AzTrials
AzTrials

Excessive Gingival DisplayNCT07715331

Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler Myomodulation for Non-Surgical Management of Excessive Gingival Display

A study testing Botulinum Toxin Type A (Refinex®) and Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler (Juvéderm Voluma® with Lidocaine) in people with Excessive Gingival Display and Gingival Diseases, run by Al-Azhar University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized controlled trial compared the clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction of two non-surgical treatments for excessive gingival display (gummy smile): botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) filler myomodulation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years
What is being tested?
Botulinum Toxin Type A (Refinex®) and Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler (Juvéderm Voluma® with Lidocaine)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jan 2025to 28 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Excessive gingival display >3 mm during maximal smiling (measured by UNC-15 periodontal probe)
  • Age 18-45 years
  • Either sex
  • Ability to provide written informed consent
  • Availability for all follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment

Who cannot join

  • Chronic neurological diseases or blood coagulation disorders
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Immunological disease or current immunosuppressive drug therapy
  • Known sensitivity or allergy to botulinum toxin or hyaluronic acid products
  • Previous treatment for gummy smile within 12 months
  • Extreme age (outside 18-45 range) or pediatric patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction of Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler in the Management of Excessive Gingival Display

This randomized controlled trial compared the clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction of two non-surgical treatments for excessive gingival display (gummy smile): botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) filler myomodulation. Excessive gingival display is defined as exposure of 3 mm or more of gingival tissue during maximal smiling. It affects approximately 14% of women and 7% of men and is associated with reduced self-confidence, smile suppression in social settings, and impaired quality of life. When caused by hyperactivity of the upper lip elevator muscles, it can be treated without surgery using injectable therapies. Twenty patients (18 females, 2 males; age 18-45 years) with excessive gingival display greater than 3 mm were randomly allocated 1:1 to one of two groups. Group A (n=10) received bilateral injections of botulinum toxin type A (Refinex; 5 IU per side) at the Yonsei point. Group B (n=10) received cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler (Juvederm Voluma with lidocaine; 1.0 mL total) injected at six periosteal sites around the nose and upper lip using a myomodulation technique. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The primary outcome was maximum gingival display measured in millimeters using a calibrated periodontal probe. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction measured by Visual Analog Scale and a 12-item questionnaire, and adverse event monitoring. Both treatments produced equivalent gingival display reductions at one month (BTX-A: 69.6%; HA: 63.0%). At six months, the HA group maintained a statistically significant 26.4% improvement while the BTX-A group showed near-complete relapse. Despite this, BTX-A patients reported higher categorical satisfaction. Both treatments had excellent safety profiles.

Read the detailed description

Study Design: Prospective, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting: Oral Diagnosis Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. Ethics: Approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University (Code: P-ME-25-02). All participants provided written informed consent. Study conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Randomization: Performed using the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trial Randomization Tool (https://ctrandomization.cancer.gov/), Maximal procedure, Maximum Tolerated Imbalance = 3, allocation ratio 1:1. Group A - BTX-A: Refinex (botulinum toxin type A), 5 IU per side, bilateral injection at the Yonsei point (convergence of levator labii superioris alaeque nasi, levator labii superioris, and zygomaticus minor muscles), single session, 30-gauge needle. Group B - HA Myomodulation: Juvederm Voluma with lidocaine (20 mg/mL cross-linked hyaluronic acid, VYCROSS technology), total 1.0 mL per patient, six periosteal deposits of 0.2 mL each at the piriform fossa bilaterally, anterior nasal spine, and nasal base bilaterally, 27-gauge needle. Negative aspiration confirmed before each injection. Outcome Measurement: Maximum gingival display measured by UNC-15 periodontal probe (three consecutive measurements averaged) at baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). Patient satisfaction by Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm) for overall smile and gingival display satisfaction. Psychosocial impact by 12-item Likert questionnaire. Adverse event monitoring at all follow-up visits. Standardized digital photography at each time point (Nikon D5600, 105mm macro lens). Statistics: SPSS v26.0. Independent-samples t-test for between-group comparisons. Paired-samples t-test for within-group comparisons. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests for categorical data. Pearson correlation for associations between gingival display reduction and satisfaction. Significance at p less than 0.05.

Being tested
Botulinum Toxin Type A (Refinex®), Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler (Juvéderm Voluma® with Lidocaine)
Medical subject headings
Gingival Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Botulinum Toxin Type A (Refinex®)Drug

    5 International Units per side, bilateral injection at Yonsei point, single-session treatment

  • Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler (Juvéderm Voluma® with Lidocaine)Drug

    20 mg/mL cross-linked HA, total 1.0 mL per patient, five periosteal injection sites; VYCROSS technology

Study groups in NCT07715331
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BTX-A GroupActive comparatorParticipants received bilateral injections of botulinum toxin type A (Refinex®; 5 IU per side) at the Yonsei point - the anatomical convergence of the levator labii superioris alaeque nasi (LLSAN), levator labii superioris (LLS), and zygomaticus minor muscles - using an insulin syringe with a 30-gauge needle. Total dose: 10 IU.
Receives: Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A (Refinex®)
HA Myomodulation GroupActive comparatorParticipants received cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler (Juvéderm Voluma® with lidocaine; 20 mg/mL; VYCROSS technology) administered as five periosteal deposits of 0.2 mL each (total 1.0 mL) at: piriform fossa and anterior nasal spine bilaterally, and base of nose, using a 27-gauge needle. Negative aspiration confirmed before each injection.
Receives: Drug: Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler (Juvéderm Voluma® with Lidocaine)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximum Gingival Display

    Maximum gingival display (mm) measured from the lower border of the upper lip to the free gingival margin at the right central incisor during standardised maximal smiling, using a UNC-15 periodontal probe. Three consecutive measurements taken and averaged by the same operator.

    Measured: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) post-treatment

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Overall Smile Satisfaction

    Patient-reported overall smile satisfaction on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (0=completely dissatisfied, 10=completely satisfied)

    Measured: Baseline (T0) and 6 months (T3) post-treatment

  2. Gingival Display Satisfaction

    Patient-reported gingival display satisfaction scored on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (0 = completely dissatisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

    Measured: Baseline (T0) and 6 months (T3) post-treatment

  3. Psychosocial Impact and Treatment Satisfaction

    12-item Likert-scale questionnaire assessing aesthetic self-perception, social smiling behaviour, and treatment endorsement including willingness to repeat and recommend the procedure

    Measured: Baseline (T0) and 6 months (T3) post-treatment

  4. Adverse Events

    Monitoring for injection-site reactions, lip asymmetry, bruising, swelling, or other treatment-related adverse events at all follow-up visits

    Measured: 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2026
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07715331
Sponsor's protocol ID
P-ME-25-02
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
15 Jul 2026
Last updated
21 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Botulinum Toxin Type A (Refinex®) and Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler (Juvéderm Voluma® with Lidocaine) in people with Excessive Gingival Display and Gingival Diseases, run by Al-Azhar University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximum Gingival Display (time frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in