CHNs will each facilitate five groups of eleven participants. Receives: Other: Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening Education |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Participants assigned to this arm will receive a structured breast cancer screening text messaging programme over five months. Messages will be delivered twice weekly on Wednesdays and Saturdays between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. The intervention will cover the same monthly themes as the CHN-led arm to ensure consistency: understanding breast cancer and screening, risk factors, signs and symptoms, costs and benefits of screening, and building confidence and intention to undergo screening. Message content will be evidence-informed and culturally appropriate, drawing on established breast cancer education materials and previous intervention studies. The timing and frequency of message delivery are based on evidence indicating that twice-weekly messaging within these hours enhances participant engagement and message uptake Receives: Other: Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational Intervention |
| Arm 3 | Placebo comparator | Participants assigned to the control arm will receive the standard community-based healthcare routinely provided through existing primary healthcare services, with no additional breast cancer screening intervention. Standard care consists of general health education delivered by community health workers and focuses on topics such as environmental hygiene, healthy eating, physical activity, family planning, reproductive health, and the importance of seeking timely healthcare. No structured breast cancer education or text messaging will be provided during the study period. This group will serve as the comparator for evaluating the effectiveness of the CHN-led and text messaging interventions. Receives: Other: Control Arm - standard of care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical breast examination uptake
The proportion of women who would have had their breasts examined by a health care professional and the proportion of women who would have practiced breast self-examination.
Measured: Five months after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Breast cancer literacy
The proportion of women who are knowledgeable of breast cancer risk factors, and the suggestive signs and symptoms of breast cancer.
Measured: Five months after the implementation of the intervention.
Attitude to breast cancer screening
The proportion of women with a positive attitude towards breast cancer screening.
Measured: Five months after the implementation of the intervention.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2026
- Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer ScreeningStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 828 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Huddersfield
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Padam Simkhada, PhD, Study chair, University of ChesterBibha Simkhada, PhD, Study chair, University of Huddersfield
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07745517
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UHudd/SREIC/2025/103
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The trial forms part of the principal investigator's doctoral research. As such, these plans are not a priority at the moment. Any decisions made will be addressed in an amendment to the registration.
Publications
Xu H, Xu B. Breast cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening. Chin J Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 30;35(6):565-583. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.02.
PubMed 38204449Spieth PM, Kubasch AS, Penzlin AI, Illigens BM, Barlinn K, Siepmann T. Randomized controlled trials - a matter of design. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 10;12:1341-9. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S101938. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27354804Shevlin M, Butter S, McBride O, Murphy J, Gibson-Miller J, Hartman TK, Levita L, Mason L, Martinez AP, McKay R, Stocks TV, Bennett KM, Hyland P, Vallieres F, Valiente C, Vazquez C, Contreras A, Peinado V, Trucharte A, Bertamini M, Panzeri A, Bruno G, Granziol U, Mignemi G, Spoto A, Vidotto G, Bentall RP. Measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) across four European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03787-5.
PubMed 35232409Sarkhani N, Negarandeh R, Heshmatian ME. Investigating the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude scale for cancer screening. BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):2068. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16981-1.
PubMed 37872519Okyere J, Ayebeng C, Dickson KS. Clicks and checks: investigating the association between internet usage frequency and women's uptake of clinical breast examination in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11576-x.
PubMed 39334073Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
PubMed 31078660Bonful HA, Addo-Lartey AA, Sefenu RS, Nwameme A, Abagre TA, Awua AK, Adu-Aryee NA, Dedey F, Adanu RMK, Okuyemi KS. Developing a culturally tailored short message service (SMS) intervention for improving the uptake of cervical cancer screening among Ghanaian women in urban communities. BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 10;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01719-9.
PubMed 35538476Asare M, Obiri-Yeboah D, Enyan NIE, Nuer-Allornuvor G, Fosu ES, Ken-Amoah S, Akakpo PK. An intervention to increase cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV: A mixed methods study. Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jan;118:107993. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107993. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
PubMed 37844427
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSE-LED AND TEXT MESSAGING INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE BREAST CANCER SCREENING IN GHANA: A MULTI-ARM RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07745517
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UHudd/SREIC/2025/103
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Screening
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Screening, Literacy, Experimental Studies
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 828 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of HuddersfieldUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to implement two interventions to determine the most effective one that can improve Ghanaian women's decision to get their breasts examined by a healthcare professional. The two interventions are (1) a system where community health nurses will be leveraged to educate women on breast cancer screening; (2) a system where women will be sent text messages about breast cancer screening. Both interventions will be carried out over five months. A survey will be conducted before the intervention is introduced. Then, after the sixth month, another survey will be implemented to determine whether there have been changes. Only women who are 25 years or older will be included in the study.
Detailed description
Research Design This study will employ a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. Specifically, a multi-arm parallel RCT design will be used. Participants will be assigned to receive either a CHN-led intervention, a text messaging intervention, or be in the control group. This parallel RCT will be a superiority trial in nature (Spieth et al., 2016). It will seek to compare the two interventions and establish the intervention that is most effective in improving screening uptake, enhancing knowledge, and promoting positive health beliefs. Essentially, participants in the CHN-led and text messaging groups will receive the same information but delivered through distinct media. The baseline for this study will be collected as part of a larger prospective longitudinal study in Ghana, India, and Nepal (ID: SREIC/2025/067).
Description of interventions CHN-led intervention: Participants in this group will engage in structured CHN-led education sessions on breast cancer screening for five months. Each month will focus on a specific theme. The sessions will be facilitated by trained community health nurses who are experienced in health education and culturally competent in working with the study communities. The CHN will receive a brief orientation and training on the study protocol, educational content, and facilitation techniques to ensure consistency in facilitation. This intervention will take the form of bi-weekly sessions that last 60 minutes over five months. These sessions will cover understanding and demystifying breast cancer and its screening (month one), risk factors of breast cancer (month two), suggestive signs and symptoms to prompt early healthcare seeking (month three), costs and benefits of undergoing breast cancer screening (month four), and building confidence and intention to get screened (month five). The intervention will be interactive, incorporating group discussions and culturally tailored educational materials (a take-home pamphlet) to maximise engagement. To ensure engagement, the CHN will be required to monitor attendance, conduct post-session reflections, and do follow-up calls for those who may miss the session. In all five, CHNs will be recruited. Each CHN will serve 5 groups, each consisting of 11 participants.
Text messaging intervention: For this intervention, participants will receive text messages on breast cancer screening for five months. Similar to the CHN-led intervention, the text messaging intervention will cover the following topics: cover understanding and demystifying breast cancer and its screening (month one), risk factors of breast cancer (month two), suggestive signs and symptoms to prompt early healthcare seeking (month three), costs and benefits of undergoing breast cancer screening (month four), and building confidence and intention to get screened (Asare et al., 2024). Informed by the findings of Bonful et al. (2022), text messages will be sent to participants between 6:00am and 8:00pm two times a week - Wednesdays and Saturdays.
Control group: The control group will receive no interventions, but the standard care provided at the community level. This standard of care is the usual community healthcare information that borders on environmental hygiene, healthy eating, exercising, family planning and reproductive health, and motivations to seek prompt healthcare.
Sampling and randomisation procedures Previous studies have found a significantly lower risk of breast cancer among young women (<25 years) (Okyere et al., 2024; Xu \& Xu, 2023). Hence, only women aged ≥25 years will be eligible to participate in the study. Prospective participants must be people who will be residing in the Danfa community for the next nine months. Any woman who is below the eligible age or who knows for a fact that they will be unavailable throughout the duration of the study will be excluded. A list of all eligible participants will be drawn from the baseline study that will precede the RCT. With this baseline information, a simple random sampling technique will be used to select participants into the RCT.
To ensure balance across groups and minimise confounding, a priori stratification will be employed before randomisation. Participants will be stratified by age (≤50 years vs. >50 years) and screening history at baseline (i.e., ever undergone breast examination or no breast examination). After stratification, block randomisation will be used to assign participants to one of the three study arms in a 1:1:1 ratio. This technique will be adopted to guarantee that the number of participants in each stratum remains balanced throughout the study. This will be achieved by listing all participants and applying Microsoft Excel's random number generator to assign individuals to either arm of the study.
A study by Okyere et al. (2024) estimates a breast cancer screening prevalence of 18.39%. This study posits a 20% increase in screening uptake through the interventions. Therefore, with a power of 80% and design effect of 1.2, the sample size is estimated as:
Where:
- Zα is the Z-value for the significance level (for α=0.05, one-tailed: Zα=1.645),
- Zβ is the Z-value for the power (for 80% power, Zβ=0.84),
- p0 is the baseline proportion (control arm),
- p1 is the intervention arm proportion.
Adjusted sample size for design effect (effect=1.2):
Final sample size adjusted for non-response (rate=5%):
Total sample size for three arms:
Substituting the figures, the total sample size will be 828 (i.e., 276 participants per arm).
Data collection procedures Before the RCT, a baseline survey will be conducted. Three research assistants will be recruited and trained to assist with the collection of data. The research assistants will be people with at least a bachelor's degree in public health or nursing and have at least 12 months of experience conducting public health surveys. They will undertake a one-week intensive training that will cover issues of ethical responsibility, the research methodology, interrogation of the questionnaire, and some role plays.
The baseline survey will collect information about the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants (e.g., age in completed years, highest level of education attained, marital status, employment status, religion, health insurance coverage, and exposure to media), risk factors (i.e., family history, smoking status, alcohol consumption, etc.), and reproductive health characteristics (e.g., age at menarche, menopausal status, age at first sex, use of oral contraceptives, etc.). And so, the baseline study will assess the state of depression and anxiety among participants using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7) scale, respectively (Shevlin et al., 2022). Additionally, baseline assessment of the participants' attitudes to screening will be done using the attitude to cancer screening (ASCS-15) scale (Sarkhani et al., 2023). Each participant recruited into the baseline (pre-intervention survey) will be assigned a unique code that will be used to follow up on them after the implementation of the intervention.
Five months after the implementation of the intervention, a follow-up data collection will be conducted to measure key outcomes of interest. These include the proportion of women who would have the intention to screen post-intervention, the proportion of women who would have been screened post-intervention, the proportion of women with good attitudes to breast cancer screening post-intervention, and the breast cancer literacy rate post-intervention. Participants will be contacted in-person to minimise non-response and loss to follow-up. The questionnaire will be designed and administered using REDCAP (Harris et al., 2019). The data collection will be stored on my student OneDrive, which will be accessible only to my supervisors.
Data analyses All statistical analyses will be performed in STATA version 18 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) and Rv4.3.2. The study will adhere to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Descriptive analyses will be performed to compare screening uptake, attitude to screening, and screening intentions at baseline and post-intervention. Pearson's chi-square test will be used to assess whether the observed prevalence differs significantly. To mitigate attrition bias, the study will implement a rigorous intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, wherein all randomised participants will be analysed within their originally assigned groups, irrespective of adherence to the intervention or dropout status. This analytical strategy preserves the benefits of randomisation, provides an unbiased estimate of the intervention's effectiveness, and enhances the generalisability of the findings (Spieth et al., 2016)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Other: Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening EducationParticipants assigned to this arm will receive a structured community health nurse (CHN)-led breast cancer screening education programme delivered over five months. Trained CHNs will facilitate ten biweekly 60 minute interactive sessions, with each month focusing on a specific theme: understanding breast cancer and screening, risk factors, signs and symptoms, costs and benefits of screening, and building confidence and intention to undergo screening. CHNs will receive standardized training on the study protocol, educational content, and facilitation methods to ensure intervention fidelity. Sessions will incorporate group discussions and culturally appropriate take-home pamphlets to enhance engagement. Attendance will be monitored, post-session reflections conducted, and follow-up phone calls made to participants who miss sessions. Five CHNs will each facilitate five groups of eleven participants. |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Other: Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational InterventionParticipants assigned to this arm will receive a structured breast cancer screening text messaging programme over five months. Messages will be delivered twice weekly on Wednesdays and Saturdays between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. The intervention will cover the same monthly themes as the CHN-led arm to ensure consistency: understanding breast cancer and screening, risk factors, signs and symptoms, costs and benefits of screening, and building confidence and intention to undergo screening. Message content will be evidence-informed and culturally appropriate, drawing on established breast cancer education materials and previous intervention studies. The timing and frequency of message delivery are based on evidence indicating that twice-weekly messaging within these hours enhances participant engagement and message uptake |
| Arm 3 | Placebo comparator | Other: Control Arm - standard of careParticipants assigned to the control arm will receive the standard community-based healthcare routinely provided through existing primary healthcare services, with no additional breast cancer screening intervention. Standard care consists of general health education delivered by community health workers and focuses on topics such as environmental hygiene, healthy eating, physical activity, family planning, reproductive health, and the importance of seeking timely healthcare. No structured breast cancer education or text messaging will be provided during the study period. This group will serve as the comparator for evaluating the effectiveness of the CHN-led and text messaging interventions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Must be a female aged 25 years or older
- Must be resident in the Danfa community
- Must be someone who can confirm their availability for at least the next eight months after the initiation of the trial
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Males
- Females aged <25 years
- Women who are not resident in the study setting
- Women who cannot be available for at least the next eight months after the initiation of the trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening EducationThe Community Health Nurse-led intervention differs from conventional health education programmes by using trained community health nurses who are embedded within the local healthcare system to deliver structured, interactive, and culturally responsive breast cancer screening education. Unlike one-time awareness campaigns, this intervention provides repeated biweekly sessions over five months, allowing progressive learning, reinforcement of key messages, and opportunities to address participant concerns and misconceptions. | Other | Arm 1 |
| Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational InterventionThe text messaging intervention is distinguished by its use of a structured, evidence-informed mobile health approach to deliver breast cancer screening information directly to participants' mobile phones. Unlike generic health reminder messages, the intervention follows the same thematic structure as the CHN-led programme, ensuring delivery of comprehensive breast cancer screening education rather than isolated screening prompts. | Other | Arm 2 |
| Control Arm - standard of careThe control group will receive standard community-level healthcare information routinely provided through existing primary healthcare services and will not receive any additional breast cancer screening-specific education, text messages, or structured intervention activities during the study period. This distinguishes the control condition from the intervention groups by maintaining usual care while allowing evaluation of the added effect of community health nurse-led education and text messaging interventions. | Other | Arm 3 |
Primary outcome
Clinical breast examination uptake
Time frame: Five months after the intervention
The proportion of women who would have had their breasts examined by a health care professional and the proportion of women who would have practiced breast self-examination.
2 secondary outcomes
Breast cancer literacy
Time frame: Five months after the implementation of the intervention.
Attitude to breast cancer screening
Time frame: Five months after the implementation of the intervention.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38204449Xu H, Xu B. Breast cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening. Chin J Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 30;35(6):565-583. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.02.
- Background: PubMed 27354804Spieth PM, Kubasch AS, Penzlin AI, Illigens BM, Barlinn K, Siepmann T. Randomized controlled trials - a matter of design. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 10;12:1341-9. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S101938. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 35232409Shevlin M, Butter S, McBride O, Murphy J, Gibson-Miller J, Hartman TK, Levita L, Mason L, Martinez AP, McKay R, Stocks TV, Bennett KM, Hyland P, Vallieres F, Valiente C, Vazquez C, Contreras A, Peinado V, Trucharte A, Bertamini M, Panzeri A, Bruno G, Granziol U, Mignemi G, Spoto A, Vidotto G, Bentall RP. Measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) across four European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03787-5.
- Background: PubMed 37872519Sarkhani N, Negarandeh R, Heshmatian ME. Investigating the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude scale for cancer screening. BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):2068. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16981-1.
- Background: PubMed 39334073Okyere J, Ayebeng C, Dickson KS. Clicks and checks: investigating the association between internet usage frequency and women's uptake of clinical breast examination in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11576-x.
- Background: PubMed 31078660Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
- Background: PubMed 35538476Bonful HA, Addo-Lartey AA, Sefenu RS, Nwameme A, Abagre TA, Awua AK, Adu-Aryee NA, Dedey F, Adanu RMK, Okuyemi KS. Developing a culturally tailored short message service (SMS) intervention for improving the uptake of cervical cancer screening among Ghanaian women in urban communities. BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 10;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01719-9.
- Background: PubMed 37844427Asare M, Obiri-Yeboah D, Enyan NIE, Nuer-Allornuvor G, Fosu ES, Ken-Amoah S, Akakpo PK. An intervention to increase cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV: A mixed methods study. Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jan;118:107993. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107993. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The trial forms part of the principal investigator's doctoral research. As such, these plans are not a priority at the moment. Any decisions made will be addressed in an amendment to the registration.
Related trials for Breast Cancer Screening
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Harvesting Cells for Experimental Cancer Treatments
Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
cfDNA Assay Prospective Observational Validation for Early Cancer Detection and Minimal Residual Disease
Brain Cancer, Breast Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Detection of Breast Cancer Among Syrian Women
Breast Cancer Detection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Padam Simkhada, PhD study chair
University of Chester
Bibha Simkhada, PhD study chair
University of Huddersfield
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening Education and Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational Intervention in people with Breast Cancer Screening, run by University of Huddersfield at 1 site in Ghana.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ghana. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Joshua Okyere, MPhil (+233249004634, joshua.okyere@hud.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical breast examination uptake (time frame: Five months after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07745517, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2026.