AzTrials
AzTrials

Pressure UlcersNCT07743385

Research and Application Evaluation of Accurate Pressure Ulcer Area Measurement Technology Based on AI Grid Intelligent Recognition: A Self-controlled Study

A study testing AI Grid Image Recognition Measurement and Traditional Manual Grid Counting Measurement in people with Pressure Ulcers and Pressure Injuries, run by Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University at 3 sites in China.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if AI grid image recognition can measure pressure ulcer wound area accurately and efficiently in adult patients with pressure ulcers. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can AI grid image recognition shorten the single measurement time of pressure ulcer wound area? Is… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pressure Ulcers, Pressure Injuries
What is being tested?
AI Grid Image Recognition Measurement and Traditional Manual Grid Counting Measurement
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
3 sitesChina
Study dates
14 Jul 2026to 30 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged ≥18 years old;
  • Clinically diagnosed pressure injury of stage I-IV;
  • Patients or legal guardians sign informed consent;
  • Able to complete wound image acquisition.

Who cannot join

  • Wounds with severe bleeding, active infection or extensive necrotic tissue unsuitable for film attachment;
  • Patients with severe skin allergic diseases who cannot tolerate transparent grid film;
  • Patients unable to cooperate with image collection;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Patients participating in other concurrent wound intervention trials.
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

China3 sites
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University

    Bengbu, Anhui, 233004

  • the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009

  • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

    Nantong, Jiangsu, 226000

Other trials in China

About this study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if AI grid image recognition can measure pressure ulcer wound area accurately and efficiently in adult patients with pressure ulcers. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can AI grid image recognition shorten the single measurement time of pressure ulcer wound area?
  • Is the wound area measured by AI grid image recognition consistent with the result from traditional manual grid counting? Researchers will compare AI grid image recognition measurement with traditional manual grid counting measurement on the same pressure ulcer wound image collected at a single time point to see if AI recognition achieves comparable accuracy with less operation time.
Read more

Participants will:

  • Have standardized transparent grid dressing applied on their pressure ulcer wound
  • Undergo one-time wound image collection
  • Receive sequential wound area measurement using both methods on the captured single wound image
Read the detailed description

This is a single-arm, self-controlled clinical trial enrolling adult inpatients with pressure ulcers. All enrolled subjects receive routine standardized wound care. A sterile transparent dressing printed with uniform standard grids will be applied onto the pressure ulcer wound surface for one-time image capture. Based on the single acquired wound image, two area measurement approaches will be performed sequentially: automated measurement via the AI grid image recognition system and manual measurement using the traditional grid counting method. The primary outcomes include single measurement operation time and the consistency of wound area results obtained from the two measurement techniques. All measurement data will be collected and statistically analyzed to verify whether AI grid recognition can achieve rapid and reliable area assessment of pressure ulcers in clinical settings.

Being tested
AI Grid Image Recognition Measurement, Traditional Manual Grid Counting Measurement
Keywords
Wound Assessment, Wound Area Measurement, AI Image Recognition, Grid Counting, Wound Measurement Film
Medical subject headings
Pressure Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AI Grid Image Recognition MeasurementDiagnostic test

    A sterile transparent grid measurement film (single grid area 0.25 cm²) is attached to the pressure ulcer wound. After wound image acquisition, the AI system automatically identifies grids covered by the wound to calculate pressure ulcer wound area.

  • Traditional Manual Grid Counting MeasurementDiagnostic test

    Based on the same wound photo with transparent grid film, trained clinical staff manually count grids covered by pressure ulcer; grids covered more than half are counted, grids less than half covered are excluded to calculate wound area.

Study groups in NCT07743385
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single Wound Measurement GroupExperimentalAll participants in this group receive standardized pressure ulcer wound measurement with a sterile transparent grid film at one single time point. After wound image capture, two measurement methods are carried out successively: AI grid intelligent recognition measurement and traditional manual grid counting measurement. The study compares the operation time and measurement consistency of the two evaluation methods on the same wound.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: AI Grid Image Recognition Measurement; Diagnostic Test: Traditional Manual Grid Counting Measurement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pressure injury wound area

    To compare pressure injury area values obtained by AI automatic grid recognition measurement and manual grid counting gold standard.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Wound measurement operation duration

    To compare the time consumed for completing one pressure injury area assessment between the AI measurement group and manual measurement group

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2026
  2. Study start14 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completion15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This is a single-arm self-controlled clinical trial. All enrolled participants are assigned to one single group. On the same pressure ulcer wound at a single time point, two wound area measurement methods are performed sequentially: AI grid image recognition measurement and traditional manual grid counting measurement. This design compares the operation efficiency and measurement consistency of the two methods within the same subject, eliminating inter-subject confounding factors.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07743385
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026-K228-01
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
24 Jul 2026
Last updated
4 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The individual participant data contains sensitive clinical information of patients. Considering the requirements of medical privacy protection and the limited research scope of this project, we do not plan to share raw individual participant data with other researchers. Aggregated study results may be published in academic journals.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AI Grid Image Recognition Measurement and Traditional Manual Grid Counting Measurement in people with Pressure Ulcers and Pressure Injuries, run by Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University at 3 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pressure injury wound area (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in