Spinal Cord InjuryGLADNCT07733401
Guided Laminectomy With Augmented Duroplasty for Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Expansile duraplasty in people with Spinal Cord Injury and Acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), run by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing at 13 sites in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether expansile duraplasty can improve neurological recovery in adult patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury, as well as evaluate the safety of this surgical strategy. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury, Acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
- What is being tested?
- Expansile duraplasty
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Sep 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 18 and 80 years old, with no restrictions on gender;
- Patients diagnosed with traumatic cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury (C2-T12) via clinical evaluation including medical history collection, physical examination and auxiliary imaging tests;
- Classified as Grade A, B or C according to the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) based on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI);
- Scheduled to receive surgical intervention within 72 hours after traumatic spinal cord injury;
- Preoperative T2-weighted MRI shows no cerebrospinal fluid signal between the spinal cord and dura mater at a minimum of one vertebral segment;
- Good general physical condition with an expected survival time of no less than 12 months;
- Voluntarily participate in this trial, sign the written informed consent form, exhibit good compliance and cooperate with all follow-up visits;
- Judged by attending surgeons to meet the surgical indications for posterior laminectomy and spinal internal fixation, with surgical decision-making based on surgeons' clinical experience.
Who cannot join
- Transverse spinal cord injury;
- Gunshot or penetrating sharp spinal cord injury;
- Pre-existing dural laceration caused by traumatic spinal cord injury;
- Spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality (SCIWORA, spinal injury without fracture or dislocation);
- Acute exacerbation of pre-existing chronic spinal cord injury;
- Traumatic spinal cord injury complicated with epidural or subdural hematoma;
- Severe concomitant traumatic brain injury defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 14; patients unable to follow simple verbal commands due to altered mental status; or patients with clinically significant abnormalities on cranial CT (only patients with suspected brain injury identified by investigators require cranial CT scanning);
- Presence of underlying comorbidities that contraindicate surgery or interfere with accurate medical and neurological assessments (judged by the principal investigator).
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
13 sites in 1 country
China13 sites
Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100053
Wanru Duan, MD, duanwanru@xwhosp.org
Xuanbo Shao, Drshao514@163.com
Beijing Jiangong Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality
Sichen Wang
Beijing Shuili Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality
Yaohui Wang, MD
Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
Cangzhou, Hebei
Nan Zhang
Xuanwu Hospital Inner Mongolia Hospital (Chifeng City Hospital)
Chifeng, Inner Mongolia
Yanze Gong
Shandong University Qilu Hospital (Dezhou Branch)
Dezhou, Shandong, 253001
Shugang Xu, MD
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong
Liang Wang, MD
Jinan Central Hospital, Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University
Jinan, Shandong
Bin Ning, MD
Liaocheng Brain Hospital
Liaocheng, Shandong
Xueyuan Li
Gaozhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Province
Maoming, Guangdong
Tianliang Chen
The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Shijiazhuang, Hebei
Honglei Liu, MD
Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital
Taiyuan, Shanxi
Guijun Jia
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality
Hongtao Rong, MD
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Bony Decompression Combined With Dural Decompression Versus Isolated Bony Decompression for Acute Severe Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether expansile duraplasty can improve neurological recovery in adult patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury, as well as evaluate the safety of this surgical strategy. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Does expansile duraplasty lead to superior motor function recovery in patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury?
- How safe is the use of expansile duraplasty in people with acute traumatic SCI?
Read more
Researchers will compare neurological function, quality of life and all safety indicators who receive expansile duraplasty to that of participants who do not receive expansile duraplasty, to determine whether the additional expansile duraplasty provides better recovery benefits for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the laminectomy combined with expansile duraplasty group and the laminectomy-only group. All participants will complete the following procedures:
- Receive standardized spinal surgery ;
- Provide blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples during hospitalization;
- Undergo spinal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at baseline (pre-operation), discharge, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery;
- Complete standardized neurological assessments at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, including ASIA motor and sensory scores, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III);
- Fill out questionnaires at each follow-up visit, including the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36);
- Be continuously monitored for all adverse events and surgical complications throughout the 12-month follow-up period.
Read the detailed description
Study Objective To evaluate whether bony decompression combined with expansile duraplasty yields superior motor functional outcomes compared with bony decompression alone in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI).
Research Rationale Traumatic spinal cord injury is a severely disabling neurological disorder that can result in permanent motor and sensory deficits, lifelong functional dependence, and a heavy socioeconomic burden, making it a prominent global public health concern.
The standard surgical management for acute traumatic spinal cord injury consists of laminectomy for bony decompression combined with spinal fixation. While this procedure effectively relieves extradural mechanical compression, it fails to reliably alleviate intrathecal hypertension. Clinical and imaging evidence confirms that even when adequate bony decompression is achieved radiographically, the edematous spinal cord frequently remains apposed to the inner wall of the dura mater, leaving residual risk of spinal cord ischemia.
This therapeutic gap stands in stark contrast to the management of severe traumatic brain injury, where dural opening is routinely performed during decompressive craniectomy to control intracranial hypertension. In spinal trauma, however, dural decompression is not incorporated into standard treatment protocols.
Preclinical studies and small observational clinical trials have demonstrated that duraplasty reduces intrathecal pressure, elevates spinal cord perfusion pressure, and correlates with improved neurological recovery. Nevertheless, high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials remains absent.
Accordingly, this trial aims to rigorously verify whether the addition of expansile duraplasty to standard bony decompression confers additional benefits in neurological function, functional prognosis, and safety for patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury.
Study Methods This is a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 80 adult patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) meeting the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B or C will be enrolled and randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either bony decompression alone or bony decompression combined with expansile duraplasty. Both participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation.
Primary Outcome Measure: The change in ASIA Motor Score (AMS) from admission baseline to 6 months after surgery (Δ-AMS).
Secondary Outcome Measures: Motor function, health-related quality of life, surgical complications and mortality will be assessed at randomization, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively.
Study Value If this randomized controlled trial verifies that combined duraplasty brings significant clinical benefits, this surgical technique is expected to provide high-level evidence for the surgical management of such patients.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
- Being tested
- Expansile duraplasty
- Keywords
- Acute Spinal Cord Injury
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Expansile duraplastyProcedure or surgery
For participants receiving expansile duraplasty during standard spinal surgery, the dura mater is longitudinally incised along the midline, followed by watertight augmented repair with autologous fascial graft to expand the intrathecal space and accommodate edematous spinal cord after trauma. The length of the dural incision matches the extent of spinal cord edema shown on preoperative MRI. This duraplasty procedure is performed concurrently with the index surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury, rather than as a staged or delayed secondary operation. The pia mater and spinal cord parenchyma remain intact and are not incised intraoperatively.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Expansile duraplasty | Experimental | Participants in this arm receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury. Receives: Procedure: Expansile duraplasty |
| No expansile duraplasty | No intervention | Participants in this arm do not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in AIS motor score
Change in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale total limb motor score at 6 months
Measured: 6 months versus baseline
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in AIS motor score
Change in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale total limb motor score at 12 months
Measured: 12 months versus baseline
Change in AIS grade
Change in American Spinal Injury Association grade
Measured: 6,12 months versus baseline
WISCI II
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury version ii
Measured: 6,12 months
SCIM III
Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III
Measured: 6,12 months
SF-36
Short Form survey 36
Measured: 6,12 months
Maximum Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) metric
The index value will be measured via MRI scan within 1 to 14 days after surgery or at hospital discharge (whichever occurs earlier) to evaluate the degree of spinal cord decompression achieved by the operation.MSCC = 2 × (Postoperative spinal cord diameter at the injured segment - Preoperative spinal cord diameter at the injured segment) / (Spinal cord diameter above the injured segment + Spinal cord diameter below the injured segment) × 100%
Measured: within 1 to 14 days after surgery or at hospital discharge (whichever occurs earlier)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wanru Duan, MD, Principal investigator, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07733401
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026015001
- Acronym
- GLAD
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Li YC, Chen KH, Li CY, Lu YJ. The outcome of injured cervical spinal cord with uncontrolled swelling under duraplasty: protocol of the ISCUD randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Dec 2;26(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09288-6.
PubMed 41331929Saadoun S, Grassner L, Belci M, Cook J, Knight R, Davies L, Asif H, Visagan R, Gallagher MJ, Thome C, Hutchinson PJ, Zoumprouli A, Wade J, Farrar N, Papadopoulos MC. Duroplasty for injured cervical spinal cord with uncontrolled swelling: protocol of the DISCUS randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 7;24(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07454-2.
PubMed 37550727Greil ME, Hunt ER, Torres Espin A, Saigal R. Retrospective Analysis of Expansile Duraplasty as Surgical Adjunct After Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Global Spine J. 2026 Mar;16(2):1212-1220. doi: 10.1177/21925682251376321. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
PubMed 40906933Zhu F, Yao S, Ren Z, Telemacque D, Qu Y, Chen K, Yang F, Zeng L, Guo X. Early durotomy with duroplasty for severe adult spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality: a novel concept and method of surgical decompression. Eur Spine J. 2019 Oct;28(10):2275-2282. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06091-1. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
PubMed 31440894Saadoun S, Werndle MC, Lopez de Heredia L, Papadopoulos MC. The dura causes spinal cord compression after spinal cord injury. Br J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;30(5):582-4. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2016.1173191. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
PubMed 27080553Werndle MC, Saadoun S, Phang I, Czosnyka M, Varsos GV, Czosnyka ZH, Smielewski P, Jamous A, Bell BA, Zoumprouli A, Papadopoulos MC. Monitoring of spinal cord perfusion pressure in acute spinal cord injury: initial findings of the injured spinal cord pressure evaluation study*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):646-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000028.
PubMed 24231762
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Bony Decompression Combined With Dural Decompression Versus Isolated Bony Decompression for Acute Severe Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07733401
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GLAD / 2026015001
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
- Keywords
- Acute Spinal Cord Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether expansile duraplasty can improve neurological recovery in adult patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury, as well as evaluate the safety of this surgical strategy. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Does expansile duraplasty lead to superior motor function recovery in patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury?
- How safe is the use of expansile duraplasty in people with acute traumatic SCI?
Researchers will compare neurological function, quality of life and all safety indicators who receive expansile duraplasty to that of participants who do not receive expansile duraplasty, to determine whether the additional expansile duraplasty provides better recovery benefits for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the laminectomy combined with expansile duraplasty group and the laminectomy-only group. All participants will complete the following procedures:
- Receive standardized spinal surgery ;
- Provide blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples during hospitalization;
- Undergo spinal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at baseline (pre-operation), discharge, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery;
- Complete standardized neurological assessments at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, including ASIA motor and sensory scores, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III);
- Fill out questionnaires at each follow-up visit, including the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36);
- Be continuously monitored for all adverse events and surgical complications throughout the 12-month follow-up period.
Detailed description
Study Objective To evaluate whether bony decompression combined with expansile duraplasty yields superior motor functional outcomes compared with bony decompression alone in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI).
Research Rationale Traumatic spinal cord injury is a severely disabling neurological disorder that can result in permanent motor and sensory deficits, lifelong functional dependence, and a heavy socioeconomic burden, making it a prominent global public health concern.
The standard surgical management for acute traumatic spinal cord injury consists of laminectomy for bony decompression combined with spinal fixation. While this procedure effectively relieves extradural mechanical compression, it fails to reliably alleviate intrathecal hypertension. Clinical and imaging evidence confirms that even when adequate bony decompression is achieved radiographically, the edematous spinal cord frequently remains apposed to the inner wall of the dura mater, leaving residual risk of spinal cord ischemia.
This therapeutic gap stands in stark contrast to the management of severe traumatic brain injury, where dural opening is routinely performed during decompressive craniectomy to control intracranial hypertension. In spinal trauma, however, dural decompression is not incorporated into standard treatment protocols.
Preclinical studies and small observational clinical trials have demonstrated that duraplasty reduces intrathecal pressure, elevates spinal cord perfusion pressure, and correlates with improved neurological recovery. Nevertheless, high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials remains absent.
Accordingly, this trial aims to rigorously verify whether the addition of expansile duraplasty to standard bony decompression confers additional benefits in neurological function, functional prognosis, and safety for patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury.
Study Methods This is a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 80 adult patients with acute severe traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) meeting the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B or C will be enrolled and randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either bony decompression alone or bony decompression combined with expansile duraplasty. Both participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation.
Primary Outcome Measure: The change in ASIA Motor Score (AMS) from admission baseline to 6 months after surgery (Δ-AMS).
Secondary Outcome Measures: Motor function, health-related quality of life, surgical complications and mortality will be assessed at randomization, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively.
Study Value If this randomized controlled trial verifies that combined duraplasty brings significant clinical benefits, this surgical technique is expected to provide high-level evidence for the surgical management of such patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Expansile duraplasty | Experimental | Procedure: Expansile duraplastyParticipants in this arm receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury. |
| No expansile duraplasty | No intervention | –Participants in this arm do not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Aged between 18 and 80 years old, with no restrictions on gender;
- Patients diagnosed with traumatic cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury (C2-T12) via clinical evaluation including medical history collection, physical examination and auxiliary imaging tests;
- Classified as Grade A, B or C according to the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) based on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI);
- Scheduled to receive surgical intervention within 72 hours after traumatic spinal cord injury;
- Preoperative T2-weighted MRI shows no cerebrospinal fluid signal between the spinal cord and dura mater at a minimum of one vertebral segment;
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Transverse spinal cord injury;
- Gunshot or penetrating sharp spinal cord injury;
- Pre-existing dural laceration caused by traumatic spinal cord injury;
- Spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality (SCIWORA, spinal injury without fracture or dislocation);
- Acute exacerbation of pre-existing chronic spinal cord injury;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Expansile duraplastyFor participants receiving expansile duraplasty during standard spinal surgery, the dura mater is longitudinally incised along the midline, followed by watertight augmented repair with autologous fascial graft to expand the intrathecal space and accommodate edematous spinal cord after trauma. The length of the dural incision matches the extent of spinal cord edema shown on preoperative MRI. This duraplasty procedure is performed concurrently with the index surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury, rather than as a staged or delayed secondary operation. The pia mater and spinal cord parenchyma remain intact and are not incised intraoperatively. | Procedure or surgery | Expansile duraplasty |
Primary outcome
Change in AIS motor score
Time frame: 6 months versus baseline
Change in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale total limb motor score at 6 months
6 secondary outcomes
Change in AIS motor score
Time frame: 12 months versus baseline
Change in AIS grade
Time frame: 6,12 months versus baseline
WISCI II
Time frame: 6,12 months
SCIM III
Time frame: 6,12 months
SF-36
Time frame: 6,12 months
Maximum Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) metric
Time frame: within 1 to 14 days after surgery or at hospital discharge (whichever occurs earlier)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 41331929Li YC, Chen KH, Li CY, Lu YJ. The outcome of injured cervical spinal cord with uncontrolled swelling under duraplasty: protocol of the ISCUD randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Dec 2;26(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09288-6.
- Background: PubMed 37550727Saadoun S, Grassner L, Belci M, Cook J, Knight R, Davies L, Asif H, Visagan R, Gallagher MJ, Thome C, Hutchinson PJ, Zoumprouli A, Wade J, Farrar N, Papadopoulos MC. Duroplasty for injured cervical spinal cord with uncontrolled swelling: protocol of the DISCUS randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 7;24(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07454-2.
- Background: PubMed 40906933Greil ME, Hunt ER, Torres Espin A, Saigal R. Retrospective Analysis of Expansile Duraplasty as Surgical Adjunct After Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Global Spine J. 2026 Mar;16(2):1212-1220. doi: 10.1177/21925682251376321. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
- Background: PubMed 31440894Zhu F, Yao S, Ren Z, Telemacque D, Qu Y, Chen K, Yang F, Zeng L, Guo X. Early durotomy with duroplasty for severe adult spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality: a novel concept and method of surgical decompression. Eur Spine J. 2019 Oct;28(10):2275-2282. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06091-1. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
- Background: PubMed 27080553Saadoun S, Werndle MC, Lopez de Heredia L, Papadopoulos MC. The dura causes spinal cord compression after spinal cord injury. Br J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;30(5):582-4. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2016.1173191. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
- Background: PubMed 24231762Werndle MC, Saadoun S, Phang I, Czosnyka M, Varsos GV, Czosnyka ZH, Smielewski P, Jamous A, Bell BA, Zoumprouli A, Papadopoulos MC. Monitoring of spinal cord perfusion pressure in acute spinal cord injury: initial findings of the injured spinal cord pressure evaluation study*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):646-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000028.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Recruiting
Reticulospinal Control of Movements
Spinal Cord Injuries, Healthy
Enrolling by invitation
Brief Prolonged Exposure Therapy Versus Clinical Standard to Reduce Posttraumatic Stress Post Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, PTSD
RecruitingPhase 4
Individualised Cryoneurolysis to Treat Pain in the Context of Spasticity in the Upper and Lower Extremities
Centreal Neurological Condition, Acquired Brain Injury (Including Stroke)
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Arm and Hand Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Wanru Duan, MD principal investigator
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Expansile duraplasty in people with Spinal Cord Injury and Acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), run by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing at 13 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in AIS motor score (time frame: 6 months versus baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07733401, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.