Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticesSTF RCTNCT07711301
The Science Tooth Fairy: A Randomized Trial of a Storytelling-Based Educational Intervention to Promote Primary Tooth Donation in a Pediatric Setting
A study testing Science Tooth Fairy Narrative and Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi Dragon in people with Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Study Overview Primary ("baby") teeth are unique biological samples because they can permanently store information about a child's early life health and development. While donating baby teeth to scientific research is painless and simple, researchers often face challenges collecting them. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices
- What is being tested?
- Science Tooth Fairy Narrative and Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi Dragon
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2022to 31 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Biological or non-biological parents (e.g., legal caregivers or guardians) of children aged 4-10 years
Who cannot join
- Reports feeling uncomfortable reading and listening to materials
- Prior exposure to the STF book or video.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
MGH Revere HealthCare Center and Tufts Pediatric Dental Clinic
Boston, Massachusetts, 02145
About this study
Official title: Tooth Book Evaluation
Study Overview Primary ("baby") teeth are unique biological samples because they can permanently store information about a child's early life health and development. While donating baby teeth to scientific research is painless and simple, researchers often face challenges collecting them. Past studies show that donation rates are particularly low among racial minority groups and lower-income families, even though these populations may experience higher rates of early-life adversity and could benefit greatly from this research. Currently, very little is known about what influences a parent's willingness to donate their child's teeth.
This study evaluates whether an educational tool can bridge this gap. Researchers will use a children's book and video called "The Science Tooth Fairy" to see if explaining the importance of tooth donation can positively change parents' attitudes and willingness to participate in scientific research.
Read more
Study Objectives and Hypotheses The main goal of this research is to investigate parental attitudes toward donating their children's baby teeth and to see if educational materials can encourage participation.
The study is testing two main hypotheses:
- Primary Hypothesis: Parents who interact with "The Science Tooth Fairy" materials (either the book, video, or both) will show a greater positive shift in their attitudes toward tooth donation compared to parents who read a standard oral health book that does not mention research.
- Secondary Hypothesis: "The Science Tooth Fairy" story's content and delivery format (book, video, or both) influence parental engagement with and understanding of the intervention materials.
Study Design and Procedures This is a randomized controlled trial aiming to recruit approximately 120 parents or legal guardians of children aged 4 to 10. Recruitment will take place in diverse clinical spaces (such as pediatric and dental clinics) and public events to ensure a representative sample. The entire study takes about 30 to 45 minutes to complete in a single session.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups:
- Group 1: Read a printed copy of "The Science Tooth Fairy" book.
- Group 2: Watch a video version of "The Science Tooth Fairy".
- Group 3: Watch the video and have the option to read the printed book.
- Group 4 (Control Group): Read a standard children's book about oral health ("Cavities vs. Toothpaste"), which contains no mention of research or donation.
The step-by-step participation process includes:
- Informed Consent: Reviewing and signing the study consent form.
- Pre-Assessment Survey: A 14-item questionnaire evaluating current trust in medical research and attitudes toward biological donations.
- The Intervention: Completing the reading or viewing activity assigned during randomization.
- Post-Assessment Survey: An identical 14-item questionnaire to measure changes in attitude, along with a background demographics survey.
By comparing survey responses before and after the activity, researchers hope to learn how to design future recruitment strategies.
Read the detailed description
Background and Significance
Teeth are a unique type of biospecimen that can permanently hold information about health across the lifespan, unlike other types of biospecimen like blood, nails, and hair. Primary or "baby" teeth specifically can contain information about early life development 1-3 because they start to form during a sensitive period of brain development9-10. The study of primary teeth can show exposure to early childhood adversity and other relevant developmental markers.
Teeth are becoming a more common type of biospecimen donation to research because the natural removal of them is pain-free, they are widely available, and they do not require specialized storage protocols. Although there are many benefits to teeth donation to science, researchers have experienced mixed success in collecting teeth relative to other biospecimens11-13. Further, there is research to show that tooth donation rates appear even lower in minority and disadvantaged groups12,16. Yet, these groups may experience early-life adversity at higher prevalence14-15. Little research has been conducted to identify why there is this disparity in tooth donation.
The first step to explore the factors that determine tooth donation is to understand willingness and attitudes for this type of biospecimen collection. Based on the current literature, there are multiple known factors that affect donation of non-tooth biospecimen to research studies4-8. Some factors that are potentially modifiable include trust in research and security of participants' personal health information4,5,8,17-19, knowledge about donation5-7, and beliefs that donations benefit future generations5,8. Some potentially non-modifiable factors that affect biospecimen donation are education status6,18,20 and religious or cultural beliefs. However, there are little studies that have investigated parents' attitudes and beliefs about donating their children's primary teeth to science.
To better understand the attitudes and willingness of parents to donate their children's primary teeth to science, parent and child pairs will be introduced to an educational book called "The Science Tooth Fairy", and their views will be assessed. This children's book, written by Dr. Dunn and team and being used in the STRONG Study (protocol 2019P003570), highlights the importance of tooth donation to research and explains the process of donation. We are hoping to understand factors that influence tooth donation so we can alter recruitment strategies and address concerns earlier in future studies to boost participation.
- Specific Aims and Objectives
Here, we aim to investigate parental attitudes and willingness to donate tooth, specifically, children's exfoliated teeth. We would like to investigate the extent to which a children's book about teeth donations can encourage participation in research. There is little research examining parent's attitudes and beliefs about donating their children's primary teeth.
We hypothesize that participants who read "The Science Tooth Fairy" book will have a positive shift in attitudes about donation primary teeth to science. After the educational intervention, they will be more open to the idea of donating primary teeth to biomedical research than the group that reads the control book. Further, we also hypothesize that attitudes will be more shifted positively for participants who are more unlikely to donate biospecimen to research (people of color and lower socioeconomic status12,16 ).
- General Description of Study Design
This study is a pre-post research design with an educational intervention. The intervention (book or video) will be used to assess if attitudes on biospecimen donation will change with education about the topic. This is a randomized controlled study with four possible interventions:
- Read printed copy of the "The Science Tooth Fairy" book (n=25)
- Watch video of "The Science Tooth Fairy" video (n=25)
- Watch the "The Science Tooth Fairy" video and have the option to also read the book (n=25)
- Read "Cavities vs.Toothpaste" book about oral health (n=25). This control children's book does not include any information about tooth donation or research studies.
We hope to recruit up to 120 participants to this study. The entire participation process will be about 30-45 minutes which includes the consent process, demographics survey, pre-test, intervention, post-test, and another demographics survey. The pre and post-test contain the same questions.
- Subject Selection
Participants eligible for this research study include parents of children who are between the ages of 4-10 years old. In this study, parents will be defined as a caregiver or guardian to a child, including biological children and non-biological children. Non-English-speaking parents will be excluded from this study due to language of the intervention and survey and funding limitations on translating the book into other languages at this time. Eligible participants will be identified at the pediatrics clinics including at MGH Revere HealthCare Center, and other clinical spaces at Mass General Brigham including pediatric dental clinics, public events held such as the Cambridge Science Festival and other outside MGB clinical practices as available to us. About 120 participants will be recruited.
We will be recruiting in diverse spaces, including the Revere clinic, as we hope to recruit from minority populations to help us understand disparities in tooth donation from a diverse sample. We will be primarily recruiting at pediatric and pediatric dental clinics because of the increased volume of parents with children within our desired age range and our collaboration with clinicians in this clinic.
In a clinic setting, the study staff will help identify eligible participants a couple days in advance. Eligible participants will be handed a flyer by the clinic's front-desk staff or study staff. In the waiting room, study staff will be visible with signage introducing the study. Providers will also present the study to eligible participants after their appointment and hand them a flyer. If interested, the provider will provide a warm hand-off to the study staff in the waiting room. Our study staff will then go over consent documents and begin participation in the study.
Recruitment at public events such as the Cambridge Science Festival will involve handing a flyer to parents with children in the right age range. If interested, we will proceed with the consent and study as outlined.
- Subject Enrollment
Potential participants will be identified by study staff and clinic front-desk staff to see if they meet eligibility criteria. The study staff/front-desk staff will give eligible participants a flyer to introduce the study and present the study-staff in the waiting room. In clinics, if the parent is eligible, the pediatrician will also introduce the research study through a flyer. If the participant is interested to participate in the study, the provider or staff member will introduce the participant to a clinical research coordinator. The clinical research coordinator will lead the participant to a private room in the clinic or remain in the waiting area if the participant is comfortable participating in an only semi-private space. In public event spaces, the interviews will be done in as private a space as possible. We believe those participants who will read the book may be able to participate in the waiting area/in public spaces. This will aid the study staff as there may not be enough private space to have two participants completing the study at the same time.
The clinical research coordinator will go through the consent information with the participant immediately before any study procedures. The clinical research coordinator will be available for any questions or clarifications needed. Consent forms will be signed on RedCap or using a paper copy, whichever is preferred by the participant.
After consent is documented, the participant's intervention will be assigned through a randomization method. This randomization method will be done through Redcap to determine which of the four intervention groups the participant will be assigned. Once assignment to one of the groups occurs, the participants will then be given the first questionnaire.
- STUDY PROCEDURES
Participation in this study will last 30-45 minutes and will be completed in one-sitting. During this time period, the consent document will be presented and signed, the randomized assignment to one of the four intervention groups will take place, the demographic questionnaire will be completed, the pre-test will be administered, the intervention will be given, and the post-test will be administered. Study enrollment will cease when the participant leaves the clinic or if they decide to opt-out at any time during the process. Participation in this study will not interfere with patient care with the clinic.
Once recruited, the study procedures are as follows:
- Consent obtained
- Demographics Survey: asking if participants have joined a research study before or if they have ever donated any biospecimen to science
- Pre-assessment: 14 items looking at attitudes towards biomedical research and teeth donation
- Intervention
- Post-assessment: 14 items identical to the pre-test
- Demographics Survey: asking about age, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, annual household income, marital status, number of children cared for. The pre- and post- assessments contain the same items, and the possible answers are on a 5-point Likert scale. The order of the items will not be identical for both assessments. If uncomfortable, participants can choose to refrain from answering any questions by selecting "prefer not to answer." Surveys will either be filled out directly into RedCap by participants on iPads or on a paper-copy with the help of a clinical research coordinator. The items asked in the pre- and post- intervention assessments are compiled from previously established measures and scales used in other research studies. These include the Biobanking Attitudes and Knowledge Survey21, the Helping Attitudes Scale23, and the Biomedical Research Trust Scale22. Some items from these scales were modified to become more easily accessible for participants in our study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the aforementioned intervention groups by the randomization feature in RedCap. After assignment, the parents will be given the intervention: either a printed-copy book or video to be watched on the iPad or both. We expect parents will read the books to their child and/or watch the video with their child, however this is not necessary for the study. Participants will be compensated for their participation in the study after completion of all surveys. They will have the option of a $20.00 gift card from Target or Stop \& Shop. We will also give them a copy of The Science Tooth Fairy book as a gift. They will be given this compensation before they leave the clinic. Participation in the study will be terminated if the participant does not want to continue. If a participant decides to withdraw before completion of the tasks, we will still offer them The Science Tooth Fairy book as a gift. The primary outcome of this study is to see a difference in attitudes about biospecimen donation, but specifically primary teeth donation. Using the preestablished measures and scales, we will identify changes by comparing the intervention group with the control to see if attitudes change. A secondary outcome of this study is to see if there are more pronounced differences within groups based on demographic information provided or prior beliefs about tooth donation.
- Risks and Discomforts Participants will be informed that there are no foreseeable physical risks from this research study. Participants may feel slightly uncomfortable completing some of the questionnaires. Participants will be reminded that they are not required to answer any questions that make them feel uncomfortable and are able to withdraw their participation at any time.
- Benefits Participants will be informed that there may be no direct benefit from participation in this research study. However, they will be informed that the information learned from this study may provide insight into different attitudes about primary teeth donation and trust in medical research.
- Statistical Analysis To test our primary hypotheses, we will compare our four groups in terms of the outcome measures to determine what level of change occurred post- versus pre-intervention. For these analyses, we will calculate change scores for each outcome measure and use regression analysis to identify the predictors of those change scores, using the four groups as our predictor variables. Depending on demographic differences in these groups at baseline (i.e., if randomization worked), we may or may not include social-demographic factors as covariates in the analysis. This regression will allow us to quantify the direction and magnitude of change across groups. Further, to test our secondary hypothesis, we will additionally examine the role of social-demographics as possible predictors of our analysis. We expect that with 30 participants per group we will have at least 80% statistical power to detect a change across groups (comparing all groups to each other).
- Monitoring and Quality Assurance
We don't foresee any adverse events as a result of taking part in this study. If an adverse event does occur, they will be documented and reported to the IRB by the PI.
- Conditions
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices
- Being tested
- Science Tooth Fairy Narrative, Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi Dragon
- Keywords
- tooth, deciduous, health education
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior, Health Education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Science Tooth Fairy NarrativeBehavioural
The STF narrative follows two children, Isabella and Charlie, as they learn about tooth donation, rituals practiced by different cultures, and why and how these teeth are used in the scientific process. Centered on curiosity and respect for child autonomy and traditions, the story concludes with a tear-away page that allows children to correspond with the character and receive a personalized response. Narrative persuasion theory suggests that readers who identify with story characters are more likely to adopt the characters' beliefs and intentions . By following Isabella and Charlie's journey of curiosity, parents and children may indirectly experience the primary tooth donation process, which may enhance self-efficacy and increase the likelihood of participation.
Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi DragonBehavioural
Cavities vs. Toothpaste by Didi Dragon is a children's book that humorously explains dental hygiene, following the "bad" bacteria in your mouth as they feast on sugar, create "sugapoo" (lactic acid), and form cavities, only to be defeated by toothpaste and proper brushing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| STF Book | Experimental | Printed narrative Receives: Behavioral: Science Tooth Fairy Narrative |
| STF Video | Experimental | Audiovisual adaptation of the book Receives: Behavioral: Science Tooth Fairy Narrative |
| STF Book + Video | Experimental | Combined exposure Receives: Behavioral: Science Tooth Fairy Narrative |
| Control | Active comparator | Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi Dragon Receives: Behavioral: Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi Dragon |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in psychosocial construct scores relevant to tooth donation
To measure primary outcomes we developed a survey by adapting validated psychometric scales assessing psychosocial factors that are relevant to primary tooth donation. The same survey was applied before and after the assigned intervention.
Measured: Thirty minutes before intervention (pre-intervention) and within 30 minutes of completion of the intervention (post-intervention)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Post-intervention psychosocial construct scores relevant to parental engagement with the intervention materials
Post-intervention psychosocial construct scores relevant to parental engagement with the intervention materials using a uniform 5-point Likert scale 1=Strongly Disagree/Not Likely at All to 5=Strongly Agree/Very Likely), with an additional "prefer not to answer" option.
Measured: Within 30 minutes of intervention completion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2022
- Primary completion31 May 2024
- Study completion31 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- four-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled superiority trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Erin Dunn, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07711301
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022P002067
- Acronym
- STF RCT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared to protect the privacy of the participants. Data sharing is limited to the aggregate results of the study, which will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported on ClinicalTrials.gov as required.
Publications
Davis KA, Mountain RV, Pickett OR, Den Besten PK, Bidlack FB, Dunn EC. Teeth as Potential New Tools to Measure Early-Life Adversity and Subsequent Mental Health Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review and Conceptual Model. Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 15;87(6):502-513. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.030. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
PubMed 31858984
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tooth Book Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07711301
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STF RCT / 2022P002067
- Conditions
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices
- Keywords
- tooth, deciduous, health education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study Overview Primary ("baby") teeth are unique biological samples because they can permanently store information about a child's early life health and development. While donating baby teeth to scientific research is painless and simple, researchers often face challenges collecting them. Past studies show that donation rates are particularly low among racial minority groups and lower-income families, even though these populations may experience higher rates of early-life adversity and could benefit greatly from this research. Currently, very little is known about what influences a parent's willingness to donate their child's teeth.
This study evaluates whether an educational tool can bridge this gap. Researchers will use a children's book and video called "The Science Tooth Fairy" to see if explaining the importance of tooth donation can positively change parents' attitudes and willingness to participate in scientific research.
Study Objectives and Hypotheses The main goal of this research is to investigate parental attitudes toward donating their children's baby teeth and to see if educational materials can encourage participation.
The study is testing two main hypotheses:
- Primary Hypothesis: Parents who interact with "The Science Tooth Fairy" materials (either the book, video, or both) will show a greater positive shift in their attitudes toward tooth donation compared to parents who read a standard oral health book that does not mention research.
- Secondary Hypothesis: "The Science Tooth Fairy" story's content and delivery format (book, video, or both) influence parental engagement with and understanding of the intervention materials.
Study Design and Procedures This is a randomized controlled trial aiming to recruit approximately 120 parents or legal guardians of children aged 4 to 10. Recruitment will take place in diverse clinical spaces (such as pediatric and dental clinics) and public events to ensure a representative sample. The entire study takes about 30 to 45 minutes to complete in a single session.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups:
- Group 1: Read a printed copy of "The Science Tooth Fairy" book.
- Group 2: Watch a video version of "The Science Tooth Fairy".
- Group 3: Watch the video and have the option to read the printed book.
- Group 4 (Control Group): Read a standard children's book about oral health ("Cavities vs. Toothpaste"), which contains no mention of research or donation.
The step-by-step participation process includes:
- Informed Consent: Reviewing and signing the study consent form.
- Pre-Assessment Survey: A 14-item questionnaire evaluating current trust in medical research and attitudes toward biological donations.
- The Intervention: Completing the reading or viewing activity assigned during randomization.
- Post-Assessment Survey: An identical 14-item questionnaire to measure changes in attitude, along with a background demographics survey.
By comparing survey responses before and after the activity, researchers hope to learn how to design future recruitment strategies.
Detailed description
Background and Significance
Teeth are a unique type of biospecimen that can permanently hold information about health across the lifespan, unlike other types of biospecimen like blood, nails, and hair. Primary or "baby" teeth specifically can contain information about early life development 1-3 because they start to form during a sensitive period of brain development9-10. The study of primary teeth can show exposure to early childhood adversity and other relevant developmental markers.
Teeth are becoming a more common type of biospecimen donation to research because the natural removal of them is pain-free, they are widely available, and they do not require specialized storage protocols. Although there are many benefits to teeth donation to science, researchers have experienced mixed success in collecting teeth relative to other biospecimens11-13. Further, there is research to show that tooth donation rates appear even lower in minority and disadvantaged groups12,16. Yet, these groups may experience early-life adversity at higher prevalence14-15. Little research has been conducted to identify why there is this disparity in tooth donation.
The first step to explore the factors that determine tooth donation is to understand willingness and attitudes for this type of biospecimen collection. Based on the current literature, there are multiple known factors that affect donation of non-tooth biospecimen to research studies4-8. Some factors that are potentially modifiable include trust in research and security of participants' personal health information4,5,8,17-19, knowledge about donation5-7, and beliefs that donations benefit future generations5,8. Some potentially non-modifiable factors that affect biospecimen donation are education status6,18,20 and religious or cultural beliefs. However, there are little studies that have investigated parents' attitudes and beliefs about donating their children's primary teeth to science.
To better understand the attitudes and willingness of parents to donate their children's primary teeth to science, parent and child pairs will be introduced to an educational book called "The Science Tooth Fairy", and their views will be assessed. This children's book, written by Dr. Dunn and team and being used in the STRONG Study (protocol 2019P003570), highlights the importance of tooth donation to research and explains the process of donation. We are hoping to understand factors that influence tooth donation so we can alter recruitment strategies and address concerns earlier in future studies to boost participation.
- Specific Aims and Objectives
Here, we aim to investigate parental attitudes and willingness to donate tooth, specifically, children's exfoliated teeth. We would like to investigate the extent to which a children's book about teeth donations can encourage participation in research. There is little research examining parent's attitudes and beliefs about donating their children's primary teeth.
We hypothesize that participants who read "The Science Tooth Fairy" book will have a positive shift in attitudes about donation primary teeth to science. After the educational intervention, they will be more open to the idea of donating primary teeth to biomedical research than the group that reads the control book. Further, we also hypothesize that attitudes will be more shifted positively for participants who are more unlikely to donate biospecimen to research (people of color and lower socioeconomic status12,16 ).
- General Description of Study Design
This study is a pre-post research design with an educational intervention. The intervention (book or video) will be used to assess if attitudes on biospecimen donation will change with education about the topic. This is a randomized controlled study with four possible interventions:
- Read printed copy of the "The Science Tooth Fairy" book (n=25)
- Watch video of "The Science Tooth Fairy" video (n=25)
- Watch the "The Science Tooth Fairy" video and have the option to also read the book (n=25)
- Read "Cavities vs.Toothpaste" book about oral health (n=25). This control children's book does not include any information about tooth donation or research studies.
We hope to recruit up to 120 participants to this study. The entire participation process will be about 30-45 minutes which includes the consent process, demographics survey, pre-test, intervention, post-test, and another demographics survey. The pre and post-test contain the same questions.
- Subject Selection
Participants eligible for this research study include parents of children who are between the ages of 4-10 years old. In this study, parents will be defined as a caregiver or guardian to a child, including biological children and non-biological children. Non-English-speaking parents will be excluded from this study due to language of the intervention and survey and funding limitations on translating the book into other languages at this time. Eligible participants will be identified at the pediatrics clinics including at MGH Revere HealthCare Center, and other clinical spaces at Mass General Brigham including pediatric dental clinics, public events held such as the Cambridge Science Festival and other outside MGB clinical practices as available to us. About 120 participants will be recruited.
We will be recruiting in diverse spaces, including the Revere clinic, as we hope to recruit from minority populations to help us understand disparities in tooth donation from a diverse sample. We will be primarily recruiting at pediatric and pediatric dental clinics because of the increased volume of parents with children within our desired age range and our collaboration with clinicians in this clinic.
In a clinic setting, the study staff will help identify eligible participants a couple days in advance. Eligible participants will be handed a flyer by the clinic's front-desk staff or study staff. In the waiting room, study staff will be visible with signage introducing the study. Providers will also present the study to eligible participants after their appointment and hand them a flyer. If interested, the provider will provide a warm hand-off to the study staff in the waiting room. Our study staff will then go over consent documents and begin participation in the study.
Recruitment at public events such as the Cambridge Science Festival will involve handing a flyer to parents with children in the right age range. If interested, we will proceed with the consent and study as outlined.
- Subject Enrollment
Potential participants will be identified by study staff and clinic front-desk staff to see if they meet eligibility criteria. The study staff/front-desk staff will give eligible participants a flyer to introduce the study and present the study-staff in the waiting room. In clinics, if the parent is eligible, the pediatrician will also introduce the research study through a flyer. If the participant is interested to participate in the study, the provider or staff member will introduce the participant to a clinical research coordinator. The clinical research coordinator will lead the participant to a private room in the clinic or remain in the waiting area if the participant is comfortable participating in an only semi-private space. In public event spaces, the interviews will be done in as private a space as possible. We believe those participants who will read the book may be able to participate in the waiting area/in public spaces. This will aid the study staff as there may not be enough private space to have two participants completing the study at the same time.
The clinical research coordinator will go through the consent information with the participant immediately before any study procedures. The clinical research coordinator will be available for any questions or clarifications needed. Consent forms will be signed on RedCap or using a paper copy, whichever is preferred by the participant.
After consent is documented, the participant's intervention will be assigned through a randomization method. This randomization method will be done through Redcap to determine which of the four intervention groups the participant will be assigned. Once assignment to one of the groups occurs, the participants will then be given the first questionnaire.
- STUDY PROCEDURES
Participation in this study will last 30-45 minutes and will be completed in one-sitting. During this time period, the consent document will be presented and signed, the randomized assignment to one of the four intervention groups will take place, the demographic questionnaire will be completed, the pre-test will be administered, the intervention will be given, and the post-test will be administered. Study enrollment will cease when the participant leaves the clinic or if they decide to opt-out at any time during the process. Participation in this study will not interfere with patient care with the clinic.
Once recruited, the study procedures are as follows:
- Consent obtained
- Demographics Survey: asking if participants have joined a research study before or if they have ever donated any biospecimen to science
- Pre-assessment: 14 items looking at attitudes towards biomedical research and teeth donation
- Intervention
- Post-assessment: 14 items identical to the pre-test
- Demographics Survey: asking about age, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, annual household income, marital status, number of children cared for. The pre- and post- assessments contain the same items, and the possible answers are on a 5-point Likert scale. The order of the items will not be identical for both assessments. If uncomfortable, participants can choose to refrain from answering any questions by selecting "prefer not to answer." Surveys will either be filled out directly into RedCap by participants on iPads or on a paper-copy with the help of a clinical research coordinator. The items asked in the pre- and post- intervention assessments are compiled from previously established measures and scales used in other research studies. These include the Biobanking Attitudes and Knowledge Survey21, the Helping Attitudes Scale23, and the Biomedical Research Trust Scale22. Some items from these scales were modified to become more easily accessible for participants in our study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the aforementioned intervention groups by the randomization feature in RedCap. After assignment, the parents will be given the intervention: either a printed-copy book or video to be watched on the iPad or both. We expect parents will read the books to their child and/or watch the video with their child, however this is not necessary for the study. Participants will be compensated for their participation in the study after completion of all surveys. They will have the option of a $20.00 gift card from Target or Stop \& Shop. We will also give them a copy of The Science Tooth Fairy book as a gift. They will be given this compensation before they leave the clinic. Participation in the study will be terminated if the participant does not want to continue. If a participant decides to withdraw before completion of the tasks, we will still offer them The Science Tooth Fairy book as a gift. The primary outcome of this study is to see a difference in attitudes about biospecimen donation, but specifically primary teeth donation. Using the preestablished measures and scales, we will identify changes by comparing the intervention group with the control to see if attitudes change. A secondary outcome of this study is to see if there are more pronounced differences within groups based on demographic information provided or prior beliefs about tooth donation.
- Risks and Discomforts Participants will be informed that there are no foreseeable physical risks from this research study. Participants may feel slightly uncomfortable completing some of the questionnaires. Participants will be reminded that they are not required to answer any questions that make them feel uncomfortable and are able to withdraw their participation at any time.
- Benefits Participants will be informed that there may be no direct benefit from participation in this research study. However, they will be informed that the information learned from this study may provide insight into different attitudes about primary teeth donation and trust in medical research.
- Statistical Analysis To test our primary hypotheses, we will compare our four groups in terms of the outcome measures to determine what level of change occurred post- versus pre-intervention. For these analyses, we will calculate change scores for each outcome measure and use regression analysis to identify the predictors of those change scores, using the four groups as our predictor variables. Depending on demographic differences in these groups at baseline (i.e., if randomization worked), we may or may not include social-demographic factors as covariates in the analysis. This regression will allow us to quantify the direction and magnitude of change across groups. Further, to test our secondary hypothesis, we will additionally examine the role of social-demographics as possible predictors of our analysis. We expect that with 30 participants per group we will have at least 80% statistical power to detect a change across groups (comparing all groups to each other).
- Monitoring and Quality Assurance
We don't foresee any adverse events as a result of taking part in this study. If an adverse event does occur, they will be documented and reported to the IRB by the PI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- four-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled superiority trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| STF Book | Experimental | Behavioral: Science Tooth Fairy NarrativePrinted narrative |
| STF Video | Experimental | Behavioral: Science Tooth Fairy NarrativeAudiovisual adaptation of the book |
| STF Book + Video | Experimental | Behavioral: Science Tooth Fairy NarrativeCombined exposure |
| Control | Active comparator | Behavioral: Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi DragonCavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi Dragon |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Biological or non-biological parents (e.g., legal caregivers or guardians) of children aged 4-10 years
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Reports feeling uncomfortable reading and listening to materials
- Prior exposure to the STF book or video.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Science Tooth Fairy NarrativeThe STF narrative follows two children, Isabella and Charlie, as they learn about tooth donation, rituals practiced by different cultures, and why and how these teeth are used in the scientific process. Centered on curiosity and respect for child autonomy and traditions, the story concludes with a tear-away page that allows children to correspond with the character and receive a personalized response. Narrative persuasion theory suggests that readers who identify with story characters are more likely to adopt the characters' beliefs and intentions . By following Isabella and Charlie's journey of curiosity, parents and children may indirectly experience the primary tooth donation process, which may enhance self-efficacy and increase the likelihood of participation. | Behavioural | STF Book, STF Book + Video, STF Video |
| Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi DragonCavities vs. Toothpaste by Didi Dragon is a children's book that humorously explains dental hygiene, following the "bad" bacteria in your mouth as they feast on sugar, create "sugapoo" (lactic acid), and form cavities, only to be defeated by toothpaste and proper brushing. | Behavioural | Control |
Primary outcome
Change in psychosocial construct scores relevant to tooth donation
Time frame: Thirty minutes before intervention (pre-intervention) and within 30 minutes of completion of the intervention (post-intervention)
To measure primary outcomes we developed a survey by adapting validated psychometric scales assessing psychosocial factors that are relevant to primary tooth donation. The same survey was applied before and after the assigned intervention.
1 secondary outcome
Post-intervention psychosocial construct scores relevant to parental engagement with the intervention materials
Time frame: Within 30 minutes of intervention completion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 31858984Davis KA, Mountain RV, Pickett OR, Den Besten PK, Bidlack FB, Dunn EC. Teeth as Potential New Tools to Measure Early-Life Adversity and Subsequent Mental Health Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review and Conceptual Model. Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 15;87(6):502-513. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.030. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared to protect the privacy of the participants. Data sharing is limited to the aggregate results of the study, which will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported on ClinicalTrials.gov as required.
Related trials for Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Comic-based Learning Materials on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Dementia Care
Dementia Care Education, Students, Nursing
Recruiting
Climate-Responsive Nutrition, WASH, and Heat Counselling for Maternal and Child Health in Sindh, Pakistan
Maternal Nutrition, Child Nutrition
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
PREVENT HPV -Related Cancers Trial
HPV Vaccination, Uptake Vaccination
Active, not recruiting
A Multilevel Intervention to Improve Adherence to Childhood Cancer Survivorship
Childhood Cancer, Survivorship
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study to Co-create and Implement a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Primary Care
Mental Health, Stigma of Mental Illness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Science Tooth Fairy Narrative and Cavities vs. Toothpaste, book by Didi Dragon in people with Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in psychosocial construct scores relevant to tooth donation (time frame: Thirty minutes before intervention (pre-intervention) and within 30 minutes of completion of the intervention (post-intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07711301, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.